Vaccination strategies for patients under monoclonal antibody and other biological treatments: an updated comprehensive review based on EMA authorisations to January 2024.

INTRODUCTION: Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and other biological agents are being increasingly approved in the last years with very different indications. Their highly heterogeneous immunosuppressive effects, mechanisms of action and pharmacokinetics require comprehensive individualized vaccination schedules. AREAS COVERED: Vaccination for immunocompromised patients. Prevention and treatment with mAbs and other biological therapies. EXPERT OPINION: Current recommendations on vaccine schedules for patients under mAbs or other biological treatments are based on expert opinions and are not individualized according to each vaccine and treatment. No studies are focusing on the high heterogeneity of these agents, which are exponentially developed and used for many different indications. Recent paradigm changes in vaccine development (boosted by the COVID-19 pandemic) and in the mAbs use for prophylactic purposes (changing 'vaccination' by 'immunization' schedules) has been witnessed in the last years. We aimed at collecting all mAbs used for treatment or prevention, approved as of 1 January 2024, by the EMA. Based on available data on mAbs and vaccines, we propose a comprehensive guide for personalizing vaccination. Recent vaccine developments and current population strategies (e.g. zoster vaccination or prophylactic nirsevimab) are discussed. This review aims to be a practical guideline for professionals working in vaccine consultations for immunosuppressed patients.

Impact of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Strategy on Surgical Hospital Discharge: Improving Antibiotic Prescription in the Transition of Care.

Antimicrobial stewardship programs (AMSPs) are essential elements in reducing the unnecessary overprescription of antibiotics. Most of the actions of these programs have focused on actions during acute hospitalization. However, most prescriptions occur after hospital discharge, which represents a necessary and real opportunity for improvement in these programs. We present an AMSP multifaceted strategy implemented in a surgical department which was carried out by a multidisciplinary team to verify its reliability and effectiveness. Over a 1-year post-implementation period, compared to the pre-intervention period, a significant reduction of around 60% in antibiotic exposure occurred, with lower economic cost and greater safety.

A patient with ulcerative colitis treated with a combination of vedolizumab and tofacitinib.

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an inflammatory bowel disease of autoimmune origin with an estimated prevalence in Spain of 0.39%. Current treatments for UC do not achieve high long-term efficacy. Treatment recommendations in moderate and severe disease involve drugs, but when these options fail, the alternatives are scarce, and surgery is intended to be reserved for the last option. We present the case of a 48-year-old male patient with UC for 23 years, who had failed several lines of treatment. The patient started combined therapy with tofacitinib and vedolizumab. These drugs have different mechanisms of action, achieving an immune response and reducing gastrointestinal inflammation. The patient's disease symptoms improved 11 months after starting this treatment, and he is now entirely asymptomatic. Analytical parameters related to the disease have also shown improvement, and the patient has so far avoided the need for surgical intervention.

Usefulness of therapeutic drug monitoring of piperacillin and meropenem in routine clinical practice: a prospective cohort study in critically ill patients.

Background: Beta-lactam anti-infective levels after standard dosing have been shown to be subtherapeutic when renal clearance is augmented. Objective: To determine if piperacillin and meropenem are found to be in their therapeutic range in infected critically ill patients when administered by continuous intravenous infusion (CII) assisted by a therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) report issued by the pharmacy service. Methods: This prospective non-controlled intervention study evaluated septic patients in an intensive care unit. Patients received a loading dose of meropenem or piperacillin-tazobactam and the antibiotics were afterwards administered by CII. Blood concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography assays. The adequacy of ß-lactam therapy in the cohort subjected to intervention was assessed by determining whether plasma levels during CII were >4 times the informed minimum inhibitory concentration during the first 96 hours of treatment. Results: A total of 124 patients were subject to TDM during antibiotic treatment but, for the analysis of the fulfilment of pharmacodynamic requirements, data from 31/124 (25%) were excluded. Of the whole cohort of treatment courses, 57/93 (61.3%) reached the target level. Plasma levels were adequate in 41/70 (58.6%) and 16/23 (69.6%) of the patients treated with piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem, respectively. Globally, recommendations based on TDM results were followed in 35/93 (37.6%) of the treatment courses. Conclusions: The results of the study show that, in critically ill patients with sepsis, there is a significant proportion of treatment courses where target levels are not reached even if the antibiotics are administered by CII and TDM support is provided by the pharmacy service. This TDM support should be offered on a real-time basis to be really useful.

Calcifilaxis no urémica mediada por acenocumarol / Non-uremic calciphylaxis due to acenocoumarol

No disponible