Mechanical properties of conventional versus microwave-polymerized denture base acrylic resins.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: New denture base acrylic resins have been introduced that are specifically formulated for microwave polymerization. Microwave polymerization is a time-efficient procedure, but few studies have evaluated how these new acrylic resin formulations compare with conventionally processed acrylic resins. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the stiffness and strength of denture base acrylic resins formulated for microwave polymerization with conventionally processed acrylic resin. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Rectangular beams were fabricated from 2 microwave-polymerized denture base acrylic resins, microwave-specific resin (Nature-Cryl MC), resin with the option of microwave polymerization (Diamond D), and a conventionally processed resin as a control (Lucitone 199). Specimens (n=10) were stored in water for 1 week and subjected to a 3-point bend test to determine the flexural modulus (stiffness) and flexural strength before (initial properties) or after 120 000 load cycles. The load cycles, conducted between 5 and 25 N at 2 Hz, simulated 6 months of mastication. Data were analyzed by using 2-way ANOVA, followed by pairwise comparisons (α=.05). RESULTS: The initial flexural modulus (mean ±standard deviation) was conventionally processed resin, 2.65 ±0.33 GPa; microwave-specific resin, 3.01 ±0.20 GPa; and microwave-option resin, 2.63 ±0.04 GPa. After load cycling, the mean flexural modulus was conventionally processed resin, 2.34 ±0.32 GPa; microwave-specific resin, 2.69 ±0.20 GPa; and microwave-option resin, 1.96 ±0.11 GPa. The initial flexural strength was conventionally processed resin, 77.6 ±11.0 MPa; microwave-specific resin, 83.6 ±3.5 MPa; and microwave-option resin, 78.9 ±2.6 MPa. After load cycling, the mean flexural strength was conventionally processed resin, 68.7 ±9.0 MPa; microwave-specific resin, 73.3 ±3.3 MPa; and microwave-option resin, 65.5 ±3.5 MPa. Resin and loading state significantly affected the stiffness and strength (P<.01); the interaction resin×state was not significant (P≥.558). CONCLUSIONS: Microwave-polymerized denture base acrylic resins were comparable in stiffness and strength with conventionally processed acrylic resin. All acrylic resins decreased in stiffness and strength after load cycling. The microwave-specific resin was significantly stiffer and stronger than the other denture base acrylic resins, initially and after 120 000 load cycles.

Working viscosity and non-Newtonian behavior of silicone denture liners.

PURPOSE: To evaluate flow profile and non-Newtonian behavior of 10 different silicone lining materials. METHODS: Ten commercially available silicone lining materials were selected for evaluation. The flow profile and non-Newtonian behavior of each material was measured using a shark fin testing method. Fin height and resultant base thickness were measured with a digital caliper and compared with one-way ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc test and fin base by Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA on ranks with Dunn post hoc test with significance at P< 0.05 for both. RESULTS: Shark fin heights ranged from 9.62 ± 0.86 mm [Reline II (Soft)] to 25.54 ± 0.43 mm [Sofreliner (Medium)]. Shark fin bases ranged from 2.57 ± 0.51 mm [Sofreliner (Medium)] to 10.31 ± 0.57 mm [Reline II (Soft)]. Statistically significant differences were found between certain samples' shark fin heights as well as resultant bases (P< 0.05) indicating different rheological properties. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Silicone liner materials differ significantly with respect to flow profile and non-Newtonian behavior. While a high flow profile (low viscosity) of an elastomeric impression material improves accuracy, it may be a detriment to a denture lining material that must achieve a critical minimum thickness to provide resilience. Likewise, a low flow profile (high viscosity) material may also pose a disadvantage, requiring excessive compression and possible tissue distortion to achieve the same critical thickness. The results of this study should be considered when selecting the appropriate material for clinical application. Additional studies are indicated to further quantify rheological properties as well as correlate them to physical properties after the complete cure of the material.

Poly(methylmethacrylate) Microwave Processing: A Technique Paper.

Microwave processing of a wax trial denture into a poly(methylmethacrylate) provides a viable alternative to conventional compression, injection, and digital techniques. This article briefly describes a processing technique that yields a complete dental prosthesis in under two hours using a combination of modern materials designed to reduce working and setting times without compromising the quality of the final prosthesis.

Diagnosis and treatment of orofacial pain in a patient with unserviceable complete dentures: A clinical report.

An ill-fitting complete denture has the potential to create pain and discomfort as well as conceal or confound the diagnosis of other primary sources of orofacial pain such as trigeminal neuralgia. Guidelines of the American Academy of Orofacial Pain offer an evidence-based approach for the assessment, diagnosis, and management of orofacial pain. A complete and accurate differential diagnosis is paramount to the success of treatment as well as to the circumvention of unnecessary therapy. The purpose of this clinical report was to emphasize an evidence-based approach to the diagnosis and treatment of orofacial pain in a patient with edentulism and a history of prolonged denture wear.

Making an implant-level impression using solid plastic, press-fit, closed-tray impression copings: a clinical report.

An implant-level impression is often desired for designing and fabricating an implant-supported fixed restoration, especially when 2 or more implants have been placed. However, convergent implants placed too close in proximity pose several problems, starting with the impression. In situations of extreme convergence or close proximity, modification of conventional metal copings may be impossible. This clinical report describes the use and associated advantages and disadvantages of solid plastic, press-fit, closed-tray impression copings as a mechanism suitable to create an implant-level cast.