RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Concurrent neoadjuvant chemo-radiation (nCRT) with total mesorectal excision (TME) alone sometimes fails to cure lateral lymph node metastasis (LLNM). Therefore, additional lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) can help in the treatment of these patients. This is what we refer to as extended total mesorectal excision (eTME). Such operations (TME alone or eTME) can be performed using conventional laparoscopic techniques and robotic-assisted techniques as well. Our meta-analysis aims to compare the results of robot-assisted (R-eTME) versus laparoscopic-assisted extended mesorectal excision (L-eTME) in terms of short- and long-term outcomes. METHODOLOGY: Databases searched using title and abstract included Medline (via PubMed), Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase, up to February 20, 2024. All studies that documented robotic versus laparoscopic procedures for extended total mesorectal excision (R-eTME versus L-eTME) and reported more than two relevant outcomes, were included in the study. RESULTS: Our meta-analysis demonstrates four significant outcomes (operative time, urinary complications, overall recurrence, and admission days) between the laparoscopic and robotic groups. The robotic approach shows advantages over the laparoscopic approach in these outcomes except for the operative time (minute), which was longer in the robotic group compared to the laparoscopic group. The laparoscopic group is associated with a higher overall recurrence than the robotic group with an Odds Ratio of 2(95% CI, 1-4, p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis study showed that the R-eTME group had a lower recurrence rate compared to the L-eTME group. Additionally, hospital admission days increased significantly in the laparoscopic group. Other long-term outcomes did not differ significantly between the two groups. Short-term outcomes were similar, except for more urinary complications in the laparoscopic group. In conclusion, the study suggests that robotic surgery may offer advantages over laparoscopic surgery for eTME. Further research and analysis could provide further insight into the potential benefits of robotic surgery in this procedure, particularly when surgeon experience, center volume, and learning curve are taken into consideration.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a major cause of disability. We aimed to assess the benefit of ultrasonography of the vagus nerve (VN) to compare between PD and healthy controls as well as to deliver reference values of nerve cross sectional area (CSA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a systematic search on Medline (PubMed), Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science, up till July 25, 2022. After article selection and screening, we performed a quality assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Furthermore, a statistical analysis and subgroup analysis was performed. RESULTS: Eleven studies were included with a total of 809 participants (409 PD patients and 400 controls). A statistically significant difference in the CSA of the right and left VN between PD patients and healthy controls was observed, indicating the atrophy of VN in PD patients (p < 0.00001). The subgroup meta-analysis for average measurements of VN CSA showed insignificant heterogeneity for age (I2 = 48.67%, p = 0.058), level of measurements (I2 = 57.91%, p = 0.05), and disease duration (I2 = 27.1%, p = 0.241). CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis showed a sonographically detectable degree of neuronal damage in PD, which correlates with VN atrophy with high confidence. Therefore, we believe this is a potential marker for vagus neuronal lesions. Future studies are required to assess the potential clinical correlation.