Changes over time in the course of advanced pancreatic cancer treatment with systemic chemotherapy: a pooled analysis of five clinical trials from two decades of the German AIO study group.

BACKGROUND: Over the past two decades, our group has conducted five multicenter trials focusing on first-line systemic therapy for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. The current pooled analysis was designed to evaluate prognosis over time and the impact of clinical characteristics on survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Individual patient data were derived from five prospective, controlled, multicenter trials conducted by the 'Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie' (AIO): 'Gem/Cis', 'Ro96', 'RC57', 'ACCEPT' and 'RASH', which recruited patients between December 1997 and January 2017. RESULTS: Overall, 912 patients were included. The median overall survival (OS) for all assessable patients was 7.1 months. OS significantly improved over time, with a median OS of 8.6 months for patients treated from 2012 to 2017 compared with 7.0 months from 1997 to 2006 [hazard ratio (HR) 1.06; P < 0.004]. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (HR 1.48; P < 0.001), use of second-line treatment (HR 1.51; P < 0.001), and Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) stage (III versus IV) (HR 1.34, P = 0.002) had a significant impact on OS. By contrast, no influence of age and gender on OS was detectable. Comparing combination therapy with single-agent chemotherapy did not demonstrate a survival benefit, nor did regimens containing epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) such as afatinib or erlotinib, compared with chemotherapy-only arms. Patients with early-onset pancreatic cancer (age at study entry of ≤50 years, n = 102) had a similar OS compared with those >50 years (7.1 versus 7.0 months; HR 1.13; P = 0.273). The use of a platinum-containing regimen was not associated with better outcomes in patients with early-onset pancreatic cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Within this selected group of patients treated within prospective clinical trials, survival has shown improvement over two decades. This effect is likely attributable to the availability of more effective combination therapies and treatment lines, rather than to any specific regimen, such as those containing EGFR-TKIs. In addition, concerning age and sex subgroups, the dataset did not provide evidence for distinct clinical behavior.

Consensus molecular subgroups (CMS) of colorectal cancer (CRC) and first-line efficacy of FOLFIRI plus cetuximab or bevacizumab in the FIRE3 (AIO KRK-0306) trial.

BACKGROUND: FIRE-3 compared first-line therapy with FOLFIRI plus either cetuximab or bevacizumab in 592 KRAS exon 2 wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. The consensus molecular subgroups (CMS) are grouping CRC samples according to their gene-signature in four different subtypes. Relevance of CMS for the treatment of mCRC has yet to be defined. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this exploratory analysis, patients were grouped according to the previously published tumor CRC-CMSs. Objective response rates (ORR) were compared using chi-square test. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) times were compared using Kaplan-Meier estimation, log-rank tests. Hazard ratios (HR) were estimated according to the Cox proportional hazard method. RESULTS: CMS classification could be determined in 438 out of 514 specimens available from the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (n = 592). Frequencies for the remaining 438 samples were as follows: CMS1 (14%), CMS2 (37%), CMS3 (15%), CMS4 (34%). For the 315 RAS wild-type tumors, frequencies were as follows: CMS1 (12%), CMS2 (41%), CMS3 (11%), CMS4 (34%). CMS distribution in right- versus (vs) left-sided primary tumors was as follows: CMS1 (27% versus 11%), CMS2 (28% versus 45%), CMS3 (10% versus 12%), CMS4 (35% versus 32%). Independent of the treatment, CMS was a strong prognostic factor for ORR (P = 0.051), PFS (P < 0.001), and OS (P < 0.001). Within the RAS wild-type population, OS observed in CMS4 significantly favored FOLFIRI cetuximab over FOLFIRI bevacizumab. In CMS3, OS showed a trend in favor of the cetuximab arm, while OS was comparable in CMS1 and CMS2, independent of targeted therapy. CONCLUSIONS: CMS classification is prognostic for mCRC. Prolonged OS induced by FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in the FIRE-3 study appears to be driven by CMS3 and CMS4. CMS classification provides deeper insights into the biology to CRC, but at present time has no direct impact on clinical decision-making.The FIRE-3 (AIO KRK-0306) study had been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00433927.

Evaluation of survival across several treatment lines in metastatic colorectal cancer: Analysis of the FIRE-3 trial (AIO KRK0306).

