Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
HPB (Oxford) ; 26(3): 333-343, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38087704

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD), including robotic (RPD) and laparoscopy (LPD), is becoming more frequently employed in the management of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), though the majority of operations are still performed via open approach (OPD). Access to technologic advances often neglect the underserved. Whether disparities in access to MIPD exist, remain unclear. METHODS: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried (2010-2020) for patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for PDAC. Cochran-Armitage tests assessed for trends over time. Social determinants of health (SDH) were compared between approaches. Multinomial logistic models identified predictors of MIPD. RESULTS: Of 16,468 patients, 80.03 % underwent OPD and 19.97 % underwent MIPD (22.60 % robotic; 77.40 % laparoscopic). Black race negatively predicted LPD (vs white (OR 0.822; 95 % CI 0.701-0.964)). Predictors of RPD included Medicare/other government insurance (vs uninsured or Medicaid (OR 1.660; 95 % CI 1.123-2.454)) and private insurance (vs uninsured or Medicaid (OR 1.597; 95 % CI 1.090-2.340)). Early (2010-2014) vs late (2015-2020) diagnosis, stratified by race, demonstrated an increase in Non-White patients undergoing OPD (13.15 % vs 14.63 %; p = 0.016), but not LPD (11.41 % vs 13.57 %;p = 0.125) or RPD (14.15 % vs 15.23 %; p = 0.774). CONCLUSION: SDH predict surgical approach more than clinical stage, facility type, or comorbidity status. Disparities in race and insurance coverage are different between surgical approaches.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático , Laparoscopía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Anciano , Estados Unidos , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medicare , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía
2.
Neuro Oncol ; 19(7): 887-896, 2017 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28339582

RESUMEN

Glioblastoma is the most common and aggressive malignant primary brain tumor. Cellular heterogeneity is a characteristic feature of the disease and contributes to the difficulty in formulating effective therapies. Glioma stem-like cells (GSCs) have been identified as a subpopulation of tumor cells that are thought to be largely responsible for resistance to treatment. Intratumoral hypoxia contributes to maintenance of the GSCs by supporting the critical stem cell traits of multipotency, self-renewal, and tumorigenicity. This review highlights the interaction of GSCs with the hypoxic tumor microenvironment, exploring the mechanisms underlying the contribution of GSCs to tumor vessel dynamics, immune modulation, and metabolic alteration.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/metabolismo , Glioblastoma/metabolismo , Células Madre Neoplásicas/metabolismo , Hipoxia Tumoral , Microambiente Tumoral , Animales , Neoplasias Encefálicas/complicaciones , Glioblastoma/complicaciones , Humanos , Neovascularización Patológica/complicaciones , Neovascularización Patológica/metabolismo , Fenotipo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA