S-Adenosylhomocysteine Is a Useful Metabolic Factor in the Early Prediction of Septic Disease Progression and Death in Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study.

A common final pathway of pathogenetic mechanisms in septic organ dysfunction and death is a lack or non-utilization of oxygen. Plasma concentrations of lactate serve as surrogates for the oxygen-deficiency-induced imbalance between energy supply and demand. As S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH) was shown to reflect tissue hypoxia, we compared the ability of SAH versus lactate to predict the progression of inflammatory and septic disease to septic organ dysfunction and death. Using univariate and multiple logistic regression, we found that SAH but not lactate, taken upon patients' inclusion in the study close to ICU admission, significantly and independently contributed to the prediction of disease progression and death. Due to the stronger increase in SAH in relation to S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), the ratio of SAM to SAH, representing methylation potential, was significantly decreased in patients with septic organ dysfunction and non-survivors compared with SIRS/sepsis patients (2.8 (IQR 2.3-3.9) vs. 8.8 (4.9-13.8); p = 0.003) or survivors (4.9 (2.8-9.5) vs. 8.9 (5.1-14.3); p = 0.026), respectively. Thus, SAH appears to be a better contributor to the prediction of septic organ dysfunction and death than lactate in critically ill patients. As SAH is a potent inhibitor of SAM-dependent methyltransferases involved in numerous vital biochemical processes, the impairment of the SAM-to-SAH ratio in severely critically ill septic patients and non-survivors warrants further studies on the pathogenetic role of SAH in septic multiple organ failure.

Pneumonia in the first week after polytrauma is associated with reduced blood levels of soluble herpes virus entry mediator.

Background: Pneumonia develops frequently after major surgery and polytrauma and thus in the presence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and organ dysfunction. Immune checkpoints balance self-tolerance and immune activation. Altered checkpoint blood levels were reported for sepsis. We analyzed associations of pneumonia incidence in the presence of SIRS during the first week of critical illness and trends in checkpoint blood levels. Materials and methods: Patients were studied from day two to six after admission to a surgical intensive care unit (ICU). Blood was sampled and physician experts retrospectively adjudicated upon the presence of SIRS and Sepsis-1/2 every eight hours. We measured the daily levels of immune checkpoints and inflammatory markers by bead arrays for polytrauma patients developing pneumonia. Immune checkpoint time series were additionally determined for clinically highly similar polytrauma controls remaining infection-free during follow-up. We performed cluster analyses. Immune checkpoint time trends in cases and controls were compared with hierarchical linear models. For patients with surgical trauma and with and without sepsis, selected immune checkpoints were determined in study baseline samples. Results: In polytrauma patients with post-injury pneumonia, eleven immune checkpoints dominated subcluster 3 that separated subclusters 1 and 2 of myeloid markers from subcluster 4 of endothelial activation, tissue inflammation, and adaptive immunity markers. Immune checkpoint blood levels were more stable in polytrauma cases than controls, where they trended towards an increase in subcluster A and a decrease in subcluster B. Herpes virus entry mediator (HVEM) levels (subcluster A) were lower in cases throughout. In unselected surgical patients, sepsis was not associated with altered HVEM levels at the study baseline. Conclusion: Pneumonia development after polytrauma until ICU-day six was associated with decreased blood levels of HVEM. HVEM signaling may reduce pneumonia risk by strengthening myeloid antimicrobial defense and dampening lymphoid-mediated tissue damage. Future investigations into the role of HVEM in pneumonia and sepsis development and as a predictive biomarker should consider the etiology of critical illness and the site of infection.

Vasoactive Inotropic Score as a Prognostic Factor during (Cardio-) Respiratory ECMO.

The vasoactive inotropic score (VIS) is calculated as a weighted sum of all administered vasopressor and inotropic medications and quantifies the amount of pharmacological cardiovascular support in patients with the most severe combined cardiopulmonary failure supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). This study evaluated (1) whether VIS prior to the initiation of ECMO is an independent predictor of survival in these patients and (2) whether VIS might guide the selection of the appropriate extracorporeal cannulation modality (Veno-Venous 'V-V' or Veno-VenoArterial 'V-VA'). In this study, 39 V-VA and 182 V-V ECMO runs were retrospectively analyzed. VIS immediately prior to ECMO initiation (pre-ECMO) was 40 (10/113) in all patients, 30 (10/80) in patients with V-V ECMO and 207 (60/328) in patients with V-VA ECMO. Pre-ECMO VIS was an independent predictor of survival in univariate (AUC = 0.68, p = 0.001) and multi-variable analyses (p = 0.02). Pre-ECMO VIS was clearly associated with mortality (p = 0.001) in V-V ECMO group; however, V-VA ECMO disrupted this association (p = 0.18). Therefore, in conjunction with echocardiography, VIS might assist in selecting the appropriate ECMO cannulation strategy as patients with a pre-ECMO VIS ≥ 61.4 had significantly lower odds of survival compared to those with lower VIS.

Ground truth labels challenge the validity of sepsis consensus definitions in critical illness.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis is the leading cause of death in the intensive care unit (ICU). Expediting its diagnosis, largely determined by clinical assessment, improves survival. Predictive and explanatory modelling of sepsis in the critically ill commonly bases both outcome definition and predictions on clinical criteria for consensus definitions of sepsis, leading to circularity. As a remedy, we collected ground truth labels for sepsis. METHODS: In the Ground Truth for Sepsis Questionnaire (GTSQ), senior attending physicians in the ICU documented daily their opinion on each patient's condition regarding sepsis as a five-category working diagnosis and nine related items. Working diagnosis groups were described and compared and their SOFA-scores analyzed with a generalized linear mixed model. Agreement and discriminatory performance measures for clinical criteria of sepsis and GTSQ labels as reference class were derived. RESULTS: We analyzed 7291 questionnaires and 761 complete encounters from the first survey year. Editing rates for all items were > 90%, and responses were consistent with current understanding of critical illness pathophysiology, including sepsis pathogenesis. Interrater agreement for presence and absence of sepsis was almost perfect but only slight for suspected infection. ICU mortality was 19.5% in encounters with SIRS as the "worst" working diagnosis compared to 5.9% with sepsis and 5.9% with severe sepsis without differences in admission and maximum SOFA. Compared to sepsis, proportions of GTSQs with SIRS plus acute organ dysfunction were equal and macrocirculatory abnormalities higher (p < 0.0001). SIRS proportionally ranked above sepsis in daily assessment of illness severity (p < 0.0001). Separate analyses of neurosurgical referrals revealed similar differences. Discriminatory performance of Sepsis-1/2 and Sepsis-3 compared to GTSQ labels was similar with sensitivities around 70% and specificities 92%. Essentially no difference between the prevalence of SIRS and SOFA ≥ 2 yielded sensitivities and specificities for detecting sepsis onset close to 55% and 83%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: GTSQ labels are a valid measure of sepsis in the ICU. They reveal suspicion of infection as an unclear clinical concept and refute an illness severity hierarchy in the SIRS-sepsis-severe sepsis spectrum. Ground truth challenges the accuracy of Sepsis-1/2 and Sepsis-3 in detecting sepsis onset. It is an indispensable intermediate step towards advancing diagnosis and therapy in the ICU and, potentially, other health care settings.

Maintaining oxygen delivery is crucial to prevent intestinal ischemia in critical ill patients.

BACKGROUND: Intestinal ischemia is a common complication with obscure pathophysiology in critically ill patients. Since insufficient delivery of oxygen is discussed, we investigated the influence of oxygen delivery, hemoglobin, arterial oxygen saturation, cardiac index and the systemic vascular resistance index on the development of intestinal ischemia. Furthermore, we evaluated the predictive power of elevated lactate levels for the diagnosis of intestinal ischemia. METHODS: In a retrospective case-control study data (mean oxygen delivery, minimum oxygen delivery, systemic vascular resistance index) of critical ill patients from 02/2009-07/2017 were analyzed using a proportional hazard model. General model fit and linearity were tested by likelihood ratio tests. The components of oxygen delivery (hemoglobin, arterial oxygen saturation and cardiac index) were individually tested in models. RESULTS: 59 out of 874 patients developed intestinal ischemia. A mean oxygen delivery less than 250ml/min/m2 (LRT vs. null model: p = 0.018; LRT for non-linearity: p = 0.012) as well as a minimum oxygen delivery less than 400ml/min/m2 (LRT vs null model: p = 0.016; LRT for linearity: p = 0.019) were associated with increased risk of the development of intestinal ischemia. We found no significant influence of hemoglobin, arterial oxygen saturation, cardiac index or systemic vascular resistance index. Receiver operating characteristics analysis for elevated lactate levels, pH, CO2 and central venous saturation was poor with an area under the receiver operating characteristic of 0.5324, 0.52, 0.6017 and 0.6786. CONCLUSION: There was a significant correlation for mean and minimum oxygen delivery with the incidence of intestinal ischemia for values below 250ml/min/m2 respectively 400ml/min/m2. Neither hemoglobin, arterial oxygen saturation, cardiac index, systemic vascular resistance index nor elevated lactate levels could be identified as individual risk factors.

Impact of different consensus definition criteria on sepsis diagnosis in a cohort of critically ill patients-Insights from a new mathematical probabilistic approach to mortality-based validation of sepsis criteria.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis-3 definition uses SOFA score to discriminate sepsis from uncomplicated infection, replacing SIRS criteria that were criticized for being inaccurate. Eligibility of sepsis-3 criteria for sepsis diagnosis and the applied validation methodology using mortality as endpoint are topic of ongoing debate. We assessed the impact of different criteria on sepsis diagnosis in our ICU and devised a mathematical approach for mortality-based validation of sepsis criteria. As infectious status is often unclear at clinical deterioration, we integrated non-infected patients into analysis. METHODS: Suspected infection, SOFA and SIRS were captured for an ICU cohort of a university center over one year. For raw scores (SIRS/SOFA) and sepsis criteria (SIRS≥2/SOFA≥2/SOFA_change≥2) frequencies and associations with in-hospital mortality were assessed. Using a mathematical approach, we estimated the correlation between sepsis and in-hospital mortality serving as reference for evaluation of observed mortality correlations of sepsis criteria. RESULTS: Of 791 patients, 369 (47%) were infected and 422 (53%) non-infected, with an in-hospital mortality of 39% and 15%. SIRS≥2 indicated sepsis in 90% of infected patients, SOFA≥2 in 99% and SOFA_change≥2 in 77%. In non-infected patients, SIRS, SOFA and SOFA_change were ≥2 in 78%, 88% and 58%. In AUROC analyses neither SOFA nor SIRS displayed superior mortality discrimination in infected compared to non-infected patients. The mathematically estimated correlation of sepsis and in-hospital mortality was 0.10 in infected and 0 in non-infected patients. Among sepsis criteria, solely SIRS≥2 agreed with expected correlations in both subgroups (infected: r = 0.19; non-infected: r = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: SOFA≥2 yielded a more liberal sepsis diagnosis than SIRS≥2. None of the criteria showed an infection specific occurrence that would be essential for reliable sepsis detection. However, SIRS≥2 matched the mortality association pattern of a valid sepsis criterion, whereas SOFA-based criteria did not. With this study, we establish a mathematical approach to mortality-based evaluation of sepsis criteria.