Fix or Replace? Patient Preferences for the Treatment of Geriatric Lower Extremity Fractures: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Introduction: When considering treatment options for geriatric patients with lower extremity fractures, little is known about which outcomes are prioritized by patients. This study aimed to determine the patient preferences for outcomes after a geriatric lower extremity fracture. Materials and Methods: We administered a discrete choice experiment survey to 150 patients who were at least 60 years of age and treated for a lower extremity fracture at a Level I trauma center. The discrete choice experiment presented study participants with 8 sets of hypothetical outcome comparisons, including joint preservation (yes or no), risk of reoperation at 6 months and 24 months, postoperative weightbearing status, disposition, and function as measured by return to baseline walking distance. We estimated the relative importance of these potential outcomes using multinomial logit modeling. Results: The strongest patient preference was for maintained function after treatment (59%, P < .001), followed by reoperation within 6 months (12%, P < .001). Although patients generally favored joint preservation, patients were willing to change their preference in favor of joint replacement if it increased function (walking distance) by 13% (SE, 66%). Reducing the short-term reoperation risk (12%, P < .001) was more important to patients than reducing long-term reoperation risk (4%, P = .33). Disposition and weightbearing status were lesser priorities to patients (9%, P < .001 and 7%, P < .001, respectively). Discussion: After a lower extremity fracture, geriatric patients prioritized maintained walking function. Avoiding short-term reoperation was more important than avoiding long-term reoperation. Joint preservation through fracture fixation was the preferred treatment of geriatric patients unless arthroplasty or arthrodesis provides a meaningful functional benefit. Hospital disposition and postoperative weightbearing status were less important to patients than the other included outcomes. Conclusions: Geriatric patients strongly prioritize function over other outcomes after a lower extremity fracture.

Socioeconomic status is associated with greater hazard of post-discharge mortality than race, gender, and ballistic injury mechanism in a young, healthy, orthopedic trauma population.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the utility of legacy demographic factors and ballistic injury mechanism relative to popular markers of socioeconomic status as prognostic indicators of 10-year mortality following hospital discharge in a young, healthy patient population with isolated orthopedic trauma injuries. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed to evaluate patients treated at an urban Level I trauma center from January 1, 2003, through December 31, 2016. Current Procedure Terminology (CPT) codes were used to identify upper and lower extremity fracture patients undergoing operative fixation. Exclusion criteria were selected to yield a patient population of isolated extremity trauma in young, otherwise healthy individuals between the ages of 18 and 65 years. Variables collected included injury mechanism, age, race, gender, behavior risk factors, Area Deprivation Index (ADI), and insurance status. The primary outcome was post-discharge mortality, occurring at any point during the study period. RESULTS: We identified 2539 patients with operatively treated isolated extremity fractures. The lowest two quartiles of socioeconomic status (SES) were associated with higher hazard of mortality than the highest SES quartile in multivariable analysis (Quartile 3 HR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.2-4.1, p = 0.01; Quartile 4 HR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.1-4.3, p = 0.02). Not having private insurance was associated with higher mortality hazard in multivariable analysis (HR 2.0, 95% CI: 1.3-3.2, p = 0.002). The presence of any behavioral risk factor was associated with higher mortality hazard in univariable analysis (HR: 1.8, p < 0.05), but this difference did not reach statistical significance in multivariable analysis (HR: 1.4, 95%: 0.8-2.3, p = 0.20). Injury mechanism (ballistic versus blunt), gender, and race were not associated with increased hazard of mortality (p > 0.20). CONCLUSION: Low SES is associated with a greater hazard of long-term mortality than ballistic injury mechanism, race, gender, and medically diagnosable behavioral risk factors in a young, healthy orthopedic trauma population with isolated extremity injury.

Using Discrete Choice Experiments to Quantify Patient Preferences.

Discrete choice experiments are a robust technique for quantifying preferences. With this method, respondents are presented with a series of hypothetical comparisons described by attributes with varying levels. The aggregated choices from respondents can be used to infer the relative importance of the described attributes and acceptable trade-offs between attributes. The data generated from discrete choice experiments can aid surgeons in aligning patient values with treatment decisions and support the design of research that is responsive to patient preferences. This article summarizes the application of discrete choice experiments to orthopaedics. We share best practices for designing discrete choice experiments and options for reporting study results. Finally, we suggest opportunities for this method within our field.

