Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 31
Filtrar
1.
Int J Nurs Stud ; 91: 35-46, 2019 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30677588

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite wide availability of patient lift equipment in hospitals to promote worker and patient safety, nursing staff do not consistently use equipment. OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of factors on the use or non-use of lift equipment during patient lifts/transfers. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. SETTING: One university teaching hospital and two community hospitals in a large health system in southeastern United States. PARTICIPANTS: 77 nurses and nursing care assistants with patient handling duties in critical care, step-down and intermediate care units. METHODS: Participants recorded information about all patient lifts/transfers during their shifts during a 1 week period per month for three months: type of lift/transfer, equipment use, type of equipment, and presence of 20 factors at the time of the lift/transfer. With the patient lift/transfer as the unit of analysis, the association (risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI)) between factors and equipment use was examined using multivariate Poisson regression with generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: Seventy-seven participants (465 person-shifts) reported 3246 patient lifts/transfers. Frequent lifts/transfers included bed-to-toilet (21%), toilet-to-bed (18%), bed-to-chair (13%), chair-to-bed (13%), chair-to-toilet (6%), and toilet-to-chair (6%). Equipment was used for 21% of lifts/transfers including powered floor based dependent lift (41%), powered sit-to-stand lift (29%), non-powered sit-to-stand lift (17%), air-assisted lateral transfer device (6%), ceiling lift (3%), and air-assist patient lift (3%). Factors associated with equipment use included: availability of equipment supplies (RR = 9.61 [95%CI: 6.32, 14.63]), staff availability to help with equipment (6.64 [4.36, 10.12]), staff preference to use equipment (3.46 [2.48, 4.83]), equipment required for patient condition (2.38 [1.74, 3.25]), patient inability to help with lift/transfer (2.38 [1.71, 3.31]), equipment located in/by patient room (1.82 [1.08, 3.06]), sling already under patient (1.79 [1.27, 2.51]), and patient size/weight (1.38 [0.98, 1.95]). Lower patient mobility score (3.39 [2.19, 5.26]) and presence of physical or mental impairments (2.00 [1.40, 2.86]) were also associated with lift equipment use. Factors associated with non-use of equipment included: patient/family preference (0.31 [0.12, 0.80]), staff assisting with lift did not want to use equipment 0.34 ([0.17, 0.68]), patient condition (0.48 [0.20, 1.20]), and patient almost fell (0.66 [0.45, 0.97]). CONCLUSIONS: Patient, worker, equipment, and situational factors influence whether nursing staff used equipment to lift/transfer a patient. Quantifying and understanding these factors associated with lift equipment use and non-use provides specific information for hospitals and safety professionals to enhance effectiveness of future organizational and ergonomic intervention efforts to prevent work-related patient-handling injuries.


Asunto(s)
Movimiento y Levantamiento de Pacientes/instrumentación , Asistentes de Enfermería , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital , Ergonomía , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos
2.
Nurs Res ; 68(1): 3-12, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30540690

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Devices to lift, transfer, and reposition patients are recommended for healthcare workers' and patients' safety, but their intended use has yet to be fully realized. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe hospital nursing staff use of lift/transfer devices and the presence of factors at the time of lifts/transfers with potential to influence whether devices are used. METHODS: Participants were 108 US nursing staff in a university-based medical center and two community hospitals. A self-completed questionnaire was used to collect demographic and work characteristics, typical frequency of patient lifts/transfers, training in and typical use of lift equipment, and specific factors that could influence use. Proportional distributions of lifting/transferring and repositioning frequencies in a typical shift, amount of equipment use, and factors present were examined overall and across worker and work-related characteristics. RESULTS: Although trained in equipment use, only 40% used equipment for at least half of lifts/transfers. During lifts/transfers, factors often present included patient unable to help with lift/transfer (91.3%) or of a size/weight where participant needed assistance to help lift/transfer (87.5%); availability of others who could assist with manual lift (86.3%) or use of lift equipment (82.4%); and equipment functioning properly (86.4%), having supplies available (82.5%), and being easy to retrieve from storage (81.6%). During repositioning tasks, physical assistance was "always/almost always" provided from coworkers (83.3%) and often perceived as "very helpful" (92.6%) in reducing physical demands. Physical assistance from patients was less common (14.0% "always/almost always") yet perceived as "very helpful" by 66.3%. One fifth always used friction-reducing devices. DISCUSSION: Despite training in their use, nursing staff use of available lift equipment and assistive devices is limited. Factors present at the time of lifts/transfers that may influence equipment/device use reflect a complex mix of patient, worker, equipment, and situational characteristics.


