Prognostic Value of Standard Heart Failure Medication in Patients with Cardiac Transthyretin Amyloidosis.

Introduction: Cardiac transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR) is a progressive, fatal disease leading to heart failure due to accumulation of amyloid fibrils in the interstitial space and may occur as a hereditary (ATTRv) or wild-type (ATTRwt) form. Guidelines recommend the use of ACE inhibitors (ACEis) and beta-blockers (BBs) as heart failure therapy (HFT) in all patients with symptomatic heart failure and reduced ejection fraction, independent of the underlying etiology. However, the prognostic benefit of ACEis and BBs in ATTR has not been elucidated in detail yet. We thus sought to retrospectively investigate the outcome of patients with ATTRwt or ATTRv under HFT. Methods: Medical records of 403 patients with cardiac ATTR (ATTRwt: n = 268, ATTRv: n = 135) were screened for long-term medication as well as clinical, laboratory, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic data. Patients were assessed between 2005 and 2020 at the University Hospital Heidelberg. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to analyze potential differences in survival among different subgroups. Results: The mean follow-up was 28 months. In total, 43 patients (32%) with ATTRv and 140 patients (52%) with ATTRwt received HFT. Survival was significantly shorter in patients receiving HFT in ATTRv (46 vs. 83 months, p = 0.0007) vs. non-HFT. A significantly better survival was observed in patients with comorbidities (coronary artery disease, arterial hypertension) and HFT among ATTRwt patients (p = 0.004). No significant differences in survival were observed in the other subgroups. Conclusions: Survival analysis revealed a potential benefit of HFT in patients with ATTRwt and cardiac comorbidities such as coronary artery disease and/or arterial hypertension. In contrast, HFT should be used with caution in patients with ATTRv.

Divergent Findings in the Diagnosis of ATTR-CM Using Common Cardiac Diagnostics and 99m Tc-DPD Scintigraphy.

ABSTRACT: A 77-year-old man presented with progressive deterioration of physical capacity after successful percutaneous coronary intervention of known chronic coronary syndrome. Transthoracic echocardiography revealed hypertrophy of the left ventricle, and electrocardiogram showed low QRS voltage in all leads. 99m Tc-DPD scintigraphy was conducted to differentiate etiology such as amyloidosis and revealed increased cardiac tracer uptake in the left (grade 3) and right ventricle. Immunofixation showed no signs of paraproteinemia or Bence-Jones proteinuria. Thus, biventricular involvement of ATTR-cardiomyopathy was identified by 99m Tc-DPD scintigraphy. This approach should be considered if hypertrophic phenotype is present in patients with persistent deterioration of physical capacity not attributable to coronary artery disease.

Endovascular thrombectomy is cost-effective in acute basilar artery occlusion stroke.

Objective: Endovascular thrombectomy is a long-established therapy for acute basilar artery occlusion (aBAO). Unlike for anterior circulation stroke, cost-effectiveness of endovascular treatment has not been evaluated and is urgently needed to calculate expected health benefits and financial rewards. The aim of this study was therefore to simulate patient-level costs, analyze the economic potential of endovascular thrombectomy in patients with acute basilar artery occlusion (aBAO), and identify major determinants of cost-effectiveness. Methods: A Markov model was developed to compare outcome and cost parameters between patients treated by endovascular thrombectomy and patients treated by best medical care, based on four recent prospective clinical trials (ATTENTION, BAOCHE, BASICS, and BEST). Treatment outcomes were derived from the most recent literature. Uncertainty was addressed by deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Willingness to pay per QALY thresholds were set at 1x gross domestic product per capita, as recommended by the World Health Organization. Results: Endovascular treatment of acute aBAO stroke yielded an incremental gain of 1.71 quality-adjusted life-years per procedure with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $7,596 per QALY. This was substantially lower than the Willingness to pay of $63,593 per QALY. Lifetime costs were most sensitive to costs of the endovascular procedure. Conclusion: Endovascular treatment is cost-effective in patients with aBAO stroke.