The Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) of marginal donors allocated by standardized pretransplant donor biopsy assessment: distribution and association with graft outcomes.

Pretransplant donor biopsy (PTDB)-based marginal donor allocation systems to single or dual renal transplantation could increase the use of organs with Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) in the highest range (e.g. >80 or >90), whose discard rate approximates 50% in the United States. To test this hypothesis, we retrospectively calculated the KDPI and analyzed the outcomes of 442 marginal kidney transplants (340 single transplants: 278 with a PTDB Remuzzi score<4 [median KDPI: 87; interquartile range (IQR): 78-94] and 62 with a score=4 [median KDPI: 87; IQR: 76-93]; 102 dual transplants [median KDPI: 93; IQR: 86-96]) and 248 single standard transplant controls (median KDPI: 36; IQR: 18-51). PTDB-based allocation of marginal grafts led to a limited discard rate of 15% for kidneys with KDPI of 80-90 and of 37% for kidneys with a KDPI of 91-100. Although 1-year estimated GFRs were significantly lower in recipients of marginal kidneys (-9.3, -17.9 and -18.8 mL/min, for dual transplants, single kidneys with PTDB score<4 and =4, respectively; p<0.001), graft survival (median follow-up 3.3 years) was similar between marginal and standard kidney transplants (hazard ratio: 1.20 [95% confidence interval: 0.80-1.79; p=0.38]). In conclusion, PTDB-based allocation allows the safe transplantation of kidneys with KDPI in the highest range that may otherwise be discarded.

Incidence of late deep venous thrombosis among renal transplant patients.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) manifest hypercoagulable state that contributes to an increased incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), not only early but also late in their course. KTRs display an imbalance of hemostatic mechanisms with a multifactorial rise in procoagulant factors, partly related to traditional risk factors and partly to transplantation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of first episodes of DVT among KTRs, focusing on risk factors. METHODS: From 2008 to 2011, we evaluated 30 kidney transplant patients who ≥4 months there after transplantation developed DVT in the lower limbs only, lower limbs complicated by pulmonary embolism or retinal thrombosis. We analyzed causes of primary nephropathy, immunosuppressive regimen, post-transplantation infections, and erythrocytosis. DVT was diagnosed by color Doppler ultrasound or eye examination. RESULTS: A significantly increased incidence of DVT was observed among patients receiving cyclosporine or cyclosporine + mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, affected by polycystic kidney diseases, systemic lupus erythematosus or nephrotic syndrome, or displaying rapid and/or excessive correction of hematocrit values. DVT was not significantly related to an acute infection (cytomegalovirus) or to the prior dialysis modality. CONCLUSIONS: Hypercoagulability is a multifactorial condition in KTRs, representing a severe complication in stable patients. Prevention may consist of either accurate pretransplantation screening for thrombophilia or identification of patients at higher DVT risk.

Incidence of cancer in kidney transplantation waiting list patients: a single center experience.

INTRODUCTION: It is widely accepted that the risk of malignancies is significantly increased among patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and after kidney transplantation compared with the general population. Only a few data are available on kidney transplantation waiting list patients. The aim of this study was to investigate solid organ cancer incidence among subjects on the waiting list at a single center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of all patients enrolled on our kidney transplantation waiting list between August 1, 2008 and July 31, 2010, seeking to evaluate the causes of withdrawal from the list, incidence of cancer, type of neoplasm, and its correlation with clinical features. We estimated the ratio of observed to expected numbers of cancers, the standardized incidence ratio (SIR). RESULTS: Among 1184 patients, we excluded 569 patients from the waiting list including 26 (4.56%) who displayed malignancies. The overall incidence of cancer was 0.11 events/person-months and the overall prevalence of cancer was 2.2%. In 97% of patients, the malignant disease was confined to the primitive organ of origin without secondary dissemination. We observed a prevalence of cancers related to ESKD (17; 65.38%). The SIR for all cancer types in our population compared with the general population was 2.22. The SIR for native kidney and thyroid cancers among our population compared with the general population was >10. CONCLUSION: The incidence of cancer was significantly increased among kidney transplantation waiting list patients compared with the general population. Our study highlighted the importance of a careful, targeted neoplastic screening. It could be particularly important for ESKD-related malignancies like native kidney tumors or thyroid cancers.