Asunto(s)
Movimiento y Levantamiento de Pacientes/instrumentación , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/psicología , Dispositivos de Autoayuda/normas , Centros Médicos Académicos/organización & administración , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Diseño de Equipo/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Movimiento y Levantamiento de Pacientes/métodos , North Carolina , Transferencia de Pacientes , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
3.
Am J Ind Med ; 60(9): 798-810, 2017 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28744929

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: A rate-based understanding of home care aides' adverse occupational outcomes related to their work location and care tasks is lacking. METHODS: Within a 30-month, dynamic cohort of 43 394 home care aides in Washington State, injury rates were calculated by aides' demographic and work characteristics. Injury narratives and focus groups provided contextual detail. RESULTS: Injury rates were higher for home care aides categorized as female, white, 50 to <65 years old, less experienced, with a primary language of English, and working through an agency (versus individual providers). In addition to direct occupational hazards, variability in workload, income, and supervisory/social support is of concern. CONCLUSIONS: Policies should address the roles and training of home care aides, consumers, and managers/supervisors. Home care aides' improved access to often-existing resources to identify, manage, and eliminate occupational hazards is called for to prevent injuries and address concerns related to the vulnerability of this needed workforce.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/estadística & datos numéricos , Auxiliares de Salud a Domicilio/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Laboral/estadística & datos numéricos , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/epidemiología , Carga de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/organización & administración , Auxiliares de Salud a Domicilio/organización & administración , Humanos , Sindicatos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/etiología , Administración de la Seguridad/métodos , Administración de la Seguridad/organización & administración , Washingtón/epidemiología , Lugar de Trabajo
4.
Am J Ind Med ; 60(1): 45-57, 2017 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27779309

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Despite the size and breadth of OSHA's Outreach Training program for construction, information on its impact on work-related injury rates is limited. METHODS: In a 9-year dynamic cohort of 17,106 union carpenters in Washington State, the effectiveness of OSHA Outreach Training on workers' compensation claims rate was explored. Injury rates were calculated by training status overall and by carpenters' demographic and work characteristics using Poisson regression. RESULTS: OSHA Outreach Training resulted in a 13% non-significant reduction in injury claims rates overall. The protective effect was more pronounced for carpenters in their apprenticeship years, drywall installers, and with increasing time since training. CONCLUSIONS: In line with these observed effects and prior research, it is unrealistic to expect OSHA Outreach Training alone to have large effects on union construction workers' injury rates. Standard construction industry practice should include hazard awareness and protection training, coupled with more efficient approaches to injury control. Am. J. Ind. Med. 60:45-57, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Asunto(s)
Industria de la Construcción , Capacitación en Servicio/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Laboral/educación , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/epidemiología , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/prevención & control , Indemnización para Trabajadores/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Competencia Profesional , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration , Washingtón/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
5.
Workplace Health Saf ; 64(11): 531-542, 2016 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27353507

RESUMEN

Concerns of violence in hospitals warrant examination of current hospital security practices. Cross-sectional survey data were collected from members of a health care security and safety association to examine the type of personnel serving as security in hospitals, their policies and practices related to training and weapon/restraint tool carrying/use, and the broader context in which security personnel work to maintain staff and patient safety, with an emphasis on workplace violence prevention and mitigation. Data pertaining to 340 hospitals suggest security personnel were typically non-sworn officers directly employed (72%) by hospitals. Available tools included handcuffs (96%), batons (56%), oleoresin capsicum products (e.g., pepper spray; 52%), hand guns (52%), conducted electrical weapons (e.g., TASERs®; 47%), and K9 units (12%). Current workplace violence prevention policy components, as well as recommendations to improve hospital security practices, aligned with Occupational Safety and Health Administration guidelines. Comprehensive efforts to address the safety and effectiveness of hospital security personnel should consider security personnel's relationships with other hospital work groups and hospitals' focus on patients' safety and satisfaction.