The Biomechanical Effects of Intramedullary Fixation to the Level of the Physeal Scar on Distal Tibia Fracture Stability.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether intramedullary nail contact with physeal scar improves construct mechanics when treating distal tibial shaft fractures. METHODS: Axially unstable extra-articular distal tibia fractures were created in 30 fresh frozen cadaveric specimens (15 pairs, mean age 79 years). Specimens underwent intramedullary nailing to the level of the physeal scar locked with one or two interlocks or short of the physeal scar locked with two interlocks (reference group). Specimens were subjected to 800N of axial load for 25,000 cycles. Primary outcomes were stiffness before and after cyclic loading. Secondary outcomes were load to failure, load at 3 mm displacement, plastic deformation, and total deformation. RESULTS: The physeal scar with one interlock cohort demonstrated 3.8% greater stiffness before cycling ( P = 0.75) and 1.7% greater stiffness after cycling ( P = 0.86) compared with the reference group. The physeal scar with two interlocks group exhibited 0.3% greater stiffness before cycling ( P = 0.98) and 8.4% greater stiffness after cycling ( P = 0.41) in relation to the reference group. No differences were identified regarding load to failure or load at 3 mm displacement. In specimens with two interlocks, those in contact with the physeal scar demonstrated significantly less plastic ( P = 0.02) and total ( P = 0.04) deformation. CONCLUSIONS: Constructs ending at the physeal scar demonstrated stiffness and load to failure similar to those without physeal scar contact. Less plastic and total deformation was noted in two-interlock constructs with physeal scar contact, suggesting a possible protective effect provided by the physeal scar. These data argue that physeal scar contact may offer a small mechanical benefit in nailing distal tibia fractures, but clinical relevance remains unknown.

Can an Orthopedic Hip Fracture Simulator Advance Orthopedic Residents' Hip Fracture Fixation Skills to an Expert Level?

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to evaluate hip fracture simulator training and orthopedic resident skill attainment. We hypothesized that after 6 training sessions, improvement in post-training scores in junior residents would exceed that of senior residents and that senior residents would attain expert level proficiency sooner. DESIGN: Thirty orthopedic residents from a single institution completed 6 training sessions. Sessions included a pretest, 9 training modules, and post-test. An expert score was obtained from the average scores of 8 trauma fellows and attending orthopedic traumatologists. The primary outcome measure was overall score. SETTING: A single academic institution. PARTICIPANTS: Orthopedic residents (postgraduate years [PGYs] 1-5). RESULTS: Twenty-six residents completed the study. The mean overall post-training score was 87% of the expert level. Factors associated with post-training score changes were additional training sessions (4.2% improvement [p < 0.01]), time between training sessions (0.3% decrease [p = 0.05]) and PGY5 class (12.1% improvement [p = 0.03]). Fifty-four percent of residents attained the expert overall score. Expert score attainment was not associated with an additional year of training or case log volume. Post-training scores plateaued for the PGY1s and showed linear improvement for the PGY5s. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in trends between training levels suggest this simulator is a useful adjunct to a 5-year orthopedic residency training program.

Work Productivity Loss After Minimally Displaced Complete Lateral Compression Pelvis Fractures.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify work impairment and economic losses due to lost employment, lost work time (absenteeism), and lost productivity while working (presenteeism) after a lateral compression pelvic ring fracture. Secondarily, productivity loss of patients treated with surgical fixation versus nonoperative management was compared. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a prospective, multicenter trial. SETTING: Two level I academic trauma centers. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Adult patients with a lateral compression pelvic fracture (OTA/AO 61-B1/B2) with a complete posterior pelvic ring fracture and less than 10 mm of initial displacement. Excluded were patients who were not working or non-ambulatory before their pelvis fracture or who had a concomitant spinal cord injury. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: Work impairment, including hours lost to unemployment, absenteeism, and presenteeism, measured by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment assessments in the year after injury. Results after non-operative and operative treatment were compared. RESULTS: Of the 64 included patients, forty-seven percent (30/64) were treated with surgical fixation, and 53% (30/64) with nonoperative management. 63% returned to work within 1 year of injury. Workers lost an average of 67% of a 2080-hour average work year, corresponding with $56,276 in lost economic productivity. Of the 1395 total hours lost, 87% was due to unemployment, 3% to absenteeism, and 10% to presenteeism. Surgical fixation was associated with 27% fewer lost hours (1155 vs. 1583, P = 0.005) and prevented $17,266 in average lost economic productivity per patient compared with nonoperative management. CONCLUSIONS: Lateral compression pelvic fractures are associated with a substantial economic impact on patients and society. Surgical fixation reduces work impairment and the corresponding economic burden. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Can a Computer-based Force Feedback Hip Fracture Skills Simulator Improve Clinical Task Performance? A Cadaveric Validation Study.