Calcineurin inhibitors in renal transplantation still needed but in reduced doses: a review.

Despite their contribution in the success of organ transplantation, calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) may be responsible for frequent and severe side effects that can affect graft survival and life expectancy. In this article, we have reviewed registry studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that seek to avoid, withdraw, or minimize CNIs in renal transplant recipients. Attempts to completely avoid CNIs by administering mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and/or sirolimus (SRL) have resulted in increased risks of rejection and side effects, with small advantage to improve renal graft function. Early withdrawal of CNIs after transplantation using administration of MMF can improve graft function but may be associated with a greater risk of acute or chronic rejection and graft failure. RCTs in which CNIs were replaced a few months after transplantation by SRL reported improved graft function among SRL-treated patients, but such a treatment was complicated by iatrogenic toxicity. Late replacement of CNIs with SRL did not produce a particular advantage and again was complicated by more frequent side effects. On the basis of these trials, it seems that CNI elimination can trigger rejection or side effects. Recent RCTs showed that minimization of CNI doses in association with everolimus does not increase the risk of rejection, allows one to obtain good graft function, and is well tolerated. Such an approach seems therefore preferable to complete elimination of CNIs with substitution of the current immunosuppressive drugs.

A very early and acute renal impairment due to polyomavirus allograft nephropathy.

Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) has become an important cause of graft loss in the last few years. The typical course of PVAN is characterized by an asymptomatic period of viruria followed, within weeks, by the development of viremia in the context of stable renal function. The persistence of viral replication characterized by high viremia, leads to parenchymal injuries and causes the development, within months, of PVAN that could lead to deterioration in graft function and graft loss. We reported, in a patient who received a renal transplant, an unusual presentation of PVAN characterized by the development of acute renal failurte earlier than would be expected after transplantation, where the histological presentation alone could be confused with an acute rejection. We underline the importance of the association of histological findings with the viral load in urine and blood and with ancillary techniques such as immunohistochemistry and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in situ for virus detection. We also want to emphasize that decoy cells and PCR for BK virus DNA research could be considered among the diagnostic tools for possible acute renal failure in kidney transplant.

[Factors determining cardiovascular disease progression after kidney transplant]. / I fattori di progressione della malattia cardiovascolare dopo trapianto renale.

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality and morbidity in renal transplant recipients as well as the leading cause of death with a functioning graft. The high cardiovascular risk is attributable to the prolonged exposure to multiple traditional and nontraditional risk factors in the pretransplant and posttransplant period. Particular attention must be paid to cardiovascular screening of candidates for kidney transplantation. After a transplant, treatment and prevention strategies should be focused on the modifiable risk factors including smoking, dietary habits, physical activity, weight control, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. Further studies on these factors are needed to better define the pharmacological approaches (hypotensive or hypolipemic drugs) and therapeutic targets. In view of the role of immunosuppressive therapy in the onset or worsening of several risk factors, it is important to tailor the treatment approach and dosage to the cardiovascular risk profile of the individual patient.

[Preventing and reducing comorbidity in candidates for kidney transplantation for the improvement of post-operative results]. / Prevenire e ridurre le comorbilita' nei candidati al trapianto di rene per migliorare i risultati post-trapianto.

The correct and constant management of transplant waiting lists is necessary for the optimal utilization of the limited number of organs available for transplantation. The guidelines regarding placement on transplant waiting lists (absolute and relative contraindications) are well documented, even though they are in constant development. The criteria for the monitoring of patients on waiting lists, however, are not so well defined; this aspect is subject to careful evaluation on account of the widening of the criteria for transplantation suitability, the increase in the average age of patients, a rise in the number of enrolments and, as a result, prolonged waiting time (in Italy, the average time spent on a waiting list is 37 months). During the waiting period, a greater risk of clinically significant comorbidities and mortality, above all from cardiovascular events, has been noted (the annual mortality is 5-7% in the US, 1.3% in Italy). An in-depth clinical and instrumental study of patients with chronic renal failure is necessary when screening eligible candidates for transplant programs, individualizing therapeutic strategies, and identifying patients for whom the risks outweigh the potential benefits. Clinical and instrumental monitoring, as well as adequate treatment of comorbidities during the waiting period, can help improve the post-transplant outcome. This work examines the study algorithms and monitoring procedures for patients on kidney transplant waiting lists.