6.
Am J Ind Med ; 58(12): 1278-87, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26351265

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hospital sitters provide continuous observation of patients at risk of harming themselves or others. Little is known about sitters' occupational safety and well-being, including experiences with patient/visitor-perpetrated violence (type II). METHODS: Data from surveys, focus groups, individual interviews at six U.S. hospitals were used to characterize the prevalence of and circumstance surrounding type II violence against sitters, as well as broader issues related to sitter use. RESULTS: Sitter respondents had a high 12-month prevalence of physical assault, physical threat, and verbal abuse compared to other workers in the hospital setting. Sitters and other staff indicated the need for clarification of sitters' roles regarding patient care and sitter well-being (e.g., calling for assistance, taking lunch/restroom breaks), training of sitters in personal safety and de-escalation, methods to communicate patient/visitor behaviors, and unit-level support. CONCLUSIONS: The burden of type II violence against hospital sitters is concerning. Policies surrounding sitters' roles and violence prevention training are urgently needed.


Asunto(s)
Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Laboral , Personal de Hospital/psicología , Violencia Laboral/estadística & datos numéricos , Lugar de Trabajo/psicología , Adulto , Servicios Técnicos en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , North Carolina , Personal de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevalencia , Investigación Cualitativa , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Texas , Visitas a Pacientes , Lugar de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , Violencia Laboral/psicología
7.
Am J Ind Med ; 58(11): 1194-204, 2015 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26076187

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: An elevated risk of patient/visitor perpetrated violence (type II) against hospital nurses and physicians have been reported, while little is known about type II violence among other hospital workers, and circumstances surrounding these events. METHODS: Hospital workers (n = 11,000) in different geographic areas were invited to participate in an anonymous survey. RESULTS: Twelve-month prevalence of type II violence was 39%; 2,098 of 5,385 workers experienced 1,180 physical assaults, 2,260 physical threats, and 5,576 incidents of verbal abuse. Direct care providers were at significant risk, as well as some workers that do not provide direct care. Perpetrator circumstances attributed to violent events included altered mental status, behavioral issues, pain/medication withdrawal, dissatisfaction with care. Fear for safety was common among worker victims (38%). Only 19% of events were reported into official reporting systems. CONCLUSIONS: This pervasive occupational safety issue is of great concern and likely extends to patients for whom these workers care for.


Asunto(s)
Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Abuso Físico/estadística & datos numéricos , Violencia Laboral/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Miedo , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , North Carolina/epidemiología , Salud Laboral/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal de Hospital/psicología , Seguridad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Texas/epidemiología , Violencia Laboral/clasificación , Adulto Joven
8.
Am J Ind Med ; 58(9): 955-63, 2015 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25939759

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal symptoms and disorders (MSDIs) are common reasons for visits to medical providers in the general population and they are common work-related complaints. Prior reports raise concerns as to whether declines in workers' compensation (WC) rates represent true improvement in occupational health and safety or shifting of care to other payment systems. METHODS: By linking administrative records, we compared patterns of WC claims and private health care utilization for disorders of the upper extremity (UE) and knee among a large cohort of union carpenters over a 20-year period. RESULTS: As WC claim rates declined, private health care utilization increased. The increase was muted somewhat but sustained when adjusting for other patterns of health care utilization. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest the decline of WC claim rates do not solely represent improved occupational safety in this population, but also a considerable shifting of care to their private insurance coverage over time.


Asunto(s)
Industria de la Construcción/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención a la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Indemnización para Trabajadores/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Industria de la Construcción/tendencias , Atención a la Salud/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Seguro de Salud/tendencias , Traumatismos de la Rodilla/epidemiología , Traumatismos de la Rodilla/etiología , Sindicatos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/epidemiología , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/etiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/epidemiología , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/etiología , Sector Privado , Extremidad Superior/lesiones , Washingtón/epidemiología , Indemnización para Trabajadores/tendencias
9.
Am J Ind Med ; 58(8): 880-5, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25914335

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Nail guns increase productivity in residential building but with a corresponding increase in worker injuries. They are also easily accessible, at low cost, to consumers. METHODS: Data from the occupational supplement to the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS-Work) were used to calculate national estimates of work-related injuries from nail guns between 2006 and 2011. These were compared to estimates of consumer injuries obtained through online access to the Consumer Product Safety Commission's (CPSC) NEISS data. RESULTS: Approximately 25,000 ED-treated work-related and consumer nail gun injuries were estimated each year. During the construction economy collapse, injuries among workers declined markedly, closely following patterns of reduced residential employment. Reduction in consumer injuries was much more modest. CONCLUSIONS: Current nail gun injury patterns suggest marked blurring of work and home exposures. A united effort of CPSC, NIOSH, and OSHA is warranted to address these preventable injuries.


