Opioids and fibromyalgia: frequency of use and factors associated with increased consumption in patients remitted to a tertiary care center.

BACKGROUND: Opioids are not recommended for fibromyalgia. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the frequency of opioid use in a large cohort of fibromyalgia patients and to identify factors associated with opioid consumption. METHODS: A retrospective, observational study of a large fibromyalgia cohort in a tertiary care center. We assessed fibromyalgia severity, functional capacity, anxiety, depression, drugs consumption and the patient's impression of change. We compared strong opioid consumers (SOC) and non-SOC. Inferential statistical and logistic regression analysis were used to identify factors associated with opioid consumption, and ANOVA for repeated measurements. RESULTS: We found a prevalence of 9.2% of SOC (100 patients) among 1087 patients in the cohort. During the last four years there was a significant increase on the incidence of SOC up to 12.8% (p = 0.004). There were no differences in demographic variables between SOC and non-SOC. Clinical variables were significantly more severe in SOC, and they consumed more non-opioid drugs (p < 0.0001). Opioid consumption was independently associated with other non-opioid drugs (Odds ratio 1.25, CI: 1.13-1.38), but not with the fibromyalgia severity. At three months, 62% of the patients had opioid withdrawal. There were no statistical differences in the fibromyalgia severity at the initial evaluation, or the patient's impression of change compared with those patients who continued opioids. Coping strategies were better in those patients who withdrew opioids (p = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: We observed an increase in opioid prescriptions during the last four years. Opioid consumption was associated with concomitant use of non-opioid drugs, but it was not associated with fibromyalgia severity.

Salivary gland ultrasound in clinical practice: What is its real usefulness?

BACKGROUND: Salivary gland ultrasound (SGU) provides information about structural gland abnormalities that can be graded and used for primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) diagnosis. Its potential role as a prognostic marker for detecting patients at high risk of lymphoma and extra-glandular manifestations is still under evaluation. We aim to assess the usefulness of SGU for SS diagnosis in routine clinical practice and its relationship with extra-glandular involvement and lymphoma risk in pSS patients. METHODS: We designed a retrospective observational single-center study. Data was collected using the electronic health records of patients referred to an ultrasound outpatient clinic for evaluation over a 4-year period. Data extraction included demographics, comorbidities, clinical data, laboratory tests, SGU results, salivary gland (SG) biopsy, and scintigraphy results. Comparisons were made between patients with and without pathological SGU. The external criterion for comparison was the fulfillment of the 2016 ACR/EULAR pSS criteria. RESULTS: A total of 179 SGU assessments were included from this 4-year period. Twenty-four cases (13.4%) were pathological. The most frequently diagnosed conditions prior to SGU-detected pathologies were pSS (9.7%), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (13.1%), and systemic lupus (4.6%). One hundred and two patients (57%) had no previous diagnosis (sicca syndrome work-up); of these, 47 patients (46.1%) were ANA positive and 25 (24.5%) anti-SSA positive. In this study, the sensitivity and specificity of SGU for SS diagnosis were 48% and 98% respectively, with a positive predictive value of 95%. There were statistically significant relationships between a pathological SGU and the presence of recurrent parotitis (p=.0083), positive anti-SSB antibodies (p=.0083), and a positive sialography (p=.0351). CONCLUSIONS: SGU shows high global specificity but low sensitivity for pSS diagnosis in routine care. Pathological SGU findings are associated with positive autoantibodies (ANA and anti-SSB) and recurrent parotitis.

Salivary gland ultrasound in clinical practice: What is its real usefulness? / Utilidad en práctica clínica de la ecografía de glándulas salivales

Background: Salivary gland ultrasound (SGU) provides information about structural gland abnormalities that can be graded and used for primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) diagnosis. Its potential role as a prognostic marker for detecting patients at high risk of lymphoma and extra-glandular manifestations is still under evaluation. We aim to assess the usefulness of SGU for SS diagnosis in routine clinical practice and its relationship with extra-glandular involvement and lymphoma risk in pSS patients. Methods: We designed a retrospective observational single-center study. Data was collected using the electronic health records of patients referred to an ultrasound outpatient clinic for evaluation over a 4-year period. Data extraction included demographics, comorbidities, clinical data, laboratory tests, SGU results, salivary gland (SG) biopsy, and scintigraphy results. Comparisons were made between patients with and without pathological SGU. The external criterion for comparison was the fulfillment of the 2016 ACR/EULAR pSS criteria. Results: A total of 179 SGU assessments were included from this 4-year period. Twenty-four cases (13.4%) were pathological. The most frequently diagnosed conditions prior to SGU-detected pathologies were pSS (9.7%), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (13.1%), and systemic lupus (4.6%). One hundred and two patients (57%) had no previous diagnosis (sicca syndrome work-up); of these, 47 patients (46.1%) were ANA positive and 25 (24.5%) anti-SSA positive. In this study, the sensitivity and specificity of SGU for SS diagnosis were 48% and 98% respectively, with a positive predictive value of 95%. There were statistically significant relationships between a pathological SGU and the presence of recurrent parotitis (p=.0083), positive anti-SSB antibodies (p=.0083), and a positive sialography (p=.0351)...(AU)

