Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Perfluorohexyloctane Ophthalmic Solution for the Treatment of Patients With Dry Eye Disease: The KALAHARI Study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of perfluorohexyloctane (PFHO) ophthalmic drop (formerly NOV03) for treatment of dry eye disease (DED). METHODS: KALAHARI was a phase 3, multicenter, single-arm, open-label extension study in patients aged 18 years or older with DED associated with Meibomian gland dysfunction who completed the randomized, double-masked, hypotonic saline-controlled GOBI study. Patients instilled 1 drop of PFHO (MIEBO, Bausch + Lomb) 4 times daily in both eyes for 52 weeks. Safety assessments included adverse events, best-corrected visual acuity, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, intraocular pressure, and dilated fundoscopy. Efficacy end points included change from GOBI study baseline in total corneal fluorescein staining and eye dryness score (0-100 visual analog scale). RESULTS: Overall, 208 patients from GOBI (PFHO [n = 97]; saline [n = 111]) were rolled over into KALAHARI. Twenty-nine patients (13.9%) had ≥1 ocular adverse event, with most being mild or moderate in severity; the most common ocular adverse events were vitreous detachment (1.9%), allergic conjunctivitis (1.4%), blurred vision (1.4%), and increased lacrimation (1.4%). Other safety end points were unremarkable. For patients continuing PFHO from GOBI, improvements in total corneal fluorescein staining and visual analog scale dryness scores observed in GOBI were maintained throughout KALAHARI. Patients treated with saline in GOBI and switched to PFHO in KALAHARI showed improvements in total corneal fluorescein staining and visual analog scale scores by week 4 that were maintained for the rest of the study. CONCLUSIONS: PFHO was safe and well tolerated and maintained efficacy for improving signs and symptoms of DED in this year-long study of patients with DED associated with Meibomian gland dysfunction.

A phase 2a, double-masked, randomized, vehicle-controlled trial of VVN001 in subjects with dry eye disease.

PURPOSE: Evaluate the initial ocular safety and tolerability and efficacy of VVN001 Ophthalmic Solution (VVN001), a small-molecule antagonist of lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1 (LFA-1), in subjects with dry eye disease (DED). METHODS: This was a multi-center, double-masked, randomized, dose-response, vehicle-controlled, parallel-group study conducted in 170 subjects with DED. Subjects were randomized to receive VVN001 (1% or 5%) or its vehicle, twice-daily in both eyes for 84 days. The primary outcome measure was inferior region corneal fluorescein staining (iCFS, 0-4 scale) at Day 84. Visual Analogue Scale eye dryness (VAS, 0-100 scale) was a secondary outcome. RESULTS: The primary and first secondary outcomes were not met. At Day 84 treatment effects in favor of VVN001 5% relative to its vehicle for iCFS were 0.29 units (p = 0.054), and for VAS were 3.18 units (p = 0.533). In other secondary outcomes, treatment effects in favor of VVN001 5% relative to its vehicle were seen in total CFS (1.61 units, 0-20 scale, p = 0.004) and Schirmer score (1.77 and 2.32 mm, p = 0.049 and p = 0.17 at Days 14 and 28 respectively). Adverse events of incidence 5% or greater in either active treatment group were instillation site pain (3/57, 5.3%), dysgeusia (3/56, 5.4%) and urinary tract infection (3/57, 5.3%). CONCLUSIONS: There were no major safety issues of note. Appropriately powered studies will be required with a priori selection of the efficacy endpoints to evaluate VVN001's therapeutic potential.

A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Povidone-Iodine 0.6% and Dexamethasone 0.1% Ophthalmic Suspension for Acute Bacterial Conjunctivitis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a topical ophthalmic suspension combination of povidone-iodine 0.6% (PVP-I) and dexamethasone 0.1% (DEX) for infectious and inflammatory components of bacterial conjunctivitis. DESIGN: Randomized, double-masked, multicenter, phase 3 clinical trial. METHODS: Subjects of all ages (those <3 months had to be full-term) with a diagnosis of bacterial conjunctivitis were randomized 3:1:3 to either PVP-I/DEX, PVP-I alone, or placebo. The primary endpoint was clinical resolution in the study eye, and the key secondary efficacy endpoint was bacterial eradication, both at the day 5 visit. Adverse events (AEs) were documented at all visits. RESULTS: Overall, 753 subjects were randomized (intent-to-treat [ITT] population; PVP-I/DEX [n = 324]; PVP-I [n = 108]; placebo [n = 321]); mean and standard deviation (SD) age was 44.3 (22.9) years, and most were female (61.2%) and white (78.1%). In all treatment groups, mean treatment compliance was >98%. The modified ITT population for the efficacy analysis comprised 526 subjects. In the study eye at the day 5 visit, clinical resolution was achieved by 50.5% (111/220) subjects in the PVP-I/DEX group vs 42.8% (95/222) in the placebo group (P = .127), and bacterial eradication was achieved by 43.3% (94/217) and 46.8% (102/218), respectively (P = .500). Treatment-emergent AEs were experienced by 32.8% (106/323), 39.8% (43/108), and 19.0% (61/321) of subjects in the safety population treated with PVP-I/DEX, PVP-I, and placebo, respectively (most mild in severity). CONCLUSION: In this study, PVP-I/DEX did not demonstrate additional benefit in clinical efficacy compared with placebo in subjects with bacterial conjunctivitis.