Chemoprophylaxis and vaccination in preventing subsequent cases of meningococcal disease in household contacts of a case of meningococcal disease: a systematic review.

Household contacts of an index case of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) are at increased risk of acquiring disease. In revising WHO guidance on IMD in sub-Saharan Africa, a systematic review was undertaken to assess the effect of chemoprophylaxis and of vaccination in preventing subsequent cases of IMD in household contacts following an index case. A literature search for systematic reviews identified a single suitable review on chemoprophylaxis in 2004 (three studies meta-analysed). A search for primary research papers published since 2004 on chemoprophylaxis and without a date limit on vaccination was therefore undertaken. There were 2381 studies identified of which two additional studies met the inclusion criteria. The summary risk ratio for chemoprophylaxis vs. no chemoprophylaxis (four studies) in the 30-day period after a case was 0·16 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0·04-0·64, P = 0·008]; the number needed to treat to prevent one subsequent case was 200 (95% CI 111-1000). A single quasi-randomized trial assessed the role of vaccination. The risk ratio for vaccination vs. no vaccination at 30 days was 0·11 (95% CI 0·01-2·07, P = 0·14). The results support the use of chemoprophylaxis to prevent subsequent cases of IMD in household contacts of a case. Conclusions about the use of vaccination could not be drawn.

Endorsement of ICMJE's Clinical Trial Registration Policy: a survey among journal editors.

BACKGROUND: Since 2005, the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) requires researchers to prospectively register their clinical trials in a publicly accessible trial registry. The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement has supported this policy since 2010. We aimed to evaluate to what extent biomedical journals have incorporated ICMJE's clinical trial registration policy into their editorial and peer review process. METHODS: We searched journals' instructions to authors and performed an internet survey among all journals publishing reports of randomised controlled trials that follow ICMJE's Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals (n = 695), and/or that endorse the CONSORT statement (n = 404) accessed in January 2011. Survey invitations were sent to the email addresses of the editorial offices and/or editors-in-chief of included journals in June 2011. RESULTS: For 757 ICMJE and/or CONSORT journals, we identified that they published RCT reports. We could assess the instructions to authors of 747 of these; 384 (51%) included a statement of requiring trial registration, and 33 (4%) recommended this. We invited 692 editorial offices for our survey; 253 (37%) responded, of which 50% indicated that trial registration was required; 18% cross-checked submitted papers against registered records to identify discrepancies; 67% would consider retrospectively registered studies for publication. Survey responses and specifications in instructions to authors were often discordant. CONCLUSION: At least half of the responding journals did not adhere to ICMJE's trial registration policy. Registration should be further promoted among authors, editors and peer reviewers.

Treatment and prognostic factors of radiation-associated angiosarcoma (RAAS) after primary breast cancer: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Radiation-associated angiosarcoma (RAAS) of the breast is a rare, aggressive disease. The incidence is increasing with the prolonged survival of women irradiated for primary breast cancer. Surgery is the current treatment of choice. Prognosis is poor. This review aims to evaluate all publications on primary treatment of RAAS to identify prognostic factors and evaluate treatment modalities. METHODS: Databases were searched for articles with published individual patient data on prognostic factors, treatment and follow-up of patients with RAAS. A regression analysis was performed to test the prognostic values of age, interval between primary treatment and RAAS, tumour size and grade on the local recurrence-free interval (LRFI) and overall survival (OS). The effects of treatment modalities surgery, radiation (with or without hyperthermia) and chemotherapy or combinations were evaluated. RESULTS: 74 articles were included, representing data on 222 patients. In these patients, the 5-year OS was 43% and 5-year LRFI was 32%. Tumour size and age were significant prognostic factors on LRFI and OS. Of all patients, 68% received surgery alone, 17% surgery and reirradiation and 6% surgery with chemotherapy. The remaining 9% received primary treatments without surgery. Surgery with radiotherapy had a better 5-year LRFI of 57% compared to 34% for surgery alone (p=0.008). The value of other treatment modalities could not be assessed. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review confirms the poor prognosis of RAAS. Tumour size and age were of prognostic value. The addition of reirradiation to surgery in the treatment of RAAS appears to enhance local control.

The incidence of mild and severe hypoglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with sulfonylureas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus using sulfonylurea derivatives or insulin may experience hypoglycaemia. However, recent data regarding the incidence of hypoglycaemia are scarce. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the proportion of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus that experience hypoglycaemia when treated with sulfonylurea or insulin. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for randomized controlled trials that compared incretin-based drugs to sulfonylureas or insulin and assessed hypoglycaemia incidence in the latter therapies. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed to study possible associations with potential risk factors for hypoglycaemia. Data of 25 studies were extracted, 22 for sulfonylurea and 3 for insulin. Hypoglycaemia with glucose ≤3.1 mmol/L or ≤2.8 mmol/L was experienced by 10.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 7.3-13.8%] and 5.9% (95% CI 2.5-13.4%) of patients with any sulfonylurea treatment. Severe hypoglycaemia was experienced by 0.8% (95% CI 0.5-1.3%) of patients. Hypoglycaemia with glucose ≤3.1 mmol/L and severe hypoglycaemia occurred least frequently with gliclazide: in 1.4% (95% CI 0.8-2.4%) and 0.1% (95% CI 0-0.7%) of patients, respectively. None of the risk factors were significant in a stepwise multivariate meta-regression analysis. Too few studies had insulin as comparator, so these data could not be meta-analysed. The majority of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus on sulfonylurea therapy in clinical trials remain free of any relevant hypoglycaemia. Gliclazide was associated with the lowest risk of hypoglycaemia. Because participants in randomized controlled trials differ from the general population, care should be taken when translating these data into clinical practice.

Prognostic factors in localized extremity osteosarcoma: a systematic review.

AIM: Finding reliable prognostic factors for osteosarcoma remains problematic. A systematic review [Davis AM, Bell RS, Goodwin PJ. Prognostic factors in osteosarcoma: a critical review. Journal of Clinical Oncology 1994; 12(2): 423-431.] showed chemotherapy response as only independent factor. We tried to identify evidence-based prognostic factors in the literature since 1992 and to establish pooled relative risks of factors. METHODS: MEDLINE and Embase search (1992-August 2006). Two reviewers independently selected papers addressing prognostic factors in localized extremity osteosarcoma, which were studied for methodological quality, and valuable new factors. An attempt was made to pool results. RESULTS: Of 1777 "hits", 93 papers were studied in depth. Several "new" prognostic factors were found. Only 7 papers were of sufficient quality to analyze. Chemotherapy response, tumor size and site, alkaline phosphatase level and p-glycoprotein expression seemed to be independent factors. Some new factors looked promising. CONCLUSIONS: Although the literature is abundant, it is disappointing that only few papers are of sufficient quality to allow hard conclusions. Because of heterogeneity of the studies pooling results is hardly possible. There is a need for standardization of studies and reports.

[Revised guideline 'Diabetic retinopathy: screening, diagnosis and treatment']. / Richtlijn 'diabetische retinopathie: screening, diagnostiek en behandeling' (herziening).

The revised evidence-based guideline 'Diabetic retinopathy: screening, diagnosis and treatment' contains important recommendations concerning screening, diagnosis and treatment of diabetic retinopathy. Regular screening and the treatment of risk factors, such as hyperglycemia, hypertension, adipositas and dyslipidemia, can prevent retinopathy and slow down its development. Fundus photography is recommended as a screening method. If necessary, diagnosis by biomicroscopy and a treatment consisting of photocoagulation and/or vitrectomy should be performed by the ophthalmologist. The reassessment of responsibilities is a vital component of the implementation of the guideline bearing in mind that the screening in particular, can be performed by personnel other than ophthalmologists.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for low back pain.

BACKGROUND: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the most frequently prescribed medications worldwide and are widely used for patients with low-back pain. Selective COX-2 inhibitors are currently available and used for patients with low-back pain. OBJECTIVES: The objective was to assess the effects of NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors in the treatment of non-specific low-back pain and to assess which type of NSAID is most effective. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to and including June 2007 if reported in English, Dutch or German. We also screened references given in relevant reviews and identified trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials and double-blind controlled trials of NSAIDs in non-specific low-back pain with or without sciatica were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed methodological quality. All studies were also assessed on clinical relevance, from which no further interpretations or conclusions were drawn. If data were considered clinically homogeneous, a meta-analysis was performed. If data were lacking for clinically homogeneous trials, a qualitative analysis was performed using a rating system with four levels of evidence (strong, moderate, limited, no evidence). MAIN RESULTS: In total, 65 trials (total number of patients = 11,237) were included in this review. Twenty-eight trials (42%) were considered high quality. Statistically significant effects were found in favour of NSAIDs compared to placebo, but at the cost of statistically significant more side effects. There is moderate evidence that NSAIDs are not more effective than paracetamol for acute low-back pain, but paracetamol had fewer side effects. There is moderate evidence that NSAIDs are not more effective than other drugs for acute low-back pain. There is strong evidence that various types of NSAIDs, including COX-2 NSAIDs, are equally effective for acute low-back pain. COX-2 NSAIDs had statistically significantly fewer side-effects than traditional NSAIDs. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The evidence from the 65 trials included in this review suggests that NSAIDs are effective for short-term symptomatic relief in patients with acute and chronic low-back pain without sciatica. However, effect sizes are small. Furthermore, there does not seem to be a specific type of NSAID which is clearly more effective than others. The selective COX-2 inhibitors showed fewer side effects compared to traditional NSAIDs in the RCTs included in this review. However, recent studies have shown that COX-2 inhibitors are associated with increased cardiovascular risks in specific patient populations.

[Guideline 'Diagnosis and treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome']. / Richtlijn 'Diagnostiek en behandeling van het carpale-tunnelsyndroom'.

--Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most frequently encountered peripheral nerve entrapment: about 10% of adult women and less than 1% of adult men in the Netherlands have a clinically and electrophysiologically confirmed CTS. --All medical and paramedical disciplines involved in the diagnosis and treatment of CTS in the Netherlands contributed to the development of a guideline for the diagnosis and treatment ofCTS. --Clinical diagnosis of CTS is based on a history of nocturnal pins and needles, numbeness and/or pain in the median nerve innervated area of the fingers and hand, which often causes the patient to awake. --Provocative tests do not contribute to the clinical diagnosis of CTS. --If invasive therapy is considered, such as corticosteroid injection or surgery, the clinical diagnosis must be confirmed by abnormal findings in electrophysiological tests. --Ultrasound or MRI of the wrist may be of diagnostic value when structural abnormalities in the carpal tunnel are suspected. Given the special expertise needed for ultrasound testing and the limited availability of MRI for CTS diagnostic purposes, these methods are not the first preference. --Depending on the degree of impact on daily functioning, treatment for CTS may be expectative, conservative (wrist splint or local steroid injections) or surgical (endoscopic or open techniques). --If CTS does not restrict daily functioning, adjustment of the working conditions will do. --Furthermore measures aimed at CTS prevention and treatment of an already existing work-related CTS are discussed.

Surgical treatment options for carpal tunnel syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Carpal tunnel syndrome is a common disorder for which several surgical treatment options are available. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of the various surgical techniques in relieving symptoms and promoting return to work or activities of daily living and to compare the occurrence of side-effects and complications in patients suffering from carpal tunnel syndrome. SEARCH STRATEGY: We updated the searches in 2006. We conducted computer-aided searches of the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Trials Register (searched in June 2006), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2006, Issue 2), MEDLINE (January 1966 to June 2006), EMBASE (January 1980 to June 2006) and also tracked references in bibliographies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials comparing various surgical techniques for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors performed study selection, assessment of methodological quality and data extraction independently of each other. MAIN RESULTS: Thirty-three studies were included in the review of which 10 were newly identified in this update. The methodological quality of the trials ranged from fair to good; however, the use of allocation concealment was mentioned explicitly in only seven trials. Many studies failed to present the results in sufficient detail to enable statistical pooling. Pooling was also impeded by the vast variety of outcome measures that were applied in the various studies. None of the existing alternatives to standard open carpal tunnel release offered significantly better relief from symptoms in the short- or long-term. In three studies with a total of 294 participants, endoscopic carpal tunnel release resulted in earlier return to work or activities of daily living than open carpal tunnel release, with a weighted mean difference of -6 days (95% CI -9 to -3 days). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is no strong evidence supporting the need for replacement of standard open carpal tunnel release by existing alternative surgical procedures for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. The decision to apply endoscopic carpal tunnel release instead of open carpal tunnel release seems to be guided by the surgeon's and patient's preferences.

WITHDRAWN: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for low-back pain.

