Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
2.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 30(6): 3648-3654, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36934378

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Completion lymph node dissection (CLND) is no longer recommended routinely in the treatment of melanoma. CLND omission may understage patients for whom the distinction between stage IIIA and IIIB-C could alter adjuvant therapy recommendations. The aim of this study is to determine if stage migration has occurred with the declining use of CLND. METHODS: Patients with clinically node-negative ≥ T1b cutaneous melanoma were identified from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2012 to 2018. CLND utilization and changes in AJCC staging were analyzed. Patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone were compared with those undergoing SLNB + CLND. RESULTS: Overall, 68,933 patients met inclusion criteria and 60,536 underwent SLNB, of which 9031 (14.9%) were tumor positive. CLND was performed in 3776 (41.8%). Patients undergoing CLND were younger (58 versus 62 years, p < 0.0001) and more likely male (61.5% versus 57.9%, p = 0.0005). Patients were more likely to have an N classification >N1a if they received SLNB + CLND (36.8%) versus SLNB alone (19.3%), p < 0.0001. This translated to a small difference in stage IIIA patients between groups (SLNB alone 34.0%, SLNB + CLND 31.8%, p < 0.0001). Of the patients with T1b/T2a tumors who would be upstaged from IIIA to IIIC with identification of additional positive nodes, IIIC incidence was only slightly higher after SLNB + CLND compared with SLNB alone (4.4% versus 1.1%, p < 0.0001). CLND utilization dramatically decreased from 59% in 2012 to 12.6% in 2018, p < 0.0001. However, the incidence of stage IIIA disease for all patients remained stable over the 7-year study period. CONCLUSIONS: While the utilization of CLND after positive SLNB has declined dramatically in the last 7 years, stage migration that may affect adjuvant therapy decisions has not occurred to a clinically meaningful degree.


Asunto(s)
Melanoma , Ganglio Linfático Centinela , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Masculino , Melanoma/cirugía , Melanoma/patología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/cirugía , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Biopsia del Ganglio Linfático Centinela , Terapia Combinada , Síndrome , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ganglio Linfático Centinela/patología
3.
Cancers (Basel) ; 14(7)2022 Mar 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35406525

RESUMEN

Several intratumoral immunotherapeutic agents have shown efficacy in controlling local disease; however, their ability to induce a durable systemic immune response is limited. Likewise, tumor ablation is well-established due to its role in local disease control but generally produces only a modest immunogenic effect. It has recently been recognized, however, that there is potential synergy between these two modalities and their distinct mechanisms of immune modulation. The aim of this review is to evaluate the existing data regarding multimodality therapy with intratumoral immunotherapy and tumor ablation. We discuss the rationale for this therapeutic approach, highlight novel combinations, and address the challenges to their clinical utility. There is substantial evidence that combination therapy with intratumoral immunotherapy and tumor ablation can potentiate durable systemic immune responses and should be further evaluated in the clinical setting.

4.
J Grad Med Educ ; 13(5): 675-681, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34721797

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: General surgery residents may be underprepared for practice, due in part to declining operative autonomy during training. The factors that influence entrustment of autonomy in the operating room are unclear. OBJECTIVE: To identify and compare the factors that residents and faculty consider influential in entrustment of operative autonomy. METHODS: An anonymous survey of 29-item Likert-type scale (1-7, 1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree), 9 multiple-choice, and 4 open-ended questions was sent to 70 faculty and 45 residents in a large ACGME-approved general surgery residency program comprised of university, county, and VA hospitals in 2018. RESULTS: Sixty (86%) faculty and 38 (84%) residents responded. Faculty were more likely to identify resident-specific factors such as better resident reputation and higher skill level as important in fostering entrustment. Residents were more likely to identify environmental factors such as a focus on efficiency and a litigious malpractice environment as impeding entrustment. Both groups agreed that work hour restrictions do not decrease autonomy and entrustment does not increase risk to patients. More residents considered low faculty confidence level as a barrier to operative autonomy, while more faculty considered lower resident clinical skill as a barrier. Improvement in resident preparation for cases was cited as an important intervention that could enhance entrustment. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in perspectives exist between general surgery residents and faculty regarding entrustment of autonomy. Residents cite environmental and attending-related factors, while faculty cite resident-specific factors as most influential. Residents and faculty both agree that entrustment is integral to surgical training.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía General , Internado y Residencia , Cirujanos , Competencia Clínica , Docentes Médicos , Cirugía General/educación , Humanos , Percepción , Autonomía Profesional
5.
J Surg Res ; 255: 632-640, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32663700

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Anorectal procedures are frequently performed and have the potential to be particularly painful. There are no evidence-based guidelines regarding opioid prescribing after anorectal surgery and limited data on how surgeons determine opioid prescriptions after anorectal procedures. We hypothesize significant variations in prescribing practices. The aim of this study is to determine current opioid prescribing patterns after anorectal surgery. METHODS: A survey was sent to members of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. It included demographics, opioid prescribing habits after anorectal procedures, and factors influencing prescribing. Median morphine equivalents were calculated. Respondents prescribing higher than the median for >4 procedures were considered high prescribers. RESULTS: 519 surveys were completed (3160 sent). 38.6% of respondents were high prescribers, and 61.4% were low prescribers. There were significant differences by years in practice (P = 0.049), hospital type (P = 0.037), region (P < 0.001), and procedures performed per month (P < 0.001). 73% prescribed a standard quantity of opioids for each procedure. The mean milligrams of ME prescribed overall was 129 (SD 82); by procedure the quantities were as follows: hemorrhoidectomy 188 (111), condyloma treatment 149 (105), fistulotomy 146 (98), advancement flap 144 (97), LIFT 140 (93), abscess drainage 107 (91), sphincterotomy 105 (85), chemodenervation 64 (34). Nearly, all (98%) surgeons used local anesthesia. 91% typically prescribed adjunctive medications. In multivariable analysis, performing <10 anorectal procedures per month or practicing in the Northeast or outside the US was associated with low prescribers. High prescribers were more likely to be in practice for >10 y, report >25% of patients request refills, or significantly consider patient satisfaction or phone calls when prescribing. CONCLUSIONS: Opioid prescribing patterns are highly variable after anorectal procedures. Creating opioid prescribing guidelines for anorectal surgery is important to improve patient safety and quality of care.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/efectos adversos , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Canal Anal/cirugía , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/normas , Femenino , Geografía , Humanos , Masculino , Epidemia de Opioides/prevención & control , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Manejo del Dolor/normas , Manejo del Dolor/estadística & datos numéricos , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Satisfacción del Paciente , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Recto/cirugía , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
6.
J Surg Oncol ; 121(6): 1015-1021, 2020 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32090338

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Current data are conflicting as to whether the outcomes of octogenarians undergoing resection for esophagogastric adenocarcinoma are comparable to younger patients. This study aims to compare perioperative outcomes and survival of patients ≥80 years old with younger patients undergoing curative resection for esophagogastric adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Retrospective data were collected on 190 patients who underwent resection with curative intent for adenocarcinomas found in the stomach and esophagogastric junction from 2004 to 2015 at a single institution. RESULTS: Of the 190 patients, 34 (18%) were ≥80 years old. Octogenarians were more likely to have chronic kidney disease (CKD) and were less likely to have received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Pathologic features were similar between groups. Octogenarians' tumors were more likely to be located in the gastric body as compared to the esophagogastric junction in younger patients. Although the length of stay was comparable, octogenarians were significantly less likely to be discharged home (P < .01). Both groups had a single death during the index admission. Incidence and severity of 90 days postoperative complications were not significantly different between groups. There was no difference in 30-day, 90-day, 1-year, or median survival. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative outcomes and survival of octogenarians undergoing curative resection for esophagogastric cancer are comparable to younger patients at our institution.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Unión Esofagogástrica/cirugía , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Unión Esofagogástrica/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Periodo Perioperatorio , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Am Surg ; 85(6): 663-670, 2019 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31267909

RESUMEN

Ineffective communication between surgical trainees and attending surgeons is a significant contributor to patient harm. The aim of this study was to evaluate a tool to improve resident-to-attending communication regarding changes in patient clinical status. Ten critical patient events were compiled into a list of triggers for direct attending surgeon notification at a single academic institution. Residents and faculty were surveyed to assess communication before and after implementation of the list. Institution of the triggers list was associated with a nonstatistically significant increase in resident-to-attending notification regarding 7 of 10 critical patient events. There was no reported change in frequency of calls associated with the list's implementation. Most residents felt that the list improved patient care and increased their comfort with calling attending surgeons. Comments were generally positive; however, both groups expressed concern that the list could negatively impact resident autonomy and supervision. Implementing a list of triggers for attending notification of critical patient events subjectively improved resident-to-attending communication in an environment with high baseline levels of communication.


