RESUMEN
In some cases transgender people spontaneously find vocal expression that is acceptable. The testosterone medication usually lowers the female voice (F to M) enough. Feminization of the male voice (M to F) needs more often care. Speech and voice therapy is usually the primary treatment. In some cases pitch-elevating surgery is needed. This will raise the pitch or at least eliminate spontaneous male voicing (cough, laughter). If cosmetically unacceptable, a prominent Adam's apple will be removed.
Asunto(s)
Personas Transgénero , Calidad de la Voz , Entrenamiento de la Voz , Estética , Femenino , Humanos , Laringoplastia , Masculino , Psicoacústica , Calidad de Vida , Identificación SocialRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Early laryngeal cancer is usually treated with either transoral laser surgery or radiation therapy. The quality of voice achieved with these treatments has not been compared in a randomized trial. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Male patients with carcinoma limited to 1 mobile vocal cord (T1aN0M0) were randomly assigned to receive either laser surgery (n=32) or external beam radiation therapy (n=28). Surgery consisted of tumor excision with a CO2 laser with the patient under general anaesthesia. External beam radiation therapy to the larynx was delivered to a cumulative dose of 66 Gy in 2-Gy daily fractions over 6.5 weeks. Voice quality was assessed at baseline and 6 and 24 months after treatment. The main outcome measures were expert-rated voice quality on a grade, roughness, breathiness, asthenia, and strain (GRBAS) scale, videolaryngostroboscopic findings, and the patients' self-rated voice quality and its impact on activities of daily living. RESULTS: Overall voice quality between the groups was rated similar, but voice was more breathy and the glottal gap was wider in patients treated with laser surgery than in those who received radiation therapy. Patients treated with radiation therapy reported less hoarseness-related inconvenience in daily living 2 years after treatment. Three patients in each group had local cancer recurrence within 2 years from randomization. CONCLUSIONS: Radiation therapy may be the treatment of choice for patients whose requirements for voice quality are demanding. Overall voice quality was similar in both treatment groups, however, indicating a need for careful consideration of patient-related factors in the choice of a treatment option.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/radioterapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirugía , Neoplasias Laríngeas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Laríngeas/cirugía , Terapia por Láser , Láseres de Gas/uso terapéutico , Pliegues Vocales/efectos de la radiación , Trastornos de la Voz/etiología , Calidad de la Voz/efectos de la radiación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Finlandia , Humanos , Neoplasias Laríngeas/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Trastornos de la Voz/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
No disponible
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Disfonía/terapia , Enfermedades Profesionales/terapia , Trastornos de la Voz/terapiaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of interventions for treating functional dysphonia or preventing voice disorders in adults. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE (1950 to 2006), EMBASE (1974 to 2006), CENTRAL (Issue 2 2006), CINAHL (1983 to 2006), PsychINFO (1967 to 2006), Science Citation Index (1986 to 2006), and the Occupational Health databases OSH-ROM (February 2006). REVIEW METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Included studies evaluated the effectiveness of interventions for 1) treating functional/nonorganic dysphonia or 2) preventing voice disorders. We identified six randomized controlled trials about treatment and two about prevention. Two authors independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. RESULTS: A combination of direct and indirect voice therapy, compared with no intervention, improves self-reported (standardized mean difference -1.07; 95% CI -1.94 to -0.19), observer-rated (weighted mean difference [WMD] -13.00; 95% CI -17.92 to -8.08), and instrumentally assessed vocal functioning (WMD -1.20; 95% CI -2.37 to -0.03) in adults with functional dysphonia. Effects are reported to remain for at least 14 weeks. Effects are similar in patients and in teachers and student teachers screened for voice problems. We found two studies that did not show voice training, compared with no intervention, to have a preventive effective in improving self-reported vocal functioning. Assessment of publication bias showed that the real effect sizes are probably smaller. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive voice therapy is effective in improving vocal performance in adults with functional dysphonia. There is no evidence of effectiveness of voice training in preventing voice disorders.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de la Voz/terapia , Entrenamiento de la Voz , Humanos , Trastornos de la Voz/prevención & controlRESUMEN
Previous studies of students studying to be teachers have indicated that these students commonly have voice disorders. Ideally, voice disorders should be treated before students start their work as teachers, but the resources for this treatment are often limited. This study examines whether group voice therapy is effective for teacher students. Accordingly, 20 teacher students with mild voice disorders received group voice therapy (in three small groups), whereas 20 students with similar voice disorders served as a control group and consequently did not receive voice therapy. Two out of three outcome measures (perceptual evaluation of voice quality and a questionnaire on the occurrence of vocal symptoms) indicated significant changes in the treatment group compared with the control group. No differences between groups were noted in the laryngeal status. The results suggest that group voice therapy seems to be an effective method to treat students with mild voice disorders.