Long-term variation in oxygen consumption rate in preterm infants.

An investigation was made of long-term variation in oxygen consumption rate (VO2) in preterm infants. Four subjects (gestational age 27-34 weeks, postnatal age 17-38 days, weight at study 1.1-2.6 kg) were studied for 5 days each using open-circuit, indirect calorimetry. The mean VO2 for each subject (11.0-11.5 litres/kg/day) was within the reported range. However, the between-subject coefficient of variation during the study (2.1%) was smaller than the mean between-measurement coefficient of variation for daily VO2 (3.8%, range 1.7-6.3%). In addition, the between-measurement coefficient of variation was increased further for measurement intervals of less than 24 h (reaching a mean of 8.3% for 1-hour periods), and a relationship between measurement duration and the precision of estimating VO2 over 3 or 5 days is described. Thus, even 24-hour measurements of VO2 in these preterm infants were less representative of the individual's VO2 over 3 days than the group mean estimate. This finding is of relevance to future studies in this area, particularly those in which short-term measurements of energy expenditure are combined with a nutrient balance study to determine the composition of weight gain, because even small errors in the estimate of total energy expenditure can lead to unacceptably large errors in calculated energy deposition.

Comparison of the doubly labeled water (2H2(18)O) method with indirect calorimetry and a nutrient-balance study for simultaneous determination of energy expenditure, water intake, and metabolizable energy intake in preterm infants.

The doubly labeled water method was compared with indirect calorimetry and a nutrient-balance study for simultaneous determination of rates of CO2 production, energy expenditure, and water intake over 5 days in four preterm infants. Additionally, metabolizable energy (ME) intake estimated using the isotope procedure (as energy expenditure plus an estimate for energy deposition based on weight gain), was compared to ME intake measured in the balance study. Compared to values obtained by traditional methods, calculated CO2 production, energy expenditure, and water intake differed by -1.4 +/- 4.8% (SD), +0.3 +/- 2.6%, and +5.7 +/- 1.4%, respectively; the difference in water intake was significant (p less than 0.05). Calculated ME intakes were 5.3 +/- 19.3% less than measured intakes, but the difference was not significant. These findings indicate that the doubly labeled water method can provide accurate information on rates of CO2 production, energy expenditure, and water intake in preterm infants, but individual estimates of ME intake may be subject to substantial error.