Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cephalalgia ; 39(1): 157-160, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30019592

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There are cases in the headache literature described as "cluster-migraine," but none of stereotyped cases of cluster headache evolving into status migrainosus. We believe this is the first documented case of "cluster-status migrainosus". CASE: A 54 year-old female hospital administrator presented with headaches with a unique periodicity and semiology that were acutely responsive to high-flow oxygen. She experienced cluster headache attacks every Thursday morning at 3-4 am, which would evolve into status migrainosus lasting through Sunday evening. These attacks were preceded by prodromal depressed mood changes and fluid retention, and later followed by postdromal euphoria and auto-diuresis. These attacks initially occurred every other week and progressed to weekly attacks for 1.5 years. These headaches did not respond to trials of propanolol, sodium valproate, topiramate, amitriptyline, gabapentin, and carbamazepine for preventive treatment or to oral sumatriptan and butalbital-acetaminophen-caffeine for acute treatment. We started her on high-flow 100% oxygen for cluster headache, which successfully aborted greater than 80% of her weekly cluster headache attacks and prevented them from evolving into status migrainosus. CONCLUSION: We believe this is the first case of "cluster-status migranosus" described in the medical literature. High-flow oxygen both aborted the cluster headaches and prevented the ensuing status migrainosus.


Asunto(s)
Cefalalgia Histamínica/terapia , Trastornos Migrañosos/terapia , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno/métodos , Cefalalgia Histamínica/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Migrañosos/complicaciones
2.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 156(3): 415-426, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27015968

RESUMEN

Patient-centered decision making about hot flash treatments often incorporates a balance of efficacy and side effects in addition to patient preference. This systematic review examines randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing at least two non-hormonal hot flash treatments in breast cancer survivors. In July 2015, PubMed, SCOPUS, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were searched for RCTs comparing active, non-hormonal hot flash treatments in female breast cancer survivors. Thirteen trials were included after identifying 906 potential studies. Four trials were dose comparison studies of pharmacologic treatments citalopram, venlafaxine, gabapentin, and paroxetine. Hot flash reduction did not differ by tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitor use. Citalopram 10, 20, and 30 mg daily had comparable outcomes. Venlafaxine 75 mg daily improved hot flashes without additional side effects from higher dosing. Gabapentin 900 mg daily improved hot flashes more than 300 mg. Paroxetine 10 mg daily had fewer side effects than 20 mg. Among four trials comparing different pharmacologic treatments, venlafaxine alleviated hot flash symptoms faster than clonidine; participants preferred venlafaxine over gabapentin. Five trials compared pharmacologic to non-pharmacologic treatments. Acupuncture had similar efficacy to venlafaxine and gabapentin but may have longer durability after completing treatment and fewer side effects. We could not perform a pooled meta-analysis because outcomes were not reported in comparable formats. Clinical trial data on non-hormonal hot flash treatments provide comparisons of hot flash efficacy and other patient important outcomes to guide clinical management. Clinicians can use the information to help patients select hot flash interventions.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/complicaciones , Sofocos/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Captación de Serotonina y Norepinefrina/uso terapéutico , Sobrevivientes , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Humanos , Prioridad del Paciente , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30766696

RESUMEN

Female sexual dysfunction occurs frequently in midlife breast cancer survivors (BCS) and encompasses problems with sexual desire, interest, arousal, orgasm and genitopelvic pain. Although common, sexual problems are under-diagnosed and under-treated in BCS. The objective of this review was to assess primary studies that intervene on sexual dysfunction in BCS. In February 2015, PubMed, SCOPUS, CINAHL, COCHRANE and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) of vaginal (lubricants, moisturizers, estrogens, dehydroepiandrosterone [DHEA], testosterone, vibrators, dilators), systemic (androgens, anti-depressants, flibanserin, ospemifene), physical therapy (physical activity, pelvic floor training), counseling and educational interventions on sexual function in BCS. Observational studies of vaginal interventions were also included due to the paucity of RCTs. The search yielded 1414 studies, 34 of which met inclusion criteria. Both interventions and outcomes, measured by 31 different sexual function scales, were heterogeneous, and therefore data were not pooled. The review found that regular and prolonged use of vaginal moisturizers was effective in improving vaginal dryness, dyspareunia, and sexual satisfaction. Educational and counseling interventions targeting sexual dysfunction showed consistent improvement in various aspects of sexual health. No consistent improvements in sexual health were observed with physical activity, transdermal testosterone or hot flash interventions. There was a lack of BCS-specific data on vaginal lubricants, vibrators, dilators, pelvic floor therapy, flibanserin or ospemifene. Overall, the quality of evidence for these studies was moderate to very low. Because each of the interventions with BCS data had limited efficacy, clinical trials to test novel interventions are needed to provide evidence-based clinical recommendations and improve sexual function in BCS.

4.
Proc Biol Sci ; 281(1784): 20140329, 2014 Jun 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24741020

RESUMEN

Sexual dimorphisms vary widely among species. This variation must arise through sex-specific evolutionary modifications to developmental processes. Anolis lizards vary extensively in their expression of cranial dimorphism. Compared with other Anolis species, members of the carolinensis clade have evolved relatively high levels of cranial dimorphism; males of this clade have exceptionally long faces relative to conspecific females. Developmentally, this facial length dimorphism arises through an evolutionarily novel, clade-specific strategy. Our analyses herein reveal that sex-specific regulation of the oestrogen pathway underlies evolution of this exaggerated male phenotype, rather than the androgen or insulin growth factor pathways that have long been considered the primary regulators of male-biased dimorphism among vertebrates. Our results suggest greater intricacy in the genetic mechanisms that underlie sexual dimorphisms than previously appreciated.


Asunto(s)
Hormonas/genética , Lagartos/anatomía & histología , Lagartos/fisiología , Caracteres Sexuales , Cráneo/anatomía & histología , Andrógenos/genética , Andrógenos/metabolismo , Animales , Estrógenos/genética , Estrógenos/metabolismo , Hormonas/metabolismo , Lagartos/genética , Lagartos/crecimiento & desarrollo , Masculino , Fenotipo , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa , Cráneo/crecimiento & desarrollo , Cráneo/fisiología , Especificidad de la Especie
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...