Etiology of falls among cognitively intact hospice patients.

BACKGROUND: Falls can pose a serious threat to hospice patients receiving palliative care. Interventions to reduce falls have yielded minimal results among older patients. Falls among hospice patients provide a unique population from which a new approach to fall prevention may need to be established. OBJECTIVE: The aim is to devise a forecasting model with which to predict the probability of a patient fall and evaluate whether the model predicts patient falls better than existing measures. METHODS: Two hundred patients were randomly selected from one of the largest hospices in the United States. After patient admission, patient falls were followed-up via weekly calls until a fall, patient death, or hospice discharge occurred. Independent factors included demographic, functional status, environmental measures, symptoms, medications, attitudinal dispositions, and the use of an ambulatory aid. RESULTS: Cognitively intact hospice patients who have a higher risk of falls are those who had a past history of a fall (p = 0.022), patients that are physically more functional as demonstrated by higher score on the Palliative Performance Scale (p = .039), patients with a greater "fear-of-losing-independence (p = 0.023)," those who try to "avoid asking for help (p = 0.005)," and those who "feel uneasy about asking for help (p = 0.05)." Patients who depend on ambulatory aids were less likely to fall (p=0.06). The forecasting model predicted patient falls correctly in 78% of the patients observed. CONCLUSIONS: The current model predicted fall occurrence far better than the Morse Falls Scale and other functional status measures and may lead to a shift in fall prevention approaches among hospice patients.

Predicting emergency room visits and hospitalizations among hospice patients with cardiac disease.

BACKGROUND: One goal of quality palliative care in hospice is to limit emergency room visits and/or hospitalizations (ERVH). PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine predisposing factors that contribute to ERVH and devise a model to predict the probability of hospice cardiac disease patients having ERVH after hospice admission. METHODS: The study was a retrospective chart review of hospice cardiac patients comparing those with ERVH (n = 65) and those who died in their homes (n = 80). Data reduction strategy included bivariate tests and model-building analyses using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Some factors were associated with decreased odds of having ERVH: older patients (odds ratio [OR] = 0.94; p = 0.001), increased nursing visits (OR = 0.79; p = 0.001) and chaplain visits (OR = 0.48; p = 0.040), patients' medication compliance (OR = 0.27; p = 0.029), patients treated with morphine sulfate (OR = 0.15; p = 0.001), patients with caregiver(s) (OR = 0.09; p = 0.012), patients with hospice emergency kits (OR = 0.33; p = 0.004), interaction of the latter two variables (OR = 0.26; p = 0.001), patients with do-not-resuscitate orders (OR = 0.29; p = 0.001), Caucasian patients (OR = 0.22; p = 0.001), and the interaction of the latter two variables (OR = 0.22; p = 0.001). Other factors were associated with increased odds of having ERVH: patients with diabetes (OR = 2.64; p = 0.009), peripheral vascular disease (OR = 5.30; p = 0.003), hyperlipidemia (OR = 4.52; p = 0.013), chronic pulmonary disease/asthma (OR = 2.83; p = 0.003) as comorbidities; palpitations (OR = 6.61; p = 0.010), and chest pain (OR = 3.78; p = 0.006). The best fitting forecasting model had six independent variables decreasing and two increasing the odds of having ERVH. The final model chosen was: Z = 7.817 + 2.929 (peripheral vascular disease) + 1.513 (diabetes mellitus) - 3.306 (Caucasian) - 1.824 (caregiver presence x hospice emergency kit at home) - 0.212 (frequency of nursing visits) - 3.275 (on morphine) - 4.422 (medication compliance). CONCLUSION: The forecasting model predicted the probability of ERVH correctly in 87.7% of the patients. The model is simple to use to predict hospice cardiac patients having ERVH. Future studies should validate this model. Interventions should utilize these factors and be evaluated to determine their ability to decrease ERVH in hospice cardiac patients.

Quality of life and symptom control in hospice patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy.

The value of palliative chemotherapy for hospice patients is difficult to quantify and little is known about outcomes from these treatments. This study examined quality of life and symptom control in hospice patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy and in a control group of hospice patients with cancer who had not received chemotherapy for at least 3 months. Using a case-control study design matching patients by age, gender, race, and cancer diagnosis, patients receiving chemotherapy reported a similar number of symptoms as patients off chemotherapy. Global symptom distress was comparable in both groups as was quality of life. Patients in both groups were similar at the symptom-specific level, however, patients on chemotherapy had better symptom outcomes for urination problems (p=0.03), numbness/tingling (p=0.03), muscle weakness (p=0.07), and pain (p=0.09). Patients on chemotherapy had poorer symptom control involving change in taste (p=0.01) and cough (p=0.01). Patients on chemotherapy were more likely than those off chemotherapy to report that chemotherapy "made them feel better" (p=0.01) and "allowed better symptom control" (p=0.01), indicating that patients taking chemotherapy had more subjective benefit from chemotherapy when compared to those off chemotherapy. The two groups showed no difference in the rate of survival.

