Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 57
Filtrar
1.
Neurology ; 102(1): e207764, 2024 Jan 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38165368

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Delivery of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) therapies is contingent on the duration from last known well (LKW) to emergency department arrival time (EDAT). One reason for treatment ineligibility is delay in presentation to the hospital. We evaluate patient and neighborhood characteristics associated with time from LKW to EDAT. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study of patients presenting to the Yale New Haven Hospital in the AIS code pathway from 2010 to 2020. Patients presenting within 4.5 hours from LKW who were recorded in the institutional Get With the Guidelines Stroke registry were classified as early while those presenting beyond 4.5 hours were designated as late. Temporal trends in late presentation were explored by univariate logistic regression. Using variables significant in univariate analysis at p < 0.05, we developed a mixed-effect logistic regression model to estimate the probability of late presentation as a function of patient-level and neighborhood (ZIP)-level characteristics (area deprivation index [ADI] derived from the Health Resources and Services Administration), adjusted for calendar year and geographic distance from the centroid of the ZIP code to the hospital. RESULTS: A total of 2,643 patients with AIS from 2010 to 2020 were included (63.4% presented late and 36.6% presented early). The frequency of late presentation increased significantly from 68% in 2010 to 71% in 2020 (p = 0.002) and only among non-White patients. Patients presenting late were more likely to be non-White (37.1% vs 26.9%, p < 0.0001), arrive by means other than emergency medical services (EMS) (32.7% vs 16.1%, p < 0.0001), have an NIHSS <6 (68.7% vs 55.2%, p < 0.0001), and present from a neighborhood with a higher ADI category (p = 0.0001) that was nearer to the hospital (median 5.8 vs 7.7 miles, p = 0.0032). In the mixed model, the ADI by units of 10 (odds ratio [OR] 1.022, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.020-1.024), non-White race (OR 1.083, 95% CI 1.039-1.127), arrival by means other than EMS (OR 1.193, 95% CI 1.145-1.124), and an NIHSS <6 (OR 1.085, 95% CI 1.041-1.129) were associated with late presentation. DISCUSSION: In addition to patient-level factors, socioeconomic deprivation of neighborhood of residence contributes to delays in hospital presentation for AIS. These findings may provide opportunities for targeted interventions to improve presentation times in at-risk communities.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Hospitales , Factores Socioeconómicos
2.
Sci Adv ; 8(16): eabm3952, 2022 Apr 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35442729

RESUMEN

Brain imaging is essential to the clinical management of patients with ischemic stroke. Timely and accessible neuroimaging, however, can be limited in clinical stroke pathways. Here, portable magnetic resonance imaging (pMRI) acquired at very low magnetic field strength (0.064 T) is used to obtain actionable bedside neuroimaging for 50 confirmed patients with ischemic stroke. Low-field pMRI detected infarcts in 45 (90%) patients across cortical, subcortical, and cerebellar structures. Lesions as small as 4 mm were captured. Infarcts appeared as hyperintense regions on T2-weighted, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery and diffusion-weighted imaging sequences. Stroke volume measurements were consistent across pMRI sequences and between low-field pMRI and conventional high-field MRI studies. Low-field pMRI stroke volumes significantly correlated with stroke severity and functional outcome at discharge. These results validate the use of low-field pMRI to obtain clinically useful imaging of stroke, setting the stage for use in resource-limited environments.

3.
Stroke ; 53(6): 1883-1891, 2022 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35086361

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There are limited data about the epidemiology and secondary stroke prevention strategies used for patients with depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and sinus rhythm following an acute ischemic stroke (AIS). We sought to describe the prevalence of LVEF ≤40% and sinus rhythm among patients with AIS and antithrombotic treatment practice in a multi-center cohort from 2002 to 2018. METHODS: This was a multi-center, retrospective cohort study comprised of patients with AIS hospitalized in the Greater Cincinnati Northern Kentucky Stroke Study and 4 academic, hospital-based cohorts in the United States. A 1-stage meta-analysis of proportions was undertaken to calculate a pooled prevalence. Univariate analyses and an adjusted multivariable logistic regression model were performed to identify demographic, clinical, and echocardiographic characteristics associated with being prescribed an anticoagulant upon AIS hospitalization discharge. RESULTS: Among 14 338 patients with AIS with documented LVEF during the stroke hospitalization, the weighted pooled prevalence of LVEF ≤40% and sinus rhythm was 5.0% (95% CI, 4.1-6.0%; I2, 84.4%). Of 524 patients with no cardiac thrombus and no prior indication for anticoagulant who survived postdischarge, 200 (38%) were discharged on anticoagulant, 289 (55%) were discharged on antiplatelet therapy only, and 35 (7%) on neither. There was heterogeneity by site in the proportion discharged with an anticoagulant (22% to 45%, P<0.0001). Cohort site and National Institutes of Health Stroke Severity scale >8 (odds ratio, 2.0 [95% CI, 1.1-3.8]) were significant, independent predictors of being discharged with an anticoagulant in an adjusted analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly 5% of patients with AIS have a depressed LVEF and are in sinus rhythm. There is significant variation in the clinical practice of antithrombotic therapy prescription by site and stroke severity. Given this clinical equipoise, further study is needed to define optimal antithrombotic treatment regimens for secondary stroke prevention in this patient population.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Cuidados Posteriores , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Alta del Paciente , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Volumen Sistólico , Función Ventricular Izquierda
4.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 67, 2022 01 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34996970

RESUMEN

Neuroimaging is crucial for assessing mass effect in brain-injured patients. Transport to an imaging suite, however, is challenging for critically ill patients. We evaluated the use of a low magnetic field, portable MRI (pMRI) for assessing midline shift (MLS). In this observational study, 0.064 T pMRI exams were performed on stroke patients admitted to the neuroscience intensive care unit at Yale New Haven Hospital. Dichotomous (present or absent) and continuous MLS measurements were obtained on pMRI exams and locally available and accessible standard-of-care imaging exams (CT or MRI). We evaluated the agreement between pMRI and standard-of-care measurements. Additionally, we assessed the relationship between pMRI-based MLS and functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale). A total of 102 patients were included in the final study (48 ischemic stroke; 54 intracranial hemorrhage). There was significant concordance between pMRI and standard-of-care measurements (dichotomous, κ = 0.87; continuous, ICC = 0.94). Low-field pMRI identified MLS with a sensitivity of 0.93 and specificity of 0.96. Moreover, pMRI MLS assessments predicted poor clinical outcome at discharge (dichotomous: adjusted OR 7.98, 95% CI 2.07-40.04, p = 0.005; continuous: adjusted OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.11-2.49, p = 0.021). Low-field pMRI may serve as a valuable bedside tool for detecting mass effect.


Asunto(s)
Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Pruebas en el Punto de Atención , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Connecticut , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia
5.
Int J Stroke ; 17(3): 315-322, 2022 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33759645

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Triage for suspected acute stroke has two main options: (1) transport to the closest primary stroke center (PSC) and then to the nearest comprehensive stroke center (CSC) (Drip-and-Ship) or (2) transport the patient to the nearest CSC, bypassing a closer PSC (mothership). The purpose was to evaluate the effectiveness of drip-and-ship versus mothership models for acute stroke patients. METHODS: A Markov decision-analytic model was constructed. All model parameters were derived from recent medical literature. Our target population was adult patient with sudden onset of acute stroke within 8 h of onset over a one-year horizon. The primary outcome was quantified in terms of quality-adjusted-life-years (QALYs). RESULTS: The base case scenario show that the drip-and-ship strategy has a slightly higher expected health benefit, 0.591 QALY, as compared to 0.586 QALY in the mothership strategy when the time to PSC is 30 min and to CSC is 65 min, although the difference in health benefit becomes minimal as the time to PSC increases towards 60 min. Multiple sensitivity analyses show that when both PSC and CSC are far from place of onset (>1.5 h away), drip-and-ship becomes the better strategy. Mothership strategy is favored by smaller difference between distances to PSC and CSC, shorter transfer time from PSC to CSC, and longer delay in reperfusion in CSC for transferred patients. Drip-and-ship is favored by the reverse. CONCLUSION: Drip-and-ship has a slightly higher utility than mothership. This study assesses the complex issue of prehospital triage of acute stroke patients and can provide a framework for real-world data input.


Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Isquemia Encefálica/terapia , Humanos , Transferencia de Pacientes , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico , Trombectomía , Terapia Trombolítica , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Resultado del Tratamiento , Triaje
6.
Front Neurol ; 12: 741044, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34675873

RESUMEN

Objectives: Our objective was to identify characteristics associated with having an acute ischemic stroke (AIS) among hospitalized COVID-19 patients and the subset of these patients with a neurologic symptom. Materials and Methods: Our derivation cohort consisted of COVID-19 patients admitted to Yale-New Haven Health between January 3, 2020 and August 28, 2020 with and without AIS. We also studied a sub-cohort of hospitalized COVID-19 patients demonstrating a neurologic symptom with and without an AIS. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory results were compared between AIS and non-AIS patients in the full COVID-19 cohort and in the sub-cohort of COVID-19 patients with a neurologic symptom. Multivariable logistic regression models were built to predict ischemic stroke risk in these two COVID-19 cohorts. These 2 models were externally validated in COVID-19 patients hospitalized at a major health system in New York. We then compared the distribution of the resulting predictors in a non-COVID ischemic stroke control cohort. Results: A total of 1,827 patients were included in the derivation cohort (AIS N = 44; no AIS N = 1,783). Among all hospitalized COVID-19 patients, history of prior stroke and platelet count ≥ 200 × 1,000/µL at hospital presentation were independent predictors of AIS (derivation AUC 0.89, validation AUC 0.82), irrespective of COVID-19 severity. Among hospitalized COVID-19 patients with a neurologic symptom (N = 827), the risk of AIS was significantly higher among patients with a history of prior stroke and age <60 (derivation AUC 0.83, validation AUC 0.81). Notably, in a non-COVID ischemic stroke control cohort (N = 168), AIS patients were significantly older and less likely to have had a prior stroke, demonstrating the uniqueness of AIS patients with COVID-19. Conclusions: Hospitalized COVID-19 patients who demonstrate a neurologic symptom and have either a history of prior stroke or are of younger age are at higher risk of ischemic stroke.

8.
Nat Commun ; 12(1): 5119, 2021 08 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34433813

RESUMEN

Radiological examination of the brain is a critical determinant of stroke care pathways. Accessible neuroimaging is essential to detect the presence of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) operates at high magnetic field strength (1.5-3 T), which requires an access-controlled environment, rendering MRI often inaccessible. We demonstrate the use of a low-field MRI (0.064 T) for ICH evaluation. Patients were imaged using conventional neuroimaging (non-contrast computerized tomography (CT) or 1.5/3 T MRI) and portable MRI (pMRI) at Yale New Haven Hospital from July 2018 to November 2020. Two board-certified neuroradiologists evaluated a total of 144 pMRI examinations (56 ICH, 48 acute ischemic stroke, 40 healthy controls) and one ICH imaging core lab researcher reviewed the cases of disagreement. Raters correctly detected ICH in 45 of 56 cases (80.4% sensitivity, 95%CI: [0.68-0.90]). Blood-negative cases were correctly identified in 85 of 88 cases (96.6% specificity, 95%CI: [0.90-0.99]). Manually segmented hematoma volumes and ABC/2 estimated volumes on pMRI correlate with conventional imaging volumes (ICC = 0.955, p = 1.69e-30 and ICC = 0.875, p = 1.66e-8, respectively). Hematoma volumes measured on pMRI correlate with NIH stroke scale (NIHSS) and clinical outcome (mRS) at discharge for manual and ABC/2 volumes. Low-field pMRI may be useful in bringing advanced MRI technology to resource-limited settings.


