Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 83
Filtrar
1.
J Orthop Trauma ; 37(11): 581-585, 2023 Nov 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37491711

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Acute compartment syndrome (ACS) is a true emergency. Even with urgent fasciotomy, there is often muscle damage and need for further surgery. Although ACS is not uncommon, no validated classification system exists to aid in efficient and clear communication. The aim of this study was to establish and validate a classification system for the consequences of ACS treated with fasciotomy. METHODS: Using a modified Delphi method, an international panel of ACS experts was assembled to establish a grading scheme for the disease and then validate the classification system. The goal was to articulate discrete grades of ACS related to fasciotomy findings and associated costs. A pilot analysis was used to determine questions that were clear to the respondents. Discussion of this analysis resulted in another round of cases used for 24 other raters. The 24 individuals implemented the classification system 2 separate times to compare outcomes for 32 clinical cases. The accuracy and reproducibility of the classification system were subsequently calculated based on the providers' responses. RESULTS: The Fleiss Kappa of all raters was at 0.711, showing a strong agreement between the 24 raters. Secondary validation was performed for paired 276 raters and correlation was tested using the Kendall coefficient. The median correlation coefficient was 0.855. All 276 pairs had statistically significant correlation. Correlation coefficient between the first and second rating sessions was strong with the median pair scoring at 0.867. All surgeons had statistically significant internal consistency. CONCLUSION: This new ACS classification system may be applied to better understand the impact of ACS on patient outcomes and economic costs for leg ACS.

2.
J Orthop Trauma ; 37(4): 155-160, 2023 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36729919

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The main 2 forms of treatment for extraarticular proximal tibial fractures are intramedullary nailing (IMN) and locked lateral plating (LLP). The goal of this multicenter, randomized controlled trial was to determine whether there are significant differences in outcomes between these forms of treatment. DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: 16 academic trauma centers. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: 108 patients were enrolled. 99 patients were followed for 12 months. 52 patients were randomized to IMN, and 47 patients were randomized to LLP. INTERVENTION: IMN or lateral locked plating. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Functional scoring including Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment, Bother Index, EQ-5Dindex and EQ-5DVAS. Secondary measures included alignment, operative time, range of motion, union rate, pain, walking ability, ability to manage stairs, need for ambulatory aid and number, and complications. RESULTS: Functional testing demonstrated no difference between the groups, but both groups were still significantly affected 12 months postinjury. Similarly, there was no difference in time of surgery, alignment, nonunion, pain, walking ability, ability to manage stairs, need for ambulatory support, or complications. CONCLUSIONS: Both IMN and LLP provide for similar outcomes after these fractures. Patients continue to improve over the course of the year after injury but remain impaired even 1 year later. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Asunto(s)
Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas , Fracturas de la Tibia , Humanos , Tibia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugía , Curación de Fractura , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
J Orthop Trauma ; 37(1): 1-7, 2023 01 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35830572

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a Bayesian analysis changes the results of the VANCO trial. DESIGN: A secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial using Bayesian methods. SETTING: Thirty-six US trauma centers. PATIENTS: Patients ages 18-80 years with a tibial plateau or pilon fracture deemed high risk of infection and definitively treated with plate and screw fixation. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly allocated to receive 1000 mg of intrawound vancomycin powder at their definitive fixation or to a control group that received no topical antibiotics. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: A deep surgical site infection requiring operative treatment within 6 months of definitive fixation. Secondary outcomes included gram-positive and gram-negative-only deep surgical site infections. RESULTS: Of the 980 patients randomized, 874 (89%) had at least 140 days of follow-up and were included in this Bayesian analysis. The estimated probability that intrawound vancomycin powder reduces the risk of a deep surgical site infection is >98% [relative risk (RR), 0.66; 95% credible interval (CrI), 0.46-0.98]. There is a >99% chance intrawound vancomycin powder reduces gram-positive infections and an 80% chance the magnitude of this risk reduction exceeds 35% (RR, 0.52; 95% CrI, 0.33-0.84) exists. It is unlikely (44%) that intrawound vancomycin powder prevents gram-negative surgical site infections (RR, 1.06; 95% CrI, 0.48-2.45). CONCLUSIONS: There is a high probability (>98%) that intrawound vancomycin powder reduces deep surgical site infections in patients with tibial plateau or pilon fractures at high risk of infection and even more likely it reduces deep infections with gram-positive pathogens (>99%). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas de la Tibia , Vancomicina , Humanos , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Vancomicina/uso terapéutico , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/tratamiento farmacológico , Teorema de Bayes , Polvos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugía , Fracturas de la Tibia/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos
4.
J Orthop Trauma ; 37(2): 70-76, 2023 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36026544

