Developing an Evidence-Based Military Auditory Fitness-for-Duty Standard Based on the 80-Word Modified Rhyme Test.

OBJECTIVES: One important function of military audiology is to conduct evaluations of service members (SMs) with hearing loss to ensure they are fit for deployment in dangerous operational environments. The objective of this study was to establish evidence-based auditory fitness-for-duty criteria based on speech-in-noise performance on the 80- and 160-word clinical versions of the Modified Rhyme Test (MRT 80 and MRT 160 ). DESIGN: Approximately 2400 SMs with various levels of hearing loss were recruited to complete the MRT 80 in conjunction with their annual hearing conservation evaluations. These SMs were also asked to perform one or more operationally-relevant listening tasks based on audio recordings made in highly realistic military training environments. The scores on these tests were compared to determine how well a proposed cutoff criterion for the MRT 80 was able to identify individuals who are hard of hearing with an exceptionally high risk of abnormally poor performance on operationally-relevant hearing tasks. RESULTS: The results show that a cutoff criterion that combines the percent correct score on two lists of the MRT 80 (i.e. MRT 160 ) with information about the better-ear threshold at 2 kHz is generally able to separate listeners with hearing loss into those who are likely to perform relatively well on operational listening tests and those who are likely to perform poorly on these tasks. This is consistent with current military acquisition standards, which identify the MRT as the preferred test for evaluating speech intelligibility for radios, headsets, and other communication equipment. It is also consistent with prior studies conducted in high-fidelity military simulations which have shown a significant correlation between MRT performance and operational outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed selection criteria, along with the new hearing profile standards that were recently adopted by the US Army, appear to provide an effective evidence-based methodology for identifying those SMs with hearing loss who are most at risk for poor performance on hearing-critical military tasks.

Development and Evaluation of a Body-Worn Dosimeter for Continuous and Impulsive Noise.

Noise exposure is encountered nearly everyday in both recreational and occupational settings, and can lead to a number of health concerns including hearing-loss, tinnitus, social-isolation and possibly dementia. Although guidelines exist to protect workers from noise, it remains a challenge to accurately quantify the noise exposure experienced by an individual due to the complexity and non-stationarity of noise sources. This is especially true for impulsive noise sources, such as weapons fire and industrial impact noise which are difficult to quantify due to technical challenges relating to sensor design and size, weight and power requirements. Because of this, personal noise dosimeters are often limited to a maximum 140 dB SPL and are not sufficient to measure impulse noise. This work details the design of a body-worn noise dosimeter (mNOISE) that processes both impulse and continuous noise ranging in level from 40 dBA-185 dBP (i.e. a quiet whisper to a shoulder fired rocket). Also detailed is the capability of the device to log the kurtosis of the sound pressure waveform in real-time, which is thought to be useful in characterizing complex noise exposures. Finally, we demonstrate the use of mNOISE in a military-flight noise environment. Clinical Relevance- On-body noise exposure monitoring can be used by audiologists industrial hygiene personnel and others to determine threshold of injury adequate hearing protection requirements and ultimately reduce permanent noise-induced hearing loss.

Reference equivalent threshold sound pressure levels for the Wireless Automated Hearing Test System.

This paper presents reference equivalent threshold sound pressure levels (RETSPLs) for the Wireless Automated Hearing Test System (WAHTS), a recently commercialized device developed for use as a boothless audiometer. Two initial studies were conducted following the ISO 389-9 standard [ISO 389-9 (2009). "Acoustics-Reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment. Part 9: Preferred test conditions for the determinations of reference hearing threshold levels" (International Organization for Standardization, Geneva)]. Although the standard recruitment criteria are intended to yield otologically normal test subjects, the recruited populations appeared to have slightly elevated thresholds [5-10 dB hearing level (HL)]. Comparison of WAHTS thresholds to other clinical audiometric equipment revealed bias errors that were consistent with the elevated thresholds of the RETSPL populations. As the objective of RETSPLs is to ensure consistent thresholds regardless of the equipment, this paper presents the RETSPLs initially obtained following ISO 389-9:2009 and suggested correction to account for the elevated HLs of the originally recruited populations. Two additional independent studies demonstrate the validity of these corrected thresholds.

Sensitivity of school-aged children to pitch-related cues.

Two experiments investigated the ability of 17 school-aged children to process purely temporal and spectro-temporal cues that signal changes in pitch. Percentage correct was measured for the discrimination of sinusoidal amplitude modulation rate (AMR) of broadband noise in experiment 1 and for the discrimination of fundamental frequency (F0) of broadband sine-phase harmonic complexes in experiment 2. The reference AMR was 100 Hz as was the reference F0. A child-friendly interface helped listeners to remain attentive to the task. Data were fitted using a maximum-likelihood technique that extracted threshold, slope, and lapse rate. All thresholds were subsequently standardized to a common d' value equal to 0.77. There were relatively large individual differences across listeners: eight had relatively adult-like thresholds in both tasks and nine had higher thresholds. However, these individual differences did not vary systematically with age, over the span of 6-16 yr. Thresholds were correlated across the two tasks and were about nine times finer for F0 discrimination than for AMR discrimination as has been previously observed in adults.