Secure Provider-to-Provider Communication With Electronic Health Record Messaging: An Educational Outreach Study.

INTRODUCTION: With increasing electronic health record (EHR) use, providers are talking less with one another. Now, many rely on EHRs, informal emails, or texts, introducing fragmentation and new data security challenges with new communication strategies. We aimed to examine the impact of a physician champion educational outreach intervention to promote electronic provider-to-provider communication in a large academic multispecialty group. METHODS: Physician champions provided educational outreach to 16 academic departments, using 10-minute case-based presentations. Online surveys assessed communication preferences and practices. Electronic health record queries counted EHR messaging use before and after intervention. Descriptive statistics compared responses by specialty (z-test). Paired responses with pre-post data were compared using chi-square tests. Time series analysis assessed EHR messaging rates before intervention versus after intervention. RESULTS: Five hundred seventeen providers responded to the postoutreach survey. Eighty-six percent were familiar with EHR messaging tool and 78% knew how to use it after intervention. Among practitioner groups, Family Medicine preferred EHR messaging the most (62%). Groups who declined outreach least preferred it (26%). Among 88 respondents with paired pre-post intervention surveys, familiarity rose (79-96%), and self-reported use increased (66-88%). CONCLUSIONS: Physician champion educational outreach increased the use of the secure provider-to-provider EHR messaging tool.

Comparison of thoracic aortic diameter changes after endograft placement in patients with traumatic and aneurysmal disease.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate acute changes in aortic size before and after endograft placement for traumatic injury and aneurysmal disease. We hypothesize that there are inherent differences between trauma and aneurysm populations undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and that these factors may affect device choice and sizing for each group. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated the existing digital imaging of traumatic injury and aneurysmal patients enrolled in the 0802 and 0803 multi-site trials that received the GORE Conformable TAG thoracic device. Pre- and post-treatment imaging was available for 70 traumatic injury and 54 aneurysmal patients. Post-treatment imaging was defined as being complete within 30 days of treatment. A standardized protocol was used to complete measurements of the proximal and distal maximum neck diameters through the use of the orthogonal view before imaging and at 30-day imaging. The resultant changes in diameter for each group were analyzed by means of t-tests. RESULTS: Mean increases in proximal (3.0 mm vs 2.0 mm; P < .05) and distal neck diameters (2.9 mm vs 0.7 mm; P < .01) after TEVAR are significantly greater in traumatic injury patients than in aneurysm patients between pretreatment and 30-day imaging. In both study populations, smaller pretreatment aortic neck diameters showed a larger change in neck diameter than did larger pretreatment aortic diameters. Aneurysm patients were oversized significantly more than were trauma patients at the proximal neck (9.1% vs 4.5%; P < .05). However, at the distal neck, the trauma patients were oversized more than were the aneurysm patients (17.5% vs 13.6%; P = .06). A strong correlation was found between the percentage of oversizing and change in the distal neck diameter after TEVAR in both patient groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that there are differences between trauma and aneurysm populations. Careful device selection may contribute to the avoidance of complications related to both undersized and oversized devices. Short-term analysis shows that TEVAR can be successfully accomplished in both trauma and aneurysm groups over a wide sizing range. Further data regarding long-term device complications are needed to better characterize this relationship.

Differences in aortic arch radius of curvature, neck size, and taper in patients with traumatic and aortic disease.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the differences in aortic morphology that would potentially affect the management of thoracic endovascular aneurysm/aortic repair between trauma and aneurysm patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective analysis of the pretreatment digital imaging of 98 traumatic injury patients and 63 aneurysm patients enrolled in multicenter regulatory studies of the Conformable GORE TAG Thoracic Device (CTAG Device) (manufactured by W.L. Gore and Associates, Flagstaff, AZ). A standardized protocol was used to perform an independent assessment of the images and measurements of the radius of curvature and proximal and distal neck diameters. The radius of curvature was measured using axial images and the proximal and distal intimal neck diameter measurements were completed using the orthogonal "centerline" view. Taper was measured over the entire treated aorta and was calculated by subtracting the distal neck diameter measurement from the proximal neck diameter. The results were analyzed with independent t-tests. RESULTS: The trauma patients had a significantly smaller radius of curvature than aneurysm patients. There was a significant difference in the aortic neck size, with trauma patients having smaller proximal and distal intimal neck diameters. Taper was noted in trauma patients but not in aneurysm patients. CONCLUSIONS: The aortic anatomy varies between treated aortic pathologies. Aneurysm patients have a wider arch and larger aortas when compared with trauma patients. Aneurysm patients have less taper than trauma patients. Despite these differences, both of these cohorts of patients are treatable under the broader oversizing ranges of the CTAG Device.

Computed tomography assessment of thoracic aortic pathology.

Computed tomography technology has improved dramatically in the past decade and now constitutes the backbone of preoperative evaluation for aortic disease. Image acquisition is accomplished with multi-row detectors, and coupled with new reconstruction algorithms provide clinicians with high-resolution images that can be visualized in synch with the cardiac cycle, or as complex three-dimensional renditions of in vivo anatomy. Knowledge regarding the means of data acquisition, reconstruction algorithms, and modes of interpretation are critical for the optimal assessment of aortic disease. These issues are increasingly important as endovascular therapy becomes more commonplace for the treatment of thoracic aortic lesions.

A biomechanical comparison of facet screw fixation and pedicle screw fixation: effects of short-term and long-term repetitive cycling.

STUDY DESIGN: A biomechanical study was conducted to assess the stabilization performance of transfacet pedicle screw fixation. OBJECTIVE: To compare the biomechanical effects of short-term and long-term cyclic loading on lumbar motion segments instrumented with either a pedicle screw or a transfacet pedicle screw construct. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Facet screw fixation is an alternative to pedicle screw fixation that permits the use of a minimally invasive strategy. It is not known whether facet screw fixation can provide stability equivalent to pedicle screw fixation during cyclical loading. Therefore, transfacet pedicle screw fixation and standard pedicle screw fixation techniques were compared biomechanically. METHODS: Lumbar motion segments were tested under short-term and long-term cyclic loading conditions. For the short-term phase, specimens were tested intact for six cycles (to 400 N or 4 Nm) in compression, flexion, extension, lateral bending, and torsion. The specimens then were instrumented with bilateral semicircular interbody spacers and pedicle screw instrumentation or transfacet pedicle screws, and the testing sequence was repeated. For the long-term phase, 12 specimens were instrumented in a similar manner and loaded to 6 Nm of flexion bending for 180,000 cycles. RESULTS: For the short-term phase, both fixation systems had significantly greater stiffness and reduced range of motion, as compared with the intact state. No differences were observed between the fixation systems except in flexion, wherein transfacet pedicle screw specimens were significantly stiffer than traditional pedicle screw specimens. For the long-term phase, the stiffness and range of motion did not significantly increase or decrease over repetitive cycling of the instrumented specimens. Furthermore, no significant difference between the fixation systems was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The stability provided by both transfacet pedicle screw fixation and traditional pedicle screw fixation was not compromised after repetitive cycling. In this model, transfacet pedicle screw fixation appears equivalent biomechanically to traditional pedicle screw fixation.