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The 2 main forms of treatment for distal femur fractures are locked lateral plating and retrograde nailing. The goal of this trial was to determine whether there are significant differences in outcomes between these forms of treatment. DESIGN: Multicenter randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Twenty academic trauma centers. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: One hundred sixty patients with distal femur fractures were enrolled. One hundred twenty-six patients were followed 12 months. Patients were randomized to plating in 62 cases and intramedullary nailing in 64 cases. INTERVENTION: Lateral locked plating or retrograde intramedullary nailing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Functional scoring including Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment, bother index, EQ Health, and EQ Index. Secondary measures included alignment, operative time, range of motion, union rate, walking ability, ability to manage stairs, and number and type of adverse events. RESULTS: Functional testing showed no difference between the groups. Both groups were still significantly affected by their fracture 12 months after injury. There was more coronal plane valgus in the plating group, which approached statistical significance. Range of motion, walking ability, and ability to manage stairs were similar between the groups. Rate and type of adverse events were not statistically different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both lateral locked plating and retrograde intramedullary nailing are reasonable surgical options for these fractures. Patients continue to improve over the course of the year after injury but remain impaired 1 year postoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Femorales Distales , Fracturas del Fémur , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas , Fracturas Óseas , Humanos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Placas Óseas , Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Fracturas del Fémur/etiología , Curación de Fractura
5.
Injury ; 53(7): 2557-2561, 2022 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35249740

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There remain gaps in knowledge regarding the pathophysiology, initial diagnosis, treatment, and outcome of acute compartment syndrome (ACS). Most reported clinical outcomes are from smaller studies of heterogeneous patients. For a disease associated with a financial burden to society that represents billions of dollars worldwide the literature does not currently establish baseline diagnostic parameters and risk factors that may serve to predict treatment and outcomes. METHODS: This study looks at a very large cohort of trauma patients obtained from four recent years of the Trauma Quality Programs data from the American College of Surgeons. From 3,924,127 trauma cases - 203,500 patients with tibial fractures were identified and their records examined for demographic information, potential risk factors for compartment syndrome, an associated coded diagnosis of muscle necrosis, and presence of other outcomes associated with compartment syndrome. A recurrent multiple logistic regression model was used to identify factors predictive of fasciotomy. The results were compared to the reported results from the literature to validate the findings. RESULTS: The rate of fasciotomy treatment for ACS was 4.3% in the cohort of identified patients. The analysis identified several clinical predictors of fasciotomy. Proximal and midshaft tibial fractures (P <0.0001) showed highest increases in the likelihood of ACS. Open fractures were twice (O.R [2.20-2.42]) as likely to have ACS. Having a complex fracture (P<0.0001), substance abuse disorder (P<0.0002), cirrhosis (P = 0.002) or smoking (P<0.0051) all increased the likelihood of ACS. Age decreased the likelihood by 1% per year (OR= [0.99-0.993]). Crush and penetrating injuries showed an important increase in the likelihood of ACS (O.R of 1.83 and 1.37 respectively). Additionally, sex, BMI, cirrhosis, tobacco smoking and fracture pattern as defined by OTA group and OTA subgroup had predictive value on actual myonecrosis. Fasciotomies for open tibial fractures were more likely to uncover significant muscle necrosis compared to closed fractures. Amputation resulted after 5.4% of fasciotomies. CONCLUSION: This big data approach shows us that ACS is primarily linked to the extent of soft tissue damage. However, newfound effect of some comorbidities like cirrhosis and hypertension on the risk of ACS imply other mechanisms.