Antecedentes y objetivo: La ecografía de glándulas salivales (EGS) proporciona información acerca de las anomalías en la estructura glandular, y puede ser utilizado para el diagnóstico del síndrome de Sjögren (SS). Además, su potencial valor pronóstico para detectar pacientes con riesgo de manifestaciones extra-glandulares, así como el riesgo de linfoma se encuentra aún bajo estudio. El objetivo de nuestro estudio es evaluar la utilidad de la EGS para el diagnóstico del SS en la práctica clínica habitual, y su relación con la afectación extra-glandular, así como el riesgo de linfoma en pacientes con síndrome de Sjögren primario (pSS). Métodos: Realizamos un estudio retrospectivo y observacional en un único centro. La información fue recolectada de la historia clínica electrónica del paciente tras un seguimiento de 4 años. Esta información incluye variables demográficas, comorbilidades, datos clínicos, análisis de laboratorio, los resultados de la EGS, biopsia de glándulas salivales y gammagrafía. Se efectuaron comparaciones entre los pacientes que tenían una EGS patológica con aquellos que tenían un resultado normal. El criterio para establecer la comparación fue cumplir los criterios de ACR/ELUAR 2016 para el diagnóstico de pSS. Resultados: Se realizaron un total de 179 EGS durante el período de 4 años. De estas, 24 (13,4%) resultaron ser patológicas. Las enfermedades más frecuentemente identificadas tras realizar la EGS fueron pSS (9,7%), artritis reumatoide (AR) (4,6%) y lupus eritematoso sistémico (LES) (4,6%). Ciento dos pacientes (57%) no tenían diagnóstico previo (estudio de síndrome seca); de estos, 47 (46,1%) tenían ANA positivo y 25 (24,5%) tenían anti-Ro positivo. La sensibilidad y la especificidad de la EGS para detectar el SS en nuestro estudio fueron del 48 y 98%, respectivamente; con un valor predictivo positivo del 95%...(AU)

Oral or pulse glucocorticoid use at the onset of giant cell arteritis and its influence on the risk of relapse: a retrospective study.

The objective is to investigate whether initial therapy with intravenous methylprednisolone pulses (ivMTP) or oral glucocorticoid (OG) influences the relapse rate in giant cell arteritis (GCA) patients. This is a retrospective observational study of patients with GCA from 2004 to 2021. Demographics, clinical and laboratory variables, cumulative glucocorticoid dose and relapse rate at 6-month follow-up defined according to EULAR recommendations were recorded. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to determine possible risk factors for relapse. A total of 74 GCA patients were included for analysis (54 (73%) female, mean (SD) age 77.2 (7.4) years). Overall, 47 (63.5%) patients received ivMTP at disease onset and 27 (36.5%) OG. Mean (SD) cumulative prednisone dose (mg) at 6-month follow-up was 3790.7 (1832.7) for patients with ivMTP vs 4298.1 (2930.6) for the OG group, p = 0.37. A total of 15 (20.3%) relapses occurred at 6-month follow-up. Relapse rates did not differ according to the initial therapy (19.1 vs 22.2%, respectively, p = 0.75). In the multivariate analysis, fever at disease onset (OR 4.837; CI 1.1-21.6) and dyslipidemia (OR 5.651; CI 1.1-28.4) were independent predictors for relapse. Initial therapy with ivMTP or OG does not influence the relapse rate of GCA patients. Fever at disease onset and dyslipidemia are independent predictors of disease relapse.

Ultrasound intima media thickness cut-off values for cranial and extracranial arteries in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis.

