Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Leukemia ; 38(1): 181-192, 2024 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37898670

RESUMEN

Targeting nucleotide biosynthesis is a proven strategy for the treatment of cancer but is limited by toxicity, reflecting the fundamental nucleotide requirement of dividing cells. The rate limiting step in de novo pyrimidine synthesis is of interest, being catalyzed by two homologous enzymes, CTP synthase 1 (CTPS1) and CTPS2, that could be differentially targeted. Herein, analyses of publicly available datasets identified an essential role for CTPS1 in multiple myeloma (MM), linking high expression of CTPS1 (but not CTPS2) with advanced disease and poor outcomes. In cellular experiments, CTPS1 knockout induced apoptosis of MM cell lines. Exposure of MM cells to STP-B, a novel and highly selective pharmacological inhibitor of CTPS1, inhibited proliferation, induced S phase arrest and led to cell death by apoptosis. Mechanistically, CTPS1 inhibition by STP-B activated DNA damage response (DDR) pathways and induced double-strand DNA breaks which accumulated in early S phase. Combination of STP-B with pharmacological inhibitors of key components of the DDR pathway (ATR, CHEK1 or WEE1) resulted in synergistic growth inhibition and early apoptosis. Taken together, these findings identify CTPS1 as a promising new target in MM, either alone or in combination with DDR pathway inhibition.


Asunto(s)
Mieloma Múltiple , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/genética , Apoptosis , Muerte Celular , Proteínas de la Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutada , Nucleótidos , Daño del ADN , Línea Celular Tumoral , Quinasa 1 Reguladora del Ciclo Celular (Checkpoint 1)/metabolismo , Proteínas Tirosina Quinasas , Proteínas de Ciclo Celular/metabolismo
3.
Front Cell Dev Biol ; 9: 634371, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33777943

RESUMEN

Tumors and the tumor microenvironment produce multiple growth factors that influence cancer cell behavior via various signal transduction pathways. Growth factors, like transforming growth factor ß (TGFß) and epidermal growth factor (EGF), have been shown to induce proliferation, migration, and invasion in different cell models. Both factors are frequently overexpressed in cancer and will often act in combination. Although both factors are being used as rational targets in clinical oncology, the similarities and differences of their contributions to cancer cell migration and invasion are not fully understood. Here we compared the impact of treating A549 lung adenocarcinoma cells with TGFß, EGF, and both in combination by applying videomicroscopy, functional assays, immunoblotting, real-time PCR, and proteomics. Treatment with both factors stimulated A549 migration to a similar extent, but with different kinetics. The combination had an additive effect. EGF-induced migration depended on activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. However, this pathway was dispensable for TGFß-induced migration, despite a strong activation of this pathway by TGFß. Proteome analysis (data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD023024) revealed an overlap in expression patterns of migration-related proteins and associated gene ontology (GO) terms by TGFß and EGF. Further, only TGFß induced the expression of epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT)-related proteins like matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP2). EGF, in contrast, made no major contribution to EMT marker expression on either the protein or the transcript level. In line with these expression patterns, TGFß treatment significantly increased the invasive capacity of A549 cells, while EGF treatment did not. Moreover, the addition of EGF failed to enhance TGFß-induced invasion. Overall, these data suggest that TGFß and EGF can partly compensate for each other for stimulation of cell migration, but abrogation of TGFß signaling may be more suitable to suppress cell invasion.

4.
Nat Commun ; 10(1): 2921, 2019 07 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31266943

RESUMEN

Cells maintain the balance between homeostasis and inflammation by adapting and integrating the activity of intracellular signaling cascades, including the JAK-STAT pathway. Our understanding of how a tailored switch from homeostasis to a strong receptor-dependent response is coordinated remains limited. Here, we use an integrated transcriptomic and proteomic approach to analyze transcription-factor binding, gene expression and in vivo proximity-dependent labelling of proteins in living cells under homeostatic and interferon (IFN)-induced conditions. We show that interferons (IFN) switch murine macrophages from resting-state to induced gene expression by alternating subunits of transcription factor ISGF3. Whereas preformed STAT2-IRF9 complexes control basal expression of IFN-induced genes (ISG), both type I IFN and IFN-γ cause promoter binding of a complete ISGF3 complex containing STAT1, STAT2 and IRF9. In contrast to the dogmatic view of ISGF3 formation in the cytoplasm, our results suggest a model wherein the assembly of the ISGF3 complex occurs on DNA.


Asunto(s)
Regulación de la Expresión Génica , Subunidad gamma del Factor 3 de Genes Estimulados por el Interferón/metabolismo , Factor 3 de Genes Estimulados por el Interferón/metabolismo , Interferones/metabolismo , Factor de Transcripción STAT2/metabolismo , Animales , Femenino , Humanos , Factor 3 de Genes Estimulados por el Interferón/genética , Subunidad gamma del Factor 3 de Genes Estimulados por el Interferón/genética , Macrófagos/metabolismo , Masculino , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Ratones Noqueados , Regiones Promotoras Genéticas , Células RAW 264.7 , Factor de Transcripción STAT1/genética , Factor de Transcripción STAT1/metabolismo , Factor de Transcripción STAT2/genética , Transcripción Genética
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...