Results of closed management of acute dislocation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative instability continues to be one of the most common complications limiting outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). The optimal management of this complication remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients with postoperative dislocation after RSA managed with closed reduction. METHODS: All patients who were treated with a closed reduction for dislocation after RSA in the period between May 2002 and September 2011 were identified and retrospectively reviewed. Final outcomes including recurrent instability, need for revision surgery, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons outcome score, and range of motion were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 21 patients were identified. Nearly 50% of cases (10 of 21) had previous surgery, with 80% (8 of 10) of these being previous arthroplasty. The average time to first dislocation was 200 days, with 62% (13 of 21) occurring in the first 90 days. At average follow-up of 28 months, 62% of these shoulders remained stable (13 of 21), 29% required revision surgery (6 of 21), and 9% remained unstable (2 of 21). The average American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 68.0 for patients treated with closed reduction for instability and 62.7 for those treated with revision surgery (P = .64). DISCUSSION: This study shows that an initial dislocation episode after RSA with use of this implant can be successfully managed with closed reduction and temporary immobilization in more than half of cases. Given that outcomes after revision surgery are not different from those after closed treatment, we would continue to recommend an initial attempt at closed reduction in the office setting in all cases of postoperative RSA dislocation.

Factors that predict postoperative motion in patients treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has proven to be a useful yet inconsistent tool to manage a variety of pathologic conditions. Factors believed to lead to poor postoperative range of motion (ROM) may be associated with preoperative diagnosis, poor preoperative ROM, and surgical factors such as inability to lengthen the arm. The purpose of this study was to analyze multiple factors that may be predictive of motion after RSA. Our hypothesis is that intraoperative ROM is most predictive of postoperative ROM. METHODS: Between February 2003 and April 2011, 540 patients (217 men and 323 women) treated with RSA were evaluated with measurements of preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative ROM at a follow-up, where ROM was found to have plateaued at 1 year as determined by a pilot study. A regression analysis was performed to define independent predictive factors of postoperative active ROM. RESULTS: Intraoperative forward flexion was the strongest predictor of final postoperative ROM, followed by gender and preoperative ROM. Age and arm lengthening were not significant independent predictors. Controlling for gender and preoperative ROM, patients with an intraoperative elevation of 90° gained 29° in postoperative forward elevation (P < .001), 120° gained approximately 40° in postoperative forward elevation (P < .001), 150° gained approximately 56° in postoperative forward elevation (P < .001) and 180° gained approximately 62° in postoperative forward flexion (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative forward flexion is the strongest predictor of postoperative ROM. Surgeons may use intraoperative motion as a powerful decision-making tool regarding soft tissue tension in RSA.

Arthroscopic posterior bone block augmentation in posterior shoulder instability.

BACKGROUND: Posterior instability is a relatively rare and challenging condition to treat. Soft-tissue procedures do not always provide satisfactory results. We present the results after arthroscopic posterior bone block augmentation with an iliac crest bone graft and a minimum of 12 months' follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2008 and 2009, we performed 19 arthroscopic posterior bone blocks on 18 patients with posterior instability (bilaterally in 1 patient). The mean age was 29.85 years at the time of surgery. The mean follow-up was 20.5 months. All patients had a painful, unstable shoulder. Preoperative etiology included trauma, glenoid dysplasia, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, and arthrosis with posterior glenoid erosion. RESULTS: The Rowe score improved from 18.4 points to 82.1 points, and the Walch-Duplay score improved from 37.4 points to 82.9 points, both statistically significant (P < .01). Radiologic bone healing was achieved in all cases. Nine cases had an excellent result with return to the previous level of sports, six were satisfied, and three had a persistently painful shoulder. Subsequent removal of screws improved symptoms in two of these patients, and in one patient, a cause for the pain and persistent instability was not found. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic posterior bone block augmentation presents a reliable technique for the treatment of symptomatic posterior instability with varying origin. Although this is a technically demanding procedure, in our experience, the potential benefits and minimally invasive nature outweigh the risks and benefits of more invasive procedures.