Perinephric Toxic Fat: Impact on Surgical Complexity, Perioperative Outcome, and Surgical Approach in Partial Nephrectomy.

INTRODUCTION: To assess influencing factors on perinephric toxic fat (high Mayo Adhesive Probability [MAP] score) and the impact of high MAP scores on surgical complexity, perioperative outcome, and surgical approach in patients with localized renal tumors undergoing open (OPN) and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). METHODS: 698 patients were included in this study. Based on preoperative imaging, adherent perinephric fat (APF) was assessed to define MAP scores. Regression analyses assessed influencing parameters for high MAP scores (≥3), predictors of surgical outcome, and influencing factors on surgical approach. RESULTS: OPN was performed in 331 (47%) patients, and 367 (53%) patients underwent RAPN. Male gender (p < 0.001), age ≥65 (p < 0.001), and BMI ≥27.4 kg/m2 (p < 0.001) showed to be significantly influencing factors for the presence of APF. High MAP scores showed to be an influencing factor for a prolonged surgery duration (OR = 1.68, 95% CI 1.22-2.31, p = 0.002) and a significant predictor to rather undergo OPN than RAPN (OR = 1.5, 95% CI 1.05-2.15, p = 0.027). CONCLUSION: Older, male patients with high BMI scores have a higher risk for APF. The presence of APF increases surgery time and may have an impact on decision making regarding the preferred surgical approach.

Impact of Surgical Experience Before Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy on Surgical Outcomes: A Multicenter Analysis of 2500 Patients.

Background: Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is a challenging procedure that is influenced by a multitude of factors. Objective: To assess the impact of prior surgical experience on perioperative outcomes in RAPN. Design setting and participants: In this retrospective multicenter study, results for 2548 RAPNs performed by 25 surgeons at eight robotic referral centers were analyzed. Perioperative data for all consecutive RAPNs from the start of each individual surgeon's experience were collected, as well as the number of prior open or laparoscopic kidney surgeries, pelvic surgeries (open, laparoscopic, robotic), and other robotic interventions. Intervention: Transperitoneal or retroperitoneal RAPN. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The impact of prior surgical experience on operative time, warm ischemia time (WIT), major complications, and margin, ischemia, complication (MIC) score (negative surgical margins, WIT ≤20 min, no major complications) was assessed via univariate and multivariable regression analyses accounting for age, gender, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists score, PADUA score, and RAPN experience. Results and limitations: BMI, PADUA score, and surgical experience in RAPN had a strong impact on perioperative outcomes. A plateau effect for the learning curve was not observed. Prior laparoscopic kidney surgery significantly reduced the operative time (p < 0.001) and WIT (p < 0.001) and improved the MIC rate (p = 0.022). A greater number of prior robotic pelvic interventions decreased WIT (p = 0.011) and the rate of major complications (p < 0.001) and increased the MIC rate (p = 0.011), while prior experience in open kidney surgery did not. One limitation is the short-term follow-up. Conclusions: Mastering of RAPN is an ongoing learning process. However, prior experience in laparoscopic kidney and robot-assisted pelvic surgery seems to improve perioperative outcomes for surgeons when starting with RAPN, while experience in open surgery might not be crucial. Patient summary: In this multicenter analysis, we found that a high degree of experience in keyhole kidney surgery and robot-assisted pelvic surgery helps surgeons in achieving good initial outcomes when starting robot-assisted kidney surgery.

Retroperitoneal Versus Transperitoneal Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: A Multicenter Matched-pair Analysis.