BACKGROUND: We explored the impacts of sequential application of various treatment lines on survival kinetics. Therefore, differences in overall survival (OS) observed in FIRE-3 were investigated in the context of time and exposure to applied treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: OS analyses (stratified by treatment with FOLFIRI plus either cetuximab or bevacizumab) were performed according to time intervals as well as using a Cox model to define changes of hazard ratio (HR) over time. RESULTS: The fraction of patients with systemic treatment and time on treatment markedly decreases over treatment lines and time. OS evaluation by a Cox model indicated a trend towards a non-proportional hazard between treatment arms (P = 0.12/P = 0.09 for KRAS-intention-to-treat (ITT)/all-RAS wild-type populations, respectively). To improve the fit of the model, a change-point (point of curve separation) was estimated at 22.6 months (day 687) after randomisation. The HR between the two arms before 22.6 months was not significantly different from one. However, markedly different survival kinetics in favour of the cetuximab arm were apparent after the change-point (KRAS-ITT: P = 0.0018; HR, 0.60 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-0.83] and RAS: P = 0.0006; HR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.35-0.75]). CONCLUSION: The differences in OS favouring the cetuximab arm become apparent about 22.6 months after randomisation, indicating that only those patients who survive 22.6 months after randomisation benefit from the superiority of the cetuximab arm. When OS curves separate, only few patients receive active systemic treatment in short courses, suggesting that earlier treatment effects are responsible for later kinetics of survival curves.

Impact of BRAF and RAS mutations on first-line efficacy of FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab: analysis of the FIRE-3 (AIO KRK-0306) study.

BACKGROUND: RAS and BRAF mutations have been identified as negative prognostic factors in metastatic colorectal cancer. Efficacy of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan (FOLFIRI) plus bevacizumab in patients with RAS-mutant tumours needs to be further evaluated. Whether to treat patients with BRAF-mutant tumours with either bevacizumab or anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies remains unclear. METHODS: Patients treated within the FIRE-3 trial were retrospectively tested for BRAF and RAS mutations using formalin fixated paraffin embedded (FFPE) tumour material applying pyrosequencing for KRAS and NRAS exon 2, 3 and 4 mutations as far as for BRAF mutations. Survival analysis was done using Kaplan-Meier estimation and differences were expressed using the log-rank test. Overall response rate (ORR) was compared using Fisher's exact test. Data from a central independent radiological response evaluation were used to calculate early tumour shrinkage (ETS) and depth of response (DpR). RESULTS: Overall, 188 patients with RAS-mutant tumours and 48 with BRAF-mutant tumours were identified. In BRAF-mutant patients, ORR was numerically higher in the cetuximab versus the bevacizumab arm (52% versus 40%), while comparable results were achieved for progression-free survival (PFS; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.84, p = 0.56) and overall survival (OS; HR 0.79, p = 0.45). RAS mutation was associated with a trend towards lower ORR (37% versus 50.5%, p = 0.11) and shorter PFS (7.4 versus 9.7 months; HR 1.25; p = 0.14) in patients receiving FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus bevacizumab, but OS was comparable (19.1 versus 20.1 months; HR 1.05; p = 0.73), respectively. ETS identified subgroups sensitive to cetuximab-based treatment in both BRAF- (9/17) and RAS-mutant (18/48) patients and was associated with significantly longer OS. DpR was comparable between both treatment arms in RAS- and BRAF-mutant patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In BRAF- and RAS-mutant patients, cetuximab- and bevacizumab-based treatment had comparable survival times. ETS represents an early parameter associated with the benefit from anti-EGFR, while this was not the case with vascular endothelial growth factor A blockade.

CEA response is associated with tumor response and survival in patients with KRAS exon 2 wild-type and extended RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer receiving first-line FOLFIRI plus cetuximab or bevacizumab (FIRE-3 trial).

