RESUMEN
Evidence-based treatments have been developed for a range of pediatric mental health conditions. These interventions have proven efficacy but require trained pediatric behavioral health specialists for their administration. Unfortunately, the widespread shortage of behavioral health specialists leaves few referral options for primary care providers. As a result, primary care providers are frequently required to support young patients during their lengthy and often fruitless search for specialty treatment. One solution to this treatment-access gap is to draw from the example of integrated behavioral health and adapt brief evidence-based treatments for intra-disciplinary delivery by primary care providers in consultation with mental health providers. This solution has potential to expand access to evidence-based interventions and improve patient outcomes. We outline how an 8-step theory-based process for adapting evidence-based interventions, developed from a scoping review of the wide range of implementation science frameworks, can guide treatment development and implementation for pediatric behavioral health care delivery in the primary care setting, using an example of our innovative treatment adaptation for child and adolescent eating disorders. After reviewing the literature, obtaining input from leaders in eating disorder treatment research, and engaging community stakeholders, we adapted Family-Based Treatment for delivery in primary care. Pilot data suggest that the intervention is feasible to implement in primary care and preliminary findings suggest a large effect on adolescent weight gain. Our experience using this implementation framework provides a model for primary care providers looking to develop intra-disciplinary solutions for other areas where specialty services are insufficient to meet patient needs.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Alimentación y de la Ingestión de Alimentos , Servicios de Salud Mental , Humanos , Adolescente , Niño , Trastornos de Alimentación y de la Ingestión de Alimentos/terapia , Terapia Conductista , Salud Mental , Atención Primaria de SaludRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Suboptimal vitamin D levels are implicated in low bone mineral density, a common medical complication of anorexia nervosa. This study aimed to examine the frequency of vitamin D assessment and treatment for adolescents with anorexia nervosa in outpatient medical management. DESIGN AND METHODS: Retrospective chart review was used to examine 179 adolescents (M age = 15.5 years, SD = 2.2), newly diagnosed with anorexia nervosa at a tertiary care medical center in the United States between January 2000 and July 2016. RESULTS: Only 16% of patients (n = 29) received serum vitamin D assessments following diagnosis, of whom 52% had suboptimal vitamin D levels (n = 15). Only three patients with suboptimal vitamin D were advised to begin supplementation. No patients in our sample were encouraged to begin prophylactic vitamin D supplementation. CONCLUSIONS/PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Findings from this study highlight the critical need for widespread care team education about vitamin D assessment and treatment in the medical management of adolescents with anorexia nervosa, particularly in light of the potentially serious consequences of bone mineral density.
Asunto(s)
Anorexia Nerviosa , Vitamina D , Adolescente , Anorexia Nerviosa/diagnóstico , Anorexia Nerviosa/terapia , Densidad Ósea , Escolaridad , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vitamina D/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
The purpose of this study was to test the Let's Go 5-2-1-0 program delivered through motivational interviewing by nurses with 4-18-year-old overweight children and parents in primary care (PC). A quasi-experimental design allocated 60 control families to standard clinical care (SCC) and 70 families to SCC plus the 5-2-1-0 intervention. Drop-out rates were 9 and 35% at 6 months and 25 and 41% at 12 months, respectively for control and intervention participants. BMI percentile trended (p = .057) toward decline (M change = -3.0 versus -1.5) for intervention children at 6 months (n = 52 control, 44 intervention), and nonsignificantly (p = 0.14) for both groups (43 control, 40 intervention) at 12 months (controls -1.9, intervention -4.6). Intervention effects were found for self-reported daily fruit/vegetable consumption, physical activity, and screen time. Satisfaction was high. Further study of the PC nursing intervention is warranted.