Vedolizumab Drug Level Correlation With Clinical Remission, Biomarker Normalization, and Mucosal Healing in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The clinical utility of vedolizumab (VDZ) trough levels (VTLs) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is not well defined. The aims of this study are to determine the median VTLs and frequency of detected antibodies, the correlation of VTLs with C-reactive protein (CRP) and mucosal healing (MH), and the change in clinical management based on VTLs. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of IBD patients treated with VDZ with VTLs checked between July 1, 2016, and March 1, 2017, was conducted. Mucosal healing was defined as absence of mucosal ulcers in Crohn's disease (CD) and Mayo endoscopic score ≤1 for ulcerative colitis (UC). Normal CRP was defined as ≤8 mg/L. RESULTS: A total of 171 patients (62% CD, 31% UC, 7% indeterminate colitis) were included. Median VTLs was 15.3 ug/mL (range, 0-60), and 1 patient had detectable antibodies to VDZ. Patients with a normal CRP had a median VTLs of 17.3 ug/mL vs 10.7 ug/mL in high CRP patients (P = 0.046). This was noted in CD (20.3 vs 10.4 ug/mL; P = 0.005) but not in UC patients (14.4 vs 20.8; P = 0.72). Mucosal healing was achieved in 35% of patients (37 of 105); among these, median VTLs was 13.7 ug/mL vs 16.1 ug/mL in patients who did not achieve MH (P = 0.64). Vedolizumab trough levels resulted in a change in clinical management in 73%. CONCLUSIONS: Our cohort showed a low rate of immunogenicity to VDZ and an association between VTLs and CRP in CD but not in UC patients. No relationship between VTLs and MH was detected. Vedolizumab trough level measurements altered management in approximately three fourths of patients.

Clinical Benefit of Capsule Endoscopy in Crohn's Disease: Impact on Patient Management and Prevalence of Proximal Small Bowel Involvement.

Background: Ileocolonoscopy and computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) enterography (CTE/MRE) are utilized to evaluate patients with small bowel (SB) Crohn's disease (CD). The purpose of our study was to estimate the impact of capsule endoscopy (CE) on patient management after clinical assessment, ileocolonoscopy, and CTE/MRE. Methods: We prospectively analyzed 50 adult CD patients without strictures at clinically indicated ileocolonoscopy and CTE/MRE exams. Providers completed pre- and post-CE clinical management questionnaires. Pre-CE questionnaire assessed likelihood of active SBCD and management plan using a 5-point level of confidence (LOC) scales. Post-CE questionnaire assessed alteration in management plans and contribution of CE findings to these changes. A change of ≥2 on LOC scale was considered clinically meaningful. Results: Of the 50 patients evaluated (60% females), median age was 38 years, median disease duration was 3 years, and median Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score was 238 points. All CTE/MRE studies were negative for proximal disease. CE detected proximal disease in 14 patients (28%) with a median Lewis score of 215 points. CE findings altered management in 17 cases (34%). The most frequent provider-perceived benefits of CE were addition of new medication (29%) and exclusion of active SB mucosal disease (24%). Conclusion: CE is a safe imaging modality that alters clinical management in patients with established SBCD by adding incremental information not available at ileocolonoscopy and cross-sectional enterography.

Postoperative care and monitoring of the reconstructed head and neck patient.

Reconstruction of head and neck patients using free tissue transfer is perhaps the most challenging of areas in the human body. Although complications are inevitable in a percentage of patients, it is good postoperative care and monitoring that determines the success or failure of the reconstruction and also permits early salvage of a failing free flap. Teamwork and cooperation among members of the reconstructive team are critical. Here we review the significance of clinical care and monitoring of reconstructed head and neck patients in the intraoperative and postoperative periods. We also review different techniques and strategies for flap monitoring and anticoagulation used for free tissue transfers.