Endoscopic management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma in patients with a history of bladder urothelial carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Endoscopic management of renal pelvis and ureteral urothelial carcinoma is gaining acceptance as a conservative treatment modality. Patients with a history of bladder urothelial carcinoma are at high risk for upper tract recurrence. We evaluate the role of endoscopic management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma in patients with a history of primary bladder urothelial carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 90 patients with a history of primary bladder urothelial carcinoma who underwent endoscopic treatment of localized upper tract urothelial carcinoma between 1983 and 2004. RESULTS: Median patient age at diagnosis was 73 years (range 50 to 90). A total of 13 (14.4%) patients previously underwent cystectomy. With a median followup of 4.3 years (range 0.1 to 17), 105 upper tract urothelial carcinoma recurrences developed in 55 patients at a mean of 0.6 years (range 22 days to 5.9 years). Of these recurrences 76 were amenable to endoscopic management while 29 required nephroureterectomy. In 38 patients there were 91 bladder recurrences. At last followup 48 patients died, 17 of urothelial carcinoma at a median of 3.4 years (range 1 to 10). Cancer specific survival at 5 years for this cohort was 71.2%. Risk of death from urothelial carcinoma was significantly associated with stage (RR 3.23) and grade (RR 4.05) of upper tract urothelial carcinoma, imperative indication (RR 4.30), and treatment of bladder urothelial carcinoma with cystectomy (RR 3.34). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma in patients with primary bladder urothelial carcinoma demonstrates a significant local recurrence rate. Furthermore, 5-year cancer specific survival is low. These patients represent a high risk cohort requiring strict ureteroscopic followup after endoscopic management is instituted.

Management of nephrolithiasis after Cohen cross-trigonal and Glenn-Anderson advancement ureteroneocystostomy.

PURPOSE: Ureteroneocystotomy is frequently performed for ureteral injury or vesicoureteral reflux. The Glenn-Anderson technique advances the ureteral orifice distal to its native position, while the Cohen technique crosses the orifice to the opposite trigone. Each treatment can alter access to the upper genitourinary tracts. We report our experience with subsequent nephrolithiasis in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients treated with ureteroneocystotomy since 1980 who had nephrolithiasis. RESULTS: Nephrolithiasis developed in 9 patients with prior Cohen ureteroneocystotomy and in 15 with prior Glenn-Anderson ureteroneocystotomy. Stones size was 2 to 20 mm (mean 6.4). In the Cohen group ureteroscopy was attempted and failed in 2 patients, requiring percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Attempted shock wave lithotripsy failed in 2 patients, of whom 1 required percutaneous nephrolithotomy and 1 required observation. Primary percutaneous nephrolithotomy was performed in 1 patient. One patient required nephrectomy for chronic pyelonephritis related to nephrolithiasis. Two patients had active stone disease and were awaiting further treatment, while 1 passed the stone. In the Glenn-Anderson group ureteroscopy was successful in all 4 attempts. Attempted shock wave lithotripsy in 2 patients was successful in 1. The other patient required subsequent percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Primary percutaneous nephrolithotomy was required in 2 patients. All other patients were asymptomatic and under observation. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment for upper tract nephrolithiasis is effected by prior ureteroneocystotomy. Minimally invasive treatments were less successful after Cohen ureteroneocystotomy than after Glenn-Anderson ureteroneocystotomy. In this study patients with prior cross-trigonal ureteroneocystotomy required more invasive therapies for symptomatic nephrolithiasis.

The current role of medical simulation in american urological residency training programs: an assessment by program directors.

PURPOSE: Although medical simulation opportunities are increasingly available, resident training to date has involved primarily hands-on, subjective assessments. The role of simulation and computer based training for urology residents remains unknown. We evaluated the current status of medical simulation among urological training programs in the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An anonymous questionnaire was developed and mailed to the program director at the 119 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education accredited United States urology training programs, and consisted of 17 questions documenting the prior experience of the responder to medical simulation as well as the current status of simulation at their institution. An additional 14 questions sought the responders' opinion of medical simulation in urology training programs. RESULTS: The questionnaire was returned by 41 program directors (35%). Among respondents, access to a laparoscopy simulator was 76%. In comparison, reported access to cystoscopy, ureteroscopy, transurethral resection and percutaneous access simulators was 16%, 21%, 8% and 12%, respectively. Respondents indicated that these simulators were good educational tools, realistic and easy to use. Unanimous agreement was reported for simulation training in residency and that simulators allow practice in a controlled environment. Disagreement was reported about the cost effectiveness, validity and ability of simulators to replace hands-on instruction in the operating room. CONCLUSIONS: Among responders a high level of access to laparoscopic simulators for urology residents is coupled with low levels of access to other endoscopic trainers. Urology residency program directors unanimously recognize a role for simulation training in residency, although the extent to which they may be incorporated remains to be resolved.

Long-term success of antegrade endopyelotomy compared with pyeloplasty at a single institution.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The classic standard for surgical repair of ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction has been open pyeloplasty, with a 95% success rate. Antegrade endopyelotomy is a less-invasive option with a slightly lower success rate. However, recent data call into question the long-term durability of UPJ repair. We present the long-term success of treatment of UPJ obstruction comparing these two modalities. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of patients undergoing percutaneous antegrade endopyelotomy or open and laparoscopic pyeloplasty for UPJ repair in our practice from 1988 to 2004. Success was defined as both radiographic and symptomatic improvement. We evaluated the impact of preoperative factors, including prior surgical repair, crossing vessels, renal function, and calculi, on success. RESULTS: The estimated 3-, 5-, and 10-year recurrence-free survival rates for the endopyelotomy group (N = 182) were 63%, 55%, and 41%, respectively, compared with 85%, 80%, and 75% for the pyeloplasty group (N = 175; P < 0.001). Of the failed endopyelotomies undergoing salvage open repair, 8 of 26 (31%) had crossing vessels. Poor renal function and previous failed pyeloplasty decreased success in the pyeloplasty group. Variation from standard cold-knife incision adversely affected endopyelotomy success. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term success rates after both endopyelotomy and pyeloplasty are worse than previously reported. Although most failures in both groups occurred within 2 years, failures continue to appear after 5 and 10 years, and patients should be followed accordingly. In view of these results of endopyelotomy, laparoscopic pyeloplasty may prove to be the preferred minimally invasive approach to repair UPJ obstruction.

The evolution of ureteroscopy: a modern single-institution series.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a modern ureteroscopy series, including the use of new technological advances, operative procedures, and potential complications, at a single institution and to compare our current experience with our prior published series and the current literature. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 1000 consecutive ureteroscopies performed in 961 patients from December 1999 to February 2003 at our institution. RESULTS: Semirigid and flexible ureteroscopes were used in 60.3% and 37.0% of the cases, respectively. In 2.6% of cases, a combination of both rigid and flexible ureteroscopes was required. The most common indications for ureteroscopy were as follows: stone, 57.9%; diagnostic, 20.6%; and urothelial carcinoma, 12.6%. Of the stones treated, 31.8% were proximal or middle and 59.1% distal. The overall, proximal, and distal stone-free rates were 91.7%, 87.3%, and 94.2%, respectively. Average operative time was 81 minutes (range, 5-280 minutes). Average follow-up was 2.36 months (range, 1-24 months). The overall complication rate was 1.9% (18/961), including a 0.2% (2/961) incidence of ureteral strictures. CONCLUSION: Current practice trends have shifted to an increased use of flexible ureteroscopes and more frequent ureteroscopic treatment of proximal calculi. Our single treatment stone-free rates are competitive with quoted shock wave lithotripsy success. In addition, there has been a decrease in ureteroscopic-associated complications in our series, with no ureteral avulsions. The improvements in treatment success and decrease in complications may be secondary to advances in ureteroscopic technology.

Diabetes mellitus and hypertension associated with shock wave lithotripsy of renal and proximal ureteral stones at 19 years of followup.

