Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Radiographics ; 37(2): 652-664, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27860550

RESUMEN

Ultrasonography (US) is an established modality for intervention. The introduction of microbubble US contrast agents (UCAs) has the potential to further improve US imaging for intervention. According to licensing, UCAs are currently approved for clinical use in restricted situations, but many additional indications have become accepted as having clinical value. The use of UCAs has been shown to be safe, and there is no risk of renal toxic effects, unlike with iodinated or gadolinium contrast medium. Broadly speaking, UCAs can be injected into the bloodstream (intravascular use) or instilled into almost any accessible body cavity (endocavitary use), either in isolation or synchronously. In microvascular applications, contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) enhances delineation of necrotic areas and the vascularized target to improve real-time targeting. The ability of CEUS to allow true assessment of vascularity has also been used in follow-up of devascularizing intervention. In macrovascular applications, real-time angiographic images can be obtained with CEUS without nephrotoxic effects or radiation. In endocavitary applications, CEUS can achieve imaging similar to that of iodinated contrast medium-based fluoroscopy; follow-up to intervention (eg, tubography and nephrostography) can be performed at the bedside, which may be advantageous. The use of UCAs is a natural progression in US-guided intervention. The aim of this article is to describe the indications, contraindications, and techniques of using UCAs as an adjunctive tool for US-guided interventional procedures to facilitate effective treatment, improve complication management, and increase the overall success of interventional procedures. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2016.


Asunto(s)
Medios de Contraste , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Contraindicaciones , Medios de Contraste/administración & dosificación , Medios de Contraste/efectos adversos , Humanos , Microburbujas
2.
Amyotroph Lateral Scler ; 7(1): 16-21, 2006 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16546754

RESUMEN

A retrospective review was carried out on the influence of pre-procedure respiratory assessment on survival of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) requiring nutritional support with either a gastrostomy or a nasogastric feeding tube. Over a five-year period 98 patients (49 male, 49 female; median age 61 years, range 26-86 years) with ALS were referred for enteral feeding with either radiological inserted gastrostomy (RIG), percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) or nasogastric tube (NG). Case notes review was performed to record patient age, sex, pre-procedure respiratory assessment, method of enteral feeding and survival post-procedure. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed for each group, with Cox regression analyses performed in order to establish the effect of each variable on outcome. Median survival (with 95% confidence intervals) following RIG, PEG and NG was 6.31 months (4.58-8.04 months), 7.13 months (4.81-9.45 months) and 0.95 months (0.00-2.77 months), respectively. The survival advantage between RIG and PEG was not statistically significant (p = 0.50), but for NG versus RIG and PEG groups combined, there was a significant difference (p = 0.03). For patients with normal overnight oximetry, median survival was 8.54 months (3.88-13.21 months), compared to 4.80 months (1.20-8.39 months) in the abnormal oximetry group (p = 0.03; relative risk 1.97). It is concluded that RIG and PEG are equivalent in terms of post-procedure survival. Abnormal oximetry prior to the procedure is a significant indicator of post-procedure survival.


Asunto(s)
Esclerosis Amiotrófica Lateral/mortalidad , Esclerosis Amiotrófica Lateral/rehabilitación , Nutrición Enteral/estadística & datos numéricos , Desnutrición/mortalidad , Desnutrición/prevención & control , Oximetría/estadística & datos numéricos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Esclerosis Amiotrófica Lateral/diagnóstico , Comorbilidad , Humanos , Incidencia , Desnutrición/diagnóstico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Análisis de Supervivencia , Tasa de Supervivencia
3.
Eur Radiol ; 13(1): 127-35, 2003 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12541120

RESUMEN

Five testicular appendages are formed during development of the male genito-urinary tract, which are the remnants of the degenerating mesonephric and paramesonephric ducts. The testicular and epididymal appendages, found at the upper pole of the testis and at the head of the epididymis respectively, are the most common and have a range of appearances on ultrasound. These appendages have the ability to undergo torsion, an important differential diagnosis in the child who presents with an acute scrotum. The varying ultrasound appearances of the testicular appendages are described and illustrated. Ultrasound features of appendiceal torsion are also demonstrated.


Asunto(s)
Escroto/diagnóstico por imagen , Torsión del Cordón Espermático/diagnóstico por imagen , Testículo/diagnóstico por imagen , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Epidídimo/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Masculino , Ultrasonografía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA