The effect of free flap surgery for oral cancer on laryngeal grade and intubation difficulty.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the change in laryngeal grade and intubation difficulty at subsequent surgery in patients with prior free flap reconstruction for oral cancer. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective case series included patients with a diagnosis of oral cancer who underwent free flap reconstruction (FFR) (S1) followed by a subsequent surgery (S2) which required intubation. The primary predictor variable was FFR. The primary outcome variable was the change in laryngeal grade, based on the classification of Cormack and Lehane, after FFR. Secondary outcomes were intubation difficulty and number of intubation attempts. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were included in the study. At S1, the average laryngeal grade was 1.1. There were 5 difficult intubations. The average time to S2 was 19 months. At S2, average laryngeal grade was 1.4. There were 17 difficult intubations. Analysis showed a significant association between FFR and a more obstructed view of the glottis at S2 (P = .007; 95% CI 0.101-0.808). FFR increased the odds of having >1 intubation attempt nearly 7-fold (OR 6.74; 95% CI 1.35-33.75), and the odds of a difficult intubation nearly 6-fold (OR 5.95; 95% CI 1.84-19.19) at S2, both of which were significant (P = .011 and P = .002, respectively) CONCLUSIONS: This investigation found an association between FFR for patients with oral cancer and a higher laryngeal grade - that is, a more obstructed view of the glottis - at subsequent surgery, in addition to increased intubation difficulty and greater number of intubation attempts.

Immediate Teeth in Fibulas Versus Standard Fibula Free Flap: A Comparison of Donor Surgical Site Infections.

BACKGROUND: Immediate placement of dental implants with dental restoration at the leg donor site requires implant components and prosthetic materials that are not packaged sterile. PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine if there was a difference in donor surgical site infection between patients that received a fibula free flap with dental implants and immediate teeth (ITFFF: immediate teeth fibula free flap) before flap transfer to the defect site when compared to standard fibula free flaps (SFFFs) without dental implant placement. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE: A retrospective cohort study was designed and implemented. The study population was composed of patients who underwent free fibula flap transfer for the treatment of benign or malignant conditions of the head and neck from 2015 to 2022. Patients who received immediate dental implants without teeth were excluded, since those implants are sterile and buried under soft tissue. PREDICTOR VARIABLE: The surgical treatment with either ITFFF or SFFF was treated as the primary predictor variable. MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE: The primary outcome variable was postoperative donor surgical site infection. COVARIATES: There were 12 covariate variables including age, sex, diabetes diagnosis, immunosuppression/prior chemotherapy treatment, body mass index, smoking status, pack year history, pathology treated, technique for fibula donor site closure, skin paddle harvest, skin paddle area (cm2), and negative pressure wound therapy. ANALYSES: For the effect of the covariates on the primary predictor variable, χ2 analyses and t-tests were used. The effect of the primary predictor variable on the primary outcome was evaluated using χ2 analysis. A P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: There were 37 patients in the ITFFF group and 47 in the SFFF group. The donor site infection rate for the entire study population was 2.38%. In the ITFFF group, there was 1 donor surgical site infection (2.70%), and in the SFFF group there was also 1 donor surgical site infection (2.13%). There was no significant difference in donor surgical site infection between the groups (P = .86). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: This study found no difference in donor surgical site infection rates between patients who received ITFFF versus SFFF. The overall donor surgical site infection rate following fibula free flap is low.

Brain Mechanisms of Virtual Reality Breathing Versus Traditional Mindful Breathing in Pain Modulation: Observational Functional Near-infrared Spectroscopy Study.

BACKGROUND: Pain is a complex experience that involves sensory-discriminative and cognitive-emotional neuronal processes. It has long been known across cultures that pain can be relieved by mindful breathing (MB). There is a common assumption that MB exerts its analgesic effect through interoception. Interoception refers to consciously refocusing the mind's attention to the physical sensation of internal organ function. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we dissect the cortical analgesic processes by imaging the brains of healthy subjects exposed to traditional MB (TMB) and compare them with another group for which we augmented MB to an outside sensory experience via virtual reality breathing (VRB). METHODS: The VRB protocol involved in-house-developed virtual reality 3D lungs that synchronized with the participants' breathing cycles in real time, providing them with an immersive visual-auditory exteroception of their breathing. RESULTS: We found that both breathing interventions led to a significant increase in pain thresholds after week-long practices, as measured by a thermal quantitative sensory test. However, the underlying analgesic brain mechanisms were opposite, as revealed by functional near-infrared spectroscopy data. In the TMB practice, the anterior prefrontal cortex uniquely modulated the premotor cortex. This increased its functional connection with the primary somatosensory cortex (S1), thereby facilitating the S1-based sensory-interoceptive processing of breathing but inhibiting its other role in sensory-discriminative pain processing. In contrast, virtual reality induced an immersive 3D exteroception with augmented visual-auditory cortical activations, which diminished the functional connection with the S1 and consequently weakened the pain processing function of the S1. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, our study suggested two analgesic neuromechanisms of VRB and TMB practices-exteroception and interoception-that distinctively modulated the S1 processing of the ascending noxious inputs. This is in line with the concept of dualism (Yin and Yang).

Spindle Cell Sarcoma of the Maxilla: A Rare Entity, Case Report, and Review of the Literature.

Spindle cell sarcoma (SCS) is a malignancy, with the most recent Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data citing a total of 250 reported cases occurring in the head and neck. Of these cases, none originated in the maxillofacial hard tissue. To the best of our knowledge, only 2 cases of primary osseous SCS of the maxillofacial region have been reported. These cases were not accounted for in the SEER data. The diagnosis of SCS requires its differentiation from other sarcomas and spindle cell neoplasms. Therefore, a comprehensive review to reinforce its inclusion in oral and maxillofacial surgeons' differential diagnosis for osseous neoplastic pathology is desired. In the present case report, we have described a maxillary SCS in a patient with an initial diagnosis of a spindle cell lesion of uncertain biologic behavior. We reviewed the data for SCS, including the epidemiologic data, diagnostic challenges, clinical and radiographic presentations, prognostic indicators, and treatment.