Objective: To determine the optimal ultrasound (US) cut-off values for cranial and extracranial arteries intima media thickness (IMT) to discriminate between patients with and without giant cell arteritis (GCA). Methods: Retrospective observational study including patients referred to an US fast-track clinic. All patients underwent bilateral US examination of the cranial and extracranial arteries including the IMT measurement. Clinical confirmation of GCA after 6 months was considered the gold standard for diagnosis. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to select the cut-off values on the basis of the best tradeoff values between sensitivity and specificity. Results: A total of 157 patients were included, 47 (29.9%) with clinical confirmation of GCA after 6 months. 41 (87.2%) of patients with GCA had positive US findings (61.7% had cranial and 44.7% extracranial involvement). The best threshold IMT values were 0.44 mm for the common temporal artery; 0.34 mm for the frontal branch; 0.36 mm for the parietal branch; 1.1 mm for the carotid artery and 1 mm for the subclavian and axillary arteries. The areas under the ROC curves were greater for axillary arteries 0.996 (95% CI 0.991-1), for parietal branch 0.991 (95% CI 0.980-1), for subclavian 0.990 (95% CI 0.979-1), for frontal branch 0.989 (95% CI 0.976-1), for common temporal artery 0.984 (95% CI 0.959-1) and for common carotid arteries 0.977 (95% CI 0.961-0.993). Conclusion: IMT cut-off values have been identified for each artery. These proposed IMT cut-off values may help to improve the diagnostic accuracy of US in clinical practice.

Long-Term Retention Rate of Golimumab in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis, and Spondyloarthritis in a Real-Life Setting.

METHODS: We conducted a single-center, medical records review study of all patients with RA, PsA, and SpA on GLM treatment attending a large rheumatology department from 2010 to 2017. Times from start to end of GLM treatment were collected, as well as sociodemographic, clinical, and safety variables. Golimumab retention rate was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and comparison across diseases was analyzed with the Mantel-Haenszel statistic (log-rank test). Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to identify factors associated with GLM discontinuation. RESULTS: In the study period, a total of 212 patients (61 RA, 48 PsA, 103 SpA) were prescribed GLM. Retention rates were 72% in the first year, 61% in the second, 56% in the third, and 38% at 5 years. Differences were statistically significant across diseases (median times to GLM discontinuation were 50.2, 46.0, and 38.7 months for RA, SpA, and PsA, respectively) and according to the number of previous biologic therapies (55.2 months in biologic-naive patients vs 14.0 months in patients with ≥2 previous biologics; p < 0.001). The use of concomitant conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs was associated with a lower probability of discontinuation (hazards ratio [HR], 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33-0.97). Female sex (HR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.07-3.17) and having used 2 biologics before GLM (HR, 2.99; 95% CI, 1.76-5.06) were associated with increased discontinuation rates. Twenty-three patients (10.9%) had at least 1 serious adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: In a real-life setting, GLM shows appropriate long-term safety-effectiveness ratio.

Persistence and adherence to biologic therapies in juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a chronic inflammatory disease that often requires biological therapy to control its activity. Medication persistence and adherence are important aspects on which we have scarce information. We performed a longitudinal, retrospective, and observational study based on data from the daily clinical management of JIA patients. We recorded clinical remission at 6 and 12 months. Persistence of biological therapy was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves, and adherence was assessed using the medication possession ratio (MPR). We included 68 patients who received biological therapy. Of these, 11 (16.2%) and 5 (7.4%) required a second and third drug, respectively. The persistence rate for biological therapy at 5 years was 64%, with no differences between the first and second lines. Adherence was high during the first year of treatment (MPR80: 96.3%) and also in the second and third years (MPR80: 85.2% and 91.8%, respectively). Persistence and adherence to biological therapy were remarkably high in our JIA cohort. Adherence to biological treatments could be related to a higher probability of fulfilling the Wallace remission criteria at 6 months, although this was not confirmed at 12 months.

Impacto clínico de la capilaroscopia periungueal en la práctica clínica diaria / Clinical impact of nailfold capillaroscopy in daily clinical practice