PURPOSE: SWL has revolutionized the management of nephrolithiasis and it is a preferred treatment for uncomplicated renal and proximal ureteral calculi. Since its introduction in 1982, conflicting reports of early adverse effects have been published. However, to our knowledge the long-term medical effects associated with SWL are unknown. We evaluated these adverse medical effects associated with SWL for renal and proximal ureteral stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Chart review identified 630 patients treated with SWL at our institution in 1985. Questionnaires were sent to 578 patients who were alive in 2004. The response rate was 58.9%. Respondents were matched by age, sex and year of presentation to a cohort of patients with nephrolithiasis who were treated nonsurgically. RESULTS: At 19 years of followup hypertension was more prevalent in the SWL group (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.03, 2.10, p = 0.034). The development of hypertension was related to bilateral treatment (p = 0.033). In the SWL group diabetes mellitus developed in 16.8% of patients. Patients treated with SWL were more likely to have diabetes mellitus than controls (OR 3.23, 95% CI 1.73 to 6.02, p <0.001). Multivariate analysis controlling for change in body mass index showed a persistent risk of diabetes mellitus in the SWL group (OR 3.75, 95% CI 1.56 to 9.02, p = 0.003). Diabetes mellitus was related to the number of administered shocks and treatment intensity (p = 0.005 and 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: At 19 years of followup SWL for renal and proximal ureteral stones was associated with the development of hypertension and diabetes mellitus. The incidence of these conditions was significantly higher than in a cohort of conservatively treated patients with nephrolithiasis.

Handling and prevention of complications in stone basketing.

OBJECTIVE: To review the incidence, risk factors, and treatment options of intraoperative and postoperative complications of stone basketing in urology with emphasis on certain principles that must be upheld to prevent those complications. METHODS: A literature search was performed using the MEDLINE database on stone basketing between 1970 and 2005. RESULTS: Iatrogenic trauma due to retrieval of a stone is well known but the exact incidence is difficult to ascertain. Rarely, stone basketing can cause major trauma to the ureter, such as avulsion or intussusception, requiring open or laparoscopic intervention for ureteral continuity restoration. Mucosal abrasion, ureteral perforation, and stricture formation have also been described as complications of stone basketing. Occasionally, the engaged or broken basket can provoke anxiety even for experienced urologists. Factors that increase the risk of complications, strategies for repair, and techniques for prevention are discussed extensively. CONCLUSION: Infrequent, surgical misadventures during stone basketing can occur and must be treated appropriately. Careful attention to instrument selection and surgical techniques and awareness of risk factors and type and site of potential injury are essential to reduce these complications.

Ureteroiliac artery fistula: diagnosis and treatment algorithm.

OBJECTIVES: To review the diagnosis and treatment of ureteroarterial fistulas and to develop a management algorithm. Long-term ureteral stenting, along with pelvic surgery and radiotherapy, have led to an increased incidence of ureteroarterial fistulas. Experience diagnosing and treating these fistulas has been limited to case reports. METHODS: A retrospective chart review from 1975 to 2004 revealed eight ureteroarterial fistulas in 7 patients at our institution. The patient demographics, presenting symptoms, and diagnostic studies were reviewed. Also, we analyzed the treatment, hospital course, and long-term outcomes. RESULTS: Ureteroarterial fistulas were more common in women (86%) than in men. All patients presented with gross hematuria, and 57% had lateralizing flank pain. Risk factors included chronic indwelling stents (87%), previous pelvic external beam radiotherapy (71%), pelvic surgery (100%), and vascular disease (87%). Provocative angiography was diagnostic in only 63% of cases. Although not sensitive, cystoscopy revealed lateralized, pulsatile hematuria in all cases when performed. Treatment ranged from endovascular stenting with nephrostomy tube to primary surgical repair with nephrectomy. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of this review, we propose a systematic diagnostic and treatment approach to a serious disease process. The use of these proposed algorithms will minimize unnecessary testing, increase the speed of diagnosis, and potentially improve overall outcomes of patients with ureteroarterial fistulas.