[Chronic allograft dysfunction: role of immunosuppressive treatment]. / Disfunzione cronica del trapianto renale (CAD): ruolo della terapia immunosoppressiva.

Renal transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage renal disease. In recent years a major improvement has been observed in short-term graft survival, but there has been no corresponding improvement in long-term survival. Chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD) is an anatomical and clinical alteration that can lead to the loss of the transplanted organ without any specific cause. The pathogenesis of CAD, which still remains to be fully clarified, involves both immunological factors (acute rejection, subclincial rejection, HLA mismatches between donor and recipient, noncompliance, etc) and non-immunological factors (marginal donor ischemia/reperfusion injury, infection, cardiovascular risk factors, nephrotoxicity, etc). Immunosuppressive therapy represents one of the strategies for the prevention of CAD. The introduction into clinical practice of novel immunosuppressive agents with no or lower nephrotoxicity, like mycophenolate mofetile, rapamycin and everolimus, will make therapeutic strategies aimed at decreasing the incidence of CAD feasible.

Hyperimmunized patients awaiting cadaveric kidney graft: is there a quick desensitization possible?

On all kidney waiting lists the 10% to 20% of patients who have antibodies against more than 80% of a panel of HLA antigens (panel reactive antibody [PRA] >80%) are difficult to transplant. The best solution for these patients is to find a compatible donor, ideally a full match, who yields a negative crossmatch test (CMX). If this is not possible, desensitization treatment (high-dose) intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) or plasmapheresis (PP) + low-dose IVIG is possible with good results in living donor kidney transplantation mainly if the antibody titer is low. It may also be offered to patients awaiting cadaveric donors too after a long waiting time; however, when applied for several months, it has the obvious disadvantage of giving the patient the risk for long-lasting immunologic weakness without the certitude of finding a kidney. In one of our recent cases of combined liver plus kidney transplantation, a positive CMX became negative 8 hours after the liver operation; the kidney was transplanted with a good result which lasted over 3 years. This observation suggested the possibility of a quick desensitization protocol in selected patients with a large (but not strong) immunization who probably are the majority. Patients sensitized to IVIG and with low titer PRA could be given a single PP + low-dose IVIG (what can be done within the time limit of cadaveric donor kidney transplantation) with good probability of turning an initial positive CMX to negative with the possibility of performing the operation and the advantage of giving the immunosuppression only when the kidney is present.

Metabolic syndrome after kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic syndrome (MS) includes some risk factors for development of diabetes and cardiovascular disease, obesity (BMI > 30), high triglycerides, low HDL cholesterol, hypertension and impaired glucose tolerance. Following the definition of the Adult Treatment Panel III criteria, a diagnosis of MS was established when 3 or more factors were present. In renal transplant patients MS has been reported to negatively influence both patient and graft survivals. The present study sought to verify the effect of MS among our cases. METHODS: 298 cadaveric renal transplant recipients operated between January 1, 1996 and December 31, 2001 with absence of diabetes before transplantation, stable renal function 1 year posttransplantation and at least 4 years follow up were retrospectively evaluated from the end of the first post-operative year. RESULTS: 50 patients out of 298 (16,7%) had MS at the beginning of the study, including 37 of them with 3 and 13 with 4 risk factors. Only one patient with MS died of cardiovascular disease. Graft failure was observed in 23.5% MS patients versus 9,7% patients without the Syndrome (p:n.s.) Only Creatinine and the incidence of Cardiovascular Diseases at 4 years were statistically higher in MS patients (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggested that MS is a risk factor for increasing CVD morbidity and decreased graft function, but early treatment of risk factors as soon as they become apparent can limit the adverse effects on patient and graft survival.

Double kidney transplantation: initial experience of the Bologna Transplant Center.