BACKGROUND: To examine the relation of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) response with tumor response and survival in patients with (K)RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy in the FIRE-3 trial comparing FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab. PATIENTS AND METHODS: CEA response assessed as the percentage of CEA decrease from baseline to nadir was evaluated for its association with tumor response and survival. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed an optimal cut-off value of 75% using the maximum of sensitivity and specificity for CEA response to discriminate CEA responders from non-responders. In addition, the time to CEA nadir was calculated. RESULTS: Of 592 patients in the intent-to-treat population, 472 were eligible for analysis of CEA (cetuximab arm: 230 and bevacizumab arm: 242). Maximal relative CEA decrease (%) significantly (P = 0.003) differed between the cetuximab arm (median 83.0%; IQR 40.9%-94.7%) and the bevacizumab arm (median 72.3%; IQR 26.3%-91.0%). In a longitudinal analysis, the CEA decrease occurred faster in the cetuximab arm and was greater than in the bevacizumab arm at all evaluated time points until 56 weeks after treatment start. CEA nadir occurred after 3.3 months (cetuximab arm) and 3.5 months (bevacizumab arm), (P = 0.49). In the cetuximab arm, CEA responders showed a significantly longer progression-free survival [11.8 versus 7.4 months; hazard ratio (HR) 1.53; 95% Cl, 1.15-2.04; P = 0.004] and longer overall survival (36.6 versus 21.3 months; HR 1.73; 95% Cl, 1.24-2.43; P = 0.001) than CEA non-responders. Analysis of extended RAS wild-type patients revealed similar results. CONCLUSION: In the FIRE-3 trial, CEA decrease was significantly faster and greater in the cetuximab arm than in the bevacizumab arm and correlated with the prolonged survival observed in patients receiving FOLFIRI plus cetuximab. CLINICAL TRIALS NUMBER: NCT00433927 (ClinicalTrials.gov); AIO KRK0306 FIRE-3.

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (CAELYX) in patients with advanced ovarian cancer: results of a German multicenter observational study.

PURPOSE: Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD, CAELYX) has demonstrated activity in several phase-III trials and has been approved for the therapy of relapsed ovarian cancer after platinum treatment. Aim of this observational study was to analyze the efficacy and toxicity profile of PLD under routine clinical conditions and without the general restrictions of defined inclusion and exclusion criteria of clinical trials. METHODS: Between 2003 and 2005, a total of 190 patients with relapsed ovarian cancer were enrolled. 183 patients were available for evaluation; dose-intensity, modifications, treatment duration, toxicities and response were systematically analyzed. RESULTS: The median patient age was 62 years (range 23-86 years). 45.4% of the patients received PLD as second-line therapy and a median of four courses per patient were administered. The median dose of PLD was 40 mg/m(2), most frequently used every 4 weeks (68.8%). Grade 3 Leucopenia (1.6%) and grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia (0.5%) were the most frequent hematological toxicities. The most frequent non-hematological toxicities were skin toxicity, pain and nausea, which were observed in 38.8, 41 and 45.9% of the patients, respectively. Twenty-seven percent of the patients showed a response to therapy with 6.9% achieving complete remission and 20.1% achieving partial remission. 37.7% achieved a stable disease. The median duration of response for all patients was 4.8 months (range 0-51.8 months). Median progression-free interval and overall survival were 5.8 months (95% CI 5.1-6.6 months) and 16.6 months (95% CI 13.9-22.6 months), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PLD is safe and effective in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer, even after numerous previous treatment regimens. A dose of 40 mg/m(2) every 28 days seems to be an effective and well-tolerated therapeutic option in advanced ovarian cancer with a low incidence of hematological toxicities and acceptable non-hematological toxicities.

Biweekly fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT) for patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or esophagogastric junction: a phase II trial of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie.

BACKGROUND: The combination of docetaxel (Taxotere), cisplatin, and fluorouracil improved efficacy in gastric cancer, but was associated with substantial toxicity. This study was designed to incorporate docetaxel into a tolerable biweekly (once every 2 weeks) oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with measurable, metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or esophagogastric junction and no prior chemotherapy received oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2), leucovorin 200 mg/m(2), and fluorouracil 2600 mg/m(2) as a 24-h infusion in combination with docetaxel 50 mg/m(2) (FLOT) on day 1 every 2 weeks. Prophylactic growth factors were not administered. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were enrolled; 54 received treatment. Patients had a median age of 60 years (range 29-76) and most (93%) of them had metastatic disease. Objective responses were observed in 57.7% of patients with a median time to treatment response of 1.54 months. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 5.2 and 11.1 months, respectively. Twenty-five percent of patients experienced prolonged (>12 months) PFS. Frequent (>10%) grade 3 or 4 toxic effects included neutropenia in 26 (48.1%), leukopenia in 15 (27.8%), diarrhea in 8 (14.8%), and fatigue in 6 (11.1%) patients. Complicated neutropenia was observed in two (3.8%) patients, only. CONCLUSIONS: Biweekly FLOT is active and has a favorable safety profile.

Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CapOx) versus capecitabine plus gemcitabine (CapGem) versus gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin (mGemOx): final results of a multicenter randomized phase II trial in advanced pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: To compare the efficacy and safety of three different chemotherapy doublets in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer (PC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: At total of 190 patients were randomly assigned to receive capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-14 plus oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on day 1 (CapOx), capecitabine 825 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-14 plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 (CapGem) or gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 plus oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on day 8 (mGemOx). Treatment cycles were repeated every three weeks. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 3 months; secondary end points included objective response rate, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 response, clinical benefit response, overall survival and toxicity. RESULTS: The PFS rate after 3 months was 51% in the CapOx arm, 64% in the CapGem arm and 60% in the mGemOx arm. Median PFS was estimated with 4.2 months, 5.7 months and 3.9 months, respectively (P = 0.67). Corresponding median survival times were: 8.1 months (CapOx), 9.0 months (CapGem) and 6.9 months (mGemOx) (P = 0.56). Grade 3/4 hematological toxicities were more frequent in the two Gem-containing arms; grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicity rates did not exceed 15% in any arm. CONCLUSION: CapOx, CapGem and mGemOx have similar clinical efficacy in advanced PC. Each regimen has a distinct but manageable tolerability profile.

Prospective randomized trial to evaluate two delayed granulocyte colony stimulating factor administration schedules after high-dose cytarabine therapy in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

In acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), treatment with granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) during remission induction shortens granulocytopenia and may decrease morbidity due to infections. However, the optimal timing of G-CSF administration after chemotherapy is not known. In a prospective randomized multi-center study, adult ALL patients were treated with high-dose ARA-C [HDAC, 3 g/m(2) bid (1 g/m(2) bid for T-ALL) days 1-4] and mitoxantrone (MI 10 mg/m(2) days 3-5). They were randomized to receive recombinant human G-CSF (Lenograstim) 263 micro g/day SC starting either from day 12 (Group 1) or day 17 (Group 2). Fifty-five patients (41 male, 14 female) with a median age of 34 years (range: 18-55 years) were enrolled into the study; 50 patients were evaluable. The median duration of neutropenia <500/ micro l after HDAC/MI was 12 days (range: 7-22 days) in the early G-CSF Group 1 and also 12 days (range: 4-22 days) in the late G-CSF Group 2; this was shorter than in the historical control group (15 days, range: 4-43 days, n=46) where the patients received identical cytotoxic treatment without G-CSF. Seventeen infections were observed in 14 patients in Group 1 (47%) and 13 infections in 10 patients in Group 2 (50%) compared to 27 infections in 49 patients of the historical control (54%). In Group 1, the patients received a median of 11 injections with G-CSF (range: 7-22) compared to 7 injections (range: 4-19) in Group 2. The total administered dose of G-CSF in Group 2 was significantly reduced by 40% ( P<0.0001). The delayed start of G-CSF after HDAC/MI in ALL achieves the same clinical benefit compared to the earlier initiation of G-CSF. The reduction of treatment costs by reducing the total G-CSF dose may be important in future treatment with this hematopoietic growth factor.

Bendamustine is effective in relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Bendamustine, an alkylating agent with a nitrogen mustard group and a purine-like benzimidazol group, has been shown to be effective in several solid tumors and indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, but has not yet been studied for efficacy in aggressive lymphomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a phase II study in patients with relapsed or refractory high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, using bendamustine at a dose of 120 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 2, every 3 weeks for up to six cycles. Twenty-one patients were enrolled; 18 were evaluable for response and toxicity, 10 of whom were refractory to previous chemotherapy. RESULTS: With three patients achieving a complete response (at 6, >or=8 and >or=22 months) and five a partial response (three at 2 months, one at 3 months and one at 10 months), the total response rate of the evaluable patients was 44% (eight out of 18; 38% of all patients). Two complete and two partial responders were refractory to prior treatment. In 10 patients, treatment had to be stopped after one to three cycles due to progressive disease or hematological toxicity (n = 2). Non-hematological side effects were mild. Eight (13%) WHO grade 3 and no grade 4 events were observed in 60 evaluable treatment cycles. Hematologic toxicity was moderate (grade 3 and 4): anemia in five cycles (8%), leukopenia in seven (12%) and thrombocytopenia in eight (13%). CONCLUSIONS: Bendamustine as a single agent is effective against aggressive lymphoma, even in cases of refractory disease. Further studies are warranted to determine the significance of bendamustine in the treatment of aggressive lymphomas.

TGF beta-induced SMAD2 phosphorylation predicts inhibition of thymidine incorporation in CD34+ cells from healthy donors, but not from patients with AML after MDS.

Cells from patients with MDS-derived AML display heterogeneous proliferative responses to transforming growth factor beta (TGF beta). We analyzed growth inhibition and SMAD2 phosphorylation by TGF beta in CD34+ cells from nine patients, as compared to normal controls. While TGF beta consistently inhibited thymidine incorporation of normal cells (41% of control, P < 0.05), cells from patients with AML were growth-inhibited in only four of seven cases (40%), whereas TGF beta stimulated thymidine incorporation in the three other samples (166%). Remarkably, TPO reverted the stimulatory effect of TGF beta to profound growth inhibition. Upon exposure to TGF beta, SMAD2 protein was phosphorylated in normal CD34+ cells (n = 3), CD34+ leukemic blasts from all examined patients with AML (n = 4), and in the myeloid leukemic cell lines M-07e and HEL. TGF beta inhibited TPO-mediated thymidine incorporation, cell proliferation and survival in all samples analyzed. In M-07e cells and CD34+ cells from healthy donors, this inhibition was enhanced by an antagonist of JAK2 (AG490), but not a MEK-1 antagonist (PD098059). Conversely, in CD34+ cells from a patient with AML, both AG490 and PD098059 significantly enhanced TGF beta-mediated suppression of TPO-induced thymidine incorporation. Thus, in MDS-derived AML, altered responses to TGF beta may be due to defects downstream of SMAD2 and may involve MAPK activation.

Effective treatment with rituximab in a patient with refractory prolymphocytoid transformed B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia and Evans syndrome.

A 65-year-old male who had been diagnosed as having chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) stage Rai 0 three years previously presented in October 1998 with progressive disease (splenomegaly, increasing lymphocytosis: 30/nl) and 50% prolymphocytes in his peripheral blood. The patient was refractory to initial treatment with fludarabine and epirubicin, and 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine. Additionally, the patient developed Evans syndrome. Therapy with cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone lead to an improvement of hemolysis, but the patient remained thrombocytopenic. Subsequently, lymphocytes further increased to 135/nl, and cyclophosphamide 3 g/m2 was again given but without effect on the peripheral lymphocyte count. At this stage, therapy with rituximab 375 mg/m2 four times weekly was initiated. The platelet count normalized within 1 week after the first dose of rituximab, and the lymphocyte count dropped within 2 months to 1.1/nl. This case demonstrates that patients with prolymphocytoid transformed B-CLL refractory to purine analogs and alkylating agents and autoimmune-hemolytic disease can effectively and safely be treated with rituximab and indicates that an investigation of antibody therapy is warranted in this patient group.

[Involvement of the facial skull in Erdheim-Chester disease]. / Beteiligung des Gesichtsschädels bei Erdheim-Chester-Erkrankung.

We report on a patient suffering from Erdheim-Chester-disease (ECD). ECD represents a very rare entity with lipogranulomatosis of mesenchymal origin. The most common radiological manifestation is the involvement of the long bones of the extremities. Here we find sclerosis of the spongiosa combined with a thinning of cortical structures. This often results in a small crack of hyperlucency between corticals and spongiosa. Our case demonstrates an involvement of the craniofacial part of the skull showing sclerosis of the upper jaw bone. This manifestation has not yet been reported in the literature.

Effect of treatment with amifostine used as a single agent in patients with refractory anemia on clinical outcome and serum tumor necrosis factor alpha levels.