Asunto(s)
Síndromes Compartimentales , Fracturas Abiertas , Fracturas de la Tibia , Macrodatos , Síndromes Compartimentales/diagnóstico , Síndromes Compartimentales/epidemiología , Síndromes Compartimentales/etiología , Fasciotomía/métodos , Fracturas Abiertas/complicaciones , Fracturas Abiertas/cirugía , Humanos , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Necrosis , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas de la Tibia/complicaciones , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugía
6.
J Orthop Trauma ; 36(2): 98-103, 2022 Feb 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35061652

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether inpatient mobilization (defined as ambulation before hospital discharge) is associated with 1-year mortality and 90-day hospital readmission in patients treated with a hip hemiarthroplasty for a femoral neck fracture. DESIGN: Retrospective case-control. SETTING: Academic Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred twelve consecutive femoral neck fractures were treated with hip hemiarthroplasties with a minimum of 1 year of follow-up. INTERVENTION: All study patients were treated with a hip hemiarthroplasty and weight-bearing as tolerated postoperative day 1. Patients were prescribed daily physical therapy with the goal of mobilization before discharge from hospital. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mortality at 1 year; hospital readmission within 90 days. RESULTS: Two hundred twelve patients were included in the study. One-year mortality was 29%. One hundred thirty-two (62%) patients were able to ambulate before hospital discharge. Ambulation with physical therapy before discharge from hospital was a significant predictor of 1-year mortality when compared with patients who were unable to ambulate (hazard ratio 0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.94; P = 0.03), which equates to 43% reduction in risk of mortality. There was no difference in the 90-day readmission rates for ambulatory versus nonambulatory patients. CONCLUSIONS: Ambulation with physical therapy before discharge reduced the risk of 1-year mortality by 43%, without an effect on 90-day readmission. Sixty-two percentage of our cohort was able to ambulate before discharge. Future investigations are warranted to further identify those patients at heightened risk of mortality and readmission and the role of early rehabilitation in recovery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Fracturas del Cuello Femoral , Hemiartroplastia , Fracturas del Cuello Femoral/cirugía , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Alta del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
J Orthop Trauma ; 36(Suppl 1): S8-S13, 2022 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34924513

RESUMEN

SUMMARY: In current clinical practice, weight-bearing is typically restricted for up to 12 weeks after definitive fixation of lower extremity periarticular fractures. However, muscle atrophy resulting from restricting weight-bearing has a deleterious effect on bone healing and overall limb function. Antigravity treadmill therapy may improve recovery by allowing patients to safely load the limb during therapy, thereby reducing the negative consequences of prolonged non-weight-bearing while avoiding complications associated with premature return to full weight-bearing. This article describes a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing outcomes after a 10-week antigravity treadmill therapy program versus standard of care in adult patients with periarticular fractures of the knee and distal tibia. The primary hypothesis is that, compared with patients receiving standard of care, patients receiving antigravity treadmill therapy will report better function 6 months after definitive treatment.


Asunto(s)
Nivel de Atención , Fracturas de la Tibia , Adulto , Prueba de Esfuerzo , Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Humanos , Soporte de Peso
8.
J Orthop Trauma ; 36(Suppl 1): S26-S32, 2022 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34924516

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the retrospective decision of an expert panel who assessed likelihood of acute compartment syndrome (ACS) in a patient with a high-risk tibia fracture with decision to perform fasciotomy. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Seven Level 1 trauma centers. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: One hundred eighty-two adults with severe tibia fractures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and receiver-operator curve) of an expert panel's assessment of likelihood ACS compared with fasciotomy as the reference diagnostic standard. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: The interrater reliability of the expert panel as measured by the Krippendorff alpha. Expert panel consensus was determined using the percent of panelists in the majority group of low (expert panel likelihood of ≤0.3), uncertain (0.3-0.7), or high (>0.7) likelihood of ACS. RESULTS: Comparing fasciotomy (the diagnostic standard) and the expert panel's assessment as the diagnostic classification (test), the expert panel's determination of uncertain or high likelihood of ACS (threshold >0.3) had a sensitivity of 0.90 (0.70, 0.99), specificity of 0.95 (0.90, 0.98), PPV of 0.70 (0.50, 0.86), and NPV of 0.99 (0.95, 1.00). When a threshold of >0.7 was set as a positive diagnosis, the expert panel assessment had a sensitivity of 0.67 (0.43, 0.85), specificity of 0.98 (0.95, 1.00), PPV of 0.82 (0.57, 0.96), and NPV of 0.96 (0.91, 0.98). CONCLUSION: In our study, the retrospective assessment of an expert panel of the likelihood of ACS has good specificity and excellent NPV for fasciotomy, but only low-to-moderate sensitivity and PPV. The discordance between the expert panel-assessed likelihood of ACS and the decision to perform fasciotomy suggests that concern regarding potential diagnostic bias in studies of ACS is warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Asunto(s)
Síndromes Compartimentales , Adulto , Síndromes Compartimentales/diagnóstico , Síndromes Compartimentales/epidemiología , Síndromes Compartimentales/cirugía , Fasciotomía , Humanos , Incidencia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos
9.
J Orthop Trauma ; 35(10): 517-522, 2021 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34510125

