Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy for Periampullary Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD) has emerged as an alternative to open technique in treating periampullary tumors. However, the safety and efficacy of LPD compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) remain unclear. Thus, we conducted an updated meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LPD versus OPD in patients with periampullary tumors, with a particular focus on the pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patient subgroup. METHODS: According to PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library in December 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that directly compare LPD versus OPD in patients with periampullary tumors. Endpoints and sensitive analysis were conducted for short-term endpoints. All statistical analysis was performed using R software version 4.3.1 with a random-effects model. RESULTS: Five RCTs yielding 1018 patients with periampullary tumors were included, of whom 511 (50.2%) were randomized to the LPD group. Total follow-up time was 90 days. LPD was associated with a longer operation time (MD 66.75; 95% CI 26.59 to 106.92; p = 0.001; I2 = 87%; Fig. 1A), lower intraoperative blood loss (MD - 124.05; 95% CI - 178.56 to - 69.53; p < 0.001; I2 = 86%; Fig. 1B), and shorter length of stay (MD - 1.37; 95% IC - 2.31 to - 0.43; p = 0.004; I2 = 14%; Fig. 1C) as compared with OPD. In terms of 90-day mortality rates and number of lymph nodes yield, no significant differences were found between both groups. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis of RCTs suggests that LPD is an effective and safe alternative for patients with periampullary tumors, with lower intraoperative blood loss and shorter length of stay.

Health Impact Assessment in protected areas: a proposal for urban contexts in Brazil.

The use of Health Impact Assessment (HIA) in the establishment of an urban protected area can enhance the positive impacts and mitigate the negative impacts resulting from its implementation. Brazil hosts some of the most important biodiversity hotspots in the world and the HIA may benefit biodiversity and human health. These areas are commonly created without any preceding survey to assess their impacts on health. Protected areas located in urban zones are essential to maintain environmental balance and quality of life in cities. It promotes positive impacts on health, providing ecosystem services and salutogenic benefits. However, they can generate negative impacts such as the violation of human rights, property speculation, spread of vectorial diseases, and psychosocial stress. Based on the identification of the potential impacts of urban protected areas on health and best practices, this qualitative and exploratory study justifies the use of HIA in urban protected areas, especially in the Brazil, and indicates the main elements for the construction of a methodological approach to contribute to the Sustainable Development Goals and one of its alternatives, the Buen Vivir approach.

Health Impact Assessment in protected areas: a proposal for urban contexts in Brazil / Avaliação de Impacto à Saúde em áreas protegidas: uma proposta para contextos urbanos no Brasil / Evaluación del Impacto en la Salud en áreas protegidas: una propuesta para contextos urbanos en Brasil

Abstract: The use of Health Impact Assessment (HIA) in the establishment of an urban protected area can enhance the positive impacts and mitigate the negative impacts resulting from its implementation. Brazil hosts some of the most important biodiversity hotspots in the world and the HIA may benefit biodiversity and human health. These areas are commonly created without any preceding survey to assess their impacts on health. Protected areas located in urban zones are essential to maintain environmental balance and quality of life in cities. It promotes positive impacts on health, providing ecosystem services and salutogenic benefits. However, they can generate negative impacts such as the violation of human rights, property speculation, spread of vectorial diseases, and psychosocial stress. Based on the identification of the potential impacts of urban protected areas on health and best practices, this qualitative and exploratory study justifies the use of HIA in urban protected areas, especially in the Brazil, and indicates the main elements for the construction of a methodological approach to contribute to the Sustainable Development Goals and one of its alternatives, the Buen Vivir approach.

Resumo: O uso da Avaliação de Impacto à Saúde (AIS) na criação de uma área protegida urbana pode potencializar os impactos positivos e mitigar os impactos negativos resultantes de sua implementação. O Brasil abriga alguns dos mais importantes hotspots de biodiversidade do mundo e a implementação da AIS pode beneficiar tanto estas áreas como a saúde humana. As áreas protegidas urbanas são comumente estabelecidas sem qualquer avaliação prévia de seus impactos na saúde e são essenciais para manter o equilíbrio ambiental e a qualidade de vida nas cidades. Além disso, as áreas protegidas impactam positivamente a saúde, fornecendo serviços ecossistêmicos e benefícios salutogênicos. Contudo, podem gerar impactos negativos, como violação de direitos humanos, especulação imobiliária, disseminação de doenças vetoriais e estresse psicossocial. Com base na identificação dos impactos potenciais das áreas protegidas urbanas na saúde e nas melhores práticas para aplicá-las, este estudo qualitativo e exploratório justifica o uso da AIS em áreas protegidas urbanas, especialmente no Brasil, e indica os principais elementos para a construção de uma abordagem metodológica que contribua com os Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável e uma de suas alternativas, a abordagem Buen Vivir.

Resumen: Usar la Evaluación del Impacto en la Salud (EIS) para crear un área protegida urbana puede potenciar los impactos positivos y mitigar los impactos negativos resultantes de su implementación. En Brasil se pueden encontrar algunos de los hotspots de biodiversidad más importantes del mundo e implementar la EIS puede beneficiar tanto estas áreas como la salud humana. Las áreas protegidas urbanas, en general, se establecen sin cualquier evaluación previa de sus impactos en la salud y son esenciales para mantener el equilibrio ambiental y la calidad de vida en las ciudades. Además, las áreas protegidas tienen un impacto positivo en la salud, proporcionando servicios ecosistémicos y beneficios salutogénicos. Sin embargo, pueden generar impactos negativos, como la violación de los derechos humanos, la especulación inmobiliaria, la propagación de enfermedades vectoriales y el estrés psicosocial. Con base en la identificación de los posibles impactos de las áreas protegidas urbanas en la salud y en las mejores prácticas para aplicarlas, este estudio cualitativo y exploratorio justifica el uso de la EIS en áreas protegidas urbanas, sobre todo en Brasil, e indica los elementos principales para construir un enfoque metodológico que contribuya a los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible y una de sus alternativas, el enfoque Buen Vivir.

Evaluation of renal replacement therapy in children and adolescents in the state of Amazonas, Brazil.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the characteristics of stage-5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) children and adolescents undergoing renal replacement therapy (RRT) in Amazonas, Brazil, estimating the frequencies of current and new cases, describing the presence of anemia and bone metabolism disorders. METHODS: Thirty-five patients aged 7 to 19 years-old on hemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD) were studied between June 2018 and April 2019. The frequencies of current and new cases were estimated based on the 0 to 19 years-old population of Amazonas, in the same period. Data were collected about the underlying cause and diagnosis of CKD, dialysis, and biochemical analysis. RESULTS: The frequencies of current and new cases were 24 and 15 patients per million people of compatible age (pmpca), respectively. The causes of CKD were nephrotic syndrome (22.8%), nephritic syndrome (14.3%), and neurogenic bladder (14.3%); in 48.6%, the cause was unknown/not investigated. Ten patients underwent renal biopsy, seven with segmental and focal glomerulosclerosis. The majority (80%) were on HD, with an average kt/V of 1.4, and in 51.4% the vascular access was the double lumen catheter. Hypocalcemia was found in 82.8% of patients, hyperphosphatemia in 57.2%, vitamin D insufficiency or deficiency in 60%, and altered parathyroid hormone values in 48.6%. Hemoglobin was low in 80%, with absolute/functional iron deficiency in 28.6%. CONCLUSIONS: In children and adolescents of Amazonas, Brazil, we found 24 pmpca with stage-5 CKU currently in RRT and 16.3 pmpca per year of new cases requiring RRT. Most patients were adolescents on HD, half without a causal diagnosis of CKD, with a high frequency of anemia and bone metabolism disorder.

Mercury Exposure through Fish Consumption in Traditional Communities in the Brazilian Northern Amazon.

Artisanal small-scale gold mining (ASGM) is the main source of anthropogenic mercury emissions and contamination in Latin America. In the Brazilian northern Amazon, ASGM has contaminated the environment and people over the past century. The main contamination route is through fish consumption, which endangers the food security and livelihoods of traditional communities. Our study aims to assess the potential toxicological health risks caused by the consumption of Hg-contaminated fish across five regions in Amapá State. We sampled 428 fish from 18 sites across inland and coastal aquatic systems. We measured the total mercury content in fish samples, and the results were applied to a mercury exposure risk assessment targeting three distinct groups (adults, women of childbearing age, and children). Mercury contamination was found to exceed the World Health Organization's safe limit in 28.7% of all fish samples, with higher prevalence in inland zones. Moreover, the local preference for carnivorous fish species presents a serious health risk, particularly for communities near inland rivers in the region. This is the first study to provide clear recommendations for reducing the mercury exposure through fish consumption in Amapá State. It builds scientific evidence that helps decision-makers to implement effective policies for protecting the health of riverine communities.

Arena política do Parque Canela de Ema em Sobradinho II, Distrito Federal / Political arena of the Canela of Ema Park in Sobradinho II, Federal District

Trata-se de um artigo, cujo objetivo foi analisar a arena política da recriação do Parque Canela de Ema, em Sobradinho II, no Distrito Federal, com enfoque na influência da participação comunitária na formação da agenda, para formulação de políticas públicas saudáveis, tendo como base teórica o modelo dos múltiplos fluxos. As estratégias utilizadas para a busca de evidências empíricas foram a análise documental e a observação participante. A arena política analisada revelou uma janela de oportunidade, que permitiu a inclusão do tema na agenda do governo local. O papel dos atores da comunidade local foi decisivo para a agregação de diferentes atores na arena, e a incorporação de seus interesses nas alternativas para política do parque. Eles formularam a proposta de um Mosaico de Unidades de Conservação para a região, que induziu a realização de estudos ambientais para a viabilidade da proposta. Essa participação foi facilitada pela mobilização prévia e preparo técnico dos atores da comunidade. A participação comunitária na arena política mostrou-se frágil frente a influencia de outros atores com maior poder econômico, cultural e político, e pela dificuldade dos órgãos governamentais trabalharem de forma cooperativa com a comunidade. O estudo sugere a necessidade de qualificar a participação política da comunidade, para que ela seja efetiva, permitindo a construção de políticas públicas saudáveis.

It is an article, whose objective was to analyze the political arena for the re-creation of the Canela de Ema Park, in Sobradinho II, in the Federal District, focusing on the influence of community participation in the formation of the agenda, for the formulation of healthy public policies, based on the multiple streams model. The strategies used to search for empirical evidence were documentary analysis and participant observation. The political arena analyzed revealed a police window, which allowed the inclusion of the theme in the local government agenda. The role of the local community actors was decisive for the aggregation of different actors in the arena, and the incorporation of their interests in the alternatives for park policy. They formulated a proposal for a Mosaic of Conservation Units for the region, which led to environmental studies for the feasibility of the proposal. This participation was facilitated by the prior mobilization and technical preparation of the community actors. Community participation in the political arena has proved fragile in the face of the influence of other actors with greater economic, cultural and political power and the difficulty of government agencies working cooperatively with the community. The study suggests the need to qualify the political participation of the community, so that it is effective, allowing the development of healthy public policies.