BACKGROUND: This cadaveric study seeks to determine whether skills acquired on the simulator translate to improved performance of the clinical task. We hypothesized that completion of simulator training modules would improve performance of percutaneous hip pinning. METHODS: Eighteen right-handed medical students from two academic institutions were randomized: trained (n = 9) and untrained (n = 9). The trained group completed nine simulator-based modules of increasing difficulty, designed to teach techniques of placing wires in an inverted triangle construct in a valgus-impacted femoral neck fracture. The untrained group had a brief simulator introduction but did not complete the modules. Both groups received a hip fracture lecture, an explanation and pictorial reference of an inverted triangle construct, and instruction on using the wire driver. Participants then placed three 3.2 mm guidewires in cadaveric hips in an inverted triangle construct under fluoroscopy. Wire placement was evaluated with CT at 0.5 mm sections. RESULTS: The trained group significantly outperformed the untrained group in most parameters (P ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that a force feedback simulation platform with simulated fluoroscopic imaging using an established, increasingly difficult series of motor skills training modules has potential to improve clinical performance and might offer an important adjunct to traditional orthopaedic training.

Small-Fragment Plate Fixation of Humeral Shaft Fractures.

Fixation of humeral shaft fractures is frequently performed with large-fragment (4.5 mm) plates to accommodate immediate weight bearing. Use of small-fragment (3.5 mm) plates as an alternative carries theoretical benefits. We examined nonunion rates and postoperative radial nerve palsy (RNP) rates in a retrospective cohort of patients undergoing open reduction and internal fixation of humeral shaft fractures with 3.5-mm or 4.5-mm plates. Two hundred thirty-six patients with 241 humeral shaft fractures were included. Small 3.5-mm plates were used in 83% of the patients, and large 4.5-mm plates were used in 17% of the patients. Fifty-three percent were made weight bearing as tolerated following surgical fixation. There was a 7% incidence of nonunion and a 10% incidence of RNP in the 3.5-mm plate group. There was a 7% incidence of nonunion and a 15% incidence of RNP in the 4.5-mm plate group. No statistically significant relationship was shown between nonunion or RNP and plate size (P=.74 and P=.39). No relationship was shown between nonunion and postoperative weight-bearing status (P=.45). Subgroup analysis according to plate size additionally showed no association of nonunion with postoperative weight bearing in both the 4.5-mm (P=.55) and the 3.5-mm (P=.25) cohorts. Small-fragment and large-fragment plating of humeral shaft fractures resulted in comparable union and RNP rates, regardless of postoperative weight-bearing status. Our findings suggest that 3.5-mm plate fixation of humeral shaft fractures is a safe alternative to 4.5-mm plate fixation. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(4):198-204.].

Outcomes of Tibiotalocalcaneal Hindfoot Fusion Nails Used for Acute Lower Extremity Trauma in a High-Risk Patient Population.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the outcomes of high-risk patients treated with tibiotalocalcaneal hindfoot fusion nails. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: Level I trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Between January 2007 and December 2016, 50 patients with significant medical comorbidities treated with a tibiotalocalcaneal hindfoot fusion nail in the setting of acute distal tibia and ankle trauma considered to be limb-threatening. INTERVENTION: Tibiotalocalcaneal hindfoot fusion nail. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Two-year cumulative incidence of unplanned reoperation and estimated survival with limb salvage at 2 years. RESULTS: Of the 50 patients, 20 (38%) had an unplanned reoperation (mean: 2.5 reoperations), including 19 for implant removal, 11 for irrigation and debridement and/or placement of an antibiotic delivery device, and 4 for revision fusion. Three patients required amputation and 3 patients died within 2 years of injury, resulting in an estimated survival with limb salvage at 2 years of 79% (95% confidence interval: 67%-91%). After accounting for the competing risk of death and incomplete follow-up, the 2-year cumulative incidence of unplanned reoperation was 64% (95% confidence interval: 62%-67%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients in this series experienced a high rate of return to the operating room but a relatively low rate of amputation. Because patients were indicated for this course of treatment on the basis of comorbidities felt to put them at high risk of loss of limb with traditional treatment, acute hindfoot fusion nailing might represent a viable option in select high-risk patients and injuries. Clinicians should be aware that complications are still common. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Does iliosacral screw removal reduce postoperative pain in unstable pelvic fracture patients? A matched prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: To compare pain and function in patients with unstable posterior pelvic fractures stabilized with posterior fixation who undergo iliosacral screw removal versus those who retain their iliosacral screws. METHODS: A prospective observational cohort study identified 59 patients who reported pain at least 4 months after iliosacral screw fixation of an unstable posterior pelvic ring fracture from 2015-2019. The primary intervention was iliosacral screw removal versus a matched iliosacral screw retention control group. Patient-reported pain was measured with the 10-point Brief Pain Inventory, and patient-reported function was measured with the Majeed Pelvic Outcome Score. Both measured within 6 months of the intervention. RESULTS: Before iliosacral screw removal, the mean pain was 4.7 (SD, 3.0) compared with 4.7 (SD, 3.0) in the matched control group. Following iliosacral screw removal, the average pain in the screw removal group was 3.7 (SD, 2.7) and 3.3 (SD, 2.5) in the matched control group. We found no evidence that iliosacral screw removal reduced pain in this population (mean difference, 0.2 points; 95% CI, -1.0 to 1.5; p = 0.71). In addition, the improvement in function after iliosacral screw removal was not statistically indistinguishable from zero (mean difference, 3.1 points; 95% CI, -4.6 to 10.9; p = 0.42). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that iliosacral screw removal offers no significant pelvic pain or function benefit when compared with a matched control group. Surgeons should consider these data when managing patients with pelvic pain who are candidates for iliosacral screw removal.

Prospective Characterization of Pain and Function in Patients With Unstable Pelvic Fractures Treated With Posterior Screw Fixation.

OBJECTIVES: Describe patient-reported pain and function within 24 months of a pelvic fracture treated with posterior screw fixation and identify factors associated with increased pain. DESIGN: Prospective case series. SETTING: Academic trauma center. PATIENTS/INTERVENTION: Eighty-eight patients with adult pelvic fracture treated with sacroiliac or transiliac screws. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Average pain measured with the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI); function measured with the Majeed Pelvic Outcome Score from 6 to 24 months postinjury. RESULTS: The mean pain from 6 to 24 months postinjury was 2.22 on the 10-point BPI scale (95% CI, 0.64-3.81). Sixty-nine patients (78.4%) reported mild to no pain at 6 months; 12 (13.6%) patients had severe pain. Two years after injury, 71 patients (80.6%) exhibited mild to no pain. Within 24 months of injury, the mean pelvic function was 71 on the 100-point Majeed scale (95% CI, 60-82). Half of the sample (n = 44) had good to excellent pelvis function by 6 months postinjury; 55 patients (62.5%) attained this level of function by 24 months. A history of chronic pain (1.31; 95% CI, 0.26-2.37; P = 0.02), initial fracture displacement (≥5 mm) (0.99; 95% CI, 0.23-1.69; P = 0.01), and socioeconomic deprivation (0.28; 95% CI, 0.11-0.44; P < 0.01) were significantly associated with increased pain. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that most patients with unstable pelvic ring fractures treated with posterior screw fixation achieve minimal to no pelvis pain and good to excellent pelvic function 6-24 months after injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The Effect of Surgeon Experience on Short- to Medium-Term Complication Rate Following Operative Fixation of Acetabular Fractures.

OBJECTIVES: Operative management of acetabular fractures is technically challenging, but there is little data regarding how surgeon experience affects outcomes. Previous efforts have focused only on reduction quality in a single surgeon series. We hypothesized that increasing surgeon experience would be associated with improved acetabular surgical outcomes in general. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Urban academic level-I trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Seven hundred ninety-five patients who underwent an open reduction internal fixation for an acetabular fracture. RESULTS: There was a significant association between surgeon experience and certain outcomes, specifically reoperation rate (16.9% overall), readmission rate (13.9% overall), and reduction quality. Deep infection rate (9.7% overall) and secondary displacement rate (3.7% overall) were not found to have a significant association with surgeon experience. For reoperation rate, the time until 50% peak performance was 2.4 years in practice. CONCLUSION: Surgeon experience had a significant association with reoperation rate, quality of reduction, and readmission rate after open reduction internal fixation of acetabular fractures. Other patient outcomes were not found to be associated with surgeon experience. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Long-Term Outcomes of Multiligament Knee Injuries.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize long-term outcomes of multiligament knee injuries (MLKIs) using patient-reported outcome measures, physical examination, and knee radiographs. DESIGN: Retrospective clinical follow-up. METHODS: Twenty knees (18 patients) were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 13.1 years (range 11-15 years). The primary outcome measure was the Internal Knee Documentation Committee score. Patients also completed secondary patient-based outcome assessments including Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System computer adaptive testing, Short Form-36, and Tegner activity score. Sixteen knees (14 patients) also had physical examination and bilateral knee radiographs assessed with the Kellgren-Lawrence score. RESULTS: The mean Internal Knee Documentation Committee score was 56 points, which was significantly lower than the age-matched normative value of 77 ( P = 0.004) and exceeds the minimum clinically important difference of 12 points. Most secondary outcome scores were worse than normative population values. Posttraumatic arthritis was present in 100% of MLKIs that had radiographs. Comparing operative versus nonoperative management, there were no statistical differences in patient demographics, injury characteristics, physical examination, or imaging, but surgical patients had better Short Form-36 Social Functioning (89 vs. 63, P = 0.02) and Tegner scores (4.5 vs. 2.9, P = 0.05). CONCLUSION: The long-term outcomes of MLKIs are generally poor, and posttraumatic radiographic evidence of arthritis seems to be universal . Operative management of these injuries may improve long-term outcomes. Clinicians should be aware of these results when counseling patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Open reduction and internal fixation alone versus open reduction and internal fixation plus total hip arthroplasty for displaced acetabular fractures in patients older than 60 years: A prospective clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: The optimal treatment of elderly patients with an acetabular fracture is unknown. We conducted a prospective clinical trial to compare functional outcomes and reoperation rates in patients older than 60 years with acetabular fracture treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) alone versus ORIF plus concomitant total hip arthroplasty (ORIF + THA). Our hypothesis was that patients who had ORIF + THA would have better patient reported outcomes and lower reoperation rates postoperatively. METHODS: Inclusion criteria were patients older than 60 years with acetabular fracture plus at least one of three fracture characteristics: dome impaction, femoral head fracture, or posterior wall component. Eligible patients were operative candidates based on fracture displacement, ambulatory status, and physiological appropriateness. Patients received either ORIF alone or ORIF + THA (accomplished at same surgery through same incision). Outcome measurements included Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index hip score, Short Form 36, Harris Hip Score, and Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form scores. Additionally, patients were monitored for any unplanned reoperation within 2 years. RESULTS: Forty-seven of 165 eligible patients with an average age of 70.7 years were included. The mean Harris Hip Score difference favored ORIF + THA (mean difference, 12.3, [95% confidence interval (CI), -0.3 to 24.9, p = 0.07]). No clinically important differences were detected in any other validated outcome score or patient satisfaction score 1 year after surgery. ORIF + THA decreased the absolute risk of reoperation by 28% (95% CI, 13% to 44%, p < 0.01). No postoperative hip dislocation occurred in either group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients older than 60 years with an operative displaced acetabular fracture with specific fracture features (dome impaction, femoral head fracture, or posterior wall component), treatment with ORIF + THA resulted in fewer reoperations than treatment with ORIF alone. No differences in patient satisfaction and other validated outcome measures were detected.

Fixed angle device comparison in young femoral neck fractures: Dynamic hip screw vs dynamic helical hip system.