Amifostine increases in vitro burst-forming unit-erythroid and colony-forming unit-granulocyte/granulcoyte-macrophage cultured from bone-marrow cells from patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Several small clinical studies give divergent informations about the potential of amifostine as single agent to improve hematopoiesis in MDS patients. In these studies, patients with refractory anemia (RA), RA with excess of blasts (RAEB), and RAEB in transformation (RAEB-T) were analyzed together, resulting in response rates varying from 8% to 30%. The present multi-center study evaluated whether treatment with amifostine is of clinical benefit in patients with RA who are transfusion dependent. The effect on transfusion frequency as well as on platelets and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) was examined in 14 patients with RA [median age 67 years (55-72 years), male:female 9:5]. Four treatment cycles were planned, each consisting of intravenous amifostine at 200 mg/m2/day three times per week followed by a 2-week interval. Since tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha is a main suppressive cytokine for hematopoiesis in RA patients, serum samples for analyzing endogenous levels of TNF alpha were collected prior to the study and after four treatment cycles. In three patients (21%), reduced transfusion requirement with prolongation of the transfusion interval from 4 weeks to 8 weeks (two patients) and 4 weeks to 6 weeks was seen. An increase in ANC from 400/microliter to 2600/microliter and 200/microliter to 3400/microliter was observed in two patients. Platelets increased from 129,000/microliter to 277,000/microliter in an additional patient. In one patient, disease progression from RA to RAEB was observed. Serum TNF alpha levels were increased in MDS patients compared with normal controls (18.8 pg/ml vs 9.1 pg/ml), and there was no change during the treatment with amifostine (17.5 pg/ml). In conclusion, treatment with amifostine as a single agent was of limited benefit in patients with RA. The serum TNF alpha levels were unchanged during treatment with amifostine in RA patients.

Defective megakaryocytic development in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Megakaryocytic proliferation and differentiation is typically abnormal in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). The underlying mechanisms for this finding are not known, but may involve defects at the level of the thrombopoietin-receptor (c-mpl) or post-receptor signaling pathways in megakaryocyte progenitor cells. Premature apoptosis of the bone marrow cells and inhibitory effects of cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor alpha have been implicated as contributing to altered megakaryopoiesis in MDS, but their significance remains unclear. The availability of thrombopoietin (TPO) has facilitated more detailed analysis of megakaryocytic biology using several experimental in-vitro systems. However numerous studies have shown that the developmental abnormalities of MDS megakaryocytes could not be corrected by TPO. Increasing investigations are being extended to the evaluation of signal transduction pathways of c-mpl both in cell lines and human hematopoietic cells in order to identify the molecular mechanisms responsible for the defective megakaryocytic development in MDS.

Cytokine therapy for myelodysplastic syndrome.

The myelodysplastic syndromes are a heterogeneous family of hematologic disorders characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis. Because of the interpatient variability regarding prognosis and morbidity, management of myelodysplastic syndromes continues to be a challenge to clinical hematologists. Pancytopenia and defective function of neutrophils and platelets carry a high risk of infectious or hemorrhagic complications. Erythropoietin is perhaps the most commonly used therapeutic option, second only to transfusion; improvement of erythropoiesis is seen in approximately 20% of patients, mainly in those with relatively preserved erythroid function and no or low transfusion requirements. Coadministration of erythropoietin with either granulocyte colony-stimulating factor or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor may increase the response rate up to 50%. Although prophylactic administration of granulocyte- or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor cannot be recommended, treatment of febrile neutropenia might benefit from administration of granulocyte- or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in addition to antibiotics.

Intensive chemotherapy with idarubicin, ara-C, etoposide, and m-AMSA followed by immunotherapy with interleukin-2 for myelodysplastic syndromes and high-risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML).

Intensive chemotherapy followed by treatment with interleukin-2 (IL-2) was evaluated in a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial including 18 patients with refractory anemia with excess of blasts in transformation (RAEB-T), 86 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) evolving from myelodysplastic syndromes, and six patients with secondary AML after previous chemotherapy. Median age was 58 years (range: 18-76 years). Forty-nine patients (45%) achieved a complete remission (CR) after two induction cycles with idarubicin, ara-C, and etoposide, 52% of them aged 60 years (p=0.06). After two consolidation courses, patients were randomized to four cycles of either high- or low-dose IL-2. Patients aged up to 55 years with an HLA-identical sibling donor were eligible for allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. The median relapse-free survival was 12.5 months, with a probability of ongoing CR at 6.5 years of 19%. Overall survival of all patients was 8 months, and 21 months for the CR patients. Median survival was significantly longer among patients aged