Asunto(s)
Hemorragia Cerebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/economía , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/instrumentación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neuroimagen/economía , Neuroimagen/instrumentación , Neuroimagen/métodos
9.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 10(17): e021724, 2021 09 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34431358

RESUMEN

Background All of Us is a novel research program that aims to accelerate research in populations traditionally underrepresented in biomedical research. Our objective was to evaluate the burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in broadly defined underrepresented groups. Methods and Results We evaluated the latest data release of All of Us. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis combining survey and electronic health record data to estimate the prevalence of CVD upon enrollment in underrepresented groups defined by race, ethnicity, age (>75 years), disability (not able to carry out everyday physical activities), sexual orientation and gender identity lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, and asexual (LGBTQIA+), income (annual household income <$35 000 US dollars) and education (less than a high school degree). We used multivariate logistic regression to estimate the adjusted odds ratio (OR) and product terms to test for interaction. The latest All of Us data release includes 315 297 participants. Of these, 230 577 (73%) had information on CVD and 17 958 had CVD (overall prevalence, 7.8%; 95% CI, 7.7-7.9). Multivariate analyses adjusted by hypertension, hyperlipidemia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, body mass index, and smoking indicated that, compared with White participants, Black participants had a higher adjusted odds of CVD (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.16-1.27). Higher adjusted odds of CVD were also observed in underrepresented groups defined by other factors, including age >75 years (OR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.81-1.99), disability (OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.53-1.68), and income <$35 000 US dollars (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.17-1.27). Sex significantly modified the odds of CVD in several of the evaluated groups. Conclusions Among participants enrolled in All of Us, underrepresented groups defined based on race, ethnicity and other factors have a disproportionately high burden of CVD. The All of Us research program constitutes a powerful platform to accelerate research focused on individuals in underrepresented groups.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Etnicidad , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Salud Poblacional , Grupos Raciales , Anciano , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Identidad de Género , Humanos , Masculino , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
10.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ; 30(10): 106016, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34325273

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Transient ischemic attack (TIA) can be a warning sign of an impending stroke. The objective of our study is to assess the feasibility, safety, and cost savings of a comprehensive TIA protocol in the emergency room for low-risk TIA patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective, single-center cohort study performed at an academic comprehensive stroke center. We implemented an emergency department-based TIA protocol pathway for low-risk TIA patients (defined as ABCD2 score < 4 and without significant vessel stenosis) who were able to undergo vascular imaging and a brain MRI in the emergency room. Patients were set up with rapid outpatient follow-up in our stroke clinic and scheduled for an outpatient echocardiogram, if indicated. We compared this cohort to TIA patients admitted prior to the implementation of the TIA protocol who would have qualified. Outcomes of interest included length of stay, hospital cost, radiographic and echocardiogram findings, recurrent neurovascular events within 30 days, and final diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 138 patients were assessed (65 patients in the pre-pathway cohort, 73 in the expedited, post-TIA pathway implementation cohort). Average time from MRI order to MRI end was 6.4 h compared to 2.3 h in the pre- and post-pathway cohorts, respectively (p < 0.0001). The average length of stay for the pre-pathway group was 28.8 h in the pre-pathway cohort compared to 7.7 h in the post-pathway cohort (p < 0.0001). There were no differences in neuroimaging or echocardiographic findings. There were no differences in the 30 days re-presentation for stroke or TIA or mortality between the two groups. The direct cost per TIA admission was $2,944.50 compared to $1,610.50 for TIA patients triaged through the pathway at our institution. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the feasibility, safety, and cost-savings of a comprehensive, emergency department-based TIA protocol. Further study is needed to confirm overall benefit of an expedited approach to TIA patient management and guide clinical practice recommendations.


Asunto(s)
Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Costos de Hospital , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/economía , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/terapia , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/economía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos Clínicos , Ahorro de Costo , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/diagnóstico por imagen , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/mortalidad , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Triaje/economía
12.
J Neurointerv Surg ; 13(9): 784-789, 2021 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33077578

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The cost-effectiveness of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to M2 branch occlusion remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of EVT compared with medical management in patients with acute stroke presenting with M2 occlusion using a decision-analytic model. METHODS: A decision-analytic study was performed with Markov modeling to estimate the lifetime quality-adjusted life years and associated costs of EVT-treated patients compared with no-EVT/medical management. The study was performed over a lifetime horizon with a societal perspective in the Unites States setting. Base case, one-way, two-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: EVT was the long-term cost-effective strategy in 93.37% of the iterations in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, and resulted in difference in health benefit of 1.66 QALYs in the 65-year-old age groups, equivalent to 606 days in perfect health. Varying the outcomes after both strategies shows that EVT was more cost-effective when the probability of good outcome after EVT was only 4-6% higher relative to medical management in clinically likely scenarios. EVT remained cost-effective even when its cost exceeded US$200 000 (threshold was US$209 111). EVT was even more cost-effective for 55-year-olds than for 65-year-old patients. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that EVT is cost-effective for treatment of acute M2 branch occlusions. Faster and improved reperfusion techniques would increase the relative cost-effectiveness of EVT even further in these patients.


Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Anciano , Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico por imagen , Isquemia Encefálica/cirugía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Humanos , Reperfusión , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Accidente Cerebrovascular/cirugía , Trombectomía , Resultado del Tratamiento
13.
Neurohospitalist ; 10(4): 305-308, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32983352

RESUMEN

A 57-year-old man presented with sudden neck pain radiating down his arms. This pain progressed to bilateral upper and subsequently lower extremity weakness and numbness. His vitals were notable for systolic blood pressures lower than his baseline (down to 90 mm Hg). The patient's neurological examination as well as magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical and thoracic spine localized to a lesion in the anterior spinal cord. The differential diagnosis for such an acute presentation included stroke, demyelination, intramedullary neoplasm, infection, metabolic myelopathy, and a dural arteriovenous fistula. Further imaging with angiography demonstrated that our patient lacked an anterior spinal artery. In its place, collateral flow from cervical artery branches provided sustenance to the anterior spinal cord. In the setting of hemodynamic instability, this variant anatomy likely predisposed the patient to ischemia, leading to the classic presentation of anterior cord syndrome.

14.
JAMA Neurol ; 2020 Sep 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32897296

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: Neuroimaging is a key step in the clinical evaluation of brain injury. Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) systems operate at high-strength magnetic fields (1.5-3 T) that require strict, access-controlled environments. Limited access to timely neuroimaging remains a key structural barrier to effectively monitor the occurrence and progression of neurological injury in intensive care settings. Recent advances in low-field MRI technology have allowed for the acquisition of clinically meaningful imaging outside of radiology suites and in the presence of ferromagnetic materials at the bedside. OBJECTIVE: To perform an assessment of brain injury in critically ill patients in intensive care unit settings, using a portable, low-field MRI device at the bedside. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a prospective, single-center cohort study of 50 patients admitted to the neuroscience or coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) intensive care units at Yale New Haven Hospital in New Haven, Connecticut, from October 30, 2019, to May 20, 2020. Patients were eligible if they presented with neurological injury or alteration, no contraindications for conventional MRI, and a body habitus not exceeding the scanner's 30-cm vertical opening. Diagnosis of COVID-19 was determined by positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 polymerase chain reaction nasopharyngeal swab result. EXPOSURES: Portable MRI in an intensive care unit room. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Demographic, clinical, radiological, and treatment data were collected and analyzed. Brain imaging findings are described. RESULTS: Point-of-care MRI examinations were performed on 50 patients (16 women [32%]; mean [SD] age, 59 [12] years [range, 20-89 years]). Patients presented with ischemic stroke (n = 9), hemorrhagic stroke (n = 12), subarachnoid hemorrhage (n = 2), traumatic brain injury (n = 3), brain tumor (n = 4), and COVID-19 with altered mental status (n = 20). Examinations were acquired at a median of 5 (range, 0-37) days after intensive care unit admission. Diagnostic-grade T1-weighted, T2-weighted, T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, and diffusion-weighted imaging sequences were obtained for 37, 48, 45, and 32 patients, respectively. Neuroimaging findings were detected in 29 of 30 patients who did not have COVID-19 (97%), and 8 of 20 patients with COVID-19 (40%) demonstrated abnormalities. There were no adverse events or complications during deployment of the portable MRI or scanning in an intensive care unit room. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This single-center series of patients with critical illness in an intensive care setting demonstrated the feasibility of low-field, portable MRI. These findings demonstrate the potential role of portable MRI to obtain neuroimaging in complex clinical care settings.