INTRODUCTION: Femoral neck fractures in the young patient present a unique challenge. Most surgeons managing these injuries prefer a fixed angle implant, however these devices are fraught with problems. A dynamic hip screw (DHS) is one such fixed angle device that risks malreduction through rotational torque during screw insertion. To avoid this risk some surgeons utilize a dynamic helical hip system (DHHS), however little is known about the complication profile of this device. We hypothesized that the complication rate between these two devices would be similar. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients presenting to a single tertiary referral center with a femoral neck fracture were identified from a prospectively collected trauma database over an 11-year period. Patients were included if they were less than 60 years of age, treated with a DHS or DHHS, and had at least 6 months of follow-up. Demographic data, injury characteristics, and post-operative complications were obtained through chart review. Standard statistical comparisons were made between groups. A total of 77 patients met inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Average age of patients was 38 years (range: 18-59) and 56 (73%) were male. The DHS was used in 37 (48%) patients and the DHHS was used in 40 (52%) patients. Demographic data including average age, gender, body mass index, and smoking status did not differ between the groups. There were 29 (39%) total complications of interest (femoral neck shortening >5 mm, non-union requiring osteotomy, conversion to THA, and osteonecrosis. There were 19 (51%) complications in the DHS group and 10 (25%) in the DHHS group (p = 0.01, risk difference 25%, 95% CI 7-43). Comparisons of the individual complications about the DHS and DHHS cohort did not reach statistical significance for non-union (8% vs 3%) or THA (16% vs 13%) (p = 0.33, p = 0.64, respectively) but a difference was detected in the rate of shortening (27% vs 10%; p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates a high risk of complication when managing young femoral neck fractures in line with prior literature. The major complication rate of non-union requiring osteotomy or fixation failure resulting in THA was no different between the two groups, but the rate of shortening was greater the DHS group. This data suggests the DHHS may be a suitable device to manage the young femoral neck fracture and without increased risk of complication.

Assessing Soft Tissue Perfusion Using Laser-Assisted Angiography in Tibial Plateau and Pilon Fractures: A Pilot Study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether skin perfusion surrounding tibial plateau and pilon fractures is associated with the Tscherne classification for severity of soft tissue injury. The secondary aim was to determine if soft tissue perfusion improves from the time of injury to the time of definitive fracture fixation in fractures treated using a staged protocol. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Academic trauma center. PATIENTS: Eight pilon fracture patients and 19 tibial plateau fracture patients who underwent open reduction internal fixation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Skin perfusion (fluorescence units) as measured by LA-ICGA. RESULTS: Six patients were classified as Tscherne grade 0, 9 as grade 1, 10 as grade 2, and 2 as grade 3. Perfusion decreased by 14 fluorescence units (95% confidence interval, -21 to -6; P < 0.01) with each increase in Tscherne grade. Sixteen patients underwent staged fixation with an external fixator (mean time to definitive fixation 14.1 days). The mean perfusion increased significantly at the time of definitive fixation by a mean of 13.9 fluorescence units (95% confidence interval 4.8-22.9; P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: LA-ICGA perfusion measures are associated with severity of soft tissue injury surrounding orthopaedic trauma fractures and appear to improve over time when fractures are stabilized in an external fixator. Further research is warranted to investigate whether objective perfusion measures are predictive of postoperative wound healing complications and whether this tool can be used to effectively guide timing of safe surgical fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A Prospective Clinical Trial Comparing Surgical Fixation Versus Nonoperative Management of Minimally Displaced Complete Lateral Compression Pelvis Fractures.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the early pain and functional outcomes of operative fixation versus nonoperative management for minimally displaced complete lateral compression (LC; OTA/AO 61-B1/B2) pelvic fractures. DESIGN: Prospective clinical trial. SETTING: Two academic trauma centers. PATIENTS: Forty-eight adult patients with LC pelvic ring injuries with <10 mm of displacement were treated nonoperatively and 47 with surgical fixation. Sixty percent of participants were randomized. Seventy-three percent of the fractures were displaced <5 mm, and 71% were LC-1 patterns. INTERVENTION: Operative fixation versus nonoperative management. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was patient-reported pain using the 10-point Brief Pain Inventory. Functional outcome was measured using the Majeed pelvic score. Outcomes were analyzed using hierarchical Bayesian models to compare the average treatment effect from injury to 12 and 52 weeks postinjury. The probability of the mean treatment benefit exceeding a clinically important difference was determined. RESULTS: The 3-month average treatment effect of surgery compared with nonoperative management was a 1.2-point reduction in pain [95% credible interval (CrI): 0.4-1.9] and an 8% absolute improvement in the Majeed score (95% CrI: 3%-14%). Similar results persisted to 1 year. Patients with initial fracture displacement ≥5 mm experienced a larger reduction in pain (2.2, 95% CrI: 0.9-3.5) compared with those patients with less initial displacement (0.9, 95% CrI: 0.1-1.8). CONCLUSION: On average, surgical fixation likely provides a small improvement in pain and functional outcome for up to 12 months. Patients with ≥5 mm of posterior pelvic ring displacement are more likely to experience clinically important improvements in pain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Comparison of 3 C-Arm Draping Techniques to Prevent Far Side Contamination.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of reducing contamination using 2 methods of C-Arm draping compared with traditional methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors simulated an operating room using an extremity drape, commercially available C-Arm drapes, and C-Arm. A black light was placed above the field. A fluorescent powder was placed on the nonsterile portions of the field. Baseline light intensity was recorded by photo. The C-Arm was brought into the surgical field for orthogonal imaging for 15 cycles. A repeat photograph was taken to measure the increase in intensity of the fluorescent powder to assess degree of contamination. This was repeated 5 times for each configuration: standard C-Arm drape, a proprietary close-fitting drape, and a split drape secured to the far side with the split wrapped around the C-Arm receiver. Light intensity difference was measured and average change in intensity was compared. RESULTS: Compared with standard draping, the proprietary close-fitting drape resulted in a 71.3% decrease in contamination (4.84% vs. 16.90%, P = 0.101) that trended toward significance and the split drape resulted in a 99.5% decrease (0.09% vs. 16.90%, P = 0.017) that was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Far side contamination can be reduced by using a split drape connecting the operative table to the C-Arm receiver, effectively "sealing off" contaminants. The proprietary close-fitting drape may also decrease contamination, but this was not statistically significant in this study. Use of the split drape technique will help prevent contamination and may ultimately lead to decreased infection risk.