AIM: Double-kidney transplantation is performed using organs from marginal donors with a histological score not suitable for single kidney transplantation. The aim of the study is to verify the results obtained with double-kidney transplantation in terms of graft and patient survival and complications. METHODS: Between September 2001 and September 2004, 16 double-kidney transplantations were performed in our center. The kidneys were all perfused with Celsior solution and the mean cold ischemia time was 17.6+/-2.7 hours. In all cases a pre-transplant kidney biopsy was performed to evaluate the damage. Immunosuppression was tacrolimus based for all patients. RESULTS: Eight patients had good renal postoperative function while the other eight had acute tubular necrosis. Two of the patients who had severe acute tubular necrosis never recovered renal function. There was only one episode of acute rejection, while the incidence of urinary complications was 31.2%; there were two surgical revisions for intestinal perforation. The graft and recipient survival was 78.1% and 100% and 78.1% and 93.7% at 3 and 36 months. CONCLUSIONS: Double-kidney transplantation is a safe way to face the organ shortage. Moreover the score used in this study is useful to determine whether a kidney should be refused or suitable for single or dual-kidney transplantation. The results of our initial experience are encouraging, but this series is too small in number to consent a conclusive statement.

Nephrological indications in combined liver-kidney transplantation.

In isolated liver transplantation pretransplant renal failure is a major mortality risk, there are no guidelines at the moment to establish the indications for a combined liver-kidney transplantation (LKT). In irreversible chronic renal failure (CRF) not on dialysis, nephrological evaluation is required to assess the need for a simultaneous kidney transplantation. There are no experiences about the functional contribution of native kidneys post-LKT. Herein we have reported the case of two patients who underwent LKT in 2004 due to CRF, not yet on dialysis. At the moment of LKT, the first patient (polycystic kidney disease) had a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) = 29 mL/min, and the second recipient (vascular nephropathy and diabetes), a GFR = 33 mL/min. In both cases we did not observe delayed graft function. At discharge the serum creatinine was 1.1 and 1.0 mg/dL, respectively, which was maintained during follow-up. In both cases renal scintigraphy with Tc-99 DMSA was performed to evaluate the functional contributions of transplanted versus native kidneys. In the first case scintigraphy at 9 months after LKT demonstrated an 81% contribution from the transplanted kidney, 9% from the right and 10% from the left native kidneys. In the second case, at 3 months after LKT, the functional contributions were 76%, 10%, and 14%, respectively. The transplanted kidney nephron mass may avoid the need for hemodialysis in the early posttransplant period; in the midterm it may help to maintain residual renal function. As in other combined transplant programs (heart-kidney, kidney-pancreas) with irreversible CRF, a GFR < or = 30 to 35 mL/min may be an indication for LKT, but we need more experience.

Combined liver-kidney transplantation--S. Orsola experience: nephrological aspects.

Combined liver kidney transplantation (LKT) has the potential to provide a complete recovery of liver and kidney failure; the literature reports an increase in LKT in the last few years and an improvement in patient and graft survival. In our experience 15 patients underwent LKT from 1997 to 2005. The mean age was 50 +/- 9 years (range 34 to 63). The patients were affected by viral (n = 9), alcoholic (n = 1), polycystic (n = 2), cholangitis (n = 1), cholestatic (n = 1), or amyloidotic (n = 1) chronic hepatopathy. Chronic renal failure (CRF) was due to polycystic kidney disease (n = 4), IgA (n = 2), interstitial nephropathy (n = 2), glomerulonephritis (n = 4), amyloidosis (n = 1), vascular nephropathy (n = 1), of unknown end-stage renal disease (n = 1). Twelve of 15 patients were on renal dialysis treatment, three patients had moderate/severe CRF. Two patients had previously been transplanted (kidney). All patients were selected based upon blood group identity and negative cross-match before kidney transplant. Histocompatibility matching (HLA) was not included in the selection criteria. We did not observe delayed graft function. After a mean follow-up was 23 +/- 32 months (range 5 to 99), 12 subjects show, normal hepatic and renal function. At the beginning of our experience two patients in bad clinical condition died within 3 months because of sepsis, and one died because of a malignancy after 7 years. Both organs were functioning well in the deceased patients. Survival analysis confirms LKT efficacy: at 5 years follow-up patient survival is 86%, graft survival censored for death 100%. Only two subjects had an acute rejection episode in the first year; the kidney rejection incidence was lower than that reported for an isolated kidney transplant (13% vs 21%).

Combined liver-kidney transplantation with preformed anti-HLA antibodies: a case report.

A pretransplant positive cross-match is a contraindication for kidney transplantation, unlike in liver transplantation (OLT). In combined liver kidney transplantation (LKT) it is hypothesized that liver can protect kidney from rejection. We report the case of a 35-year-old woman on renal replacement therapy with gastrointestinal tract compression due to a hematoma following spontaneous liver rupture (May 2004). She was affected by amyloidosis, treated with a bone marrow autotransplantation (2001). The liver rupture was surgically untreatable, so an LKT was proposed. Panel-reactive antibody was 80% to 100% (complement dependent cytotoxicity) with specific anti-HLA antibodies (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay). A compatible donor was found (July 2004). The cross-match before LKT was positive for B and T cells (score 8): an emergency OLT was performed. Immediately after liver reperfusion the cross-match result was less positive (6) for T cells. After 6 hours it was negative for T and slightly positive for B cells (4): the kidney was transplanted. The immunosuppressive therapy was: alemtuzumab, steroids, and tacrolimus. Renal function immediately recovered. On day 7 a rejection episode was successfully treated by increasing steroids (intravenous bolus). At discharge hepatic and renal function were normal (creatinine 1 mg/dL). They are stable after 1 year. This case showed LKT efficacy even in complex immunological situations. Many immunological mechanisms, still not defined, are hypothesized about the protective role of the liver. This case confirmed experimental data that highlighted that in vivo in humans a cross-match can change from positive to negative after OLT giving highly sensitized patients the possibility for LKT.

Predictive factors in chronic allograft nephropathy.

Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is characterized by progressive renal dysfunction leading in many cases to graft loss. The pathogenesis of CAN involves both immune and nonimmune factors. Concerning immune factors, one of the most remarkable predictors of CAN is acute rejection, which is associated with a worse prognosis if there are multiple episodes or when late onset occurs. Delayed graft function is also a major risk factor for CAN because of a correlation between late restoration of renal function after transplantation and long-term decreased graft survival. High creatinine levels at 6 months and 1 year after transplantation, proteinuria, viral infections, and cardiovascular risk factors are additional significant parameters for the development of CAN. Recent findings suggest that a high renal segmental arterial resistance index measured by Doppler ultrasonography in intrarenal vessels is associated with poor allograft function. Moreover, the study of patient genetic profile represents a new approach to identify predictive factors for CAN.

[Therapy strategies in the prevention of chronic allograft nephropathy]. / Strategie terapeutiche nella prevenzione della nefropatia cronica da trapianto.

Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is an anatomical and clinical alteration, characterized by proteinuria, hypertension and a progressive decline in kidney function, which begins at variable times (months, years) and can lead to the loss of the transplanted organ. CAN pathogenesis, which remains to be fully clarified, involves both immunological (early acute rejection, hyperimmunization, HLA-mismatches between donor and recipient, suboptimal immunosuppression, etc) and non-immunological factors (ischemia/reperfusion injury, reduced nephron mass, age differences between donor and recipient, dialysis time, hypertension, dislipidemia, proteinuria, etc). The possible prevention strategies for CAN consist of procedures aimed at the reduction of some potential risk factors: optimization of the conditions for organ explantation, diminution of ischemia/reperfusion injury, aggressive pharmacological treatment of acute rejection episodes, routine utilization of anti-hypertensive and hypolipidemic agents, and appropriate and rational immunosuppressive regimen. Moreover, some categories of immunosuppressive drugs, such as calcineurin inhibitors, can have a nephrotoxic effect, often regardless of therapeutic dosage. The introduction in clinical practice of novel immunosuppressive drugs with no nephrotoxicity, like mycophenolate mofetil and rapamycin, makes therapeutical strategies able to reduce the incidence of CAN feasible.

Tacrolimus-associated myositis: a case report in a renal transplant patient.

A 55-year-old Caucasian man who had received a second kidney graft in July 1993, was switched from cyclosporine to tacrolimus in June 2000 due to deterioration of renal function. Thereafter, he began to complain of muscle cramps in both quadriceps with an increased CPK and EMG findings of polyneuropathy. A muscle biopsy demonstrated acute myositis. Prednisone was administered with amelioration of the patient's symptoms, but with persistently increased CPK and myoglobin levels. In February 2001, mycophenolate mofetil was introduced and tacrolimus tapered to 3 mg daily to seek a toxic role of this immunosuppressant, since there was no other cause of myositis. A sudden decrease in CPK was observed, but the complete normalization took place only after its withdrawal in September 2002. This case represents a tacrolimus-associated myositis.

Clinical application of sodium profiling in the treatment of intradialytic hypotension.

BACKGROUND: Intradialytic hypotension is mainly induced by the removal of extracellular sodium during dialysis, which impairs intravascular fluid refilling and reduces blood volume. To counter this complication we tested a new kind of profiled hemodialysis (PHD) consisting of the intradialytic modulation of dialysate sodium concentration according to individual profiles set up using a new mathematical model for intradialytic solutes and water kinetics. The clinical aim of this PHD is to stabilize blood pressure maintaining higher blood volume values than standard dialysis treatments. We clinically validated PHD in comparison with constant dialysate sodium dialysis (CHD). METHODS: Twenty hypotensive dialysis patients underwent one PHD and one CHD session maintaining the same dialysis length, sodium mass removal and body weight decrease. A new mathematical model was used to define both the dialysate sodium profiles for PHD and the constant dialysate sodium for CHD. Percent blood volume variation (Crit-line), mean blood pressure, heart rate, cardiac output (Doppler-echocardiography) were monitored intradialitically. RESULTS: Cardiovascular stability improved on PHD as compared with CHD sessions; blood volume and cardiac output during PHD showed a lower decrease than on CHD, the differences statistically significant (from 30' and 60' respectively). Mean blood pressure was, at all time intervals, more stable on PHD than on CHD and was accompanied, on PHD, by a lower heart rate increase (differences statistically significant). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that PHD performed using dialysate sodium profiles elaborated by our mathematical model obtains, in hypotensive patients, a higher hemodynamic intradialytic stability than CHD, probably due to a higher stabilization of blood volume.

Design of a trial comparing sirolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil versus sirolimus plus cyclosporine.

We present the study design of a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial aimed at comparing the effects of two different combinations of sirolimus. Renal transplant recipients will be allocated to receive either sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (group A) or sirolimus and cyclosporine (group B). The primary endpoint will be the graft function at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months. A number of secondary endpoints will also be considered. To obtain a significant difference in the primary endpoint 180 patients will be enrolled.

[Malignant neoplasia and kidney transplantation. Retrospective analysis of data on the population having kidney transplantation with de novo neoplasia in the setting of the AIRT]. / Trapianto renale e neoplasie. Analisi retrospettiva dei dati relativi alla popolazione dei trapiantati di rene affetti da neoplasie de novo in ambito AIRT.

BACKGROUND: In transplanted patients undergoing immunossuppressive therapy the incidence of malignant neoplasia is 3-4 times higher than in the general population. Aim of the present study was to evaluate the prevalence of different tumours and the links between modulation of immunosuppressive therapy and patient and graft survival. PATIENTS: We evaluated 2029 kidney-transplanted patients from four Transplant Centres (Bari, Bologna, Modena, Novara) belonging to the Associazione InterRegionale Trapianti (AIRT). RESULTS: The incidence of neoplastic disease after transplantation was 3.9% in our population with a median time between transplantation and clinical onset of 23 months. We demonstrated a significant difference in the geographical distribution of different tumours. We did not observe any correlation with specific immunosuppressive drugs. Finally, dramatic reduction of the immunosuppression levels did not modify either the patients' or the graft's survival. CONCLUSIONS: Several factors can influence the post-transplant onset of neoplastic diseases with immunosuppressive therapy playing a pivotal role. The implementation of a National Registry would be the first step in an attempt to optimise immunosuppression in this particular group of patient's.