Patterns and mechanisms of major trauma injuries during and after the UK Covid-19 Nationwide lockdown: analysis from a UK Major Trauma Centre.

PURPOSE: To compare patterns and mechanisms of injuries during and after the UK Nationwide lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included all major trauma admissions during the 10-week period of the nationwide lockdown (09/03/2020-18/05/2020), compared with admissions in the 10-weeks following the full lifting of lockdown restrictions (04/07/20-12/09/2020). Differences in the volume, spectrum and mechanism of injuries presenting during and post-lockdown were compared using Fisher's exact and Chi-squared tests as appropriate. The associated risk of 30-day mortality was examined using univariable and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 692 major trauma admissions were included in this analysis. Of these, 237 patients were admitted during the lockdown and 455 patients were admitted post-lockdown. This represented a twofold increase in trauma admission between the two periods. Characteristically, both cohorts had a higher proportion of male patients (73.84% male during lockdown and 72.5% male post-lockdown). There was a noted shift in age groups between both cohorts with an overall more elderly population during lockdown (p = 0.0292), There was a significant difference in mechanisms of injury between the two cohorts. The 3-commonest mechanisms during the lockdown period were: Road traffic accidents (RTA)-31.22%, Falls of less than 2 m-26.58%, and falls greater than 2 m causing 22.78% of major trauma admissions. However, in the post-lockdown period RTAs represented 46.15% of all trauma admissions with falls greater than 2 m causing 17.80% and falls less than 2 m causing 15.16% of major trauma injuries. With falls in the elderly associated with an increased risk of mortality. In terms of absolute numbers, there was a twofold increase in major trauma injuries due to stabbings and shootings, rising from 25 admitted patients during the lockdown to 53 admitted patients post-lockdown. CONCLUSIONS: The lifting of lockdown restrictions resulted in a twofold increase in major trauma admissions that was also associated with significant changes in both the demographic and patterns of injuries with RTA's contributing almost half of all injury presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was classed as a service evaluation and registered with the local audit department, registration number: 20-177C.

Publication Rates, Ethnic and Sex Disparities in UK and Ireland Surgical Research Prize Presentations: An Analysis of Data From the Moynihan and Patey Prizes From 2000 to 2020.

BACKGROUND: Presentation at academic conferences is an important marker of research productivity. However, not all accepted abstracts progress to full publication, and there is anecdotal evidence suggesting an imbalance in sex and ethnicity amongst presenters. There is a lack of data evaluating the outcome of prize presentation sessions at academic surgical conferences in the UK. This study aimed to analyse the outcomes and demographics from presentations at prize sessions at two prestigious UK surgical conferences. METHODS: This retrospective observational study compared data on all Moynihan (Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland) and Patey (Surgical Research Society) prize presentations from 2000 to 2020. The primary outcome was rate of publication. Secondary outcomes included demographic differences in sex and ethnicity, publication according to prize outcome, academic affiliation, time to publication, and journal impact factor. RESULTS: Some 442 accepted abstracts were identified over the 21-year period, with 71.0% from the Moynihan sessions and 79.3% from the Patey sessions leading to full publications, with a median time to publication of 448 days (IQR 179-859) in journals with relatively high impact factors (median 5.00; IQR 3.15-6.36). Of the 442 prize presenters, 85 (19.2%) were female. The majority of the presenters were White males (211, 47.7%), followed by Asian males (112, 25.3%). However, there was a continuously increasing overall trend of female presenters from 2000 to 2020 (P = 0.019). CONCLUSION: Publication rates from the two prize sessions were high, with presenters publishing in journals with high impact factors. There, however, was a disparity in sex and ethnicity amongst presenters.