Asunto(s)
Accidentes Domésticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Industria de la Construcción/instrumentación , Industria de la Construcción/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/epidemiología , Heridas Penetrantes/epidemiología , Materiales de Construcción , Seguridad de Productos para el Consumidor , Diseño de Equipo , Análisis de Falla de Equipo , Humanos , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/etiología , Estados Unidos , Heridas Penetrantes/etiología
10.
Am J Ind Med ; 58(4): 411-21, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25676039

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Declining work injury rates may reflect safer work conditions as well as under-reporting. METHODS: Union carpenters were invited to participate in a mailed, cross-sectional survey designed to capture information about injury reporting practices. Prevalence of non-reporting and fear of repercussions for reporting were compared across exposure to behavioral-based safety elements and three domains of the Nordic Safety Climate Questionnaire (NOSACQ-50). RESULTS: The majority (>75%) of the 1,155 participants felt they could report work-related injuries to their supervisor without fear of retribution, and most felt that the majority of injuries on their jobsites got reported. However, nearly half indicated it was best not to report minor injuries, and felt pressures to use their private insurance for work injury care. The prevalence of non-reporting and fear of reporting increased markedly with poorer measures of management safety justice (NOSACQ-50). CONCLUSIONS: Formal and informal policies and practices on jobsites likely influence injury reporting.


Asunto(s)
Industria de la Construcción/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Laboral , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/epidemiología , Cultura Organizacional , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Miedo , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Política Organizacional , Administración de la Seguridad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Washingtón/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
11.
Am J Ind Med ; 58(4): 428-36, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25712704

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Numerous aspects of construction place workers at risk of musculoskeletal disorders and injuries (MSDIs). Work organization and the nature of MSDIs create surveillance challenges. METHODS: By linking union records with workers' compensation claims, we examined 20-year patterns of MSDIs involving the upper extremity (UE) and the knee among a large carpenter cohort. RESULTS: MSDIs were common and accounted for a disproportionate share of paid lost work time (PLT) claims; UE MSDIs were three times more common than those of the knee. Rates declined markedly over time and were most pronounced for MSDIs of the knee with PLT. Patterns of risk varied by extremity, as well as by age, gender, union tenure, and predominant work. Carpenters in drywall installation accounted for the greatest public health burden. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of factors likely account for the patterns observed over time and across worker characteristics. Drywall installers are an intervention priority.


Asunto(s)
Industria de la Construcción/estadística & datos numéricos , Traumatismos de la Rodilla/epidemiología , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/epidemiología , Extremidad Superior/lesiones , Indemnización para Trabajadores/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Industria de la Construcción/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/etiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/etiología , Factores de Riesgo , Washingtón/epidemiología , Indemnización para Trabajadores/tendencias
12.
Am J Ind Med ; 57(9): 984-91, 2014 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24771631

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Falls from height (FFH) are a longstanding, serious problem in construction. METHODS: We report workers' compensation (WC) payments associated with FFH among a cohort (n = 24,830; 1989-2008) of carpenters. Mean/median payments, cost rates, and adjusted rate ratios based on hours worked were calculated using negative-binomial regression. RESULTS: Over the 20-year period FFH accounted for $66.6 million in WC payments or $700 per year for each full-time equivalent (2,000 hr of work). FFH were responsible for 5.5% of injuries but 15.1% of costs. Cost declines were observed, but not monotonically. Reductions were more pronounced for indemnity than medical care. Mean costs were 2.3 times greater among carpenters over 50 than those under 30; cost rates were only modestly higher. CONCLUSIONS: Significant progress has been made in reducing WC payments associated with FFH in this cohort particularly through 1996; primary gains reflect reduction in frequency of falls. FFH that occur remain costly.


