RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is the fastest-growing indication for liver transplantation (LT). Sex disparities among patients with cirrhosis on the LT waitlist are well known. We wanted to understand these disparities further in women with end-stage liver disease patients listed for NASH cirrhosis in a contemporary cohort. METHODS: We used data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients to assess sex racial, and ethnic differences in NASH patients listed for LT. Adults transplanted from August 1997 to June 2021 were included. Inferential statistics were used to evaluate differences with univariate and multivariate comparisons, including competitive risk analysis. RESULTS: During the study time period, we evaluated 12â 844 LT for NASH cirrhosis. Women were transplanted at a lower rate (46.5% versus 53.5%; P â <â 0.001) and higher model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) (23.8 versus 22.6; P < 0.001) than men. Non-White women were transplanted at a higher MELD (26.1 versus 23.1; P â <â 0.001) than White women and non-White male patients (26.1 versus 24.8; P â <â 0.001). Graft and patient survivals were significantly different ( P â <â 0.001) between non-White women and White women and men (White and non-White). CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of LT candidates in the United States demonstrates women with NASH cirrhosis have a higher MELD than men at LT. Additional disparities exist among non-White women with NASH as they have higher MELD and creatinine at LT compared with White women. After LT, non-White women have worse graft and patient survival compared with men or White women. These data indicate that non-White women with NASH are the most vulnerable on the LT waitlist.
Asunto(s)
Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Trasplante de Hígado , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico , Listas de Espera , Humanos , Trasplante de Hígado/efectos adversos , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/cirugía , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/etnología , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Listas de Espera/mortalidad , Factores Sexuales , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Supervivencia de Injerto , Adulto , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Enfermedad Hepática en Estado Terminal/cirugía , Enfermedad Hepática en Estado Terminal/mortalidad , Enfermedad Hepática en Estado Terminal/diagnóstico , Cirrosis Hepática/cirugía , Cirrosis Hepática/mortalidad , Cirrosis Hepática/diagnóstico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Medición de Riesgo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of evidence on the risk of donor-recipient transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 in solid organ transplant recipients. Initial impressions suggest non-lung solid organs may be safely transplanted from SARS-CoV-2-positive donors without risk of viral transmission. METHODS: We reviewed clinical results of transplants in which SARS-CoV-2-negative recipients received non-lung solid organs from SARS-CoV-2-positive donors at a single transplant center. No prisoners were used in this study, and participants were neither coerced nor paid. The manuscript was created in compliance with the Helsinki Congress and the Declaration of Istanbul. RESULTS: Between June 2021 and January 2023, we transplanted 26 solid organs, including 13 kidneys, 8 livers, 3 hearts, and 1 simultaneous heart and kidney, from 23 SARS-CoV-2-positive donors into 25 SARS-CoV-2 negative recipients. Two of the recipients had a positive SARS-CoV-2 real-time polymerase chain reaction after transplantation, but otherwise, patients had no SARS-CoV-2-related complications, and all patients to date are alive with excellent allograft function. CONCLUSION: Transplantation of non-lung solid organs from SARS-CoV-2-positive donors into uninfected recipients can be safely performed without adverse effects from SARS-CoV-2.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Trasplante de Órganos , Trasplantes , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Trasplante de Órganos/efectos adversos , Donantes de Tejidos , Receptores de TrasplantesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Racial and ethnic minorities are disproportionally affected by end-stage liver disease. Unfortunately, disparities in referrals to liver transplantation (LT), organ allocation, and posttransplant outcomes exist in this population. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients over the age of 18 years undergoing LT in the United States using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients from 2002 to 2016. We evaluated factors associated with patient and graft outcomes and explored the effect of race and ethnicity along with social variables. RESULTS: During the study time period, 78,999 patients received LT. Of these, 60,102 were non-Hispanic White (NHW), 7988 were African American (AA), and 10,909 were Hispanic. AA had significantly lower patient survival, graft survival, and death-censored graft survival at both 1 and 5 years when compared to NHW. Conversely, at 1 and 5 years, patient survival and graft survival were significantly higher for Hispanics compared to NWH. In addition, AA had significantly lower survival outcomes compared to Hispanics. On multivariate analysis after controlling for race/ethnicity, age, AA race, diagnosis, and deceased donor were independent risk factors for patient death and graft failure. CONCLUSIONS: Despite socioeconomic disadvantages seen among Hispanics, this population appears to have improved short- and long-term survival after LT compared to NHW and AA.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Hígado , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trasplante de Hígado/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Minorías Étnicas y Raciales , Hispánicos o Latinos , Supervivencia de InjertoRESUMEN
