Barriers and facilitators to effective electronic health record-based sepsis screening in the pediatric intensive care unit.

Introduction: The Pediatric Surviving Sepsis Campaign supports the implementation of automated tools for early sepsis recognition. In 2019 the C.S. Mott Children's Hospital Pediatric Intensive Care Unit deployed an electronic medical record (EMR)-based screening for early recognition and treatment of sepsis. Materials and Methods: We analyzed all automated primary sepsis alerts, secondary screens, and bedside huddles from November 2019 to January 2020 (Cohort 1) and from November 2020 to January 2021 (Cohort 2) to identify barriers and facilitators for the use of this tool. We distributed surveys to frontline providers to gather feedback on end-user experience. Results: In Cohort 1, 895 primary alerts were triggered, yielding 503 completed secondary screens and 40 bedside huddles. In Cohort 2, 925 primary alerts were triggered, yielding 532 completed secondary screens and 12 bedside huddles. Surveys assessing end-user experience identified the following facilitators: (1) 73% of nurses endorsed the bedside huddle as value added; (2) 74% of medical providers agreed the bedside huddle increased the likelihood of interventions. The greatest barriers to successful implementation included the (1) overall large number of primary alerts from the automated tool and (2) rate of false alerts, many due to routine respiratory therapy interventions. Discussion: Our data suggests that the successful implementation of EMR-based sepsis screening tools requires countermeasures focusing on 3 key drivers for change: education, technology, and patient safety. Conclusion: While both medical providers and bedside nurses found merit in our EMR-based sepsis early recognition system, continued refinement is necessary to avoid sepsis alert fatigue.

Ensuring No Death Is Ignored: Development of a Hospital Mortality Review and Notification System.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Standardized review of mortalities may identify potential system improvements. We designed a hospitalwide identification, review, and notification system for inpatient pediatric mortalities. METHODS: Key stakeholders constructed a future state process map for identification and review of deaths. An online mortality review form was modified through a series of Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles and spread to all pediatric services in January 2019. Mortalities occurring within 30 days of discharge were added in December 2019. Our primary outcome was percentage of mortalities reviewed, and the process measure was time to review completion. Additional Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles were used to refine 2 mechanisms for monthly notification of deaths. We surveyed monthly mortality notification e-mail recipients to elicit feedback to further improve notifications. RESULTS: After the pilot, 284 of 328 (86.6%) of mortalities were reviewed. Average time to review completion decreased by 49% compared with baseline after an increase during the first year of the pandemic. Qualitative analysis of a subset of these mortalities showed that 154 of 229 (67.2%) underwent further review. We added a summary of mortalities by unit to a monthly hospitalwide safety report and developed monthly mortality notification e-mails. The survey showed that 89% of respondents (70 of 79) learned about a death they did not know about, 58% (46 of 79) sought additional information through discussion with a colleague, and 76% (65 of 86) agreed that the notifications helped process grief. CONCLUSIONS: We describe an effective and well-received approach to the identification, review, and notification of mortalities at an academic pediatric hospital, which may be useful at other institutions.

Implementing Pediatric Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines: Improving Compliance With Lactate Measurement in the PICU.

The 2020 pediatric Surviving Sepsis Campaign (pSSC) recommends measuring lactate during the first hour of resuscitation for severe sepsis/shock. We aimed to improve compliance with this recommendation for patients who develop severe sepsis/shock while admitted to the PICU. DESIGN: Structured, quality improvement initiative. SETTING: Single-center, 26-bed, quaternary-care PICU. PATIENTS: All patients with PICU-onset severe sepsis/shock from December 2018 to December 2021. INTERVENTIONS: Creation of a multidisciplinary local sepsis improvement team, education program targeting frontline providers (nurse practitioners, resident physicians), and peer-to-peer nursing education program with feedback to key stakeholders. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome measure was compliance with obtaining a lactate measurement within 60 minutes of the onset of severe sepsis/shock originating in our PICU using a local Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes database and definitions. The process measure was time to first lactate measurement. Secondary outcomes included number of IV antibiotic days, number of vasoactive days, number of ICU days, and number of ventilator days. A total of 166 unique PICU-onset severe sepsis/shock events and 156 unique patients were included. One year after implementation of our first interventions with subsequent Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles, overall compliance increased from 38% to 47% (24% improvement) and time to first lactate decreased from 175 to 94 minutes (46% improvement). Using a statistical process control I chart, the preshift mean for time to first lactate measurement was noted to be 179 minutes and the postshift mean was noted to be 81 minutes demonstrating a 55% improvement. CONCLUSIONS: This multidisciplinary approach led to improvement in time to first lactate measurement, an important step toward attaining our target of lactate measurement within 60 minutes of septic shock identification. Improving compliance is necessary for understanding implications of the 2020 pSSC guidelines on sepsis morbidity and mortality.