BACKGROUND: With increasing acceptance of robotic partial nephrectomy over the last decade, there is an ongoing discussion about the transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal access. OBJECTIVE: To report outcomes after transperitoneal (TRPN) versus retroperitoneal (RRPN) robotic partial nephrectomy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 754 patients were identified from the databases of three high-volume centers who underwent either TRPN (n = 551) or RRPN (n = 203). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Perioperative data were evaluated retrospectively. A propensity score matched-pair analysis was performed with the following variables: grade of renal insufficiency, age, body mass index, tumor diameter, and preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) score with a subsequent subgroup analysis for tumor location. For quality outcomes, the margin, ischemia, and complications (MIC) criteria were used (negative margins, ischemia time <20 min, and no major complications). Statistical analyses included chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: In all, 176 patients could be matched in each group. The median tumor diameter was 28 mm with a PADUA score of 9. In 11% of RRPN versus 44% of TRPN cases, an anterior tumor location was found, and in 55% versus 30%, a posterior lesion was found (p < 0.001). Operative time (119 vs 139 min, p < 0.001) and warm ischemia time (9 vs 10 min, p = 0.003) were significantly shorter for RRPN. No significant differences were observed between intra- and postoperative complication rates, with 8% major complications in TRPN versus 3% in RRPN (p = 0.06). The MIC criteria were achieved in 90% in the RRPN versus 88% in the TRPN group, without differences for tumor location. CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences between TRPN and RRPN could be found for intraoperative time, while complication rates and quality outcomes were comparable. RRPN can also be a considerable alternative for anterior tumors. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this study, we demonstrate that robotic partial nephrectomy is feasible with either a transperitoneal or a retroperitoneal surgical access. The posterior approach can also be used for anterior renal tumors and may result in shorter operative time.

Are there limits of robotic partial nephrectomy? TRIFECTA outcomes of open and robotic partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors.

BACKGROUND: To compare the outcomes of robot-assisted (RAPN) and open partial nephrectomy (OPN) for completely endophytic renal tumors. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing OPN or RAPN for entirely endophytic tumors in four high-volume centers between 2008 and 2016 were identified. Endophytic masses were identified based on sectional imaging. Patient characteristics and surgical outcome were compared using Mann-Whitney-U-test and chi-squared-tests. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of TRIFECTA achievement and excisional volume loss. RESULTS: Out of 1128 patients, 10.9% (64) of RAPN and 13.9% (76) of OPN underwent surgery for entirely endophytic tumors. Operative time was longer for RAPN (169 vs 140 min, P = 0.03) while ischemia time was shorter (13 vs 18 min, P = 0.001). Complication rates were comparable (21% OPN vs 22% RAPN, P = 0.91) and TRIFECTA achievement was not different between the groups (68% OPN vs 75% RAPN, P = 0.39). In multivariate analyses type of surgery was not associated with TRIFECTA achievement or excisional volume loss. Here, only tumor complexity (OR 0.48, P = 0.001) and size (OR 1.01, P = 0.002) were independent predictors. CONCLUSION: For entirely endophytic tumors, both RAPN and OPN offer good TRIFECTA achievement. This encourages the use of NSS even for these highly complex tumors using the surgeon's preferred approach.

Tumor complexity and the impact on MIC and trifecta in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multi-center study of over 500 cases.

PURPOSE: To demonstrate the surgical feasibility of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for complex renal masses with comparison of low/intermediate risk versus high-risk tumors according to the PADUA score. METHODS: Since 2008, 538 robot-assisted partial nephrectomies were performed at three German robotic centers. Both the MIC (margin, ischemia, complications) criteria and trifecta were applied. RESULTS: 60.1% of the tumors were of low and intermediate complexity (PADUA score 6-9, n = 326, group A), while 39.9% were highly complex (n = 212, score ≥ 10, B). Median clinical tumor size was 28 in A versus 37 mm in B (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in terms of operative time (160 vs. 163 min, p = 0.20); ischemia time was slightly longer for B (11 vs. 12 min, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences for intra- (3.4%, A, vs. 6.6%, B, p = 0.10) or postoperative (21.5%, A, vs. 25.5%, B, p = 0.30) complication rates. There was a median eGFR decrease of - 9.4 (A) versus - 15.1 (B) ml/min (p < 0.001) on discharge. Histopathology revealed an R1 margin rate of 3.4% for the low/intermediate versus 6.1% for the high complexity group (p = 0.14). MIC criteria were fulfilled in 81.9% (A) versus 75.5% (B, p = 0.11) and trifecta criteria in 74.2% (A) versus 68.93% (B, p = 0.26). CONCLUSIONS: Complication rates, histopathology results as well as quality criteria as indicated by MIC and trifecta were similar for high and low complexity groups. Therefore, robot-assisted partial nephrectomy is a safe and feasible option also in highly complex tumors.

Selective clamping under the usage of near-infrared fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a single-surgeon matched-pair study.