Utilization of Hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected kidney allografts represents an opportunity to bridge the gap between organ supply and demand. Highly efficacious vaccines and antiviral therapies allow these allografts to be transplanted with negligible risk to the recipient. The purpose of this study was to describe the prophylactic strategies and related clinical outcomes of kidney transplant recipients who received a kidney from an HBV viremic donor. Eight patients received an allograft from an HBV viremic deceased kidney donor between January 1, 2017 and December 4, 2020. All recipients were immune to hepatitis B with a surface antibody titer greater than or equal to 10 mIU/ml (range: 12 - > 1000 mIU/ml). After transplant, 62.5% demonstrated HBV core antibody seroconversion at an average of 47.4 ± 28.5 days post-transplant. Anti-viral prophylaxis was initiated in 87.5% of patients; 62.5% preemptively during the transplant admission (range 1-3 days post-transplant) and 25% following HBcAb seroconversion (range 45-304 days post-transplant). Of the four patients who were started on entecavir preemptively, two subsequently core converted. These two patients had an HBV surface antibody less than 100 mIU/ml at the time of transplant. None of the recipients converted to HBV surface antigen positivity. The average estimated glomerular filtration rate was 41 ± 19 ml/min/1.73m2 , and there were no significant elevations in liver enzymes through one year post-transplant. The use of HBV viremic kidney allografts may represent an additional source of transplant organs; however, more studies are needed to better elucidate the optimal protective strategies for these recipients.
Asunto(s)
Hepatitis B , Trasplante de Riñón , Hepatitis B/tratamiento farmacológico , Hepatitis B/prevención & control , Anticuerpos contra la Hepatitis B , Antígenos del Núcleo de la Hepatitis B , Antígenos de Superficie de la Hepatitis B , Virus de la Hepatitis B , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Donantes de Tejidos , ViremiaRESUMEN
Importance: Non-Hispanic Black individuals experience a higher burden of COVID-19 than the general population; hence, there is an urgent need to characterize the unique clinical course and outcomes of COVID-19 in Black patients with cancer. Objective: To investigate racial disparities in severity of COVID-19 presentation, clinical complications, and outcomes between Black patients and non-Hispanic White patients with cancer and COVID-19. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used data from the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium registry from March 17, 2020, to November 18, 2020, to examine the clinical characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19 in Black patients with cancer. Data analysis was performed from December 2020 to February 2021. Exposures: Black and White race recorded in patient's electronic health record. Main Outcomes and Measures: An a priori 5-level ordinal scale including hospitalization intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, and all-cause death. Results: Among 3506 included patients (1768 women [50%]; median [IQR] age, 67 [58-77] years), 1068 (30%) were Black and 2438 (70%) were White. Black patients had higher rates of preexisting comorbidities compared with White patients, including obesity (480 Black patients [45%] vs 925 White patients [38%]), diabetes (411 Black patients [38%] vs 574 White patients [24%]), and kidney disease (248 Black patients [23%] vs 392 White patients [16%]). Despite the similar distribution of cancer type, cancer status, and anticancer therapy at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis, Black patients presented with worse illness and had significantly worse COVID-19 severity (unweighted odds ratio, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.15-1.58]; weighted odds ratio, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.11-1.33]). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that Black patients with cancer experience worse COVID-19 outcomes compared with White patients. Understanding and addressing racial inequities within the causal framework of structural racism is essential to reduce the disproportionate burden of diseases, such as COVID-19 and cancer, in Black patients.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasias , Anciano , Población Negra , COVID-19/epidemiología , Prueba de COVID-19 , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Importance: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a distinct spatiotemporal pattern in the United States. Patients with cancer are at higher risk of severe complications from COVID-19, but it is not well known whether COVID-19 outcomes in this patient population were associated with geography. Objective: To quantify spatiotemporal variation in COVID-19 outcomes among patients with cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This registry-based retrospective cohort study included patients with a historical diagnosis of invasive malignant neoplasm and laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection between March and November 2020. Data were collected from cancer care delivery centers in the United States. Exposures: Patient residence was categorized into 9 US census divisions. Cancer center characteristics included academic or community classification, rural-urban continuum code (RUCC), and social vulnerability index. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. The secondary composite outcome consisted of receipt of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit admission, and all-cause death. Multilevel mixed-effects models estimated associations of center-level and census division-level exposures with outcomes after adjustment for patient-level risk factors and quantified variation in adjusted outcomes across centers, census divisions, and calendar time. Results: Data for 4749 patients (median [IQR] age, 66 [56-76] years; 2439 [51.4%] female individuals, 1079 [22.7%] non-Hispanic Black individuals, and 690 [14.5%] Hispanic individuals) were reported from 83 centers in the Northeast (1564 patients [32.9%]), Midwest (1638 [34.5%]), South (894 [18.8%]), and West (653 [13.8%]). After adjustment for patient characteristics, including month of COVID-19 diagnosis, estimated 30-day mortality rates ranged from 5.2% to 26.6% across centers. Patients from centers located in metropolitan areas with population less than 250â¯000 (RUCC 3) had lower odds of 30-day mortality compared with patients from centers in metropolitan areas with population at least 1 million (RUCC 1) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.31; 95% CI, 0.11-0.84). The type of center was not significantly associated with primary or secondary outcomes. There were no statistically significant differences in outcome rates across the 9 census divisions, but adjusted mortality rates significantly improved over time (eg, September to November vs March to May: aOR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.17-0.58). Conclusions and Relevance: In this registry-based cohort study, significant differences in COVID-19 outcomes across US census divisions were not observed. However, substantial heterogeneity in COVID-19 outcomes across cancer care delivery centers was found. Attention to implementing standardized guidelines for the care of patients with cancer and COVID-19 could improve outcomes for these vulnerable patients.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Pandemias , Población Rural , Vulnerabilidad Social , Población Urbana , Anciano , Causas de Muerte , Censos , Femenino , Instituciones de Salud , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Sistema de Registros , Respiración Artificial , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Análisis Espacial , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Background: Ampicillin-sulbactam is a piperacillin-tazobactam-sparing alternative antibiotic administered as surgical prophylaxis during orthotopic liver transplant (OLT), but limited data are available describing its pharmacokinetics and impact of blood product resuscitation. The purpose of this study was to determine the intra-operative pharmacokinetics of ampicillin-sulbactam in patients during OLT and evaluate the effects of blood resuscitation on exposure. Patients and Methods: This was a pharmacokinetic study in 10 OLT patients receiving ampicillin-sulbactam surgical prophylaxis. A 5,000-patient Monte Carlo simulation was conducted to identify optimal ampicillin-sulbactam regimens. Linear regression assessed association between blood product administration and ampicillin exposures. Results: Ampicillin and sulbactam concentrations best fitted two-compartment models. Mean ampicillin pharmacokinetic parameters were central compartment volume (Vc): 6.9 ± 2.0 L, clearance (CL): 26.6 ± 18.4 L/h, and inter-compartmental rate constants (k12 and k21): 4.8 ± 2.6 and 2.3 ± 1.4 h-1. Sulbactam pharmacokinetic parameters were Vc: 8.1 ± 2.7 L, CL: 26.1 ± 7.4 L/h, k12 and k21: 4.9 ± 1.0 and 2.8 ± 1.1 h-1. Participants received between 500 and 23,642 mL of total blood product. No statistical relations were observed between blood product administration and exposures (R2 0.00-0.26). Ampicillin-sulbactam 2/1 g every two hours and 2/1 g bolus followed by 6/3 g continuous infusion provided acceptable probability of target attainment up to minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 16 and 32 mcg/mL, respectively. Conclusions: High and frequent ampicillin-sulbactam doses are required to maintain 100% fT > MIC at relevant MICs during OLT and no impact of blood product resuscitation was observed on ampicillin exposure. These are the first data available to guide ampicillin-sulbactam dosing in patients undergoing OLT.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Hígado , Sulbactam , Ampicilina/farmacología , Ampicilina/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Sulbactam/farmacología , Sulbactam/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
As the scarcity of transplantable organs continues to increase, juxtaposed with an aging donor population, transplant surgeons are increasingly confronted with marginal organ offers. The presence of atherosclerosis in the donor allograft has been shown to compromise the vascular integrity and predispose to vascular complications in the transplanted liver. Here, we present a case of 54-year-old brain-dead donor who was discovered to have a severely diseased aorta during organ recovery. Pathologic evaluation revealed severe atherosclerosis with calcifications. Because there was no evidence of donor graft dysfunction, we elected to proceed with implantation, although thoughtful consideration was given to aborting the procedure. The donor hepatic artery was resected from the bifurcation of the splenic artery and the common hepatic artery until no further gross atheromas were evident; this segment was then anastomosed with the recipient proper hepatic artery. The recipient is doing well 6 months after transplant without any significant adverse postoperative events. The presence of severe atherosclerosis should not discourage the use of an otherwise adequate graft. Novel newer preservation techniques, such as normothermic perfusion, may enable functional graft evaluation and can increase the utilization of marginal grafts.
Asunto(s)
Aterosclerosis , Trasplante de Hígado , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trasplante de Hígado/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Hígado/métodos , Donadores Vivos , Hígado , Arteria Hepática/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Hepática/cirugía , Aterosclerosis/etiología , Aterosclerosis/cirugíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Racial disparities in access to liver transplantation have been known since the National Transplant Act of 1980. Since the inception of the Final Rule in 2000, the United Network of Organ Sharing has sought to ensure the equitable distribution of donor livers. Despite several measures aimed to improve access for vulnerable populations, disparities in outcomes are still prevalent throughout the liver transplant (LT) evaluation, while on the waitlist, and after liver transplantation. RECENT FINDINGS: Blacks and Hispanics are underrepresented on the LT list and have an increased waitlist mortality rate compared to Whites. Additionally, Blacks have a significantly higher risk of posttransplant mortality. SUMMARY: Ongoing efforts are necessary to eliminate inequities in transplant access. Strategies such as policy implementation and increasing diversity in the healthcare workforce may prove efficacious in creating change.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Hígado , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Hispánicos o Latinos , Humanos , Donantes de Tejidos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Listas de EsperaRESUMEN
The superior death-censored graft survival of the pancreas allograft in simultaneous pancreas kidney transplants (SPK) over pancreas alone transplants (PTA) has long been recognized. Using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) and a high-volume pancreas transplant program, we investigated the possible protective role of the kidney allograft in SPK transplants. We analyzed 19 043 primary pancreas transplants between 2000 and 2020, including 735 transplants performed at the University of Minnesota. SPK transplants demonstrated a superior death-censored graft survival over pancreas after kidney (PAK) and simultaneous pancreas and living donor kidney (SPLK) transplants, which both demonstrated better survival than PTA transplants. This effect was not affected by mode or duration of renal replacement therapy prior to transplant. Furthermore, we found that HLA match at the B-locus between the prior kidney and current pancreas allografts demonstrated a protective effect (HR .54; 95% confidence interval .29-1.00), with a 2-antigen match demonstrating superior death-censored graft survival to a 1- or 0-antigen match. We propose that a homologous kidney allograft in SPK transplants affords protection to the pancreas allograft-likely through a combination of better surveillance for rejection and direct immunoprotection offered by the same-donor kidney.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Trasplante de Páncreas , Aloinjertos , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Riñón , PáncreasRESUMEN
The widespread transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) continues to propagate the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic with solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients being an exceptionally vulnerable population for poor outcomes. Treatments for COVID-19 are limited; however, monoclonal antibodies are emerging as a potential therapeutic option to change the trajectory of high-risk patients. This retrospective single center cohort study evaluated the outcomes of SOT recipients with mild to moderate COVID-19 who received bamlanivimab monotherapy. Eighteen SOT recipients (15 kidney, 2 liver, and 1 heart) received the medication between November 9, 2020 and February 10, 2021 with no reported infusion reactions. One patient experienced headache and fatigue following the infusion that resolved within 3 days. Fourteen patients continued their recovery as an outpatient with no further escalation in care. Three patients required hospitalization: two for suspected bacterial pneumonia 9 and 32 days postinfusion, respectively, and one for acute kidney injury 7 days postinfusion. One patient had an emergency room visit for gastrointestinal symptoms 24 days postinfusion. In this small cohort of SOT recipients, bamlanivimab monotherapy appeared to be a well-tolerated option for treatment of mild to moderate COVID-19, but it was not completely effective in preventing hospitalization. One month following the end of this cohort, COVID-19 treatment guidance changed due to the rising prevalence of resistant variants. For this reason, bamlanivimab is now recommended to be used only in combination with etesevimab. Further studies are needed to fully elucidate the role of this therapy in SOT recipients.
Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Trasplante de Órganos , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Trasplante de Órganos/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Receptores de TrasplantesRESUMEN
Postoperative pain is a significant source of morbidity in patients undergoing living donor nephrectomy (LDN) and a deterrent for candidates. We implemented a standardized multimodal analgesic regimen, which consists of pharmacist-led pre-procedure pain management education, a combination transversus abdominis plane and rectus sheath block performed by the regional anesthesia team, scheduled acetaminophen and gabapentin, and as-needed opioids. This single-center retrospective study evaluated outcomes between patients undergoing LDN who received a multimodal analgesic regimen and a historical cohort. The multimodal cohort had a significantly shorter length of stay (LOS) (days, mean ± SD: 1.8 ± 0.7 vs. 2.6 ± 0.8; p < .001) and a greater proportion who were discharged on postoperative day (POD) 1 (38.6% vs. 1.5%; p < .001). The total morphine milligram equivalents (MME) that patients received during hospitalization were significantly less in the multimodal cohort on POD 0-2. The outpatient MME prescribed through POD 60 was also significantly less in the multimodal cohort (median [IQR]; 180 [150-188] vs. 225 [150-300]; p < .001). The mean patient-reported pain score (PRPS) was significantly lower in the multimodal cohort on POD 0-2. The maximum PRPS was significantly lower on POD 0 (mean ± SD: 7 ± 2 vs. 8 ± 1, respectively; p = .02). This study suggests that our multimodal regimen significantly reduces LOS, PRPS, and opioid requirements and has the potential to improve the donation experience.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Donadores Vivos , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Nefrectomía , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a rare malignancy with increased incidence in the kidney transplantation (KT) population for which immunosuppression has been implicated as a putative cause. The average time interval from KT to AML development is 5 years. We present the case of a 61-year-old man who was found to have peripheral blood blasts on a postoperative day 20 routine blood draw after an uneventful unrelated living donor kidney transplant. He subsequently had a bone marrow biopsy and next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based molecular testing, which demonstrated AML characterized by SMC1A and TET2 mutations. He received induction chemotherapy followed by hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) from the kidney donor, who happened to be matched at one haplotype. At 12 months after his HCT and 15 months after his KT, his AML remained in remission, normal renal function was preserved, no active graft-versus-host disease was present, and immunosuppression was tapering. With full donor-derived hematopoietic chimerism, we expect to be able to discontinue immunosuppression shortly, thereby achieving tolerance. The short time interval between KT and development of AML suggests the malignancy was likely present before KT. Modern NGS-based analysis offers a promising method of identifying transplant candidates with unexplained hematologic abnormalities on pre-KT testing who may benefit from formal hematologic evaluation.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/diagnóstico , Médula Ósea/patología , Proteínas de Ciclo Celular/genética , Quimerismo , Proteínas Cromosómicas no Histona/genética , Proteínas de Unión al ADN/genética , Dioxigenasas , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/etiología , Haplotipos , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Humanos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/etiología , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/genética , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/terapia , Donadores Vivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mutación , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas/genética , Inducción de RemisiónRESUMEN
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a significant cause of morbidity in kidney transplant recipients (KTR). Historically at our institution, KTR with low and intermediate CMV risk received 6 months of valganciclovir if they received lymphocyte depleting induction therapy. This study evaluates choice and duration of CMV prophylaxis based on donor (D) and recipient (R) CMV serostatus and the incidence of post-transplant CMV viremia in low (D-/R-) and intermediate (R+) risk KTR receiving lymphocyte-depleting induction therapy. A protocol utilizing valacyclovir for 3 months for D-/R- and valganciclovir for 3 months for R+ was evaluated. Adult D-/R- and R+ KTR receiving anti-thymocyte globulin, rabbit or alemtuzumab induction from 8/20/2016 to 9/30/2018 were evaluated through 1 year post-transplant. Patients were excluded if their CMV serostatus was D+/R-, received a multi-organ transplant, or received basiliximab. Seventy-seven subjects met the inclusion criteria: 25 D-/R- (4 historic group, 21 experimental group) and 52 R+ (31 historic, 21 experimental). No D-/R- patients experienced CMV viremia. Among the R+ historic and experimental groups, there was no significant difference in viremia incidence (35.5% vs 52.4%; P = .573). Of these cases, the peak viral load was similar between the groups (median [IQR], 67 [<200-444] vs <50 [<50-217]; P = .711), and there was no difference in the incidence of CMV syndrome (16.1% vs 14.3%; P = 1.000) or CMV related hospitalization (12.9% vs 14.3%; P = 1.000). No patient experienced tissue invasive disease. These results suggest limiting valganciclovir exposure may be possible in low and intermediate risk KTR receiving lymphocyte-depleting induction therapy with no apparent impact on CMV-related outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Citomegalovirus , Trasplante de Riñón , Animales , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Ganciclovir/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Linfocitos , Conejos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
As the scarcity of transplantable organs continues to rise, compounded with an aging donor population, transplant surgeons are increasingly confronted with organ offers from less than ideal donors. The presence of a celiomesenteric aneurysm involving the vascular supply of a donor allograft may predispose to vascular complications in the transplanted liver. We present a 61-year-old brain-dead donor who was discovered to have a celiac artery aneurysm during organ recovery. After gross atherosclerotic or mycotic involvement was ruled out and after careful consideration of the vascular reconstructive options, the donor common hepatic artery was divided distal to the aneurysmal dilatation and anastomosed to the recipient bifurcation of the left and right hepatic artery in an end-to-end beveled anastomosis. The postoperative course was unre-markable, with normal blood flow through the anastomosis and no significant com-plications. The recipient is doing well 6 months after transplant. The presence of a celiomesenteric aneurysm should not discourage the use of an otherwise adequate liver graft. Careful vascular reconstruction is encouraged to increase the rate of marginal graft utilization and minimize vascular complications. Liberal postoperative imaging can enable early detection of vascular com-plication and prompt intervention. Through this case, we demons-trate the remarkable potential of less-than-ideal grafts with acceptable posttransplant outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma , Trasplante de Hígado , Aloinjertos , Aneurisma/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma/etiología , Aneurisma/cirugía , Arteria Celíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Celíaca/cirugía , Arteria Hepática/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Hepática/cirugía , Humanos , Hígado , Trasplante de Hígado/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Hígado/métodos , Donadores Vivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery (BS) may be associated with significant malabsorption and nutritional deficiencies. METHODS: Between March 1987 and January 2017, we performed 922 liver transplants (LT) at our institution; 33 had antecedent BS. We matched the BS cohort to LT recipients without BS (1:3 matching) based on exact matching for gender and cancer and inverse variance matching for age, LT body mass index, MELD score, and transplant date. RESULTS: We analyzed outcomes in 132 LT recipients (33 BS; 99 non-BS). The BS cohort comprised 26 (79%) women with a mean age of 52.4 years. The BS procedures included 20 Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (61%), 6 jejunoileal bypass (18%), 3 gastric band (9%), 2 sleeve gastrectomy (6%), and 1 duodenal switch (3%). The primary indications for LT listing were alcoholic cirrhosis (9; 27%), nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (7; 21%), hepatitis C (8; 24%), and hepatocellular carcinoma (3; 9%). At LT, body mass index for the BS cohort was 29.6, and MELD was 24. Compared with matched controls, BS recipients did not have longer LT length of hospital stay (17.8 versus 15.7 d, P = 0.71), longer intensive care unit length of stay (5.3 versus 4.1 d, P = 0.16), or higher 30-day complication rate (76% versus 85%, P = 0.43). Overall patient survival was similar (1- and 3-y survival was 90.1% and 75.9% for BS; 90.9% and 76.4% for non-BS, P = 0.34). CONCLUSIONS: A history of BS does not portend a deleterious effect on LT outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica , Trasplante de Hígado , Adulto , Cirugía Bariátrica/efectos adversos , Cirugía Bariátrica/mortalidad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Trasplante de Hígado/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Hígado/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In December 2014, the Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) was developed to give more precise information on donor kidney quality. Kidneys with KDPI scores ≥ 85 (K ≥ 85) have been reported to have inferior outcomes to kidneys with KDPI scores < 85. METHODS: After the implementation of the new Kidney Allocation System, we developed a protocol to evaluate K ≥ 85 use. We analyzed the safety and efficacy of our institutional criteria and evaluated post-transplant outcomes. K ≥ 85 recipients were stratified based on their 1-year creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rates to elucidate characteristics associated with serum creatinine < 1.7 mg/dL or estimated glomerular filtration rates ≤ 45 mL/min/1.73 m2. RESULTS: From December 2014 to December 2019, 304 deceased donor kidney transplants were performed at Hartford Hospital; 58 (19%) were K ≥ 85 with an average KDPI of 91%. There were 4 graft losses; 2 were death censored. Prolonged cold ischemia time and black recipient race were associated with inferior recipient graft function at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: High KDPI kidney use requires a multifaceted evaluation that takes into account donor and recipient characteristics for an ideal match. We have identified several characteristics that may predict optimal post-transplant kidney function.