Introducción: La capilaroscopia periungueal (CP) es útil en la evaluación del fenómeno de Raynaud tanto primario como secundario, y en el seguimiento de los pacientes con esclerosis sistémica. Nuestro estudio evalúa el impacto de la CP en el diagnóstico, en función del motivo de solicitud y el perfil de autoanticuerpos en la práctica clínica diaria. Material y métodos: Se incluyeron todos los pacientes con al menos una CP entre junio de 2012 y diciembre de 2017. Se revisaron las historias clínicas y se determinó de forma dicotómica (sí/no) si la CP contribuyó al diagnóstico realizado en la consulta posterior a la realización de la CP. Se recogieron datos demográficos, clínicos y de laboratorio, motivo de solicitud de la CP y su relación con los patrones CP. Resultados: De 530 pacientes con una primera CP, 266 se realizaron como estudio de un fenómeno de Raynaud. De estos, en 20 pacientes (3,8%) se realizó un diagnóstico de enfermedad del tejido conectivo en la consulta posterior a la CP; 15 fueron diagnosticados de esclerosis sistémica, 4 de conectivopatía indiferenciada y uno de enfermedad mixta. Salvo un paciente diagnosticado de conectivopatía indiferenciada, el resto tenía anticuerpos antinucleares positivos y 11 de ellos, además, anticuerpos específicos (9 anticentrómero, uno anti-Scl70 y otro, anti-RNPC). La positividad de anticuerpos antinucleares se asoció con una mayor probabilidad de presentar una CP de esclerodermia, y ningún paciente diagnosticado de una enfermedad reumática tras la CP tenía un patrón normal. Conclusión: La CP es una técnica útil, pero con impacto limitado en el diagnóstico de enfermedades del tejido conectivo. La positividad de los anticuerpos se relaciona con una mayor probabilidad de presentar patrones patológicos en la CP.(AU)

Introduction: Nailfold capillaroscopy (NC) is useful in the evaluation of Raynaud's phenomenon, associated with some connective tissue diseases and in the follow-up of patients with systemic sclerosis. Our study evaluates the impact of NC in the diagnosis, according to the reason for the request and profile of autoantibodies in daily clinical practice. Material and methods: All patients that undergone at least one NC between June 2012 and December 2017 were included. Clinical records were reviewed and analysed in a dichotomous way (yes/no), to see whether the NC contributed to a change of diagnosis in subsequent consultations. In addition, demographic, clinical and laboratory data were collected, and the relationship with NC patterns evaluated. Results: Of the 530 patients who had undergone at least one NC, 266 had Raynaud's phenomenon as primary indication for the technique. Of those, 20 patients (3.8%) had a diagnostic change in the post-NC consultation; 15 were diagnosed with systemic sclerosis, 4 with undifferentiated connective tissue disease and one with mixed connective tissue disease. All patients had, except for one patient diagnosed with undifferentiated connective tissue disease, positive antinuclear antibodies titres, 11 of them had disease specific antibodies (9 anti-centromere, one anti-Scl70 and other anti-RNPC). The positivity of antinuclear antibodies titres was associated with a higher probability of presenting a scleroderma pattern in the NC, and all patients with a specific rheumatological diagnosis had an abnormal NC. Conclusion: NC is a useful technique, but with limited impact in the diagnosis of connective tissue diseases. Autoantibody positivity is associated with a greater likelihood of presenting pathological NC patterns.(AU)

Subclavian artery involvement in patients with giant cell arteritis: do we need a modified Halo Score?

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether adding the subclavian artery examination into the ultrasound (US) Southend Halo Score, as proposed in the modified Halo Score, improves the diagnostic accuracy of giant cell arteritis (GCA) and its relationship with systemic inflammation. METHODS: Retrospective observational study of patients referred to a GCA fast track pathway (FTP) over a 1-year period. Patients underwent US exam of temporal and large vessel (LV) (carotid, subclavian, and axillary) arteries. The extent of inflammation was measured by the halo count, the Southend Halo Score, and the modified Halo Score. The gold standard for GCA diagnosis was clinical confirmation after 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients were evaluated in the FTP, 17 (26.5%) had GCA. Subclavian artery involvement was present only in patients with GCA (29.4% versus 0%, p < 0.001). Overall, the three scores showed excellent diagnostic accuracy for GCA (ROC AUC 0.906, 0.930, and 0.928, respectively) and moderate correlations with acute phase reactants (0.35-0.51, p < 0.01). Only the modified Halo Score correlated with markers of inflammation in patients with LV involvement. CONCLUSIONS: The inclusion of subclavian artery examination in the modified Halo Score does not improve the diagnostic accuracy of GCA. Nevertheless, it correlates better with markers of systemic inflammation in LV-GCA. Key Points • Adding the subclavian artery examination into the Southend Halo Score, as proposed in the modified Halo Score, does not improve the diagnostic accuracy of GCA. • However, the extent of vascular inflammation as quantified by the modified Halo Score correlates better with markers of systemic inflammation in the large vessel (LV) GCA subgroup of patients. • Although the diagnostic value of adding subclavian arteries to the current recommended US examination of GCA is limited, it may have a role in monitoring disease activity as it correlates with the general burden of inflammation in LV GCA. These findings need to be confirmed in additional populations and larger prospective studies.

Clinical impact of nailfold capillaroscopy in daily clinical practice. / Impacto clínico de la capilaroscopia periungueal en la práctica clínica diaria.

