Clinical, Echocardiographic, and Longitudinal Characteristics Associated With Heart Failure With Improved Ejection Fraction.

Heart failure with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF) has better outcomes than HF with reduced EF (HFrEF). However, factors contributing to HFimpEF remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate clinical and longitudinal characteristics associated with subsequent HFimpEF. This was a single-center retrospective HFrEF cohort study. Data were collected from 2014 to 2022. Patients with HFrEF were identified using International Classification of Diseases codes, echocardiographic data, and natriuretic peptide levels. The main end points were HFimpEF (defined as EF >40% at ≥3 months with ≥10% increase) and mortality. Cox proportional hazards and mixed effects models were used for analyses. The study included 1,307 patients with HFrEF with a median follow-up of 16.3 months (interquartile range 8.0 to 30.6). The median age was 65 years; 68% were male whereas 57% were White. On follow-up, 38.7% (n = 506) developed HFimpEF, whereas 61.3% (n = 801) had persistent HFrEF. A multivariate Cox regression model identified gender, race, co-morbidities, echocardiographic, and natriuretic peptide as significant covariates of HFimpEF (p <0.05). The HFimpEF group had better survival compared with the persistent HFrEF group (p <0.001). Echocardiographic and laboratory trajectories differed between groups. In this HFrEF cohort, 38.7% transitioned to HFimpEF and approximately 50% met the definition within the first 12 months. In a HFimpEF model, gender, co-morbidities, echocardiographic parameters, and natriuretic peptide were associated with subsequent HFimpEF. The model has the potential to identify patients at risk of subsequent persistent or improved HFrEF, thus informing the design and implementation of targeted quality-of-care improvement interventions.

Clinical, Echocardiographic, and Longitudinal Characteristics Associated with Heart Failure with Improved Ejection Fraction.

Background: Heart failure (HF) with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF) has better outcomes than HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, factors contributing to HFimpEF remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate clinical and longitudinal characteristics associated with subsequent HFimpEF. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective HFrEF cohort study. Data were collected from 2014 to 2022. Patients with HFrEF were identified using ICD codes, echocardiographic data, and natriuretic peptide levels. The main endpoints were HFimpEF (defined as ejection fraction >40% at ≥3 months with ≥10% increase) and mortality. Cox proportional hazards and mixed effects models were used for analyses. Results: The study included 1307 HFrEF patients with a median follow-up of 16.3 months (IQR 8.0-30.6). The median age was 65 years; 68% were male while 57% were white. On follow-up, 39% (n=506) developed HFimpEF, while 61% (n=801) had persistent HFrEF. A multivariate Cox regression model identified sex, race comorbidities, echocardiographic, and natriuretic peptide as significant covariates of HFimpEF ( p <0.05). The HFimpEF group had better survival compared to the persistent HFrEF group ( p <0.001). Echocardiographic and laboratory trajectories differed between groups. Conclusion: In this HFrEF cohort, 39% transitioned to HFimpEF and approximately 50% met the definition within the first 12 months. In a HFimpEF model, sex, comorbidities, echocardiographic parameters, and natriuretic peptide were associated with subsequent HFimpEF. The model has the potential to identify patients at risk of subsequent persistent or improved HFrEF, thus informing the design and implementation of targeted quality-of-care improvement interventions.

Remote monitoring titration clinic to implement guideline-directed therapy for heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction: a pilot quality-improvement intervention.

Introduction: Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) is the recommended treatment for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, the implementation remains limited, with suboptimal use and dosing. The study aimed to assess the feasibility and effect of a remote monitoring titration program on GDMT implementation. Methods: HFrEF patients were randomly assigned to receive either usual care or a quality-improvement remote titration with remote monitoring intervention. The intervention group used wireless devices to transmit heart rate, blood pressure, and weight data daily, which were reviewed by physicians and nurses every 2-4 weeks. Medication tolerance was assessed via phone, and dosage instructions were given. This workflow was repeated until target doses were reached or further adjustments were not tolerated. A 4-GDMT score measured use and target dosage, with the primary endpoint being the score at 6 months follow-up. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar (n = 55). A median of 85% of patients complied with transmitting device data every week. At the 6-month follow-up, the intervention group had a 4-GDMT score of 64.6% compared to 56.5% in the usual care group (p = 0.01), with a difference of 8.1% (95% CI: 1.7%-14.5%). Similar results were seen at the 12-month follow-up [difference 12.8% (CI: 5.0%-20.6%)]. The intervention group showed a positive trend in ejection fraction and natriuretic peptides, with no significant difference between groups. Conclusions: The study suggests that a full-scale trial is feasible and that utilizing a remote titration clinic with remote monitoring has the potential to enhance the implementation of guideline-directed therapy for HFrEF.