Multicenter assessment of HIV-1 RNA quantitation in semen in the CREAThE network.

Detection of HIV-1 RNA in semen is used commonly to determine the safety of semen processing procedures before assisted reproductive technology (ART). Using two panels of prepared semen samples containing HIV-1 the performances of protocols from 14 centers have been compared. No false-positive results were detected but false-negative results were frequent when the concentration was below 500 HIV-1 RNA copies/ml of seminal plasma. Frequency of HIV-1 RNA detection was higher on seminal cells than on seminal plasma. Assays (or protocols) for quantifying HIV-1 RNA in semen performed less well than standardized blood plasma assays. The HIV load in seminal plasma could be a useful marker of the risk of sexual transmission of the virus. Its use as a marker of global HAART efficiency in the HIV reservoir needs further study. Standardized assays are required for detection and measurement of HIV-1 RNA in semen samples.

Evaluation of the Roche Cobas TaqMan and Abbott RealTime extraction-quantification systems for HIV-1 subtypes.

OBJECTIVES: We conducted a comparison of the Abbott Molecular RealTime (Rungis, France) and Roche Diagnostics Cobas Taqman (Meylan, France) automated nucleic acid extraction and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification systems for their capacity to quantify HIV RNA of various subtypes. The systems were tested on culture supernatants belonging to HIV-1 group M (n = 29), HIV-1 group O (n = 8), and HIV-2 (n = 7). We also tested 88 plasma samples from patients infected with HIV-1 group M (B-D [n = 7], A-CRF01 [n = 16], CRF02 [n = 49], and other strains [n = 16]). RESULTS: The Abbott RealTime system quantified all 29 HIV-1 group M supernatants. One of these samples was not detected by the Roche Cobas TaqMan system. The Abbott RealTime system quantified 7 HIV-1 group O strains. Neither technique cross-reacted with HIV-2. The 79% intraclass correlation coefficient for the 88 plasma samples was barely acceptable, but 4 plasma samples were underestimated by more than 1 log by the Roche Cobas TaqMan system. Similar values were obtained for subtype B and D strains with the tests, indicating that the primers and probes are suitable for these strains. In contrast, the large differences observed with other subtypes, particularly CRF02, show the importance of primer and probe selection. CONCLUSION: The limitation of real-time PCR to span the entire diversity of HIV must be taken into account during treatment monitoring, resistance studies, and clinical trials.

Multicenter quality control of the detection of HIV-1 genome in semen before medically assisted procreation.

Couples in whom the man is HIV-1-positive may use medically assisted procreation in order to conceive a child without contaminating the female partner. But, before medically assisted procreation, the semen has to be processed to exclude HIV and tested for HIV nucleic acid before and after processing. The performance was evaluated of the technical protocols used to detect and quantify HIV-1 in 11 centers providing medically assisted procreation for couples with HIV-1 infected men by testing panels of seminal plasma and cells containing HIV-1 RNA and/or DNA. The performance of these tests varied due to the different assays used. False positive results were obtained in 14-19% of cases. The sensitivity for RNA detection in seminal plasma was 500-1,000 RNA copies/ml, over 500 RNA copies/10(6) cells in semen cells, and for DNA detection in semen cells 50-500 DNA copies/10(6) cells. The use of silica-based extraction seemed to increase the assay performance, whereas the use of internal controls to detect PCR inhibitor did not. This first quality control highlights the need for technical improvements of the assays to detect and quantify HIV in semen fractions and for regular evaluation of their performance.

Assisted reproduction techniques for HIV serodiscordant couples: 18 months of experience.

BACKGROUND: Assisted reproduction techniques can minimize the risk of infection and treat possible sterility associated with serodiscordant couples. METHODS: We assessed the efficacy of these techniques in 57 couples in which at least one partner had human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) infection that was currently under control (47 men and 10 women). The semen of seropositive men was prepared and tested for viruses. Assisted reproduction techniques included intrauterine insemination (IUI), IVF and especially ICSI, with ovarian stimulation that used a long agonist protocol and recombinant FSH. Embryos were transferred on day 3 after oocyte retrieval. RESULTS: For couples with seropositive men, five IUI and 49 IVF or ICSI attempts were perfomed, whilst for seropositive women these numbers were three IUI and 12 IVF or ICSI. No pregnancy occurred following the eight IUI trials. Seroconversion was not observed in any partners of seropositive men. Efficacy of treatment for these couples with ICSI was good, the clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transfer was 48.8%. The results for seropositive women were disappointing, with a clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transfer of 9.1%. Fourteen babies from 47 treated couples have so far been born and no pregnancies from IUI. CONCLUSIONS: Assisted reproduction techniques and particularly ICSI provide HIV-1-seropositive men with a safe and highly effective means of fathering children. These techniques may be less effective for seropositive women.