PURPOSE: To present a single-surgeon matched-pair analysis to show the feasibility of combining the technique of selective clamping with usage of near-infrared fluorescence imaging in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy and to investigate short-term renal function outcomes. METHODS: Twenty-two patients underwent selective clamping partial nephrectomy with the application of indocyanine green (ICG). Out of this cohort, a matched-pair analysis for R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry parameter was employed for 15 exactly matching partners. Demographic, surgical, pathological and kidney function data were collected for the initial cohort, and matched-pair comparison was made between the subgroups retrospectively. RESULTS: Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy without clamping of the hilum was possible in 21 patients; in one patient, main artery clamping was necessary due to bleeding. Mean clinical tumor size was 37.7 mm. Mean selective clamping ischemia time was 11.6 min with an estimated blood loss of 347 ml. No intraoperative complications occurred, and postoperative complications (n = 4), including two major urological (urinoma, late-onset acute hemorrhage) complications, were found. There were no side effects of ICG administration. Matched-pair analysis for 15 patients showed similar demographic and surgical data without any significant differences in tumor characteristics. Comparing short-term renal function outcomes, significantly decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate reduction in the selective clamping group with an absolute loss of 5.1 versus 16.1 ml/min in the global ischemia cohort (p = 0.045) could be observed. CONCLUSIONS: Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy with selective clamping of the tumor feeding vascular branches is a promising technique for reduced ischemic renal trauma. This may lead to improved kidney function preservation.

Technique and short-term outcome of green light laser (KTP, 80W) vaporisation of the prostate.

OBJECTIVE: Photoselective laser vaporisation prostatectomy with an 80-W potassium-titanyl-phosphate (KTP) laser is an effective procedure for men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. The main advantages of the laser treatment are less blood loss and the short hospital stay. METHODS: The DVD and photos show the main steps and difficulties of the procedure. All patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively by using the International Prostate Symptom Score, volume of prostate, maximum flow rate, haemoglobin values, and postmicturition volume of residual urine. Days of bladder catheterisation, duration of the procedure, and prostate-specific antigen values were determined as well. RESULTS: The results in 140 patients, who underwent KTP laser treatment, were evaluated. The mean age of the patients was 69+/-7.8 yr. Mean volume of prostates, mean operative time, and mean energy delivery were 43+/-22 ml, 53+/-16 min, and 181+/-58 kJ, respectively. The bladder catheter was removed usually on the first postoperative day. Preoperative haemoglobin values were just slightly higher at 14.4+/-1.3g/dl compared to the postoperative values of 13.9+/-1.4 g/dl. The most common complication, dysuria, was seen in 35 patients (25%), followed by mild haematuria in 21 patients (15%). CONCLUSIONS: Photoselective laser vaporisation of the prostate is a treatment option in men who are at high risk for clinically significant bleeding. The procedure provides a high level of intraoperative and postoperative safety and seems to be comparable to transurethral resection of the prostate in the relief of obstructive symptoms.

Organ-preserving endoscopic kidney cancer resection.

OBJECTIVE: Recently, minimally invasive therapies for renal cell carcinoma have been devised to minimise operative morbidity yet achieve comparable oncologic and functional outcomes. This video summary of laparoscopic transperitoneal organ-preserving kidney cancer resection shows the procedure from the surgeon's view. METHODS: The video and photos show the main steps of the procedure. The results of 40 transperitoneal and retroperitoneal procedures performed during 2001-2005 are discussed. Preoperative preparation includes abdominal computed tomography and ureteral catheterisation. Tumour margins were determined by laparoscopic renal ultrasonography. Vessel control was done by en bloc clamping or solitary clamping of the artery. For optimal macroscopic evaluation of the resection margins, tumour excision was solely done with cold Endoshears followed by pelvicaliceal suture repair and parenchymal closure over surgical bolsters with a biologic haemostatic agent. RESULTS: In 40 cases, we converted to the open procedure only once. The average patients age was 53 yr and mean tumour size was 26 mm. No patient showed positive surgical margins. The mean warm ischemia time was 21 min. Final histopathology revealed renal clear cell carcinoma as the major cell type followed by papillary renal carcinoma. Two patients required blood transfusion. Estimated mean blood loss was 270 ml. Median time of hospitalisation was 6 d. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic partial nephrectomy can be performed by experienced surgeons in selected patients. Tumour location and size and the surgeons' experience and preference are the main parameters to make the decision of the type of access.