Analysis of Computed Tomography-Based Technique for Measuring Femoral Anteversion: Implications for Measuring Rotation After Femoral Intramedullary Nail Insertion.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the reliability of the current computed tomography (CT)-based technique for determining femoral anteversion and quantify the prevalence and magnitude of side-to-side differences. DESIGN: Cross-sectional cohort study. SETTING: Academic trauma center. PATIENTS: We reviewed CT scans from 120 patients with bilateral full-length axial cuts of both femurs. Two hundred forty femurs with no fractures or other identifying features in their femora were included. Ten unique data sets were created to measure anteversion of the left and right sides. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Intraobserver and interobserver reliability were calculated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and pooled absolute differences. The mean absolute difference between the sides was determined using a fixed-effects model. RESULTS: Interobserver reliability was high (ICC: 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83-0.88). The pooled mean absolute magnitude of variation between reviewers was small at 1.6 degrees (95% CI: 1.4-1.8 degrees) per scan. The intraobserver reproducibility was high (ICC: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.88-0.93) with a mean error of 2.7 degrees (95% CI: 2.2-3.1 degrees) per repeat viewing of the same scan by the same person. The magnitude of side-to-side variation was 2.0 degrees (95% CI: 1.5-2.6 degrees). Twenty-one subjects (18%, 95% CI: 12%-25%) had a mean side-to-side calculated femoral anteversion difference of ≥10 degrees, whereas 6 (5%, 95% CI: 2-10) subjects had a calculated mean side-to-side difference of ≥15 degrees. CONCLUSIONS: CT based femoral anteversion measurement techniques demonstrate good precision. Only 1 in 20 patients had side-to-side differences of 15 degrees or more.

Simulation Training in Fracture Surgery.

The current surgical training environment has sparked a paradigm shift toward the use of surgical training simulation. An apprentice-based model has historically been used in surgical education, but current financial and practical constraints have led to a more variable training experience. Surgical simulation has demonstrated efficacy in many facets of orthopaedic training and has most recently been implemented to fine-tune surgical skill in reconstruction of traumatic skeletal injuries. Although some surgical skills learned during residency training are not fully used in later practice, most surgeons require a baseline level of competence in managing skeletal trauma. Fracture surgery is heavily dependent on technical skill. Trainee simulation use in skill acquisition has potential to improve proficiency during actual surgery. Furthermore, in a specialty where the standard axiom has been repetition matters, education augmentation with simulation provides overall benefit. Work remains to maximize the effectiveness of surgical simulation in fracture treatment through improved model integration and access.