Urinary matrix calculi: our experience at a single institution.

PURPOSE: Matrix stones are an uncommon form of urinary calculi and may be mistaken for tumors involving the renal collecting system, thereby presenting a diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma to the practicing urologist. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1980 to 2003 we identified 5 patients with urinary matrix stones referred to our tertiary medical center for evaluation and treatment. RESULTS: All 5 cases had complex clinical and radiographic features at presentation. We outline the clinical presentations, imaging findings and management, and review the literature of matrix stone disease. CONCLUSIONS: A high index of suspicion is required in diagnosing matrix calculi in addition to carefully selected radiographic imaging. Due to their variable appearance in standard radiological studies, the evaluation of matrix stones may require invasive techniques such as ureteroscopy for accurate diagnosis. Percutaneous removal is the primary treatment modality to render patients stone-free.

Detection of crossing vessels as the cause of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: the role of antegrade pyelography prior to endopyelotomy.

PURPOSE: To review the utility of antegrade pyelography in detecting crossing vessels as the cause of uretero-pelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction prior to planned endopyelotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of the medical records, surgical reports, and medical images was performed in 109 consecutive adult patients in our practice who underwent antegrade pyelography just prior to planned endopyelotomy for symptomatic UPJ obstruction between January 1996 and December 2002. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were identified in whom a specific antegrade pyelographic appearance was detected in the diagnosis UPJ obstruction caused by crossing vessels. Surgical plans were changed in all 14 patients from antegrade endopyelotomy to open surgical pyeloplasty, during which the anterior (ventral) crossing vessels causing obstruction were confirmed. An additional three patients in the reviewed endopyelotomy group clinically failed their initial endopyelotomy procedure and were shown at the time of subsequent open or laparoscopic reconstructive surgery to have UPJ obstruction caused by anterior crossing vessels, but that diagnosis was missed at the time of the initial antegrade pyelogram. CONCLUSION: A specific antegrade pyelographic appearance was identified to diagnose UPJ obstruction caused by anterior crossing vessels with a sensitivity of 82.4% and a specificity of 100%. The direct obstructing effect of the vessels on the ureter is defined with pyelography as an acute posteriorly angulated ureteral deformity just below a patent UPJ. Recognition of this specific antegrade pyelographic appearance permits use of an appropriate surgical technique for UPJ obstruction repair.

Percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy (PUL) after shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) failure.

OBJECTIVE: Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) is an attractive initial treatment for nephrolithiasis. Unfortunately, a significant number of stones are resistant to SWL therapy and require subsequent percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy (PUL) for definitive treatment. Our objective was to determine if previous SWL had adverse effects on PUL success and if there were differences between the patients undergoing primary PUL and those undergoing PUL after SWL failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 2001, 108 PULs were performed at our institution, of which 40 (37%) were performed after SWL failure. Stone location, anesthesia time, stone composition and size, and complication rates were compared between patients who had PUL alone and those who underwent PUL after SWL failure. Anesthesia time was considered a reflection of technical difficulty of the case. RESULTS: Stone composition differed between the SWL failure and primary PUL groups. Cystine stones were found to be more common in the ESWL failure group and calcium oxalate monohydrate stones more common in the primary PUL group. There was not a statistically significant difference in stone size, anesthesia time or complication rates, between the PUL alone and PUL after SWL failure groups. CONCLUSION: PUL remains a reliable and safe treatment of nephrolithiasis. Prior SWL does not affect efficacy, technical difficulty, or postoperative complications of subsequent PUL. Based on our data, prior SWL should not be considered a negative factor in PUL outcomes. Stone composition should be considered a prognostic indicator of SWL failure and alert the surgeon that primary PUL may be indicated.

Ureteroscopy: effect of technology and technique on clinical practice.

PURPOSE: Technical advances in ureteroscopy allow for more aggressive management of upper tract pathology. We evaluate to what extent clinical practice and treatment efficacy have been impacted by improvements in technology and technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 1998, 176 consecutive patients underwent 182 ureteroscopic procedures at our institution. Retrospective chart review was performed. Factors such as clinical indication, pathology location, type of ureteroscope, procedure duration, procedure success, complication rate and length of stay were evaluated. Data from the 1998 cohort were compared to those obtained from a cohort of patients from 1992. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square test. RESULTS: Overall stone extraction rate was 94.4% (1992) vs 88.5% (1998) (p = 0.05). Proximal stones were treated in 13.5% (1998) vs 28.3% (1998) of cases. Distal stone extraction rate was 97.2% (1992) vs 95.1% (1998) (p = 0.43) and proximal stone extraction rate was 76.5% (1992) vs 71.9% (1998) (p = 0.73). Diagnostic inspection success rate was 98.3% (1992) vs 98.3% (1998). Use of flexible ureteroscopy was 11.5% (1992) vs 29.4% (1998). Complication rate was 12% (1992) vs 10.2% (1998) (p = 0.76). Of the cases 76.1% were outpatient in 1998 vs only 50% in 1992. CONCLUSIONS: Recent advances in ureteroscopic technology permit more aggressive instrumentation of the upper tract as reflected in higher use of flexible ureteroscopy and more frequent attempts to manage proximal ureteral calculi. These advances have not translated into better efficacy of calculus treatment. Furthermore, our data reflect a nationwide trend toward outpatient treatment.

Use of a temporary ureteral drainage stent after uncomplicated ureteroscopy: results from a phase II clinical trial.

PURPOSE: An indwelling ureteral stent is commonly placed for 48 hours after uncomplicated ureteroscopy to maintain drainage and prevent postoperative complications. A propriety temporary ureteral drainage stent (TUDS, Boston Scientific/Microvasive, Natick, Massachusetts) was developed to satisfy this goal with the added advantages of biodegradability and spontaneous passage. We evaluated TUDS performance in a patient population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 88 patients at 6 centers were selected for TUDS placement. Device safety as well as effectiveness, defined as adequate intervention-free drainage for 48 hours with the maintenance of ureteral position, were the primary study end points. Secondary end points consisted of the time required to eliminate TUDS from the body, tolerability of device presence and passage, and overall patient satisfaction with the stent. RESULTS: A single patient was excluded from primary end point analysis because of inadequate day 2 evaluation, resulting in an overall stent effectiveness rate of 78.2% (68 of 87 patients). Primary end point failure occurred in the remaining 19 patients (21.8%) with early stent extrusion in 17 and intervention required in 2 others within 48 hours of stent placement (cystoscopy and intravenous analgesia in 1, and intravenous analgesia alone in 1). There were no adverse clinical sequelae in 16 patients who experienced early extrusion with only 1 requiring intravenous pain medication. Stent fragments were retained beyond 3 months in 3 patients, of whom 2 were treated in a minimally invasive manner with shock wave lithotripsy, while 1 required ureteroscopy and shock wave lithotripsy to clear the residual fragments. Median time to stent elimination from the ureter and from the body was 8 and 15 days, respectively. Overall 71 of the 80 patients (89%) reported satisfaction with TUDS. CONCLUSIONS: The concept of a self-degrading internal ureteral stent represents a new paradigm in ureteral drainage. TUDS combines adequate ureteral drainage and patient satisfaction after uncomplicated ureteroscopy, eliminating the need for stent removal.

Surgical management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults

Ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction is a well-recognized entity that may present at any time - in fetal life, infancy, childhood, or early or late adulthood. As the most common site of obstruction in the upper urinary tract, the UPJ is an area with which urologists should be well familiar. There has been an improved understanding of the pathophysiology of primary congenital UPJ obstruction that has been reflected in the evolution of surgical options, from open surgical repair to minimally invasive surgery. Although the primary scope of this review is the surgical management of this condition, we will briefly review the pathogenesis, clinical presentation, and diagnosis of UPJ obstruction