Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures in Women Older than 80 Years: A Preliminary Report of Functional and Radiographic Outcomes after Open Reduction and Internal Fixation.

Background Distal radius fractures are one of the most common fractures seen in the elderly. The management of distal radius fractures in the elderly, especially patients older than 80 years, has not been well defined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate operative treatment of distal radius fractures in patients older than 80 years to determine functional outcomes and complication rates. Materials and Methods A retrospective review was performed to identify patients 80 years or older who were treated for a distal radius fracture with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Medical records were reviewed for demographics, medical history, functional outcomes including quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (qDASH), radiographs, and postoperative complications. Results There were 40 patients included for review. Average age was 84 years. The preoperative qDASH score was 69. At 6 months follow-up, the postoperative qDASH score was 13 ( p < 0.001). There were five (12.5%) complications reported postoperatively. All fractures healed with adequate radiographic alignment and there were no hardware failures. Conclusion Distal radius fractures in patients older than 80 years treated with ORIF have good functional outcomes and low complication rates. Increased functionality and independence of the elderly, as well as updated implant design can lead to the effective surgical management of these patients. When indicated from a clinical perspective, operative fixation of distal radius fractures should be considered in patients older than 80 years.

Lunatocapitate and Triquetrohamate Arthrodeses for Degenerative Arthritis of the Wrist: A Midterm Follow-Up.

BACKGROUND: Degenerative arthritis of the wrist is a common condition often treated with 4 corner arthrodesis (FCA) or a partial wrist fusion. A number of limited intercarpal arthrodeses have been proposed for treatment of this condition. One technique, described by Wang and Bednar in 2012, involves fusion of the lunatocapitate and triquetrohamate joints. This study presents midterm follow-up of outcomes following this 2 column arthrodesis. METHODS: From 2000 to present, patients who underwent lunatocapitate and triquetrohamate arthrodesis were evaluated. The original cohort from the 2012 study was reviewed, as well as any additional patients who since underwent this procedure. Only patients who had greater than 5 years of follow-up data were included. Outcomes included demographics, wrist range of motion, grip strength, complications, and radiographic evidence of union. RESULTS: Twenty-one cases were included in the final analysis. Mean follow-up was 8.75 years. Wrist extension and flexion were 58% and 90% of the unaffected side, respectively. Grip strength was 92% of the unaffected side. Osseous union was achieved in 95.2% of cases. Two cases underwent revision surgery, one for nonunion and one following a fall. CONCLUSIONS: Lunatocapitate and triquetrohamate arthrodesis offers a treatment for wrist arthritis that yields good clinical outcomes, low nonunion rates, and no conversions to total wrist arthrodesis, as shown by 5-year follow-up data. Limited intercarpal arthrodesis is an alternative to FCA, with the advantage of a smaller surgical footprint and simpler technique, while still providing excellent mid- to long-term outcomes.

Evaluation of the Incidence and Etiology of Unplanned Return to Operating Room Following Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Distal radius fractures (DRF) are the most common upper extremity fractures in adults. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence, causes, and independent predictors for unplanned return to the operating room (URTO) in a single institution within 90 days following distal radius open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). METHODS: A retrospective study of 2933 consecutive patients from January 2015 to December 2019 who underwent distal radius ORIF was undertaken. Patients who returned to the operating room within 90 days of the index procedure were identified. Patients with planned return to the operating room for staged procedures were excluded, yielding a patient cohort of those with URTO. Demographic data, causes for reoperation, and final Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand DASH (QuickDASH) scores were collected. RESULTS: Overall, 45 patients had URTO (1.5%) occurring a mean of 44 (6-89) days from the index procedure. Reasons for reoperation included nerve complications (n = 14), loss of fixation (n = 11), hardware complications (n = 9), wound complications (n = 7), and tendon complications (n = 4). Neurologic reasons for return included carpal tunnel release (n = 13) and ulnar nerve decompression (n = 1). QuickDASH scores were higher for URTO compared with control cohort at the final follow-up (33 [range: 0-91] vs 14 [range: 0-100], P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical hardware failure and neurologic symptoms were the most common reasons for URTO after distal fracture ORIF.

Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures: What Type of Plate to Use and When?

There are several options for plate fixation of distal radius fractures. Volar plating has broad applicability and consistent outcomes, and thus is the most commonly used plate type. Dorsal plates are advantageous for specific fracture patterns, and can provide direct fracture reduction and buttressing, but may be prominent and can cause tendon irritation. Bridge plates offer an alternative to external fixation while avoiding the complications with prominent hardware, because they span highly comminuted fractures and can be used for immediate weight bearing; however, they require plate removal. Choice of plate fixation should depend on fracture type, patient factors, and surgeon experience.

Comparison of Surgical Techniques for Fixation of Terrible Triad Injuries of the Elbow: A Meta-Analysis.

Treatment of the terrible triad injury of the elbow remains a difficult problem. There are several ways to treat the radial head and coronoid fractures; controversy still exists regarding the best way to treat each. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the clinical outcomes of radial head and coronoid fractures treated using current protocols. No differences in functional outcomes were found between the different surgical techniques. There is no superior current protocol for treating these injuries. Surgical treatment should be dictated by fracture type and surgeon experience. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(6):328-332.].

Total Elbow Arthroplasty Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for the Management of Distal Humerus Fractures in the Elderly.

Distal humerus fractures, which are challenging injuries seen in geriatric patients, are often repaired using open reduction and internal fixation or total elbow arthroplasty. This updated meta-analysis, which includes more recent open reduction and internal fixation techniques, examined outcomes following distal humerus fractures repaired using open reduction and internal fixation vs total elbow arthroplasty. Although distal humerus fractures treated with total elbow arthroplasty achieved statistically higher functional scores relative to those treated with open reduction and internal fixation, this difference was not clinically significant. Furthermore, the authors found no early difference in the use of either open reduction and internal fixation or total elbow arthroplasty in the management of distal humerus fractures. Choice of treatment should be based on patients' long-term demands and anticipated need for implant longevity. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(1):22-27.].