BACKGROUND: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the most frequently prescribed medications worldwide and are widely used for patients with low back pain. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this systematic review was to assess the effects of NSAIDs in the treatment of non-specific low back pain and to assess which type of NSAID is most effective. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Medline and Embase databases and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CCTR) up to and including September 1998 if reported in English, Dutch or German. We also screened references given in relevant reviews and identified trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials and double-blind controlled trials of NSAIDs in non-specific low back pain with or without radiation were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors blinded with respect to authors, institution and journal independently extracted data and assessed methodological quality. A methodological quality score was applied, and studies meeting at least six of 11 specified criteria were considered high quality studies. If data were considered clinically homogeneous, a meta-analysis was performed using a fixed effects model for statistically homogeneous subgroups and a random effects model for statistically heterogeneous subgroups. If data were considered clinically heterogeneous, a qualitative analysis was performed using a rating system with four levels of evidence (strong, moderate, limited, no). MAIN RESULTS: A total of 51 trials (total number of patients = 6057) were included in this review, of which 46 were published in English and five in German. Sixteen trials (31%) were of high quality. The pooled Relative Risk for global improvement after one week was 1.24 (95% CI 1.10 , 1.41) and for additional analgesic use 1.29 (95% CI 1.05 , 1.57), indicating a statistically significant effect in favour of NSAIDs compared to placebo. The results of the qualitative analysis showed that there is conflicting evidence (level 3) that NSAIDs are more effective than paracetamol for acute low back pain, and that there is moderate evidence (level 2) that NSAIDs are not more effective than other drugs for acute low back pain. There is strong evidence (level 1) that various types of NSAIDs are equally effective for acute low back pain. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the evidence from the 51 trials included in this review suggests that NSAIDs are effective for short-term symptomatic relief in patients with acute low back pain. Furthermore, there does not seem to be a specific type of NSAID which is clearly more effective than others. Sufficient evidence on chronic low back pain is still lacking.

[From the Cochrane Library: wearing compression stockings during long-distance flights reduces the risk of asymptomatic deep-vein thrombosis]. / Uit de Cochrane Library: door dragen van elastische kousen tijdens langeafstandsvluchten minder kans op asymptomatische diepe veneuze trombose.

A recent Cochrane systematic review assessed the effects of wearing compression stockings during long-distance flights on the risk of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT). Ten randomised trials were included, 9 of which compared wearing compression stockings on both legs during the whole flight (at least 7 hours) with not wearing compression stockings. In these 9 trials, 50 of 2637 participants with 1 week of follow-up had asymptomatic DVT; 3 had worn stockings, 47 had not (odds ratio: 0.10; 95% CI: 0.04-0.25). No deaths, pulmonary emboli or symptomatic DVTs were reported. Wearing stockings had a significant impact in reducing oedema of the lower legs. No significant adverse effects of wearing stockings were reported.

[From the Cochrane Library: topical antibiotic treatment is more effective than systemic antibiotic treatment for chronic otitis media with eardrum perforation and purulent discharge]. / Uit de Cochrane Library: lokale toepassing van antibiotica effectiever dan systemische voor de behandeling van chronische otitis media met geperforeerd trommelvlies en purulente afscheiding.

Chronic suppurative otitis media with underlying persistent eardrum perforation is a common cause of preventable hearing impairment. A Cochrane systematic review compared topical treatment (antibiotics or antiseptics) with systemic antibiotics to identify which is best. Nine randomised controlled trials were included (833 randomised patients; 842 analysed patients or ears). Topical treatment with quinolones was more effective in stopping (purulent) discharge than systemic treatment with quinolones or non-quinolones. No benefit from adding systemic treatment to topical antibiotics was detected. The effects of topical non-quinolone antibiotics or antiseptics were not clear. Little is known about secondary outcomes (prevention of complications, healing the eardrum, and improving hearing) or about the efficacy and safety of topical antibiotics in the long term.

[Centralisation of pancreatic resection: a systematic review and evaluation in the Netherlands]. / Centralisatie van pancreasoperaties: een systematische review en evaluatie in Nederland.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the volume-outcome effect of pancreatic surgery by means of a systematic review, and to determine the effect of the ongoing plea for centralisation of pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy in the Netherlands. DESIGN: Systematic review and retrospective evaluation. METHOD: A systematic search for studies comparing hospital mortality rates after pancreatic resection in high- and low-volume hospitals was conducted. The studies were independently assessed regarding design, inclusion criteria, threshold value for high and low volume and primary hospital mortality outcome. Data were obtained from the Dutch nation-wide registry on the mortality outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy in 1994-2003. Hospitals were divided into 4 categories based on the number of pancreaticoduodenectomies performed. The effect of the ongoing plea for centralisation was analysed. RESULTS: Twelve observational studies comprising a total of 19,688 patients were included. Because the studies were too heterogeneous to allow a meta-analysis, a qualitative analysis was performed. The relative risk of dying in a high-volume hospital compared with a low-volume hospital was between 0.07 and 0.76 and was inversely proportional to the arbitrarily defined volume cut-off values. Various analyses conducted over a to-year period in the Netherlands reported mortality rates of 14-17% in hospitals that performed fewer than 5 pancreaticoduodenectomies per year, compared with rates of 0.0-3.50 degrees h in hospitals that performed more than 24 pancreaticoduodenectomies per year. The percentage of patients undergoing surgery in hospitals with a volume less than ro pancreaticoduodenectomies per year was 57% in 2000-2003 (454/792), compared with 65% (280/428) in 1994-1995. CONCLUSION: This systematic review provided evidence of an inverse relationship between hospital volume and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy and confirmed the value of centralisation of this procedure in high-volume hospitals. The 10-year-long plea of the Dutch surgical community for quality assessment and, if necessary, centralisation has not resulted in a reduction in mortality rates after pancreatic resection or a change in referral patterns in The Netherlands.

[From the Cochrane Library: postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy (HRT) does not protect women against cardiovascular disease but does lead to an increased risk of venous thromboembolism]. / Uit de Cochrane Library: met postmenopauzale hormonale substitutietherapie geen bescherming tegen hart-vaatziekte, wel meer kans op veneuze trombo-embolie.

Observational studies in the early nineteen-nineties have strongly suggested that hormone replacement therapy (HRT) has benefits for reducing cardiovascular events in postmenopausal women. A recent Cochrane systematic review assessed the effects of HRT in primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in postmenopausal women from ten randomized placebo-controlled trials published in the last decade. No protective effect of HRT was seen for any of the cardiovascular outcomes assessed. In contrast, higher risks of venous thromboembolic events, pulmonary embolus and stroke were found in postmenopausal women randomized to HRT compared to a placebo. Initiating HRT in postmenopausal women (with or without cardiovascular disease) for the sole reason of preventing cardiovascular disease should not be recommended. Further, in the case of other risk factors for venous thromboembolic events, the use of HRT for preventive purposes should be discouraged.

[From the Cochrane Library: effective measures are available to prevent falls in the elderly]. / Uit de Cochrane Library: effectieve maatregelen beschikbaar voor valpreventie bij ouderen.

Approximately 30% of people over 65 years of age and living in the community fall each year; the percentage is higher in institutions. A fifth of the incidents require medical attention. A Cochrane systematic review of 62 studies, encompassing 21,668 elderly people, showed that several interventions are effective in preventing falls, especially in people who have already fallen once, including multidisciplinary interventions targeting multiple risk factors, individually prescribed muscle strengthening combined with balance training at home, cardiac pacing for hypersensitivity of the sinus node, and withdrawal of psychotropic medication. Individually tailored interventions delivered by a health professional were more effective than standard or group-delivered programmes. Some potential interventions were of unknown effectiveness or unlikely to be beneficial. Examples of these are physical exercises, the use of dietary supplements and the correction of impaired vision.

[From the Cochrane Library: Improvement of photodamaged skin with retinoid creams and not with other local treatments]. / Uit de Cochrane Library: door zonlicht beschadigde huid te verbeteren met retinoïdecrèmes en niet met andere lokale behandelingen.

A Cochrane systematic review of 30 randomised clinical trials assessed the effects of current treatments for adults with mild-to-severe changes in facial and forearm skin that occurred as a result of prolonged exposure to the sun ('photodamage'). Topical tretinoin > or = 0.02% improved the appearance of mild-to-severe photodamage. Tazarotene 0.01-0.1% and isotretinoin 0.1% provided benefit to patients with moderate photodamage. The treatment duration was 4-11 months. Adverse effects were pain and redness. Both the efficacy and adverse effects were dose-dependent. Other treatments, such as polysaccharides, hydroxy acids, surgical procedures and laser, cannot be recommended.

Use of methodological search filters to identify diagnostic accuracy studies can lead to the omission of relevant studies.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the usefulness of methodological filters in search strategies for diagnostic studies in systematic reviews. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We made an inventory of existing methodological search filters for diagnostic accuracy studies and applied them in PubMed to a reference set derived from 27 published systematic reviews in a broad range of clinical fields. Outcome measures were the fraction of not identified relevant studies and the reduction in the number of studies to read. RESULTS: We tested 12 search filters. Of the studies included in the systematic reviews, 2%-28% did not pass the sensitive search filters, 4%-24% did not pass the accurate filters, and 39%-42% did not pass the specific filters. Decrease in number-needed-to-read when a search filter was used in a search strategy for a diagnostic systematic review varied from 0% to 77%. CONCLUSION: The use of methodological filters to identify diagnostic accuracy studies can lead to omission of a considerable number of relevant studies that would otherwise be included. When preparing a systematic review, it may be preferable to avoid using methodological filters.

[From the Cochrane Library: brushing the teeth with an electric toothbrush with an oscllating rotating movement more effective against plaque and gingivitis than brushing with a conventional toothbrush]. / Uit de Cochrane Library: elektrisch tandenpoetsen met oscillerende roterende beweging beter tegen tandplaque en gingivitis dan poetsen met een conventionele tandenborstel.

Removing dental plaque plays a key role in maintaining oral health and reducing gingivitis and parodontitis. A systematic Cochrane review ofrandomised controlled trials encompassing participants from the general public with uncompromised manual dexterity showed that when compared to the use of manual toothbrushes, the use of powered toothbrushes with a rotating oscillation action for a period of three months reduced gingivitis and (although not statistically significantly) plaque. The long-term clinical relevance of the differences is unclear. Electric toothbrushes that did not have an oscillating rotating movement were not consistently better than manual toothbrushes.

The Cochrane Collaboration.

The Cochrane Collaboration is an international, not-for-profit organisation that aims to help people make well-informed decisions about health care by preparing, maintaining and promoting the accessibility of systematic reviews of the effects of health-care interventions. Cochrane systematic reviews are prepared according to predefined, explicit methodology, and published in The Cochrane Library. The abstracts and plain English summaries of the reviews are freely available on the Internet. All reviews are prepared and maintained under the editorial control of 50 Cochrane Collaborative Review Groups that focus on (groups of) health problems. The work of Collaborative Review Groups is supported, among others, by people working in Cochrane Fields. Cochrane Fields focus on dimensions of health care other than health problems. To date, the issue of nutrition has not been addressed sufficiently in The Cochrane Collaboration. Nutrition issues are very important for day-to-day health care and the initiatives to establish a new Cochrane Diet and Nutrition (Sub)Field will help to promote the preparation of systematic reviews of nutritional interventions by the variety of Collaborative Review Groups to whom such interventions are relevant. Many issues regarding nutritional interventions, however, are complex, and methodological challenges will have to be overcome. A Cochrane Diet and Nutrition (Sub)Field with experts on nutritional research can help fill this gap and make those reviews more possible.

Efficacy of oral prophylactic antibiotics in neutropenic afebrile oncology patients: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

The use of oral prophylactic antibiotics in oncology patients is still a matter of debate. A systematic review was performed to assess the evidence for the effectiveness of oral prophylactic antibiotics to decrease bacteraemia and infection-related mortality in oncology patients during neutropenic episodes. Medline, Embase and the Cochrane register of controlled trials were searched from 1966 until 2002. The main outcome was the number of patients with documented bacteraemia (Gram-negative or Gram-positive bacteraemia) and infection related mortality. Data-extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. A total of 22 trials met the inclusion criteria. Seventeen trials compared prophylaxis (quinolones or Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMZ)) to no prophylaxis. The incidence of Gram-negative bacteraemia decreased significantly (pooled OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.24-0.62) without an increase in Gram-positive bacteraemia. Quinolone-based regimens showed a stronger reduction in Gram-negative bacteraemia while TMP/SMZ based regimens were more effective in Gram-positive bacteraemia. Infection related mortality due to bacterial causes decreased with the use of prophylactic antibiotics (pooled OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.27-0.88). No increase in fungaemia or fungal related mortality was seen with the use of oral prophylaxis. In conclusion, this study has shown that oral prophylactic antibiotics decreased Gram-negative bacteraemia and infection related mortality due to bacterial causes during neutropenic episodes in oncology patients.