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare immediate quality of open reduction of femoral neck fractures by alternative surgical approaches. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Twelve Level 1 North American trauma centers. PATIENTS: Eighty adults 18-65 years of age with isolated, displaced, OTA/AO type 31-B2 or -B3 femoral neck fractures treated with internal fixation. INTERVENTION: Thirty-two modified Smith-Petersen anterior approaches versus 48 Watson-Jones anterolateral approaches for open reduction performed by fellowship-trained orthopaedic trauma surgeons. MAIN OUTCOME: Reduction quality as assessed by 3 senior orthopaedic traumatologists as "acceptable" or "unacceptable" on AP and lateral postoperative radiographs. RESULTS: No difference was observed in the rate of acceptable reduction by modified Smith-Petersen (81%) versus Watson-Jones (81%) approach (risk difference null, 95% confidence interval -17.4% to 17.4%, P = 1.00) with 90.4% panel agreement (Fleiss' weighted κ = 0.63, P < 0.01). Stratified analyses did not identify a significant difference in the rate of acceptable reduction between approaches when stratified by Pauwels angle, basicervical or transcervical fracture location, or posterior comminution. The Smith-Petersen approach afforded a better reduction when preoperative skeletal traction was not applied (RR = 1.67 [95% CI 1.10-2.52] vs. RR = 0.87 [95% CI 0.70-1.08], P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: No difference was observed in the quality of open reduction of displaced femoral neck fractures in young adults when a Watson-Jones anterolateral approach versus a modified Smith-Petersen anterior approach was performed by orthopaedic trauma surgeons. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas del Cuello Femoral , Fracturas Conminutas , Fracturas del Cuello Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas del Cuello Femoral/cirugía , Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Humanos , Reducción Abierta , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
10.
Injury ; 52(8): 2395-2402, 2021 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33712297

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the factors that influence the timing of definitive fixation in the management of bilateral femoral shaft fractures and the outcomes for patients with these injuries. METHODS: Patients with bilateral femur fractures treated between 1998 to 2019 at ten level-1 trauma centers were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were grouped into early or delayed fixation, which was defined as definitive fixation of both femurs within or greater than 24 hours from injury, respectively. Statistical analysis included reversed logistic odds regression to predict which variable(s) was most likely to determine timing to definitive fixation. The outcomes included age, sex, high-volume institution, ISS, GCS, admission lactate, and admission base deficit. RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-eight patients were included; 164 patients were included in the early fixation group and 164 patients in the delayed fixation group. Patients managed with delayed fixation had a higher Injury Severity Score (26.8 vs 22.4; p<0.01), higher admission lactate (4.4 and 3.0; p<0.01), and a lower Glasgow Coma Scale (10.7 vs 13; p<0.01). High-volume institution was the most reliable influencer for time to definitive fixation, successfully determining 78.6% of patients, followed by admission lactate, 64.4%. When all variables were evaluated in conjunction, high-volume institution remained the strongest contributor (X2 statistic: institution: 45.6, ISS: 8.83, lactate: 6.77, GCS: 0.94). CONCLUSION: In this study, high-volume institution was the strongest predictor of timing to definitive fixation in patients with bilateral femur fractures. This study demonstrates an opportunity to create a standardized care pathway for patients with these injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas del Fémur , Traumatismo Múltiple , Fracturas del Fémur/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Fémur , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros Traumatológicos
11.
Injury ; 52 Suppl 2: S18-S22, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33563416

RESUMEN

Bone grafting has over 100 years of successful clinical use. Despite the successes of autograft bone transplantation, complications of bone grafting are significant, mostly at the donor site. This article reviews the biology of fracture healing, the properties of bone grafts, and reviews the specific advantages and problems associated with autograft bone. Recent techniques such as the Reamer Irrigator Aspirator are described, which has dramatically reduced complications of bone autograft harvesting.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante Óseo , Recolección de Tejidos y Órganos , Autoinjertos , Curación de Fractura , Humanos , Irrigación Terapéutica , Trasplante Autólogo
12.
J Orthop Trauma ; 35(9): 499-504, 2021 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33512861

