Design parameters for Airy beams in light-sheet microscopy.

We derive analytical expressions for the length, thickness, and curvature of an Airy light sheet in terms of basic parameters of the cubic phase and the paraxially defined focusing optics that form the beam. The length and thickness are defined analogously to the Rayleigh range and beam waist of a Gaussian beam, hence providing a direct and quantitative comparison between the two beam types. The analytical results are confirmed via numerical Fresnel propagation simulations and discussed within the context of light-sheet microscopy, providing a comprehensive guide for the design of the illumination unit.

[Literature review of the influences on error rates when identifying equids with transponder and hot-iron branding]. / Literaturübersicht zu den Einflussfaktoren auf die Fehlerwahrscheinlichkeiten bei der Identifikation von Equiden durch Transponder und Heißbrand.

Although equids have had to be tagged with a transponder since 2009, breeding associations in Germany disagree as to which method is best suited for identification (with or without hot iron branding). Therefore, the aim of this systematic literature review was to gain an overview of how effective identification is using transponders and hot iron branding and as to which factors influence the success of identification. Existing literature showed that equids can be identified by means of transponders with a probability of 85-100%, whereas symbol brandings could be identified correctly in 78-89%, whole number brandings in 0-87% and single figures in 37-92% of the readings, respectively. The successful reading of microchips can be further optimised by a correctly operated implantation process and thorough training of the applying persons. affect identification with a scanner. The removal of transponders for manipulation purposes is virtually impossible. Influences during the application of branding marks can hardly, if at all, be standardised, but influence the subsequent readability relevantly. Therefore, identification by means of hot branding cannot be considered sufficiently reliable. Impaired quality of identification can be reduced during reading but cannot be counteracted. Based on the existing studies it can be concluded that the transponder method is the best suited of the investigated methods for clearly identifying equids, being forgery-proof and permanent. It is not to be expected that applying hot branding in addition to microchips would optimise the probability of identification relevantly.