INTRODUCTION: Nailfold capillaroscopy (NC) is useful in the evaluation of Raynaud's phenomenon, associated with some connective tissue diseases and in the follow-up of patients with systemic sclerosis. Our study evaluates the impact of NC in the diagnosis, according to the reason for the request and profile of autoantibodies in daily clinical practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients that undergone at least one NC between June 2012 and December 2017 were included. Clinical records were reviewed and analysed in a dichotomous way (yes/no), to see whether the NC contributed to a change of diagnosis in subsequent consultations. In addition, demographic, clinical and laboratory data were collected, and the relationship with NC patterns evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 530 patients who had undergone at least one NC, 266 had Raynaud's phenomenon as primary indication for the technique. Of those, 20 patients (3.8%) had a diagnostic change in the post-NC consultation; 15 were diagnosed with systemic sclerosis, 4 with undifferentiated connective tissue disease and one with mixed connective tissue disease. All patients had, except for one patient diagnosed with undifferentiated connective tissue disease, positive antinuclear antibodies titres, 11 of them had disease specific antibodies (9 anti-centromere, one anti-Scl70 and other anti-RNPC). The positivity of antinuclear antibodies titres was associated with a higher probability of presenting a scleroderma pattern in the NC, and all patients with a specific rheumatological diagnosis had an abnormal NC. CONCLUSION: NC is a useful technique, but with limited impact in the diagnosis of connective tissue diseases. Autoantibody positivity is associated with a greater likelihood of presenting pathological NC patterns.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in autoimmune and inflammatory conditions: clinical characteristics of poor outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To describe clinical characteristics of patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) and immunosuppressive therapies with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) at an academic rheumatology center in Madrid and to identify baseline variables associated with a severe infection requiring hospitalization. METHODS: We identified SARS-CoV-2 positive cases by polymerase chain reaction performed at our center within an updated RMDs database in our clinic. Additional RMDs patients were identified when they contacted the clinic because of a positive infection. Data extraction included diagnosis, demographics, immunosuppressive treatment, comorbidities, and laboratory tests. Comparisons between patients with or without hospitalization were performed. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze associations between baseline variables and need for hospitalization. RESULTS: A total of 62 patients with COVID-19 and underlying RMDs were identified by April 24, 2020. Median age was 60.9 years, and 42% men. Forty-two patients required hospitalization; these were more frequently men, older and with comorbidities. There were no statistically significant between-group differences for rheumatologic diagnosis and for baseline use of immunosuppressive therapy except for glucocorticoids that were more frequent in hospitalized patients. Total deaths were 10 (16%) patients. In multivariate analysis, male sex (odds ratio [OR], 8.63; p = 0.018), previous lung disease (OR, 27.47; p = 0.042), and glucocorticoids use (> 5 mg/day) (OR, 9.95; p = 0.019) were significantly associated to hospitalization. CONCLUSION: Neither specific RMD diagnoses or exposures to DMARDs were associated with increased odds of hospitalization. Being male, previous lung disease and exposure to glucocorticoids were associated with higher odds of hospitalization in RMDs patients.

Does ultrasound-scored synovitis depend on the pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous anti-TNF agents in patients with rheumatoid arthritis?

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of the pharmacokinetics of s.c. anti-TNF agents on the grade of US-detected synovitis in RA patients. METHODS: Fifty RA patients were prospectively recruited from the Biologic Therapy Unit of our hospital. Inclusion criteria were being in treatment with s.c. anti-TNF agents and having had neither changes in therapy nor local corticosteroid injections in the previous 3 months. Patients underwent clinical, laboratory [28-joint DAS (DAS28) and Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI)] and US assessment at two time points, i.e. at peak plasma drug concentration and at trough plasma drug concentration. US assessments were performed blindly to the anti-TNF agent, the administration time and the clinical and laboratory data. Twenty-eight joints were investigated for the presence and grade (0-3) of B-mode synovitis and synovial power Doppler signal. Global indices for B-mode synovitis (BSI) and Doppler synovitis (DSI) were calculated for 12 joints and for wrist-hand-ankle-foot joints. B-mode US remission was defined as a BSI <1 and Doppler US remission as a DSI <1. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the clinical, laboratory and B-mode and Doppler US parameters at peak time and trough time (P = 0.132-0.986). There were no significant differences between the proportion of patients with active disease and those in remission according to DAS28, SDAI, B-mode US and Doppler US at peak time and trough time assessments (P = 0.070-1). CONCLUSION: Our results suggested that s.c. anti-TNF pharmacokinetics do not significantly influence US-scored synovitis in RA patients.