Effects of menstruation on the onset of acute coronary syndrome in premenopausal women: A case series.

Background: The incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) among women is lower before the menopause, which may be due to the atheroprotective effects of female sex hormones, including estrogens. This study explored whether women experienced acute coronary syndrome (ACS) more often during menstruation, when the levels of female sex hormones are low. Methods: All premenopausal women referred to the local cardiac rehabilitation program after ACS between August 2010 and September 2018 were contacted by telephone to gather information about their menstrual cycle, contraceptive use and whether ACS occurred during menstruation. Information on cardiovascular risk factors was collected using the clinical electronic health record. Results: Of the 22 women fulfilling the inclusion criteria and having a regular menstrual cycle, 22.7% reported that they were diagnosed with ACS at the time of menstruation. Conclusions: The percentage of women who were menstruating whilst having their cardiovascular event is higher than the percentage expected if the event was unrelated to the menstrual cycle. To gain more insight into the effect of female sex hormones on ACS, it is suggested that information on the menstrual cycle is routinely collected from women admitted to hospital with the condition.

The effect of age on blood pressure response by 4-week treatment perindopril: A pooled sex-specific analysis of the EUROPA, PROGRESS, and ADVANCE trials.

Previous studies showed that postmenopausal women are more likely to have poorly controlled hypertension than men of the same age. Whether this is caused by inadequate treatment or poor response to antihypertensive agents remains unknown. The aim of this study is to analyze treatment response to the most potent renin angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitor perindopril in different age categories in women and men. Individual patient data were used from the combined European Trial on Reduction of Cardiac Events With Perindopril (EUROPA), Perindopril Protection Against Recurrent Stroke Study (PROGRESS), and Action in Diabetes and Vascular disease: Preterax and Diamicron-MR Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) trials, which include patients with vascular disease (n = 29,463). We studied the relative and absolute changes in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) during a 4-week run-in phase in which all patients were treated with the perindopril-based treatment in different age categories. In total, 8366 women and 21,097 men were included in the analysis. Women greater than 65 years of age showed a significantly smaller blood pressure reduction after perindopril treatment (2.8 mmHg [95% confidence interval {CI} = 0.1-5.5] less reduction compared to women ≤45 years, p = 0.039). In men, the SBP reduction after perindopril in patients greater than 55-65 and greater than 65 years was lower compared to the age category less than or equal to 45 years (adjusted mean difference >55-65: 2.8 mmHg [95% CI = 1.8-3.7], p < 0.001, >65: 3.7 mmHg [95% CI = 2.7-4.7], p < 0.001). A trend of less blood pressure reduction was seen with ageing in both men and women (p < 0.001). To conclude, we observed that in both women and men the perindopril leads to less SBP reduction with increasing age, whereas the DBP reduction increases with age. More research is needed to determine whether it would be beneficial to use age-adjusted perindopril dosages.

Catamenial chest pain and spontaneous coronary artery dissection: A case report.

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a rare cause of myocardial infarction, presenting mostly in healthy, young women. The pathogenesis is still poorly understood. A 45-year-old woman presented with an ST-elevation myocardial infarction, caused by SCAD of the mid left anterior descending coronary artery. In the six years prior to this event, she frequently experienced chest pain coinciding with her menstruation.

Efficacy and Safety of High Potent P2Y12 Inhibitors Prasugrel and Ticagrelor in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease Treated With Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Sex-Specific Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background Sex differences in efficacy and safety of dual antiplatelet therapy remain uncertain because of the underrepresentation of women in cardiovascular trials. The aim of this study was to perform a sex-specific analysis of the pooled efficacy and safety data of clinical trials comparing a high potent P2Y12 inhibitor+aspirin with clopidogrel+aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Methods and Results A systematic literature search was performed. Randomized clinical trials that compared patients following percutaneous coronary intervention/acute coronary syndrome who were taking high potent P2Y12 inhibitors+aspirin versus clopidogrel+aspirin were selected. Random effects estimates were calculated and relative risks with 95% CIs on efficacy and safety end points were determined per sex. We included 6 randomized clinical trials comparing prasugrel/ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in 43 990 patients (13 030 women), with a median follow-up time of 1.06 years. Women and men had similar relative risk (RR) reduction for major cardiovascular events (women: RR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.80-1.00; men: RR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.79-0.91) (P for interaction=0.39). Regarding safety, women and men had similar risk of major bleeding by high-potency dual antiplatelet therapy (RR, 1.18 [95% CI, 0.98-1.41] versus RR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.93-1.14]) (P for interaction=0.20). Conclusions The small and statistically insignificant difference in efficacy and safety estimates of high-potency dual antiplatelet therapy between women and men following percutaneous coronary intervention/acute coronary syndrome do not justify differential dual antiplatelet therapy treatment for both sexes.

[Male or female general practitioner; do patients have a preference?] / Mannelijke of vrouwelijke huisarts.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether and when patients prefer a female or male general practitioner (GP). DESIGN: Questionnaire survey. METHOD: A total of 24,430 patients registered in the Care Panel [Zorgpanel] of the Dutch patient federation [Patiëntenfederatie Nederland] received an e-mail with a questionnaire. The questionnaire consisted of 50 questions divided in different themes such as contact with GPs, differences between male and female GPs, sensitive topics and free choice of doctors. RESULTS: The questionnaire was completed by 7,019 patients of whom 26.7% indicated that there are differences between female and male GPs. Empathic practices were more often attributed to female GPs. Women more often prefer a GP of their own sex than men (38.9% vs 12.8%), especially for problems involving sexuality and private body parts. Patients prefer to discuss psychological symptoms with a female rather than a male GP (16.3% vs 4.4%). Embarrassment to discuss symptoms with a GP and embarrassment regarding physical examination by doctors of the opposite sex were more common in women than in men (p < 0.001) but decreased with age. 8% of the respondents indicated that they had occasionally postponed a GP consultation because they were reluctant to discuss a symptom with a GP of the opposite sex. CONCLUSION: The majority of respondents feel there is no difference between female and male GPs. Women tend to feel embarrassed more often at the GP but this feeling decreases with age. To prevent patients from unnecessarily delaying their GP visits, it is important to know whether the patient prefers a female or a male GP.

Adverse Events Associated With PCSK9 Inhibitors: A Real-World Experience.

In randomized clinical trials (RCTs) proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors showed a favorable safety profile, however, "real-world" data on adverse events (AEs) is scarce. Three datasets, a hospital registry (n = 164), and two Pharmacovigilance databases, Lareb (n = 149) and VigiLyze (n = 15,554), reporting AEs attributed to PCSK9 inhibitors (alirocumab or evolocumab) prescribed in clinical practice were analyzed. In the hospital registry, 41.5% of the patients reported any AE, most often injection-site reactions (33.8%) and influenza-like illness (27.9%). Twelve patients (7%) discontinued PCSK9 inhibitor treatment. Most common AE reported in the Lareb and VigiLyze database was myalgia (12.8% and 8.3%, respectively). No clinically relevant differences in gender or between drugs were observed. No specific subgroup of patients could be identified at risk of developing AEs. During follow-up, AEs resolved in most patients (71.1%). In a real-world setting, PCSK9 inhibitors are well tolerated with an overall safety profile comparable to RCTs.