Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
BJS Open ; 7(2)2023 03 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36932651

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Quilting, a technique in which skin flaps are sutured to the underlying muscle, reduces seroma after mastectomy and/or axillary lymph node dissection. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of different quilting techniques on the formation of clinically significant seroma. METHODS: This was a retrospective study including patients undergoing mastectomy and/or axillary lymph node dissection. Four breast surgeons applied the quilting technique based on their own discretion. Technique 1 was performed using Stratafix in 5-7 rows placed at 2-3 cm distance. Technique 2 was performed using Vicryl 2-0 in 4-8 rows placed at 1.5-2 cm distance. Technique 3 was performed using Vicryl 0/1 in 3 rows placed at 3-4 cm distance. Technique 4 was performed using Vicryl 0 in 4-5 rows placed at 1.5 cm distance. The primary outcome was clinically significant seroma. RESULTS: A total of 445 patients were included. Clinically significant seroma incidence was 4.1 per cent (six of 147) for technique 1, which was significantly lower than that for the other techniques (25.0 per cent (29 of 116), 29.4 per cent (32 of 109), and 33 per cent (24 of 73) for techniques 2, 3, and 4 (P < 0.001) respectively). The duration of surgery was not significantly longer for technique 1 compared with the other three techniques. The length of hospital stay, number of additional visits to the outpatient clinic, and reoperations did not differ significantly between the four techniques. CONCLUSION: Quilting using Stratafix and placing 5-7 rows with 2-3 cm distance between the stitches associates with low clinically significant seroma incidence without adverse effects.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Mastectomía , Humanos , Femenino , Mastectomía/efectos adversos , Mastectomía/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Seroma/epidemiología , Seroma/etiología , Seroma/prevención & control , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Poliglactina 910 , Técnicas de Sutura/efectos adversos , Drenaje/efectos adversos , Drenaje/métodos
2.
Psychooncology ; 29(4): 719-728, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31876036

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We performed a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to investigate whether regular screening with the distress thermometer (DT) by a nurse improved global quality of life (QOL) of patients with breast cancer (BC) treated with curative intent. METHODS: BC patients were randomized between regular screening for distress with a nurse-led DT intervention (NDTI) and usual care (UC). Both groups filled out questionnaires at baseline, after each received treatment modality and at follow-up visits up to 2 years. At these points, the intervention group received also the NDTI. The primary outcome was the global QOL of the EORTC QLQ C30 at 2 years after the end of treatment. Analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis, using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), generalized least squares, and interaction analyses. RESULTS: Of 194 randomized patients, 153 filled out the questionnaires up to 2 years after treatment. There was no significant difference between NDTI and UC in global QOL 2 years after the end of treatment (mean diff. = -1∙273, P = .610; 95% CI [-6.195; 3.649]). Subgroup analysis of patients who received multimodality treatment (surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, n = 66) showed a significant between-group difference in global QOL over time (mean diff. = -10, P < .001; 95% CI [-14.835; -5.167]) together with other secondary outcome measures in favor of the NDTI. CONCLUSION: NDTI did not lead to a significant improvement in global QOL 2 years after the end of treatment for patients with BC. However, the findings indicate that BC patients who received multimodality treatment may benefit from NDTI.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Enfermeras y Enfermeros , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Distrés Psicológico , Psicoterapia/métodos , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Adulto , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
3.
Sci Rep ; 9(1): 11679, 2019 08 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31406196

RESUMEN

Breast cancer treatment depends on human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) status, which is often determined using dual probe fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH). Hereby, also loss and gain of the centromere of chromosome 17 (CEP17) can be observed (HER2 is located on chromosome 17). CEP17 gain can lead to difficulty in interpretation of HER2 status, since this might represent true polysomy. With this study we investigated whether isolated polysomy is present and how this effects HER2 status in six breast cancer cell lines and 97 breast cancer cases, using HER2 FISH and immunohistochemistry, DNA ploidy assessment and multiplex ligation dependent probe amplification. We observed no isolated polysomy of chromosome 17 in any cell line. However, FISH analysis did show CEP17 gain in five of six cell lines, which reflected gains of the whole chromosome in metaphase spreads and aneuploidy with gain of multiple chromosomes in all these cases. In patients' samples, gain of CEP17 indeed correlated with aneuploidy of the tumour (91.1%; p < 0.001). Our results indicate that CEP17 gain is not due to isolated polysomy, but rather due to widespread aneuploidy with gain of multiple chromosomes. As aneuploidy is associated with poor clinical outcome, irrespective of tumour grade, this could improve future therapeutic decision making.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/genética , Carcinoma Lobular/genética , Centrómero/química , Cromosomas Humanos Par 17/química , Receptor ErbB-2/genética , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/patología , Carcinoma Lobular/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Lobular/patología , Línea Celular Tumoral , Femenino , Duplicación de Gen , Expresión Génica , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Hibridación Fluorescente in Situ , Metástasis Linfática , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Ploidias , Pronóstico
4.
Breast Cancer Res ; 20(1): 84, 2018 08 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30075794

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most sensitive imaging method for breast cancer detection and is therefore offered as a screening technique to women at increased risk of developing breast cancer. However, mammography is currently added from the age of 30 without proven benefits. The purpose of this study is to investigate the added cancer detection of mammography when breast MRI is available, focusing on the value in women with and without BRCA mutation, and in the age groups above and below 50 years. METHODS: This retrospective single-center study evaluated 6553 screening rounds in 2026 women at increased risk of breast cancer (1 January 2003 to 1 January 2014). Risk category (BRCA mutation versus others at increased risk of breast cancer), age at examination, recall, biopsy, and histopathological diagnosis were recorded. Cancer yield, false positive recall rate (FPR), and false positive biopsy rate (FPB) were calculated using generalized estimating equations for separate age categories (< 40, 40-50, 50-60, ≥ 60 years). Numbers of screens needed to detect an additional breast cancer with mammography (NSN) were calculated for the subgroups. RESULTS: Of a total of 125 screen-detected breast cancers, 112 were detected by MRI and 66 by mammography: 13 cancers were solely detected by mammography, including 8 cases of ductal carcinoma in situ. In BRCA mutation carriers, 3 of 61 cancers were detected only on mammography, while in other women 10 of 64 cases were detected with mammography alone. While 77% of mammography-detected-only cancers were detected in women ≥ 50 years of age, mammography also added more to the FPR in these women. Below 50 years the number of mammographic examinations needed to find an MRI-occult cancer was 1427. CONCLUSIONS: Mammography is of limited added value in terms of cancer detection when breast MRI is available for women of all ages who are at increased risk. While the benefit appears slightly larger in women over 50 years of age without BRCA mutation, there is also a substantial increase in false positive findings in these women.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/estadística & datos numéricos , Mamografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Proteína BRCA1/genética , Proteína BRCA2/genética , Biopsia , Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Reacciones Falso Positivas , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mutación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
5.
Radiology ; 286(2): 443-451, 2018 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29040037

RESUMEN

Purpose To evaluate the real-life performance of a breast cancer screening program for women with different categories of increased breast cancer risk with multiple follow-up rounds in an academic hospital with a large screening population. Materials and Methods Screening examinations (magnetic resonance [MR] imaging and mammography) for women at increased breast cancer risk (January 1, 2003, to January 1, 2014) were evaluated. Risk category, age, recall for workup of screening-detected abnormalities, biopsy, and histopathologic diagnosis were recorded. Recall rate, biopsy rate, positive predictive value of recall, positive predictive value of biopsy, cancer detection rate, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated for first and follow-up rounds. Results There were 8818 MR and 6245 mammographic examinations performed in 2463 women. Documented were 170 cancers; of these, there were 129 screening-detected cancers, 16 interval cancers, and 25 cancers discovered at prophylactic mastectomy. Overall sensitivity was 75.9% including the cancers discovered at prophylactic mastectomy (95% confidence interval: 69.5%, 82.4%) and 90.0% excluding those cancers (95% confidence interval: 83.3%, 93.7%). Sensitivity was lowest for carriers of the BRCA1 mutation (66.1% and 81.3% when including and not including cancers in prophylactic mastectomy specimens, respectively). Specificity was higher at follow-up (96.5%; 95% confidence interval: 96.0%, 96.9%) than in first rounds (85.1%; 95% confidence interval: 83.4%, 86.5%) and was high for both MR imaging (97.1%; 95% confidence interval: 96.7%, 97.5%) and mammography (98.7%; 95% confidence interval: 98.3%, 99.0%). Positive predictive value of recall and positive predictive value of biopsy were lowest in women who had only a family history of breast cancer. Conclusion Screening performance was dependent on risk category. Sensitivity was lowest in carriers of the BRCA1 mutation. The specificity of high-risk breast screening improved at follow-up rounds. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/prevención & control , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Proteína BRCA2/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Femenino , Mutación de Línea Germinal , Heterocigoto , Humanos , Interpretación de Imagen Asistida por Computador , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/normas , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/estadística & datos numéricos , Mamografía/normas , Mamografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Tamizaje Masivo/normas , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Mastectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Ubiquitina-Proteína Ligasas/genética , Adulto Joven
6.
J Clin Pathol ; 70(9): 781-786, 2017 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28325747

RESUMEN

AIMS: Preoperative core needle biopsy (CNB) is commonly used to confirm the diagnosis of breast cancer. For treatment purposes and for determining histological type, especially in case of neoadjuvant therapy, oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status and E-cadherin assessments are crucial. Considering the increasing demand for same-day diagnosis of breast lesions, an accelerated method of CNB processing was developed, in which the tissue fixation time is radically reduced. METHODS: To determine whether short fixation time frustrates assessment of ER, PR and E-cadherin immunohistochemistry (IHC) and HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH), 69 consecutive patients with 70 invasive breast carcinomas were included through the same-day diagnostics programme of breast lesions of the Radboud university medical center and the hospital Pantein. IHC for ER, PR and E-cadherin and HER2 FISH were compared between CNBs fixed for approximately 60-90 min and traditionally fixed resection specimens. RESULTS: Overall agreement between CNBs and resection specimens was 98.6% for ER (p<0.001; κ=0.93), 90.0% for PR (p<0.001; κ=0.75), 100% for E-cadherin (p<0001; κ=1.00) and 98.6% (p<0.001; κ=0.94) for HER2 FISH. Positive and negative predictive values were respectively 98.4% and 100% for ER, 95.9% and 76.2% for PR, 100% and 100% for E-cadherin and 90% and 100% for HER2 FISH. CONCLUSIONS: Hormone receptors and E-cadherin IHC and HER2 FISH are highly comparable between briefly fixed CNBs and the corresponding traditionally fixed resection specimens, and can therefore reliably be used in the daily clinical practice of same-day diagnostics of breast cancer.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor , Neoplasias de la Mama/química , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Cadherinas/análisis , Receptor ErbB-2/genética , Receptores de Estrógenos/análisis , Receptores de Progesterona/análisis , Fijación del Tejido/métodos , Centros Médicos Académicos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antígenos CD , Biomarcadores de Tumor/análisis , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Biopsia con Aguja Gruesa , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Hibridación Fluorescente in Situ , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Factores de Tiempo , Flujo de Trabajo
7.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 137(2): 609-16, 2013 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23239152

RESUMEN

Many attempts have been made to combine the high diagnostic accuracy and conclusive rate of core needle biopsy (CNB) with the speed of fine needle aspiration cytology in evaluation of solid breast lesions. Multiple hybrid techniques have been developed to achieve this. We describe a cohort of patients for whom we used a relatively new, accelerated method of CNB processing, allowing for a definitive diagnosis the same day. All patients visiting the Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre breast clinic during a 4-year period were reviewed to identify all CNBs in this period performed in a same-day diagnosis track. CNB result was compared to post-operative pathology reports when available, and to follow-up when patients were not surgically treated. 1,060 patients underwent CNB of 1,383 lesions, 898 of which in a same-day diagnosis track with a sensitivity of 96.9 % and a specificity of 99.4 %. The inconclusive rate was 9.2 %. For a same-day diagnosis for solid breast lesions, we could give a conclusive diagnosis with accelerated CNB processing in 65 % of our patients requiring CNB. This technique can be used reliably in a same-day diagnosis breast clinic with a very high sensitivity, specificity, and conclusive rate.


Asunto(s)
Biopsia con Aguja Gruesa , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Factores de Tiempo , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos
8.
Am J Surg ; 198(2): 262-9, 2009 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19375068

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: After breast-conserving surgery of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast or invasive breast carcinoma with an extensive intraductal component, tumor-positive surgical margins are frequently found. Therefore, the extent of the intraductal disease needs to be accurately determined preoperatively. METHODS: Data for this review were identified by search of PubMed. Reference lists of selected articles were cross-searched for additional literature. RESULTS: DCIS is accurately detected with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), but the typical malignant features are inconsistently seen and most often in high-grade DCIS or in DCIS with a small invasive component. The histopathologic extent of DCIS is more accurately demonstrated with MRI. However, overestimation due to benign proliferative lesions does frequently occur. An improved depiction of DCIS could lead to improved preoperative staging. Conversely, the identification of more extensive disease on MRI could give rise to unnecessary interventions. Therefore, MRI should be used carefully and preferable in specialized and experienced centers. CONCLUSION: [corrected] To date, there is no evidence that the use of MRI improves outcomes (ie, decreases recurrence rates) in patients with DCIS.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Carcinoma in Situ/patología , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/patología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Carcinoma in Situ/cirugía , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Mastectomía , Mastectomía Segmentaria , Cuidados Preoperatorios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA