Immunoadsorption in SLE: three different high affinity columns are adequately effective in removing autoantibodies and controlling disease activity.

INTRODUCTION: Pathogenic autoantibodies (Abs) are a hallmark of SLE and their rapid removal is beneficial in active SLE. Immunoadsorption (IAS) is effective in removing serum levels of all classes of immunoglobulin (Ig), immune complexes (IC) and anti-dsDNA Abs and appears superior to plasmapheresis with respect to side effects. IAS can be performed with different columns, which use different ligands to bind their target. In particular, high affinity columns are in the focus of interest. Their ligands are either sheep IgG directed against human Ig (Ig-column, Ig-Therasorb®), or staphylococcal Protein A (ProtA-column, Immunosorba®), or the synthetic peptide Gam146 (GAM-column, Globaffin®). In our experience Ig-columns have been effective in treating active renal SLE. However, no analysis has so far been published on which column type should be preferred in treating SLE patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among our SLE patients maintained on prolonged IAS therapy, we identified those with stable renal SLE and low to moderate disease activity who were successfully treated by using Ig-columns. Six of these patients were switched to ProtA-columns, keeping the rest of the protocol and the medication constant. In addition, two patients were switched from Ig- to GAM-columns. RESULTS: All types of columns significantly lowered the serum levels of IgG, IgM, and anti-dsDNA Abs. Disease activity was constantly low before and after the switch, as were parameters of renal function. In addition, patients with highly active disease were effectively treated when ProtA- (n=6) or GAM-columns (n=1) were used as first-line extracorporeal treatment. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that all columns are adequately effective in controlling key parameters of SLE. Thus, it is not the type of the ligand, but only the outcome, i.e. the successful removal of Ig, IC, and (auto-) Abs that is required for controlling SLE activity.

Intermittent administration of betalactam-antibiotics for treatment of severe infection in hemodialysis patients.

Infections are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in hemodialysis patients. Still, due to altered pharmacokinetics and potential toxic sideeffects, safe and efficient antibiotic therapy in dialysis patients remains a major challenge. We reviewed our experience with intermittent administration of betalactam antibiotics for treatment of severe infections in hemodialysis patients. A total of 81 episodes of infection in 45 patients was assessed. All patients were treated with betalactam antibiotics (cefepime in 11 episodes, cefpirom in 33 episodes, piperacillin in 9 episodes, amoxicillin in 18 episodes, ceftazidime in 10 episodes, respectively). All antibiotics were given post hemodialysis 3x per week. Treatment was considered efficient in case of a significant decrease in CRP in addition to clinical response. Overall treatment success rate was 85% (69 episodes of infection). The decrease of CRP was 52% (6.9 +/- 5.8 to 3.3 +/- 4.9 mg/dl; p = 0.00003). The mean duration of treatment was 19 +/- 13 days. Treatment was generally well tolerated. We conclude, that severe infections in hemodialysis patients can be treated safely and efficiently with an empiric therapy with betalactam antibiotics. Intermittent administration, potentially allowing ambulatory treatment, is possible.

IgG immunoadsorption reduces systemic lupus erythematosus activity and proteinuria: a long term observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the effects of rigorous immunoglobulin removal by immunoadsorption (IAS) on proteinuria (primary outcome variable), disease activity (SIS, SLEDAI, ECLAM), and autoantibodies to double stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) in active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: 16 patients with severe SLE and renal disease, in whom cyclophosphamide was contraindicated or failed to halt disease progression, were treated with IAS for 3 months. Patients achieving at least 20% improvement in two or more of the outcome measures were considered responders and offered a 9 months' extension period. RESULTS: Within 3 months, 14 patients responded and 11 opted for an extension. Proteinuria decreased from 6.7 (4.6) g/day (mean (SD)) at baseline to 4.3 (3.5) g/day at 3 months and 2.9 (2.4) g/day at 12 months (p<0.001). From baseline to 3 and 12 months, disease activity improved independently of scoring by SIS (15 (5) to 5 (2) and to 5 (2), p<0.0001), SLEDAI (21 (7) to 5 (4) and to 5 (4), p<0.0001), or ECLAM (7 (2) to 2 (1) and to 3 (1), p<0.0001). Anti-dsDNA fell from 391 (647) IU/ml to 146 (218) and to 53 (50) IU/ml at 3 and 12 months, respectively. Steroids could be tapered from 117 (159) mg/day at baseline to 29 (17) mg/day at 3 months and 9 (2) mg/day at 12 months. IAS was not associated with an excess of infections. However, one patient died of septicaemia after 1 month of treatment. CONCLUSION: In this negatively selected cohort of patients with SLE, IAS was associated with a significant response shown by reduced proteinuria, improved global disease activity, decreased anti-dsDNA, and lower glucocorticoid dosages, suggesting therapeutic benefit.

Intravenous immunoglobulin application following immunoadsorption: benefit or risk in patients with autoimmune diseases?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate infection rates, side-effects and autoantibody resynthesis after immunoadsorption with and without intravenous immunoglobulin substitution. METHODS: Thirty-five patients with autoimmune diseases who were on long-term immunoadsorption therapy participated in a prospective, randomized study. Results and conclusions. Infections were rare but similar in frequency in patients receiving combined immunoadsorption and intravenous immunoglobulins (intervention group, n=17, 1.3 infections per patient-year) and in a control group (n=18, 0.9 infections per patient-year) treated by immunoadsorption alone. The reduction in IgG achieved with two immunoadsorptions within 3 days was 95.0+/-2.5%. The extent of removal of pathogenic autoantibodies was similar to the removal of IGG: Substitution of immunoglobulins was not associated with an increased circulating IgG level before the following immunoadsorption. Infusion of immunoglobulins at a dose of 0.14 g/kg (interquartile range 0.12-0.16) body weight in patients in whom circulating immunoglobulins had been depleted was associated with a high incidence of serious side-effects; these necessitated the termination of treatment in 24% of the patients. No evidence was found that immunoglobulin administration had any beneficial effect with respect to autoantibody resynthesis after immunoadsorption.

Treatment of coagulation inhibitors with extracorporeal immunoadsorption (Ig-Therasorb).

Coagulation inhibitors may occur as alloantibodies in patients with congenital factor deficiencies or as autoantibodies in patients with a previously normal coagulation. We treated 10 patients with factor VIII inhibitors (three haemophiliacs and seven patients with acquired factor VIII inhibitors) and one patient with a factor V inhibitor using extracorporeal immunoadsorption to immobilized antibodies against human immunoglobulins (Ig-Therasorb). The initial inhibitor titre was between 18 BU/ml and 540 BU/ml. Nine patients had signs of bleeding. Eighty-nine immunoadsorption sessions were performed in the 11 patients (8.1 +/- 5.1 per patient), each processing 6980 +/- 880 ml of plasma in 3.8 +/- 0.5 h. The mean reduction of the inhibitor titre was 71.9 +/- 19.4% per session. Serum IgG, IgA and IgM levels decreased by 68.7 +/- 10.1%, 55.7 +/- 12.7% and 48.6 +/- 11.1% respectively. In two haemophiliac patients, an initial titre reduction prior to an immune tolerance protocol was performed. Another haemophiliac patient was treated because of acute cerebral bleeding. In six out of eight patients with acquired inhibitors, a durable elimination was achieved within a median of 18 d. Treatment was safe and well-tolerated and seems to be a promising method in the treatment of patients with coagulation inhibitors, especially when a fast inhibitor titre reduction is necessary.

Local anticoagulation of the extracorporeal circuit with heparin and subsequent neutralization with protamine during immunoadsorption.

A regimen of local anticoagulation of an immunoadsorption device was studied. The extracorporeal circuit was anticoagulated with citrate (5.5%) and a continuous infusion of heparin (2,000 U/h or 1,500 U/h), which was neutralized by a continuous infusion of protamine chloride (75% of the heparin dose) before reinfusion in 23 patients treated with low-density lipoprotein or immunoglobulin apheresis. Sufficient anticoagulation of the extracorporeal circuit was obtained (activated partial thromboplastin time [APTT] > 180 seconds; thrombin time [TT] > 120 seconds; anti-Xa activity, 1.05 +/- 0.21 U/mL) during the entire treatment of 190 minutes, whereas coagulation parameters in the patients' blood stayed within the normal range. In a control group without heparin neutralization, full systemic anticoagulation of the patients occurred (APTT, 157.8 +/- 30.6 seconds; TT, 119.8 +/- 0.4 seconds; anti-Xa activity, 0.88 +/- 0.21 U/mL). No side effects or clotting of the system were observed. Our data show that this regimen of local anticoagulation is a safe protocol for extracorporeal circulation without exposing the patients to anticoagulants.

Prospective randomised cross-over comparison of three LDL-apheresis systems in statin pretreated patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia.

Various LDL-apheresis systems have gained wider clinical acceptance in recent years to treat patients with severe familial hypercholesterolaemia, in particular in patients with coronary artery disease. For each single device data on efficacy have been provided, but up to now no comparative analysis including the novel direct adsorption of lipoproteins from whole blood has been reported. This prospectively designed cross-over comparison of three commercially available LDL-apheresis systems (immunoadsorption, IMAL; dextran sulphate adsorption, DSA; direct adsorption of lipoproteins, DALI) was performed in eight patients with homozygous (n = 3) and heterozygous (n = 5) familial hypercholesterolaemia. Removal of atherogenic lipoproteins was highly effective in all systems, for LDL-cholesterol in particular: DSA: - 84.3 +/- 6.2%; IMAL: -82.1 +/- 8.3%; DALI: -76.6 +/- 7.2% (P < 0.05 as compared DALI versus IMAL and DSA). A reduction in Lp(a) of about 63% was achieved by each device. Loss in HDL-cholesterol was highest with IMAL (-21.3 +/- 4.9%, P < 0.05) as compared to the other two treatment modalities. DSA decreased HDL-cholesterol by - 10.4 +/- 6.1% and the DALI system by -12.7 +/- 5.0%. Remarkable differences were found for the removal of fibrinogen (DSA: -29.8 +/- 14.7%, (P < 0.05 versus DALI/IMAL); IMAL: -21.4 +/- 10.1% (P < 0.05 versus DALI); DALI: -14.8 +/- 8.0%). The shortest duration for treatment was achieved by the DALI system (135 +/- 20 min, P < 0.05 versus IMAL (195 +/- 20 min) and DSA (187 +/- 29 min)). No side effects were recorded in the total of 96 treatments performed during the study. Long-term observations have yet to prove whether these differences in efficacy may be of clinical relevance.

Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of cefepime in long-term hemodialysis with high-flux membranes.

OBJECTIVE: Among uremic patients on hemodialysis, infectious complications leading to a high incidence of morbidity and mortality are a well-documented problem. In this multi-dose study, the safety, tolerance, and pharmacokinetics of cefepime during high-flux hemodialysis were investigated and an improved dosing schedule is presented. METHODS: Six long-term hemodialysis patients received 2 g cefepime i.v. at the end of hemodialysis three times per week. RESULTS: Trough levels of cefepime were 23.3 +/- 7.3 mg/l and peak serum concentrations 165.6 +/- 48.7 mg/l. After 3.5 h of high-flux hemodialysis, 72.2 +/- 6.4% of cefepime was eliminated. The intradialytic half-life was 1.6 +/- 0.29 h and the interdialytic half-life 22.0 +/- 2.14 h. CONCLUSION: A dosage of 2 g cefepime after each hemodialysis session achieved drug levels well above the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC)90 for most of the target pathogens. Thus, the described dosing schedule is an efficient and cost saving antmicrobial therapy for severe infections in long-term hemodialysis patients with no residual renal function.

Beneficial effects of atorvastatin in the treatment of hyperlipidemia after renal transplantation.

Despite the availability of various lipid lowering drugs, the treatment of hyperlipidemia, one of the most important risk factors for morbidity and mortality after organ transplantation, remains a therapeutic challenge. We investigated the safety and efficacy of a new HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, atorvastatin, in renal transplant patients whose serum lipids were insufficiently controlled by diet and treatment with other lipid lowering drugs. Twenty-four patients (14 males/10 females; mean age 51.2 +/- 2.3 years) were converted to low dose atorvastatin (10 mg/day) at a mean of 67.7 +/- 8.6 months after renal transplantation and prospectively followed for 3 months after initiation of the study drug. HDL, LDL, and total cholesterol, triglycerides, serum creatinine and CPK levels were evaluated pre (-3, -1, 0 months) and post conversion (+1, +3 months). In the eighteen patients who completed the study, low dose atorvastatin therapy led to a significant reduction in total cholesterol (304.6 +/- 13.2 vs. 247.6 +/- 12.0 mg/dl; p = 0.007) and LDL cholesterol (191.9 +/- 9.0 vs. 141.8 +/- 14.7 mg/dl; p < 0.0001) and a modest reduction in serum triglyceride levels at three months after conversion. We conclude that low dose atorvastatin (10 mg/day) can be successfully used and appears to be safe in the treatment of posttransplant hyperlipidemia. Its long-term effects on patient morbidity and mortality as well as graft survival should be investigated in larger and more prolonged prospective trials.

Direct adsorption of lipoproteins (DALI) from whole blood: first long-term clinical experience with a new LDL-apheresis system for the treatment of familial hypercholesterolaemia.

BACKGROUND: The DALI (direct adsorption of lipoproteins) LDL-apheresis system is a novel device for the removal of lipoproteins from whole blood. METHODS: We report the first long-term treatment experience (16.7 +/- 12.6 months; 57 +/- 43 treatments/patient) using different DALI adsorber sizes (DALI-500, DALI-750, DALI-1000) in seven patients with homozygous (n = 1) and severe heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia. For each treatment, 1.6 fold of the calculated blood volume was processed. Treatments were scheduled at weekly or two-weekly intervals. RESULTS: The smallest DALI-500 configuration was unable to achieve sufficient removal of LDL cholesterol, with the adsorber being exhausted already at desorption of 65% of the calculated blood volume. In contrast, both larger adsorber systems effectively removed lipoproteins until the end of treatment. Therefore, the DALI-750 device was used for long-term treatment. LDL cholesterol (mean pretreatment value: 179 +/- 44 mg/dl) was reduced by 73.4 +/- 7.7% and Lp(a) levels (mean pretreatment value: 43 +/- 33 mg/dl) by 69.5 +/- 8.3%. HDL cholesterol (mean pretreatment value: 47 +/- 15 mg/dl) was reduced by 16.3 +/- 8.0% during the treatment. In the long term, LDL cholesterol was reduced by 54.0 +/- 10.5%--from 259 +/- 101 mg/dl to 119 +/- 19 mg/dl. No serious side effects occurred during the treatment. Long-term evaluation of other laboratory parameters showed a reduction in haemoglobin due to treatment-associated blood loss despite frequent iron supplementation. CONCLUSION: Sufficient reductions in LDL cholesterol and Lp(a) were achieved using the DALI-750 system and the treatment was well tolerated. The easy use and short period of 153 +/- 22 minutes required for each treatment are the major advantages of the DALI system as compared to other available LDL-apheresis devices. Potential particle release from the adsorber into the circulation must be ruled out before the system can be introduced in clinical routine.

Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after kidney transplantation: a retrospective analysis to evaluate the benefit or risk of immunostimulation.

BACKGROUND: Leukopenia due to immunosuppressive drugs represents a well-known complication in graft recipients, which might put patients at an increased risk for infections. In this study, recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF), a hematopoietic growth factor that selectively stimulates neutrophil colony formation and neutrophil cell differentiation, was tested for safety and efficacy. METHODS: We evaluated 30 episodes of leukopenia (<2000/mm3) in 19 kidney graft recipients treated with rhG-CSF. This cohort was compared with an age- and sex-matched historical control group without therapy. Peripheral and differential blood cell counts were analyzed, and the duration of leukopenia was estimated. Furthermore, the occurrence of infections associated with leukopenia was investigated. RESULTS: All patients responded to rhG-CSF therapy. Peripheral leukocyte counts increased from 1756+/-582 to a peak of 8723+/-3038/mm3 (P<0.0001). On the average, the peak was reached after 2.7 days (range 1 to 8). Furthermore, the effect was fairly persistent, because in 22 of 30 episodes leukocyte counts were within the normal range after 7 days. The elevation of total leukocytes was mainly due to a specific increase in neutrophil granulocytes from 1143+/-514 to 6895+/-1950/mm3 on the peak day (P<0.0001). Patients in the G-CSF group were leukopenic for a mean of 1.29+/-0.59 days, whereas in the control group leukopenia persisted for at least 7 days. Consequently, the rate of infections was significantly higher (P<0.045) in nontreated patients. CONCLUSION: rhG-CSF was safe and effective in leukopenic kidney graft recipients. Leukopenic episodes in treated patients were significantly shorter, and infections occurred at a significantly lower rate. No evidence was found that rhG-CSF therapy might trigger rejection episodes, and no side effects were observed.

Effects of sodium nitroprusside on hemodialysis-induced platelet activation.

BACKGROUND: Hemodialysis (HD) is associated with increased platelet activation as reflected by enhanced P-selectin expression on platelets and by increased formation of heterotypic platelet-leukocyte aggregates. Both may play a pathophysiologic role in HD-associated platelet dysfunction or the propagation of atherosclerosis. As nitric oxide (NO) is a potent inhibitor of platelet activation, we were interested in whether HD-induced platelet activation could be blunted by a NO donor. METHODS: After a pilot study in 12 patients to gain an estimate for the sample size, the main trial was conducted as a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-way, cross-over study. Twelve patients received an infusion of sodium nitroprusside (1 microgram/kg/min for over 15 min) or placebo into the inlet port of the HD device. RESULTS: Platelet activation increased within five minutes after start of HD (P < 0.05). Infusion of sodium nitroprusside neither decreased platelet activation (P-selectin + platelets) nor affected the number of platelet-leukocyte aggregates (CD41+ neutrophils) as measured by flow cytometry. CONCLUSION: Although NO may have inhibitory effects on platelet activation in vivo, our results confirm recent findings showing that NO donors were ineffective in preventing platelet activation by extracorporeal circulation during cardiopulmonary bypass or plateletpheresis. Thus, NO donors do not appear to be ideal candidate drugs to inhibit HD-associated platelet activation.

Posttransplant hemolytic uremic syndrome in adult retransplanted kidney graft recipients: advantage of FK506 therapy?

BACKGROUND: Posttransplant hemolytic uremic syndrome (pHUS) is a rare but severe disorder that confers a poor prognosis on an allograft due to thrombotic microangiopathy. Immunosuppression with cyclosporine (CsA) is implicated as a significant risk factor for the development of pHUS. In early reports, it was hypothesized that immunosuppression with FK506 (tacrolimus) would avoid the development of pHUS. However, this initially supposed beneficial effect remains controversial, because pHUS associated with tacrolimus therapy has been published in some later case reports. This article aims to further evaluate FK506 with respect to the development and resolution of pHUS. METHODS: We describe the course of seven adult kidney graft recipients with pHUS, treated with FK506 either as initial immunosuppression for retransplantation or after discontinuation of CsA for resolution of pHUS. Work-up for pHUS was initiated when certain clinical features, such as hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and deterioration of graft function, were found. The diagnosis was confirmed by histologic examination of a renal allograft biopsy specimen (thrombotic microangiopathy). With the onset of pHUS, additional plasma exchange was performed in all patients. RESULTS: Two patients suffered from end-stage renal disease due to primary HUS and had a history of recurrent pHUS in previous renal transplants. In both patients, the attempt to regraft was only made because of the early optimistic reports using FK506. Despite initial FK506 therapy, both recipients developed pHUS again, leading to loss of graft function. Two additional kidney graft recipients with primary renal failure other than HUS also received FK506 as initial immunosuppression. One of them (loss of the first kidney graft due to CsA-induced pHUS) was successfully treated with FK506 for his second renal transplant. The other recipient, a patient in whom de novo pHUS had occurred in the first graft despite initial therapy with FK506, was treated with CsA for his second graft and again developed pHUS. The latter process, however, could be reversed by a switch to steroids and azathioprine. In all three patients regrafted for reasons other than pHUS, development of de novo pHUS was treated by CsA withdrawal and a switch to FK506; this approach was effective in two patients. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that three of seven renal allograft recipients benefited from FK506 therapy for prevention or resolution of pHUS. Treatment or prophylaxis with FK506 can be considered advantageous in some patients with de novo pHUS, but FK506 fails to prevent recurrent pHUS in patients with primary HUS.

Adrenal function in patients with chronic renal failure.

Previous studies have reported divergent findings on the function of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in patients with chronic renal failure (CRF). The low-dose adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) test offers the possibility of unmasking adrenal dysfunction, which might remain undiscovered using the ACTH test with the standard 250-microg dose. Furthermore, the choice of renal replacement therapy (either hemodialysis or continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis [CAPD]) might have an impact on adrenal function. To investigate these possibilities, ACTH tests were performed with three different doses (ie, 1, 5, and 250 microg) in 14 CRF patients and in seven healthy controls. Seven of the CRF patients were receiving chronic hemodialysis and seven were receiving CAPD. Basal plasma concentrations of cortisol were comparable in the three groups tested (5.3+/-0.4 microg/dL in the controls, 6.6+/-0.7 microg/dL in the hemodialysis patients, and 7.9+/-1.0 microg/dL in the CAPD patients), whereas basal ACTH concentrations were significantly elevated in the CRF patients (28.5+/-3.8 pg/mL in the hemodialysis patients and 33.0+/-6.0 pg/mL in the CAPD patients) when compared with normal controls (17.0+/-1.4 pg/mL; P < 0.05). All three doses of ACTH resulted in a rapid increase of plasma cortisol concentrations that was comparable in all three groups. In the hemodialysis patients, a trend toward a diminished response to the lowest dose of 1 microg was noticed. We conclude, therefore, that adrenal response to ACTH in various doses is unaffected in CRF independent of whether hemodialysis or CAPD is chosen for renal replacement therapy.