Asunto(s)
Accidentes por Caídas/economía , Accidentes de Trabajo/economía , Industria de la Construcción , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/economía , Indemnización para Trabajadores/economía , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Seguro/economía , Sindicatos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis de Regresión , Washingtón
13.
Am J Ind Med ; 57(6): 627-39, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24526348

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: While violence can adversely affect mental health of victims, repercussions of violence against workers is not as well characterized. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We explored relationships between workplace violent events perpetrated by patients or visitors (Type II) against hospital employees and the employee use of psychotropic medications or mental health services using a data system that linked violent events with health claims. RESULTS: Significant associations were observed between reported Type II workplace violent events and employee prescription claims for anti-depressants and anxiolytics combined (RR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.01-2.33) and anti-depressants alone (RR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.10-2.48). No significant association between reported violent events and health claims for treatment of depression or anxiety was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Type II violence experienced by hospital workers may lead to increased use of psychotropic drugs, particularly anti-depressants but also anxiolytics. Our results suggest an important role of employee assistance programs in mitigating the psychological consequences of workplace violent events.


Asunto(s)
Ansiolíticos/uso terapéutico , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Ansiedad/terapia , Víctimas de Crimen/psicología , Depresión/terapia , Hospitales , Servicios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal de Hospital/psicología , Violencia Laboral/psicología , Adulto , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Ansiedad/psicología , Estudios de Cohortes , Víctimas de Crimen/estadística & datos numéricos , Depresión/epidemiología , Depresión/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Personal de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis de Regresión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Violencia Laboral/estadística & datos numéricos
14.
Am J Ind Med ; 57(1): 69-77, 2014 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24038233

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Falls from height (FFH) continue to cause significant morbidity and mortality across the construction industry. METHODS: By linking data on work hours with workers' compensation records, rates of work-related injuries resulting from FFH and associated days away from work were evaluated among a large cohort (n = 24,830) of union carpenters in Washington State from 1989 to 2008. Using Poisson regression we assessed rates of FFH over the 20-year period while adjusting for temporal trend in other work-related injuries. Patterns of paid lost days (PLDs) were assessed with negative binomial regression. RESULTS: Crude rates of FFH decreased 82% over the 20-year period. Reductions were more modest and without demonstrable change since 1996 when adjusting for the temporal reduction in other injuries. Younger workers had higher injury rates; older workers lost more days following falls. Rates of PLDs associated with falls decreased over time, but there was not a consistent decline in mean lost days per fall. CONCLUSION: These patterns are consistent with decreased FFH for several years surrounding state (1991) and then federal (1994) fall standards; the decline during this time period exceeded those seen in injury rates overall in this cohort. While crude rates of FFH have continued to decline, the decline is not as substantial as that seen for other types of injuries. This could reflect a variety of things including more global efforts designed to control risk (site planning, safety accountability) and changes in reporting practices.


Asunto(s)
Accidentes por Caídas/estadística & datos numéricos , Accidentes de Trabajo/tendencias , Industria de la Construcción/estadística & datos numéricos , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/epidemiología , Accidentes por Caídas/prevención & control , Accidentes de Trabajo/prevención & control , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Femenino , Humanos , Sindicatos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ausencia por Enfermedad/tendencias , Washingtón/epidemiología , Indemnización para Trabajadores/estadística & datos numéricos
15.
Am J Ind Med ; 57(2): 184-94, 2014 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24038384

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Construction workers are at high risk of work-related musculoskeletal back disorders, and research suggests medical care and costs associated with these conditions may be covered by sources other than workers' compensation (WC). Little is known about the back injury experience and care seeking behavior among drywall installers, a high-risk workgroup regularly exposed to repetitive activities, awkward postures, and handling heavy building materials. METHODS: Among a cohort of 24,830 Washington State union carpenters (1989-2008), including 5,073 drywall installers, we identified WC claims, visits for health care covered through union-provided health insurance and time at risk. Rates of work-related overexertion back injuries (defined using WC claims data) and health care utilization for musculoskeletal back disorders covered by private health insurance were examined and contrasted over time and by worker characteristics, stratified by type of work (drywall installation, other carpentry). RESULTS: Drywall installers' work-related overexertion back injury rates exceeded those of other carpenters (adjusted IRR 1.63, 95% CI 1.48-1.78). For both carpentry groups, rates declined significantly over time. In contrast, rates of private healthcare utilization for musculoskeletal back disorders were similar for drywall installers compared to other carpenters; they increased over time (after the mid-1990s), with increasing years in the union, and with increasing numbers of work-related overexertion back injuries. CONCLUSIONS: Observed declines over time in the rate of work-related overexertion back injury, as based on WC claims data, is encouraging. However, results add to the growing literature suggesting care for work-related conditions may be being sought outside of the WC system.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos de la Espalda/epidemiología , Traumatismos de la Espalda/terapia , Industria de la Construcción , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/epidemiología , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/terapia , Seguridad , Adulto , Femenino , Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Sindicatos/estadística & datos numéricos , Elevación/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Salud Laboral , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Esguinces y Distensiones/epidemiología , Esguinces y Distensiones/terapia , Washingtón/epidemiología , Indemnización para Trabajadores/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
16.
Am J Ind Med ; 56(10): 1137-48, 2013 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23861237

