Contemporary Review of Traumatic Axillary and Subclavian Artery Injuries at an Urban Level One Trauma Center.

OBJECTIVE: Traumatic axillary and subclavian artery injuries are uncommon. Limited data are available regarding patient and injury characteristics, as well as management strategies and outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed on patients presenting to University of Louisville Hospital, an urban Level One Trauma Center, with traumatic axillary and subclavian artery injuries from 2015-2021. Patients were identified using University of Louisville trauma, radiology, and billing database searches based on ICD9/10 codes for axillary and subclavian artery injuries. Descriptive statistics are expressed as frequencies and percentages. Comparisons were performed using Fisher's Exact and Chi-squared tests. RESULTS: Forty-four patients with traumatic axillary-subclavian arterial injuries were identified for analysis. Blunt and penetrating trauma were equally represented (n = 22 for both). A variety of injury types were seen, including minimal/intimal injury, laceration, pseudoaneurysm, transection, occlusion, and arteriovenous fistula. Management strategies were also variable, including non-operative, endovascular, planned hybrid, open, and endovascular converted to open. In operative patients, revascularization technical success was high (n = 31, 97%) with low likelihood of thrombosis (n = 2, 6%) and no infections. Among all patients, amputation rate was 5% (n = 2) and mortality rate was 9% (n = 3). Regarding arterial involvement, blunt injury was more likely to affect the subclavian (n = 18) than the axillary artery (n = 6) (P = .04). No significant difference was seen in brachial plexus injury based on artery involved (subclavian = 9 vs axillary = 11, P = .14) or mechanism (blunt = 6 vs penetrating = 11, P = .22). Non-operative management was more likely with subclavian artery injury (n = 11) vs axillary artery injury (n = 1) (P = .008). There was no significant difference between decision for non-operative (blunt = 9, penetrating = 3) vs operative (blunt = 13, penetrating = 19) management based on mechanism (P = .09). Transection injury was associated with an open repair strategy (endovascular/hybrid = 1, open/endovascular to open conversion = 11, P = .0003). Of the three patients requiring endovascular to open conversion, two required amputation, which were the only two patients in the study undergoing amputation. CONCLUSIONS: Both open and endovascular/hybrid strategies are useful when treating traumatic axillary and subclavian artery injuries and are associated with high likelihood of revascularization technical success, with low rates of thrombosis or infection, when treated promptly at a trauma center with vascular specialists available. Transection injuries were most often treated with open revascularization. Patients undergoing amputation had blunt transection injuries to the subclavian artery and underwent endovascular to open conversion after failed attempts at endovascular revascularization.

Plasma resuscitation improves and restores intestinal microcirculatory physiology following haemorrhagic shock.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Intestinal ischaemia-reperfusion injury following resuscitated haemorrhagic shock (HS) leads to endothelial and microcirculatory dysfunction and intestinal barrier breakdown. Although vascular smooth muscle machinery remains intact, microvascular vasoconstriction occurs secondary to endothelial cell dysfunction, resulting in further ischaemia and organ injury. Resuscitation with fresh frozen plasma (FFP) improves blood flow, stabilizes the endothelial glycocalyx and alleviates organ injury. We postulate these improvements correlate with decreased tissue CO2 concentrations, improved microvascular oxygenation and attenuation of intestinal microvascular endothelial dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to groups (n = 8/group): (1) sham, (2) HS (40% mean arterial blood pressure [MAP], 60 min) + crystalloid resuscitation (CR) (shed blood saline) and (3) HS + FFP (shed blood + FFP). MAP, heart rate (HR), ileal perfusion, pO2 and pCO2 were measured at intervals until 4 h post-resuscitation (post-RES). At 4 h post-RES, the ileum was rinsed in situ with Krebs solution. Topical acetylcholine and then nitroprusside were applied for 10 min each. Serum was obtained, and after euthanasia, tissues were harvested and snap-frozen in liquid N2 and stored at -80°C. RESULTS: FFP resuscitation resulted in sustained ileal perfusion as well as rapid sustained return to baseline microvascular pO2 and pCO2 values when compared to CR (p < 0.05). Endothelial function was preserved relative to sham in the FFP group but not in the CR group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: FFP-based resuscitation improves intestinal perfusion immediately following resuscitation, which correlates with improved tissue oxygenation and decreased tissue CO2 levels. CR resulted in significant damage to endothelial vasodilation response to acetylcholine, while FFP preserved this function.

Comparing Patency Rates of Arteriovenous Dialysis Access following Percutaneous Thrombectomy Using Various Catheter Directed Therapies.

BACKGROUND: Arteriovenous fistulas often require frequent interventions to maintain patency for hemodialysis. Interventions may include open or percutaneous thrombectomy with additional targeted interventions as indicated. We evaluated the primary and cumulative functional patency rates following three unique approaches to percutaneous thrombectomy of thrombosed dialysis access. METHODS: A retrospective review of 236 unique patients who presented with thrombosed hemodialysis access was analyzed over a period of 4 years from 2016 to 2020. We analyzed a total of 413 procedures that utilized 3 separate percutaneous thrombectomy devices to assist with restoring patency. The Indigo System CAT-D Aspiration Thrombectomy Catheter (Penumbra; Alameda, CA), the Arrow-Trerotola Rotational Thrombectomy System (Teleflex; Wayne, PA) and the Angiojet Rheolytic Thrombectomy Catheter (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA) devices were compared for primary and cumulative functional patency. Primary patency was defined as time from percutaneous thrombectomy to next intervention (Angioplasty, stenting, and repeat thrombectomy). Cumulative functional patency was defined as time from percutaneous thrombectomy to time of access abandonment. Medical record chart review was utilized to determine patency rates. RESULTS: A total of 413 percutaneous thrombectomy procedures were performed. Of the procedures performed, 98 utilized Angiojet, 103 utilized Trerotola, and 212 used Penumbra. The mean primary patency rates in (days) for the devices were as follows: Angiojet (194), Trerotola (204), and Penumbra (107). The mean cumulative functional patency rates (in days) for the devices were as follows: rheolytic thrombectomy (450 days), aspiration thrombectomy (292 days), and rotational thrombectomy (475 days). Angiojet versus Penumbra and Trerotola versus Penumbra both showed diminished patency rates when using the Penumbra catheter that were statistically significant (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: All percutaneous thrombectomy approaches do not result in the same primary or cumulative functional patency rates. Approaches with Trerotola and Angiojet resulted in improved primary and cumulative functional patency rates compared to those using Penumbra.

Effect of Plasma Resuscitation with Adjunctive Peritoneal Resuscitation on Hepatic Blood Flow and End-Organ Damage after Hemorrhagic Shock.