15.
J Neurosurg ; 135(1): 53-63, 2020 Aug 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32796146

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: While the benefit of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for patients with anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke with large-vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO) has been clearly established, difficult vascular access may make the intervention impossible or unduly prolonged. In this study, the authors evaluated safety as well as radiographic and functional outcomes in stroke patients treated with MT via direct carotid puncture (DCP) for prohibitive vascular access. METHODS: The authors retrospectively studied patients from their prospective AIS-LVO database who underwent attempted MT between 2015 and 2018. Patients with prohibitive vascular access were divided into two groups: 1) aborted MT (abMT) after failed transfemoral access and 2) attempted MT via DCP. Functional outcome was assessed using the modified Rankin Scale at 3 months. Associations with outcome were analyzed using ordinal logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 352 consecutive patients with anterior circulation AIS-LVO who underwent attempted MT, 37 patients (10.5%) were deemed to have prohibitive vascular access (mean age [± SD] 82 ± 11 years, mean National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score 17 ± 5, with females accounting for 75% of the patients). There were 20 patients in the DCP group and 17 in the abMT group. The two groups were well matched for the known predictors of clinical outcome: age, sex, and admission NIHSS score. Direct carotid access was successfully obtained in 19 of 20 patients. Successful reperfusion (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score 2b or 3) was achieved in 16 (84%) of 19 patients in the DCP group. Carotid access complications included an inability to catheterize the carotid artery in 1 patient, neck hematomas in 4 patients, non-flow-limiting common carotid artery (CCA) dissections in 2 patients, and a delayed, fatal carotid blowout in 1 patient. The neck hematomas and non-flow-limiting CCA dissections did not require any subsequent interventions and remained clinically silent. Compared with the abMT group, patients in the DCP group had smaller infarct volumes (11 vs 48 ml, p = 0.04), a greater reduction in NIHSS score (-4 vs +2.9, p = 0.03), and better functional outcome (shift analysis for 3-month modified Rankin Scale score: adjusted OR 5.2, 95% CI 1.02-24.5; p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: DCP for emergency MT in patients with anterior circulation AIS-LVO and prohibitive vascular access is safe and effective and is associated with higher recanalization rates, smaller infarct volumes, and improved functional outcome compared with patients with abMT after failed transfemoral access. DCP should be considered in this patient population.

16.
Stroke ; 51(9): 2664-2673, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32755347

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Anecdotal reports suggest fewer patients with stroke symptoms are presenting to hospitals during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We quantify trends in stroke code calls and treatments at 3 Connecticut hospitals during the local emergence of COVID-19 and examine patient characteristics and stroke process measures at a Comprehensive Stroke Center (CSC) before and during the pandemic. METHODS: Stroke code activity was analyzed from January 1 to April 28, 2020, and corresponding dates in 2019. Piecewise linear regression and spline models identified when stroke codes in 2020 began to decline and when they fell below 2019 levels. Patient-level data were analyzed in February versus March and April 2020 at the CSC to identify differences in patient characteristics during the pandemic. RESULTS: A total of 822 stroke codes were activated at 3 hospitals from January 1 to April 28, 2020. The number of stroke codes/wk decreased by 12.8/wk from February 18 to March 16 (P=0.0360) with nadir of 39.6% of expected stroke codes called from March 10 to 16 (30% decrease in total stroke codes during the pandemic weeks in 2020 versus 2019). There was no commensurate increase in within-network telestroke utilization. Compared with before the pandemic (n=167), pandemic-epoch stroke code patients at the CSC (n=211) were more likely to have histories of hypertension, dyslipidemia, coronary artery disease, and substance abuse; no or public health insurance; lower median household income; and to live in the CSC city (P<0.05). There was no difference in age, sex, race/ethnicity, stroke severity, time to presentation, door-to-needle/door-to-reperfusion times, or discharge modified Rankin Scale. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital presentation for stroke-like symptoms decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic, without differences in stroke severity or early outcomes. Individuals living outside of the CSC city were less likely to present for stroke codes at the CSC during the pandemic. Public health initiatives to increase awareness of presenting for non-COVID-19 medical emergencies such as stroke during the pandemic are critical.


Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica/epidemiología , Hemorragias Intracraneales/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Betacoronavirus , Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico , Isquemia Encefálica/fisiopatología , Isquemia Encefálica/terapia , COVID-19 , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Connecticut/epidemiología , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Dislipidemias/epidemiología , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Etnicidad , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Renta , Seguro de Salud , Hemorragias Intracraneales/diagnóstico , Hemorragias Intracraneales/fisiopatología , Hemorragias Intracraneales/terapia , Masculino , Pacientes no Asegurados , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/fisiopatología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Telemedicina , Trombectomía , Terapia Trombolítica
17.
Stroke ; 51(9): e193-e202, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32781941

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We aim to examine effects of collateral status and post-thrombectomy reperfusion on final infarct distribution and early functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke. METHODS: Patients with large vessel occlusion who underwent endovascular intervention were included in this study. All patients had baseline computed tomography angiography and follow-up magnetic resonance imaging. Collateral status was graded according to the criteria proposed by Miteff et al and reperfusion was assessed using the modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) system. We applied a multivariate voxel-wise general linear model to correlate the distribution of final infarction with collateral status and degree of reperfusion. Early favorable outcome was defined as a discharge modified Rankin Scale score ≤2. RESULTS: Of the 283 patients included, 129 (46%) had good, 97 (34%) had moderate, and 57 (20%) had poor collateral status. Successful reperfusion (mTICI 2b/3) was achieved in 206 (73%) patients. Poor collateral status was associated with infarction of middle cerebral artery border zones, whereas worse reperfusion (mTICI scores 0-2a) was associated with infarction of middle cerebral artery territory deep white matter tracts and the posterior limb of the internal capsule. In multivariate regression models, both mTICI (P<0.001) and collateral status (P<0.001) were among independent predictors of final infarct volumes. However, mTICI (P<0.001), but not collateral status (P=0.058), predicted favorable outcome at discharge. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of patients with large vessel occlusion stroke, both the collateral status and endovascular reperfusion were strongly associated with middle cerebral artery territory final infarct volumes. Our findings suggesting that baseline collateral status predominantly affected middle cerebral artery border zones infarction, whereas higher mTICI preserved deep white matter and internal capsule from infarction; may explain why reperfusion success-but not collateral status-was among the independent predictors of favorable outcome at discharge. Infarction of the lentiform nuclei was observed regardless of collateral status or reperfusion success.


Asunto(s)
Arteriopatías Oclusivas/patología , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/terapia , Infarto Cerebral/patología , Infarto Cerebral/terapia , Circulación Colateral , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Femenino , Humanos , Infarto de la Arteria Cerebral Media/patología , Infarto de la Arteria Cerebral Media/terapia , Modelos Lineales , Angiografía por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reperfusión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Trombectomía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Sustancia Blanca/patología
19.
Stroke ; 51(3): 914-921, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32078493

RESUMEN

Background and Purpose- Loss of cerebral autoregulation in the acute phase of ischemic stroke leaves patients vulnerable to blood pressure (BP) changes. Effective BP management after endovascular thrombectomy may protect the brain from hypoperfusion or hyperperfusion. In this observational study, we compared personalized, autoregulation-based BP targets to static systolic BP thresholds. Methods- We prospectively enrolled 90 patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy for stroke. Autoregulatory function was continuously measured by interrogating changes in near-infrared spectroscopy-derived tissue oxygenation (a cerebral blood flow surrogate) in response to changes in mean arterial pressure. The resulting autoregulatory index was used to trend the BP range at which autoregulation was most preserved. Percent time that mean arterial pressure exceeded the upper limit of autoregulation or decreased below the lower limit of autoregulation was calculated for each patient. Time above fixed systolic BP thresholds was computed in a similar fashion. Functional outcome was measured with the modified Rankin Scale at 90 days. Results- Personalized limits of autoregulation were successfully computed in all 90 patients (age 71.6±16.2, 47% female, mean National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale 13.9±5.7, monitoring time 28.0±18.4 hours). Percent time with mean arterial pressure above the upper limit of autoregulation associated with worse 90-day outcomes (odds ratio per 10% 1.84 [95% CI, 1.3-2.7] P=0.002), and patients with hemorrhagic transformation spent more time above the upper limit of autoregulation (10.9% versus 16.0%, P=0.042). Although there appeared to be a nonsignificant trend towards worse outcome with increasing time above systolic BP thresholds of 140 mm Hg and 160 mm Hg, the effect sizes were smaller compared with the personalized approach. Conclusions- Noninvasive determination of personalized BP thresholds for stroke patients is feasible. Deviation from these limits may increase risk of further brain injury and poor functional outcome. This approach may present a better strategy compared with the classical approach of maintaining systolic BP below a predetermined value, though a randomized trial is needed to determine the optimal approach for hemodynamic management.


Asunto(s)
Presión Sanguínea , Isquemia Encefálica , Circulación Cerebrovascular , Homeostasis , Modelos Cardiovasculares , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Trombectomía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Isquemia Encefálica/fisiopatología , Isquemia Encefálica/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/fisiopatología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/cirugía
20.
Radiology ; 294(3): 580-588, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31934828

RESUMEN

Background Minor stroke is common and may represent up to two-thirds of cases of acute ischemic stroke. The cost-effectiveness of CT angiography in patients with minor stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score ≤6) is not well established. Purpose To evaluate cost-effectiveness of CT angiography in the detection of large-vessel occlusion (LVO) in patients with acute minor stroke (NIHSS score ≤6). Materials and Methods A Markov decision-analytic model with a societal perspective was constructed. Three different management strategies were evaluated: (a) no vascular imaging and best medical management, (b) CT angiography for all patients and immediate thrombectomy for LVO after intravenous thrombolysis, and (c) CT angiography for all and best medical management (including intravenous thrombolysis, with rescue thrombectomy for patients with LVO and neurologic deterioration). One-way, two-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Results Base-case calculation showed that CT angiography followed by immediate thrombectomy had the lowest cost ($346 007) and highest health benefits (9.26 quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]). CT angiography followed by best medical management with possible rescue thrombectomy for patients with LVO had a slightly higher cost ($346 500) and lower health benefits (9.09 QALYs). No vascular imaging had the highest cost and lowest health benefits. The difference in health benefits compared with the CT angiography and immediate thrombectomy strategy was 0.39 QALY, which corresponds to 142 days in perfect health per patient. The conclusion was robust in a probabilistic sensitivity analysis. CT angiography was cost-effective when the probability of LVO was greater than 0.16% in patients with acute minor stroke. The net monetary benefit of performing CT angiography was higher in younger patients ($68 950 difference between CT angiography followed by immediate thrombectomy and no vascular imaging in 55-year-old patients compared with $20 931 in 85-year-old patients). Conclusion Screening for large-vessel occlusion with CT angiography in patients with acute minor stroke is cost-effective and associated with improved health outcomes. Undetected large-vessel occlusion in the absence of vascular imaging results in worse health outcomes and higher costs. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article.


Asunto(s)
Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Triaje , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada/economía , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Accidente Cerebrovascular/clasificación , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Accidente Cerebrovascular/economía , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Triaje/economía , Triaje/estadística & datos numéricos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...