Advancing geriatrics education: evaluation of a new curricular initiative.

BACKGROUND: This study describes the development of a required 1-week curricular program in geriatric medicine for 3rd-year medical students and presents 3 years of evaluation data. DESCRIPTION: Successful aging, heterogeneity of the aging population, and comprehensive geriatric assessment were emphasized. In addition to didactic sessions, students participated in panel discussions and small group case conferences, and performed history and physical examinations on older patients. EVALUATION: Students' acquisition of knowledge about geriatric medicine was assessed with pre-and posttests; posttest scores showed statistically significant improvement. Because attitudes toward older patients can impact the care provided, students' completed pre- and postattitude assessment scales. Attitude measures were repeated for 2 student cohorts, 1 and 2 years after completion of the program. Independent t tests comparing mean pretest and posttest scores revealed significant improvement in students' attitudes, which were maintained when attitudes were retested. Standardized mean difference scores were computed to measure the relationship between the educational intervention and students' attitude measures. CONCLUSIONS: Time in the medical school curriculum is scarce, but these results indicate that significant improvements can be made in medical students' attitudes toward and knowledge of older patients in 1 week.

Decisions for hospice care in patients with advanced cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To identify factors that may influence the decision of whether to enter a hospice program or to continue with a traditional hospital approach in patients with advanced cancer and to understand their decision-making process. DESIGN: Cross-sectional structured interview. SETTING: One community-based hospice and three university-based teaching hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred thirty-four adult patients diagnosed with advanced lung, breast, prostate, or colon cancer with a life expectancy of less than 1 year: 173 hospice patients and 61 nonhospice patients receiving traditional hospital care. MEASUREMENTS: Hospice and nonhospice patients' demographic, clinical, and other patient-related characteristics were compared. Multivariate analysis was then conducted to identify variables associated with the hospice care decision in a logistic regression model. Information sources regarding hospice care and people involved in the hospice decision were identified. RESULTS: Patients receiving hospice care were significantly older (average age 69 vs 65 years, P =.009) and less educated (average 11.9 vs 12.9 years, P =.031) and had more people in their households (average 1.66 vs 1.16 persons, P =.019). Hospice patients had more comorbid conditions (1.30 vs 0.93, P =.035) and worse activities of daily living scores (7.01 vs 6.23, P =.030) than nonhospice patients. Hospice patients were more realistic about their disease course than their nonhospice counterparts. Patients' understanding of their prognoses affected their perceptions of the course of their disease. Hospice patients preferred quality of life to length of life. In the multivariate analysis, lower education level and greater number of people in the household were associated with the decision to enter hospice. A healthcare provider first told most of those who entered hospice about hospice. Families largely made the final decision to enter hospice (42%), followed by patients themselves (28%) and physicians (27%). CONCLUSION: The decision to enter hospice is related to demographic, clinical, and other patient-related characteristics. This study suggests that the decision-making process for hospice care in patients with advanced cancer is multidimensional. The healthcare community may better meet the end-of-life care needs of advanced cancer patients through enhanced communication with patients and families, including providing accurate prognoses and better understanding of patients' preferences and values.

Predictors of six-month survival among patients with dementia: an evaluation of hospice Medicare guidelines.

The goal of the present study was to assess the validity of the Medicare hospice eligibility guidelines for dementia patients, as well as identify predictors that could more accurately identify prognosis in dementia patients referred to hospice. A retrospective chart review was conducted, including initial assessment and longitudinal follow-up of patients until the time of death. In addition, a second validation cohort was also followed. Participants consisted of 245 patients admitted to a large community-based hospice with a diagnosis of dementia, including a validation sample of 80 patients. The Kaplan-Meier estimation of survival and a Cox regression analysis (p > 0. 05) revealed no significant relationship between the Medicare guidelines or any component of the guidelines and survival at six months for the initial and validation samples. Significant multivariate predictors of shorter survival in both the initial and validation sample include greater age (p = 0. 02) and anorexia (p < 0. 001), as well as a combination of anorexia and greater functional impairment (p = 0.005). Overall, the results indicated that the Medicare guidelines were not valid predictors of survival in hospice patients with dementia and should be altered to include empirically valid predictors. Advanced age, as well as impaired nutritional and functional status, was associated with shortened survival in these patients. The predictor variables identified are an initial step toward providing improved prognoses for advanced dementia patients, their families, and practitioners. Broader issues in improving access to hospice care for dementia patients are discussed.

Initial voluntary program standards for fellowship training in palliative medicine.

Initial voluntary standards for fellowship programs in palliative medicine were developed through a collaborative process involving the directors of fellowship training programs, the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine (AAHPM), and the American Board of Hospice and Palliative Medicine (ABHPM). These groups worked with a consultant and representatives from the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS) and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) to create a training structure for the programs that will maximize the likelihood for recognition and accreditation of the subspecialty. An accreditation group modeled after an ACGME residency review committee will be formed to review and adopt the standards, then accredit programs voluntarily.