Diagnosis and Treatment of Perioperative Allergic Complications: A Practical Review.

Background: Reported drug allergies are commonly encountered by surgeons and can lead to uncertainty in selecting an appropriate agent due to concerns of associated risks with related and cross-reactive drugs. This uncertainty can ultimately lead to increased infection rates. Methods: A literature review was conducted in PubMed using a combination of the terms "allergy," "allergic reaction," "anaphylaxis," and "surgery," "surgical," or "operating room" for articles published within the last 10 years. Publications identified with these search terms were then filtered for review articles, sorted by "best match," and a maximum of 100 articles were manually reviewed for each combination of search terms. Results: Search results yielded 46,484 articles, 676 of which were ultimately included for manual review, based on selection criteria. Specifically, articles selected for inclusion focused on surgical allergic reactions that were either related to mechanism of action, causative agent for the allergic reaction, timing of allergic reaction, or recommendations for appropriate management. Conclusions: Allergic reactions can be a common occurrence in the operative room. Knowledge of likely causative agents, timing of a reaction to various agents, and appropriate management in the immediate and delayed setting can improve outcomes and safety for plastic surgery patients.

Open Versus Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release: A Comparison of Opioid Prescription Patterns and Occupational Therapy Referrals.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic and open carpal tunnel releases (ECTR and OCTR) are safe and effective operations. We compared the approaches in terms of postoperative opioid refills and occupational therapy (OT) referrals. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) treated with ECTR or OCTR. Patients with isolated idiopathic CTS were included; patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral carpal tunnel release (CTR), revision CTR, and additional procedures at time of CTR were excluded. Outcomes included number of patients requiring an opioid refill and/or an OT referral within 6 months of surgery. RESULTS: A total of 1125 patients met inclusion criteria. Endoscopic release was performed in 634 (56%) cases and open release in 491 (44%). Unadjusted analysis revealed no difference in number of patients requiring refills (6.0% vs 7.1%, P = .44), mean number of refills among those requiring one (1.29 vs 1.23, P = .69), total oral morphine equivalents (45.1 vs 44.7, P = .84), number of patients calling regarding pain (12.8% vs 14.7%, P = .36), OT referrals (12.1% vs 11.4%, P = .71), or average number of OT visits (4.5 vs 4.2, P = .74) for endoscopic and open techniques, respectively. Adjusted analysis revealed lower age, lower body mass index, and history of muscle relaxant as predictors of opioid refills, and in contrast to the unadjusted analysis, operating surgeon and surgical technique were predictors of referral to OT. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic CTR and OCTR did not differ in terms of unadjusted postoperative patient calls for pain, number of opioid refills, or OT referrals. After correcting for individual surgeon practice, endoscopic was associated with decreased odds of requiring postoperative OT.

Impact of Opioid Restriction Legislation on Prescribing Practices for Outpatient Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Overprescription of opioids for acute postoperative pain, plastic surgery procedures included, is contributing to the pervasive opioid epidemic in the United States. This study examines the effect of a statewide legislation limiting postoperative opioids on opioid prescription behavior among providers following outpatient plastic surgery procedures at a high-volume academic center. METHODS: Retrospective review of all outpatient surgical encounters between June 1, 2016, and November 30, 2018, was performed. Encounters were grouped into two cohorts: prepolicy and postpolicy. Primary outcomes included total oral morphine equivalents prescribed on the day of surgery and proportion of patients prescribed greater than 210 oral morphine equivalents. Secondary outcomes included proportion of patients requiring an opioid refill within 30 days following surgery, and number of refills required. RESULTS: The mean oral morphine equivalents prescribed on the day of surgery was reduced from 271.8 to 150.37 oral morphine equivalents ( p < 0.001) following implementation of the legislation, with an associated decrease in the standard deviation of oral morphine equivalents prescribed from 225.35 to 196.71 ( p < 0.001), suggesting a decrease in the variability of prescriber practices. Time series analysis demonstrated the decrease in oral morphine equivalents remained significant when accounting for baseline level of change in opioid prescription patterns. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that legislation at the state level restricting postoperative opioid prescriptions is associated with a decrease in opioid prescriptions without an increase in the need for refills in the acute postoperative setting following outpatient plastic surgery procedures.

Tissue Engineering Strategies for Auricular Reconstruction.

Simulating natural characteristics and aesthetics in reconstructed ears has provided a complex 3-dimensional puzzle for those treating patients with microtia. Costochondral grafts remain the gold standard for autologous reconstruction. However, other options such as Medpor and prosthetics are indicated depending on patient circumstances and personal choice. Research into tissue engineering offers an alternative method to a traditional surgical approach that may reduce donor-site morbidity. However, tissue engineering for microtia reconstruction brings new challenges such as cell sourcing, promotion of chondrogenesis, scaffold vascularization, and prevention of scaffold contraction. Advancements in 3D printing, nanofiber utilization, stem cell technologies, and decellularization techniques have played significant roles in overcoming these challenges. These recent advancements and reports of a successful clinical-scale study in an immunocompetent animal suggest a promising outlook for future clinical application of tissue engineering for auricular reconstruction.