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate rates of complications in patients with bilateral femur fractures treated with intramedullary nailing (IMN) during either 1 single procedure or 2 separate procedures. DESIGN: A multicenter retrospective review of patients sustaining bilateral femur fractures, treated with IMN in single or 2-stage procedure, from 1998 to 2018 was performed at 10 Level-1 trauma centers. SETTING: Ten Level-1 trauma centers. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred forty-six patients with bilateral femur fractures. INTERVENTIONS: Intramedullary nailing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of complications. RESULTS: A total of 246 patients were included, with 188 single-stage and 58 two-stage patients. Gender, age, injury severity score, abbreviated injury score, secondary injuries, Glasgow coma scale, and proportion of open fractures were similar between both groups. Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) occurred at higher rates in the 2-stage group (13.8% vs. 5.9%; P value = 0.05). When further adjusted for age, gender, injury severity score, abbreviated injury score, Glasgow coma scale, and admission lactate, the single-stage group had a 78% reduced risk for ARDS. In-hospital mortality was higher in the single-stage cohort (2.7% compared with 0%), although this did not meet statistical significance (P = 0.22). CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest multicenter study to date evaluating the outcomes between single- and 2-stage IMN fixation for bilateral femoral shaft fractures. Single-stage bilateral femur IMN may decrease rates of ARDS in polytrauma patients who are able to undergo simultaneous definitive fixation. However, a future prospective study with standardized protocols in place will be required to discern whether single- versus 2-stage fixation has an effect on mortality and to identify those individuals at risk. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas del Fémur , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas , Fracturas del Fémur/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Fémur , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
13.
J Orthop Trauma ; 35(4): 211-216, 2021 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32931687

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine the factors associated with successful union and eradication of infection in the setting of staged procedures to treat obviously infected nonunions of long bones. We hypothesize that patients with positive intraoperative cultures obtained at the time of definitive surgery for infected nonunions are more likely to have persistent nonunion than those with negative cultures. DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective review. SETTING: Eight academic Level 1 trauma centers. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Patients who underwent staged management for obviously infected nonunion of a long bone. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: For each patient, initial fracture management, management of retained implants, number of debridements, grafting, bacteriology, antibiotic course, bone defect management, soft-tissue coverage, and definitive surgery performed were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 134 patients were treated with staged procedures for obviously infected nonunion of a long bone (mean age 49 years, 60% open fractures, and mean follow-up 22 months). During definitive procedures, 120 patients had intraoperative cultures taken with 43% having positive cultures. For culture-positive patients, 41 patients achieved eventual union and 10 had persistent nonunion. Of 69 culture-negative patients, 66 achieved eventual union and 3 had persistent nonunion. The number of patients with union versus persistent nonunion was statistically significant between culture-positive and culture-negative groups (P = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Management of infected nonunion in long bones with staged treatments before definitive fixation are beneficial but ultimately less effective when performed in the setting of positive bacterial cultures at the time of definitive management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Abiertas , Fracturas no Consolidadas , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Fracturas Abiertas/tratamiento farmacológico , Fracturas Abiertas/cirugía , Fracturas no Consolidadas/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas no Consolidadas/tratamiento farmacológico , Fracturas no Consolidadas/cirugía , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg ; 29(5): 183-188, 2021 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33337823

RESUMEN

The Major Extremity Trauma and Rehabilitation Consortium and the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons have developed the Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Compartment Syndrome (ACS). Evidence-based information, in conjunction with the clinical expertise of physicians, was used to develop the criteria to improve patient care, aid decision-making, and obtain the best possible outcomes while considering the subtleties and distinctions necessary in making clinical decisions. The AUC for the Diagnosis and Management of ACS were derived by identifying clinical indications typical of patients suspected of an ACS in clinical practice. These indications were most often parameters observable by the clinician, including symptoms or results of diagnostic tests. The 135 patient scenarios and five treatments were developed by the writing panel, a group of clinicians who are specialists in this AUC topic. Next, a separate, multidisciplinary, voting panel (made up of specialists and nonspecialists) rated the appropriateness of treatment of each patient scenario using a nine-point scale to designate a treatment as "appropriate" (median rating, seven to nine), "may be appropriate" (median rating, four to six), or "rarely appropriate" (median rating, one to three).


Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Síndromes Compartimentales , Síndromes Compartimentales/diagnóstico , Síndromes Compartimentales/terapia , Humanos
16.
J Orthop Trauma ; 34(10): 518-523, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32379231

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To identify potential physiologic markers of muscle ischemia to serve as diagnostic indicators of compartment syndrome. We hypothesize that muscle bundles in hypoxic conditions will elicit decreases in potential hydrogen (pH) and increases in lactate and potassium that correlates with decreased muscle twitch forces. METHODS: We performed an ex vivo evaluation of individual skeletal muscle bundles obtained from a swine's diaphragm that were exposed to hypoxic conditions and compared with control groups. Over a 4-hour period, we evaluated the following parameters for each muscle bundle: muscle twitch forces and levels of potassium, lactate, and pH. Comparisons between the hypoxic and control groups were calculated at each time point using the 2-tailed Wilcoxon rank sum test for nonparametric data. Longitudinal associations between biomarkers and muscle twitch forces were tested using repeated measures analyses. RESULTS: The hypoxic group elicited more significant decreases in normalized muscle twitch forces than the control group at all time points (0.15 g vs. 0.55 g at 4 hours, P < 0.001). Repeated measures analyses of the hypoxic group demonstrated a statistically significant association between potassium, lactate, and normalized peak force over the course of time. Potassium demonstrated the strongest association with a 1 mmol/L unit increase in potassium associated with a 2.9 g decrease in normalized peak force (95% confidence interval -3.3 to -2.4, P < 0.001). The pH of all muscle baths increased over the course of time at similar rates between the study groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study used an ex vivo ischemic skeletal muscle model as a representation for pathophysiologic pathways associated with compartment syndrome. In this experimental approach we were unable to evaluate the pH of the muscle bundles due to continuous applied gassing. Our findings support further evaluations of potassium and lactate levels as potential diagnostic markers.


Asunto(s)
Síndromes Compartimentales , Músculo Esquelético , Biomarcadores , Síndromes Compartimentales/diagnóstico , Humanos , Isquemia/diagnóstico
17.
J Orthop Trauma ; 34(6): 287-293, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32332336

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of perfusion pressure (PP) thresholds for fasciotomy. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Seven Level-1 trauma centers. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fifty adults with severe leg injuries and ≥2 hours of continuous PP data who had been enrolled in a multicenter observational trial designed to develop a clinical prediction rule for acute compartment syndrome (ACS). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: For each patient, a given PP criterion was positive if it was below the specified threshold for at least 2 consecutive hours. The diagnostic performance of PP thresholds between 10 and 30 mm Hg was determined using 2 reference standards for comparison: (1) the likelihood of ACS as determined by an expert panel who reviewed each patient's data portfolio or (2) whether the patient underwent fasciotomy. RESULTS: Using the likelihood of ACS as the diagnostic standard (ACS considered present if median likelihood ≥70%, absent if <30%), a PP threshold of 30 mm Hg had diagnostic sensitivity 0.83, specificity 0.53, positive predictive value 0.07, and negative predictive value 0.99. Results were insensitive to more strict likelihood categorizations and were similar for other PP thresholds between 10- and 25-mm Hg. Using fasciotomy as the reference standard, the same PP threshold had diagnostic sensitivity 0.50, specificity 0.50, positive predictive value 0.04, negative predictive value 0.96. CONCLUSION: No value of PP from 10 to 30 mm Hg had acceptable diagnostic performance, regardless of which reference diagnostic standard was used. These data question current practice of diagnosing ACS based on PP and suggest the need for further research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Asunto(s)
Síndromes Compartimentales , Adulto , Síndromes Compartimentales/diagnóstico , Síndromes Compartimentales/cirugía , Fasciotomía , Humanos , Perfusión , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos
18.
J Orthop Trauma ; 34(6): 294-301, 2020 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32079891

