Determining the potency of primordial germ cells by injection into early mouse embryos.

Primordial germ cells (PGCs) are the earliest precursors of the gametes. During normal development, PGCs only give rise to oocytes or spermatozoa. However, PGCs can acquire pluripotency in vitro by forming embryonic germ (EG) cells and in vivo during teratocarcinogenesis. Classic embryological experiments directly assessed the potency of PGCs by injection into the pre-implantation embryo. As no contribution to embryos or adult mice was observed, PGCs have been described as unipotent. Here, we demonstrate that PGCs injected into 8-cell embryos can initially survive, divide, and contribute to the developing inner cell mass. Apoptosis-deficient PGCs exhibit improved survival in isolated epiblasts and can form naive pluripotent embryonic stem cell lines. However, contribution to the post-implantation embryo is limited, with no functional incorporation observed. In contrast, PGC-like cells show an extensive contribution to mid-gestation chimeras. We thus propose that PGC formation in vivo establishes a latent form of pluripotency that restricts chimera contribution.

Random Allocation of Blastomere Descendants to the Trophectoderm and ICM of the Bovine Blastocyst.

The first lineage specification during mammalian embryo development can be visually distinguished at the blastocyst stage. Two cell lineages are observed on the embryonic-abembryonic axis of the blastocyst: the inner cell mass and the trophectoderm. The timing and mechanisms driving this process are still not fully understood. In mouse embryos, cells seem prepatterned to become certain cell lineage because the first cleavage plane has been related with further embryonic-abembryonic axis at the blastocyst stage. Nevertheless, this possibility has been very debatable. Our objective was to determine whether this would be the case in another mammalian species, the bovine. To achieve this, cells of in vitro produced bovine embryos were traced from the 2-cell stage to the blastocyst stage. Blastocysts were then classified according to the allocation of the labeled cells in the embryonic and/or abembryonic part of the blastocyst. Surprisingly, we found that there is a significant percentage of the embryos (∼60%) with labeled and nonlabeled cells randomly distributed and intermingled. Using time-lapse microscopy, we have identified the emergence of this random pattern at the third to fourth cell cycle, when cells started to intermingle. Even though no differences were found on morphokinetics among different embryos, these random blastocysts and those with labeled cells separated by the embryonic-abembryonic axis (deviant pattern) are significantly bigger; moreover deviant embryos have a significantly higher number of cells. Interestingly, we observed that daughter cells allocation at the blastocyst stage is not affected by biopsies performed at an earlier stage.

Early epigenetic reprogramming in fertilized, cloned, and parthenogenetic embryos.

Despite ongoing research in a number of species, the efficiency of embryo production by nuclear transfer remains low. Incomplete epigenetic reprogramming of the nucleus introduced in the recipient oocyte is one factor proposed to limit the success of this technique. Nonetheless, knowledge of reprogramming factors has increased-thanks to comparative studies on reprogramming of the paternal genome brought by sperm on fertilization-and will be reviewed here. Another valuable model of reprogramming is the one obtained in the absence of sperm fertilization through artificial activation-the parthenote-and will also be introduced. Altogether the objective of this review is to have a better understanding on the mechanisms responsible for the resistance to reprogramming, not only because it could improve embryonic development but also as it could benefit therapeutic reprogramming research.