BACKGROUND: Intestinal injury from resuscitated hemorrhagic shock (HS) disrupts intestinal microvascular flow and causes enterocyte apoptosis, intestinal barrier breakdown, and injury to multiple organs. Fresh frozen plasma (FFP) resuscitation or directed peritoneal (DPR) resuscitation protect endothelial glycocalyx, improve intestinal blood flow, and alleviate intestinal injury. We postulated that FFP plus DPR might improve effective hepatic blood flow (EHBF) and prevent associated organ injury (liver, heart). STUDY DESIGN: Anesthetized Sprague-Dawley rats underwent HS (40% mean arterial pressure, 60 minutes) and were randomly assigned to groups (n = 8 per group): Sham; crystalloid resuscitation (CR; shed blood + 2 volumes CR); DPR (intraperitoneal 2.5% peritoneal dialysis fluid); FFP (shed blood + 1 vol IV FFP); FFP + DPR. EHBF was measured at postresuscitation timepoints. Organ injury was evaluated by serum ELISA (fatty acid-binding protein [FABP]-1 [liver], FABP-3 [heart], Troponin-I [heart], and Troponin-C [heart]) and hematoxylin and eosin. Differences were evaluated by 1-way ANOVA and 2-way repeated-measures ANOVA. RESULTS: CR resuscitation alone did not sustain EHBF. FFP resuscitation restored EHBF after resuscitation (2 hours, 3 hours, and 4 hours). DPR resuscitation restored EHBF throughout the postresuscitation period but failed to restore serum FABP-1 VS other groups. Combination FFP + DPR rapidly and sustainably restored EHBF and decreased organ injury. CR and DPR alone had elevated organ injury (FABP-1 [hepatocyte], FABP-3 [cardiac], and Troponin-I/C), whereas FFP or FFP + DPR demonstrated reduced injury at 4 hours after resuscitation. CONCLUSION: HS decreased EHBF, hepatocyte injury, and cardiac injury as evidenced by serology. FFP resuscitation improved EHBF and decreased organ damage. Although DPR resuscitation resulted in sustained EHBF, this alone failed to decrease hepatocyte or cardiac injury. Combination therapy with DPR and FFP may be a novel method to improve intestinal and hepatic blood flow and decrease organ injury after HS/resuscitation.

Direct Peritoneal Resuscitation for Trauma.

Direct peritoneal resuscitation (DPR) has been found to be a useful adjunct in the management of critically ill trauma patients. DPR is performed following damage control surgery by leaving a surgical drain in the mesentery, placing a temporary abdominal closure, and postoperatively running peritoneal dialysis solution through the surgical drain with removal through the temporary closure. In the original animal models, the peritoneal dialysate infusion was found to augment visceral microcirculatory blood flow reducing the ischemic insult that occurs following hemorrhagic shock. DPR was also found to minimize the aberrant immune response that occurs secondary to shock and contributes to multisystem organ dysfunction. In the subsequent human trials, performing DPR had significant effects in several key categories. Traumatically injured patients who received DPR had a significantly shorter time to definitive fascial closure, had a higher likelihood of achieving primary fascial closure, and experienced fewer abdominal complications. The use of DPR has been further expanded as a useful adjunct for emergency general surgery patients and in the pretransplant care of human cadaver organ donors.

The Effect of Transfer on Outcomes in Burns.

Patients with burn injuries are often initially transported to centers without burn capabilities, requiring subsequent transfer to a higher level of care. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of this treatment delay on outcomes. Adult burn patients meeting American Burn Association criteria for transfer at a single burn center were retrospectively identified. A total of 122 patients were evenly divided into two cohorts-those directly admitted to a burn center from the field vs those transferred to a burn center from an outlying facility. There was no difference between the transfer and direct admit cohorts with respect to age, percentage of total body surface area burned, concomitant injury, or intubation prior to admission. Transfer patients experienced a longer median time from injury to burn center admission (1 vs 8 hours, P < .01). Directly admitted patients were more likely to have inhalation burn (18 vs 4, P < .01), require intubation after admission (10 vs 2, P = .03), require an emergent procedure (18 vs 5, P < .01), and develop infectious complications (14 vs 5, P = .04). There was no difference in ventilator days, number of operations, length of stay, or mortality. The results suggest that significantly injured, high acuity burn patients were more likely to be immediately identified and taken directly to a burn center. Patients who otherwise met American Burn Association criteria for transfer were not affected by short delays in transfer to definitive burn care.

Plasma resuscitation with adjunctive peritoneal resuscitation reduces ischemia-induced intestinal barrier breakdown following hemorrhagic shock.

INTRODUCTION: Hemorrhagic shock (HS) and resuscitation (RES) cause ischemia-induced intestinal permeability due to intestinal barrier breakdown, damage to the endothelium, and tight junction (TJ) complex disruption between enterocytes. The effect of hemostatic RES with blood products on this phenomenon is unknown. Previously, we showed that fresh frozen plasma (FFP) RES, with or without directed peritoneal resuscitation (DPR) improved blood flow and alleviated organ injury and enterocyte damage following HS/RES. We hypothesized that FFP might decrease TJ injury and attenuate ischemia-induced intestinal permeability following HS/RES. METHODS: Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to groups (n = 8): sham; crystalloid resuscitation (CR) (HS of 40% mean arterial pressure for 60 minutes) and CR (shed blood plus two volumes of CR); CR and DPR (intraperitoneal 2.5% peritoneal dialysis fluid); FFP (shed blood plus one volume of FFP); and FFP and DPR (intraperitoneal dialysis fluid plus two volumes of FFP). Fluorescein isothiocyanate-dextran (molecular weight, 4 kDa; FD4) was instilled into the gastrointestinal tract before hemorrhage; FD4 was measured by UV spectrometry at various time points. Plasma syndecan-1 and ileum tissue TJ proteins were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Immunofluorescence was used to visualize claudin-4 concentrations at 4 hours following HS/RES. RESULTS: Following HS, FFP attenuated FD4 leak across the intestine at all time points compared with CR and DPR alone. This response was significantly improved with the adjunctive DPR at 3 and 4 hours post-RES (p < 0.05). Resuscitation with FFP-DPR increased intestinal tissue concentrations of TJ proteins and decreased plasma syndecan-1. Immunofluorescence demonstrated decreased mobilization of claudin-4 in both FFP and FFP-DPR groups. CONCLUSION: Fresh frozen plasma-based RES improves intestinal TJ and endothelial integrity. The addition of DPR can further stabilize TJs and attenuate intestinal permeability. Combination therapy with DPR and FFP to mitigate intestinal barrier breakdown following shock could be a novel method of reducing ischemia-induced intestinal permeability and systemic inflammation after trauma. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic/Epidemiologic, Level III.

Plasma resuscitation with adjunctive peritoneal resuscitation reduces ischemic intestinal injury following hemorrhagic shock.

INTRODUCTION: Impaired intestinal microvascular perfusion following resuscitated hemorrhagic shock (HS) leads to ischemia-reperfusion injury, microvascular dysfunction, and intestinal epithelial injury, which contribute to the development of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in some trauma patients. Restoration of central hemodynamics with traditional methods alone often fails to fully restore microvascular perfusion and does not protect against ischemia-reperfusion injury. We hypothesized that resuscitation (RES) with fresh frozen plasma (FFP) alone or combined with direct peritoneal resuscitation (DPR) with 2.5% Delflex solution might improve blood flow and decrease intestinal injury compared with conventional RES or RES with DPR alone. METHODS: Sprague-Dawley rats underwent HS (40% mean arterial pressure) for 60 minutes and were randomly assigned to a RES group (n = 8): sham, HS-crystalloid resuscitation (CR) (shed blood + two volumes CR), HS-CR-DPR (intraperitoneal 2.5% peritoneal dialysis fluid), HS-FFP (shed blood + two volumes FFP), and HS-DPR-FFP (intraperitoneal dialysis fluid + two volumes FFP). Laser Doppler flowmeter evaluation of the ileum, serum samples for fatty acid binding protein enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining were used to assess intestinal injury and blood flow. p Values of <0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: Following HS, the addition of DPR to either RES modality improved intestinal blood flow. Four hours after resuscitated HS, FABP-2 (intestinal) and FABP-6 (ileal) were elevated in the CR group but reduced in the FFP and DPR groups. The H&E staining demonstrated disrupted intestinal villi in the FFP and CR groups, most significantly in the CR group. Combination therapy with FFP and DPR demonstrated negligible cellular injury in H&E graded samples and a significant reduction in fatty acid binding protein levels. CONCLUSION: Hemorrhagic shock leads to ischemic-reperfusion injury of the intestine, and both FFP and DPR alone attenuated intestinal damage; combination FFP-DPR therapy alleviated most signs of organ injury. Resuscitation with FFP-DPR to restore intestinal blood flow following shock could be an essential method of reducing morbidity and mortality after trauma.

Incidence of and Risk Factors for Multiple Readmissions after Kidney Transplantation.

Unplanned readmission is often used as a surgical quality metric. A subset of kidney transplant recipients undergos multiple readmissions (MRs), although the incidence and risk factors are not well described. The aim of this study was to evaluate risk factors for MR after deceased donor kidney transplantation. All patients undergoing deceased donor kidney transplantation at a single center over a three-year period were analyzed via retrospective chart review for factors associated with MR. P values <0.05 were considered significant. Of 141 patients, the 30-day readmission rate was 26.2 per cent. MR occurred in 43 (30.5%) patients. Age, race, gender, initial organ function, and dialysis vintage were not associated with MR. Diabetic recipients, those who received basiliximab induction, those with acute rejection, and those with unplanned reoperations were at increased risk for MR. Infection was the most common reason for initial readmission in patients with MR (23.3%). One-year patient survival and death-censored graft survival were reduced for patients with MR. MRs are required for 30 per cent of kidney transplant recipients, primarily because of infection and immunologic causes. Recipients with diabetes and those who have acute rejection are at greatest risk.

Direct Peritoneal Resuscitation Reduces Lung Injury and Caspase 8 Activity in Brain Death.

Background: Acute brain death (ABD) is associated with inflammation and lung injury. Direct peritoneal resuscitation (DPR) improves blood flow to the vital organs after ABD. DPR reduces lung injury, but the mechanism for this is unknown. Methods: Male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized to five groups (n = 8/group): (1) Sham (no ABD); (2) Targeted intravenous fluid (TIVF) (ABD plus enough IVF to maintain a MAP of 80 mmHg) at 2 hours post-resuscitation (RES); (3) ABD + TIVF + DPR (TIVF and 30 cc intraperitoneal 2.5% Delflex) at 2 hours post-RES; (4) ABD + TIVF at 4 hours post-RES; and (5) ABD + TIVF + DPR at 4 hours post-RES. Messenger RNA (mRNA) levels were measured using Qiagen qRT PCR. Protein levels were assessed using quantitative ELISAs and the Luminex MagPix system. Results: Use of DPR caused 5.8-fold downregulation of mRNA expression for TNF-α and 2.7-fold decrease for the TNF receptor compared to TIVF alone. Caspase 8 mRNA was also downregulated. Protein levels for TNF-α, TNF receptor, caspase 8, NFκB, and NFκB inhibitor kinase, which promotes dissociation of NFκB inhibitor, were reduced by DPR. Cell death markers M30 and M65 were also decreased with DPR. Conclusions: Use of DPR caused changes in the expression of multiple mRNAs and proteins in the caspase 8 apoptotic pathway. These data represent a mechanism through which DPR exerts its beneficial effects within the lung tissue.

Nationwide Outcomes after Renal Transplantation from Kidney-Only versus Multiple-Organ Deceased Donors.

To assess renal transplant outcomes after donation by kidney-only (KO) versus multiple-organ (MO) donors on a national scale. The United Network for Organ Sharing database was examined for patients undergoing isolated kidney transplant from a deceased donor from 2000 through 2016. Comparison was made between recipients of grafts from KO versus MO donors at baseline and in a cohort of KO and MO recipients matched via propensity scoring. Outcomes of interest included delayed graft function (DGF), patient survival, and the cumulative incidence of graft loss. There were 33,326 recipients in the KO cohort versus 144,690 in the MO cohort. Donation after cardiac death donors were more prevalent in the KO group (43.8% vs 5.3%; P < 0.001). DGF occurred in 36.1 per cent of the KO versus 22.7 per cent of the MO recipients (P < 0.001). Five-year survival was 79.5 per cent versus 83.4 per cent (P < 0.001) in the KO versus MO group. After propensity matching, DGF was still more common in the KO group (33.1% vs 30.1%; P < 0.001). Patient survival was similar (79.5% KO vs 80.1% MO; P = 0.117). Cumulative incidence of graft loss was higher in the KO group (17.8% vs 16.8%). Survival outcomes from KO donors are actually quite good and should not be considered as inferior to MO donors.

Self-Inflicted Stab Wounds: A Single-Center Experience from 2010 to 2016.

Despite low mortality rates, self-inflicted stab wounds (SISWs) can result in significant morbidity and often reflect underlying substance abuse and mental health disorders. This study aimed to characterize demographics, comorbidities, and outcomes seen in self-inflicted stabbings and compare these metrics to those seen in assault stabbings. A Level I trauma center registry was queried for patients with stab injuries between January 2010 and December 2015. Classification was based on whether injuries were SISWs or the result of assault stab wounds (ASWs). Demographic, injury, and outcome measures were recorded. Differences between genders, ethnicities, individuals with and without psychiatric comorbidities, and SISW and ASW patients were assessed. Within the SIWS cohort, no differences were found when comparing age, gender, or race, including need for operative intervention. However, patients with psychiatric histories were less likely to have a positive toxicology test on arrival than those without psychiatric histories (22% vs. 0%, P = 0.04). When compared with 460 ASW patients, SISW were older (41 vs. 35, P < 0.001), more likely to be white (92% vs. 64%, P < 0.001), more likely to have a psychiatric history (15% vs. 4%, P < 0.001), require operative intervention (65% vs. 50%, P = 0.008), and be discharged to a psychiatric facility (47% vs. 0.2%, P < 0.001). SISW patients have higher rates of psychiatric illness and an increased likelihood to require operative intervention as compared with ASW patients. This population demonstrates an acute need for both inpatient and outpatient psychiatric care with early involvement of multidisciplinary teams for treatment and discharge planning.

Does Distance to Transplant Center Affect Post Kidney Transplant Readmission Rates?

Many transplant recipients travel long distances to their transplant center with challenging access to their transplant team. As such, many centers keep recipients near to the center for a period immediately after discharge from the transplant admission. Thus far, the correlation between distance to the transplant center, readmission, and outcomes has not been described. The aim of this study was to examine this relationship. Patients undergoing deceased donor kidney transplant at a single center over a three-year period were analyzed via retrospective chart review for factors associated with distance to the transplant center and readmission. P values < 0.05 were considered significant. Of 141 patients, the overall 90-day readmission rate was 38.3 per cent, and rates were similar between nonlocal and local recipients. Nonlocal were more likely whites (66.1% vs 45.6%; P = 0.032) and from rural areas (56.5% vs 13.9%; P < 0.001). Length of stay was similar between groups, as were rates of delayed graft function. Non-death-censored graft survival was higher at one and three years for nonlocal patients (96.8% and 96.8% vs 89.7% and 78.4%; P = 0.016). This remained significant after adjusting for baseline differences between the groups (hazard ratio (HR) for graft failure = 0.195, 95%, P = 0.046). Patients who live remotely from the transplant center do not experience higher rates of readmission or worsened outcomes, and thus may be managed safely at home. Interestingly, graft survival is improved in nonlocal patients. This may reflect the urban nature of the area surrounding our transplant center, but warrants further study for conclusions to be reached.

Use of Enteral Nutrition for Gastrointestinal Bleeding Prophylaxis in the Critically Ill: Review of Current Literature.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review provides a comprehensive overview of the etiology of stress-related mucosal disease, current acid suppression therapy recommendations, and the role enteral nutrition may play in disease prevention. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent literature indicates enteral nutrition may prevent complications of stress-related mucosal disease by increasing splanchnic blood flow, enhancing gastrointestinal motility, and promoting cellular immunity and integrity through local nutrient delivery. Stress-related mucosal disease is a common complication of hospitalization in the critically ill which may lead to overt gastrointestinal bleeding and enhanced mortality. High-risk patients have historically been prescribed acid suppression therapy, though enteral nutrition may also have a role in disease mitigation.