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine (1) which factors are associated with the choice to perform an open reduction and (2) by adjusting for these factors, if the choice of reduction method is associated with reoperation. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study with radiograph and chart review. SETTING: Twelve Level 1 North American trauma centers. PATIENTS: Two hundred thirty-four adults 18-65 years of age with an isolated, displaced, OTA/AO type 31-B2 or type 31-B3 femoral neck fracture treated with internal fixation with minimum of 6-month follow-up or reoperation. Exclusion criteria were pathologic fractures, associated femoral head or shaft fractures, and primary arthroplasty. INTERVENTION: Open or closed reduction technique during internal fixation. MAIN OUTCOME: Cox proportional hazard of reoperation adjusting for propensity score for open reduction based on injury, demographic, and medical factors. Reduction quality was assessed by 3 senior orthopaedic traumatologists as "acceptable" or "unacceptable" on AP and lateral postoperative radiographs. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 1.5 years. One hundred six (45%) patients underwent open reduction. Reduction quality was not significantly affected by open versus closed approach (71% vs. 69% acceptable, P = 0.378). The propensity to receive an open reduction was associated with study center; younger age; male sex; no history of injection drug use, osteoporosis, or cerebrovascular disease; transcervical fracture location; posterior fracture comminution; and surgery within 12 hours. A total of 35 (33%) versus 28 (22%) reoperations occurred after open versus closed reduction (P = 0.056). Open reduction was associated with a 2.4-fold greater propensity-adjusted hazard of reoperation (95% confidence interval 1.3-4.4, P = 0.004). A total of 35 (15%) patients underwent subsequent total hip arthroplasty or hemiarthroplasty. CONCLUSIONS: Open reduction of displaced femoral neck fractures in nonelderly adults is associated with a greater hazard of reoperation without significantly improving reduction. Prospective randomized trials are indicated to confirm a causative effect of open versus closed reduction on outcomes after femoral neck fracture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas del Cuello Femoral , Adulto , Fracturas del Cuello Femoral/cirugía , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg ; 28(3): e108-e114, 2020 Feb 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31977609

RESUMEN

The Management of Acute Compartment Syndrome Clinical Practice Guideline is based on a systematic review of current scientific and clinical research. The purpose of this clinical practice guideline is to guide the clinician's ability to diagnose and treat acute compartment syndrome by providing evidence-based recommendations for key decisions that affect the management of patients with extremity trauma. This guideline contains 15 recommendations including both diagnosis and treatment. In addition, the workgroup highlighted the need for better research in the diagnosis and treatment of acute compartment syndrome.


Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Síndromes Compartimentales/fisiopatología , Síndromes Compartimentales/terapia , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Examen Físico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto
20.
J Orthop Trauma ; 33 Suppl 7: S5-S10, 2019 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31596777

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Rising health care expenditures and declining reimbursements have generated interest in providing interventions of value. The use of external fixation is a commonly used intermediate procedure for the staged treatment of unstable fractures. External fixator constructs can vary in design and costs based on selected component configuration. The objective of this study was to evaluate cost variation and relationships to injury and noninjury characteristics in temporizing external fixation of tibial plateau fractures. We hypothesize that construct costs are highly variable and present no noticeable patterns with both injury and noninjury characteristics. METHODS: A retrospective review of tibial plateau fractures treated with initial temporizing external fixation between 2010 and 2016 at 2 Level I trauma centers was conducted. Fracture and patient characteristics including age, body mass index, AO/OTA classification, and Schatzker fracture classification were observed with construct cost. In addition, injury-independent characteristics of surgeon education, site of procedure, and date of procedure were evaluated with construct cost. Factors associated with cost variation were assessed using nonparametric comparative and goodness-of-fit regression tests. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-one patient cases were reviewed. The mean knee spanning fixator construct cost was $4947 (95% confidence interval = $4742-$5152). The overall range in construct costs was from $1848 to $11,568. The mean duration of use was 16.4 days. No strong correlations were noted between construct cost and patient demographics (r = 0.02), fracture characteristics (r = 0.02), or injury-independent characteristics (r = 0.10). Finally, there was no significant difference between constructs of traumatologists and other orthopaedic surgeon subspecialists (P = 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: Temporizing external fixation of tibial plateau is a high-cost intervention per unit of time and exhibits massive variation in the mean cost. This presents an ideal opportunity for cost savings by reducing excessive variation in implant component selection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III. Retrospective Cohort.


Asunto(s)
Fijadores Externos/economía , Fijación de Fractura/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugía , Ahorro de Costo , Fijación de Fractura/instrumentación , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas de la Tibia/economía , Fracturas de la Tibia/etiología , Centros Traumatológicos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...