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Drywall installers are at high-risk of work-related injury. Comprehensive descriptive epidemiology of injuries among drywall installers, particularly over time, is lacking. METHODS: We identified worker-hours and reported and accepted workers' compensation (WC) claims for a 20-year (1989-2008) cohort of 24,830 Washington State union carpenters. Stratified by predominant type of work (drywall installation, other carpentry), work-related injury rates were examined over calendar time and by worker characteristics. Expert interviews provided contextual details. RESULTS: Drywall installers' injury rates, higher than those of other carpenters, declined substantially over this period by 73.6%. Common injury mechanisms were struck by/against, overexertion and falls. Drywall material was considered a contributing factor in 19.7% of injuries. One-third of these drywall material-related injuries resulted in paid lost time, compared to 19.4% of injuries from other sources. Rates of injury were particularly high among workers with 2 to <4 years in the union. Notable declines over time in rates of overexertion injury in which drywall material was a contributing factor were still observed after controlling for secular temporal trends. Experts highlighted changes over the past 20 years that improved both work safety and, in some cases, production. CONCLUSIONS: Declines in drywall installers' injury rates over time likely reflect, in part, enhanced workplace safety, including efforts to reduce overexertion hazards associated with handling drywall. Continued injury prevention efforts are needed, particularly for less tenured workers. Given the potential for under-reporting to WC, additional sources of health outcomes data may provide a more complete picture of workers' health.


Asunto(s)
Industria de la Construcción/estadística & datos numéricos , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/epidemiología , Accidentes por Caídas/estadística & datos numéricos , Accidentes de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Materiales de Construcción/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Sindicatos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Tiempo , Washingtón/epidemiología , Indemnización para Trabajadores/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
17.
Scand J Work Environ Health ; 39(1): 27-36, 2013 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22396049

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Using an observational research design and robust surveillance data, we evaluated rates of musculoskeletal (MS) injuries, days away from work, and restricted work days among patient care staff at a medical center and community hospital in the United States over 13 years, during which time a "minimal manual lift" policy and mechanical lift equipment were implemented. METHODS: Workers' compensation claims data were linked to human resources data to define outcomes of interest and person-time at risk to calculate rates. Poisson and negative binomial regression with lagging were used to compare outcome rates in different windows of time surrounding the intervention. Patterns of MS injuries associated with patient-handling were contrasted to patterns of other MS injuries that would not be affected by the use of mechanical lift equipment. RESULTS: At the medical center, no change in the patient-handling MS injury rate followed the intervention. A 44% decrease was observed at the community hospital. At both hospitals, the rate of days away declined immediately - before it was reasonable for the intervention to have been adopted. CONCLUSIONS: Institutional-level changes at the time of the intervention likely influenced observed results with findings only partially consistent with an intervention effect. Observational studies can be useful in assessing effectiveness of safety interventions in complex work environments. Such studies should consider the process of intervention implementation, the time needed for intervention adoption, and the dynamic nature of work environments.


Asunto(s)
Movimiento y Levantamiento de Pacientes/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/etiología , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/prevención & control , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Personal de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Absentismo , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Salud Laboral , Indemnización para Trabajadores/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
18.
Am J Ind Med ; 56(4): 381-8, 2013 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23143816

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Individuals who work in the construction industry are at high risk of occupational injury. Robust surveillance systems are needed to monitor the experiences of these workers over time. METHODS: We updated important surveillance data for a unique occupational cohort of union construction workers to provide information on long-term trends in their reported work-related injuries and conditions. Combining administrative data sources, we identified a dynamic cohort of union carpenters who worked in Washington State from 1989 through 2008, their hours worked by month, and their workers' compensation claims. Incidence rates of reported work-related injuries and illnesses were examined. Poisson regression was used to assess risk by categories of age, gender, time in the union, and calendar time contrasting medical only and paid lost time claims. RESULTS: Over the 20-year study period, 24,830 carpenters worked 192.4 million work hours. Work-related injuries resulting in medical care or paid lost time (PLT) from work occurred at a rate of 24.3 per 200,000 hr worked (95% CI: 23.5-25.0). Medical only claims declined 62% and PLT claims declined 77%; more substantive declines were seen for injuries resulting from being struck and falls to a lower level than from overexertion with lifting. Differences in risk based on union tenure and age diminished over time as well. CONCLUSIONS: Significant declines in rates of reported work-related injuries and illnesses were observed over the 20-year period among these union carpenters. Greater declines were observed among workers with less union tenure and for claims resulting in PLT.


Asunto(s)
Industria de la Construcción/estadística & datos numéricos , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/epidemiología , Indemnización para Trabajadores/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Estudios de Cohortes , Industria de la Construcción/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Sindicatos/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/clasificación , Distribución de Poisson , Estudios Retrospectivos , Distribución por Sexo , Washingtón/epidemiología , Indemnización para Trabajadores/tendencias , Adulto Joven
19.
Am J Ind Med ; 54(12): 935-45, 2011 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22068724

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Interventions to reduce patient-handling injuries in the hospital setting are often evaluated based on their effect on outcomes such as injury rates. Measuring intervention adoption could address how and why observed trends in the outcome occurred. METHODS: Unit-level data related to adoption of patient lift equipment were systematically collected at several points in time over 5 years on nursing units at two hospitals, including hours of lift equipment use, equipment accessibility, and supply purchases and availability. RESULTS: Various measures of adoption highlighted the adoption process' gradual nature and variability by hospital and between units. No single measure adequately assessed adoption. Certain measures appear well-correlated. CONCLUSION: Future evaluation of primary preventive efforts designed to prevent patient-handling injuries would be strengthened by objective data on intermediate measures that reflect intervention implementation and adoption.


Asunto(s)
Accidentes de Trabajo/prevención & control , Hospitales Comunitarios , Movimiento y Levantamiento de Pacientes/métodos , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital , Salud Laboral , Transferencia de Pacientes/métodos , Accidentes de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Humanos , Movimiento y Levantamiento de Pacientes/efectos adversos , Movimiento y Levantamiento de Pacientes/instrumentación , Política Organizacional , Administración de la Seguridad/métodos , Estadística como Asunto , Estados Unidos , Lugar de Trabajo
20.
Am J Ind Med ; 54(12): 946-54, 2011 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22068725

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Work focused on understanding implementation and adoption of interventions designed to prevent patient-handling injuries in the hospital setting is lacking in the injury literature and may be more insightful than more traditional evaluation measures. METHODS: Data from focus groups with health care workers were used to describe barriers and promoters of the adoption of patient lift equipment and a shift to a "minimal-manual lift environment" at two affiliated hospitals. RESULTS: Several factors influencing the adoption of the lift equipment and patient-handling policy were noted: time, knowledge/ability, staffing, patient characteristics, and organizational and cultural aspects of work. The adoption process was complex, and considerable variability by hospital and across units was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The use of qualitative data can enhance the understanding of factors that influence implementation and adoption of interventions designed to prevent patient-handling injuries among health care workers.


Asunto(s)
Cultura , Hospitales Comunitarios , Movimiento y Levantamiento de Pacientes/instrumentación , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital , Cultura Organizacional , Accidentes de Trabajo/prevención & control , Competencia Clínica , Diseño de Equipo , Grupos Focales , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Relaciones Interpersonales , Movimiento y Levantamiento de Pacientes/efectos adversos , Movimiento y Levantamiento de Pacientes/métodos , Enfermedades Profesionales/prevención & control , Salud Laboral , Política Organizacional , Investigación Cualitativa , Administración de la Seguridad , Análisis y Desempeño de Tareas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA