Perceptions and acceptance of COVID-19 vaccine among pregnant and lactating women in Singapore: A pre-vaccine rollout cross-sectional study.

Introduction: Vaccination is critical in controlling the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. However, vaccine perception and acceptance among pregnant and lactating women is unknown in Singapore. We aimed to determine the acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination among these two groups of women in Singapore and the factors associated with vaccine acceptance. Methods: We conducted an anonymous, online survey on the perceptions of the COVID-19 vaccine and its acceptance by pregnant and lactating women at a tertiary maternal and child hospital in Singapore from 1 March to 31 May 2021. Information on their demographics and knowledge was collected. These factors were assessed for their relationship with vaccine acceptance. Results: A total of 201 pregnant and 207 lactating women participated. Vaccine acceptance rates in pregnant and lactating women were 30.3% and 16.9%, respectively. Pregnant women who were unsure or unwilling to take the vaccine cited concerns about safety of the vaccine during pregnancy (92.9%), while lactating women were concerned about its potential long-term negative effects on the breastfeeding child (75.6%). Factors that were positively associated with vaccine acceptance included a lower monthly household income or education level, appropriate knowledge regarding vaccine mechanism and higher perceived maternal risk of COVID-19. Most pregnant (70.0%) and lactating women (83.7%) were willing to take the vaccine only when more safety data during pregnancy and breastfeeding were available. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccine acceptance was low among pregnant and lactating women in Singapore. Addressing the safety concerns when more data are available and education on the mechanism of vaccine action will likely improve acceptance among these women.

Knowledge and Expectations of Perinatal Care Among Pregnant Women During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Introduction: This study aimed to investigate the knowledge and expectations of pregnant women on perinatal care during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among pregnant women ≥21 years, without a history of confirmed COVID-19, attending antenatal clinics between August and September 2020 via a secure online platform. The survey consisted of 10 questions which evaluated the knowledge and expectations on perinatal and neonatal care during the current pandemic. Results: A total of 313 pregnant women completed the survey. The mean age of the participants was 30 years (SD 4; range 22-43 years). The median gestational age was 25 weeks (range 4-40 weeks). The participants were predominantly multiparous (54%) and almost all (98%) had completed secondary level education. Majority of participants were aware of the spread of COVID-19 by respiratory secretions and contact (90%), and the importance of prevention strategies (94%). Up to 72% agreed or strongly agreed that in-utero transmission of SARS-CoV-2 was possible. Most were unsure of the optimal mode of delivery (77%) and only 22% believed that breastfeeding was safe in a pregnant woman with active COVID-19. Although 46% were concerned about increased transmission risk with antenatal clinic visits, only 37% were agreeable to teleconferencing of clinic appointments. Maternal age >35 years was significantly associated with agreement with separation of mother-infant after birth [AOR 1.89 (95% CI 1.05, 3.39)], restrictions of visitors during the postnatal period [1.92 (1.05, 3.49)] and having their confinement practices were affected [2.3 (1.26, 4.17)]. Pregnant women who were multiparous disagreed that breastfeeding was safe in women with active COVID-19 [0.42 (0.23, 0.75)]. Conclusions: There was significant uncertainty about the optimal delivery method and safety of breastfeeding with COVID-19 among expectant mothers, along with variable agreement with alterations to routine perinatal care.

Subserosal adenomyotic cysts and peritoneal inclusion cysts - Unusual differential diagnoses of multicystic pelvic masses: A review of two cases.

BACKGROUND: Multiloculated pelvic cysts are commonly misdiagnosed as ovarian tumors or malignancies. We report 2 patients diagnosed with subserosal adenomyotic cysts and peritoneal inclusion cysts, mimicking multiloculated pelvic tumors. We discuss their clinical presentation, investigations, operation findings, and histopathology, present a literature review. CASES: Case 1 was a 44-year-old patient with abnormal uterine bleeding. Imaging showed an enlarging multiloculated cystic structure over the right uterine wall. She underwent a diagnostic laparoscopy and right salpingo-ophorectomy. Intra-operatively, she was found to have multiple subserosal uterine cysts, diagnosed as adenomyotic cysts on histology.Case 2 was a 50-year-old patient with history of laparoscopic cystectomy done 20 years ago. She was incidentally found to have a multiloculated cystic lesion in the pelvis. The lesion was located midline, anterior and superior to the uterus and bladder. She underwent a total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-ophorectomy, and bladder peritonectomy. Intra-operatively, multiple cystic lesions were noted over the anterior and fundus of uterus, bladder peritoneum, and pelvic side walls. The condition was confirmed to be peritoneal inclusion cysts on histology. CONCLUSION: Subserosal adenomyotic cysts are a rare presentation of adenomyosis. They typically occur in premenopausal women. Treatment is usually by hormonal medications or surgical excision.Many patients with peritoneal inclusion cysts have a history of peritoneal insults. Surgical excision is the most commonly described management as they often mimic malignancy. Both conditions are unusual presentations of multiloculated pelvic masses. A high recurrence rate is found, hence long-term follow-up with imaging is essential.

An unusual presentation of a ruptured degenerative fibroid in a perimenopausal woman.

A 55-year-old woman in a perimenopausal state presented with severe suprapubic pain and fever. Physical examination revealed a tender pelvic mass measuring 24 weeks in size. Ultrasound of the pelvis and CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis showed a 12 cm mass arising from the posterior wall of the uterus with irregular margin inferiorly, raising suspicion of a ruptured mass. The patient was treated conservatively and discharged from the hospital with regular simple analgaesia. She had an elective total hysterectomy bilateral salpingo-oophrectomy and frozen section the following week and histology revealed a benign leiomyoma with extensive necrosis. Moreover, intraoperatively, the fibroid was found to have ruptured its capsule. This case illustrates that a ruptured degeneration of uterine leiomyoma should be considered as one of the differential diagnoses for all women presenting with abdominal pain and a large fibroid mass regardless of their hormonal status or age.

Nonimmune hydrops fetalis in a children's hospital: a six-year series.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to study the profile of nonimmune hydrops fetalis (NIHF) in the local population and identify its outcomes and causes. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective review of the medical records in KK Women's and Children's hospital, a single tertiary referral centre, for pregnancies with an antenatal diagnosis of NIHF in the six-year period from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2010. RESULTS: A total of 29 cases of NIHF were identified; 19 (66%) cases underwent karyotype evaluation, 17 (59%) underwent intrauterine infection screening, and all underwent antenatal thalassaemia screening. The median gestational age at diagnosis was 27 (range 12-37) weeks, median gestational age at birth was 33 (range 27-37) weeks, and median birth weight of live births was 2,480 (range 1,230-3,900) g. The aetiologies for NIHF were identified in 20 (69%) cases, which included cardiac anomalies (n = 5), haematological problems (n = 4), congenital tumours (n = 4), genetic/metabolic disorders (n = 4) and cystic hygromas (n = 3). The cause of NIHF was not identified in the remaining 9 (31%) cases. There were 19 live births - 8 (42%) survived and 11 (58%) died in the neonatal period - and one stillbirth. Nine women opted for medical termination of pregnancy following the diagnosis of NIHF. CONCLUSION: It is important to thoroughly investigate all cases of NIHF and identify its causes in order to provide appropriate antenatal and postnatal counselling. In our series, almost one-third of NIHF cases had no identified aetiology. The neonatal mortality rate was approximately 58%.