Asunto(s)
Internado y Residencia/organización & administración , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/organización & administración , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Centros Médicos Académicos , Adulto , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/organización & administración , Femenino , Humanos , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Masculino , Errores Médicos/prevención & control , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ohio
8.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 28(8): 1935.e1-6, 2014 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25108090

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has emerged as a safe and effective alternative to open surgery for treatment of thoracic aortic aneurysms. It has recently been reported that stent-graft coverage of the celiac artery (CA) during TEVAR is associated with a low risk of acute mesenteric ischemia. However, the long-term effect of CA coverage on foregut perfusion is unknown. Here, we report the case of a patient who underwent TEVAR with partial coverage of the CA and subsequently developed symptoms of chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI). She was successfully treated with CA stent placement. METHODS: Preoperative imaging included computed tomography (CT) angiography of the abdomen and conventional aortogram of a redo-TEVAR, revealing near complete coverage of the CA orifice. Endovascular repair was done using a 7 mm × 20 mm biliary balloon-expandable stent (Cook Medical Inc, Bloomington, IN). A review of the current literature for this rare problem was performed. RESULTS: Completion arteriography demonstrated successful revascularization of the CA without evidence of endoleak. Postoperatively, the abdominal pain was alleviated with early improved diet tolerance and weight gain. Follow-up CT at 6 month demonstrated widely patent CA. A PubMed review showed no reported cases of CMI secondary to CA coverage during TEVAR in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: CMI may develop with coverage of the CA during TEVAR. When other causes of abdominal pain and weight loss have been ruled out, revascularization of the CA can help alleviate the symptoms.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Arteria Celíaca/cirugía , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Isquemia Mesentérica/etiología , Angioplastia de Balón/instrumentación , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico , Aortografía/métodos , Prótesis Vascular , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Enfermedad Crónica , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Femenino , Humanos , Isquemia Mesentérica/diagnóstico , Isquemia Mesentérica/terapia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diseño de Prótesis , Stents , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg ; 114(7): 897-901, 2012 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22386262

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a rare but serious event that may occur after spinal surgery. OBJECTIVE: To correlate PE incidence after spinal arthrodesis with surgical approach, region of spine operated, and primary spinal pathology. To identify PE incidence trends in this population. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was queried using ICD-9 codes (81.01-81.08) for spinal fusion procedures over a 21-year period (1988-2008). Other data points included PE occurrence, surgical approach, spinal region, surgical indication, and mortality. Multivariate and relational analyses were performed. RESULTS: 4,505,556 patients were identified and 9530 had PE (incidence=0.2%). PE patients had higher odds of combined A/P surgical approaches than posterior approaches (OR=1.97; 95% CI=1.66-2.33), and PE incidence was higher in thoracic versus cervical or lumbar fusions (OR=2.54; 95% CI=2.14-3.02). PE was more likely with vertebral fracture (OR=1.85; 95% CI=1.53-2.23) and SCI with vertebral fracture (OR=4.59; 95% CI=3.72-5.70) than without trauma. Between 1988 and 2008, the PE incidence remained stable for patients with intervertebral disk degeneration and scoliosis, but increased for patients with vertebral fracture, and SCI with vertebral fracture. There was greater inpatient mortality with occurrence of a PE (OR=12.92; 95% CI=10.55-14.41). CONCLUSION: Although the incidence of PE in spinal arthrodesis patients is only 0.2%, there is a higher incidence after combined A/P approaches, thoracic procedures, and trauma surgical procedures. Despite the overall PE incidence remaining stable since 1988, incidence steadily increased among trauma patients. Further research is needed to explain these trends, given the context of changing patient populations and improving surgical techniques and prophylaxis measures. Greater caution and prophylaxis among trauma patients may be warranted.


Asunto(s)
Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Embolia Pulmonar/epidemiología , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversos , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Vértebras Cervicales/cirugía , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Embolia Pulmonar/etiología , Embolia Pulmonar/mortalidad , Columna Vertebral/patología , Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Vértebras Torácicas/cirugía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA