Shortened Automatic Lung Recruitment Maneuvers in an In Vivo Model of Neonatal ARDS.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of 2 protocols for automatic lung recruitment maneuvers (LRMs) using stepwise increases in PEEP in a neonatal ARDS model. These protocols were designed with lower maximum opening pressures than traditional methods and differ each one in the duration of the opening phases (short vs prolonged). We described hemodynamic changes through invasive monitoring, and we analyzed if the behavior of the variables depends on the duration of the opening phase of the LRM. METHODS: We designed a prospective, experimental study with 10 Landrace x Large White pigs < 48 h old. Under general anesthesia, tracheal intubation, invasive hemodynamic monitoring with a pediatric arterial thermodilution catheter was performed. An ARDS model was developed with bronchoalveolar lavages. Two types of LRMs were performed in each piglet, with a maximum peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) of 30 cm H2O and a PEEP 15 cm H2O applied during 8.5 s in the short LRM and 17 s in the prolonged LRM. A comparative analysis by virtue of the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and a regression analysis using generalized estimation equation were performed. RESULTS: We found that both LRMs were effective regarding oxygenation and respiratory mechanics. Shortening the duration of the opening phase and lowering the maximum opening pressures to PIP 30 and PEEP 15 cm H2O were above the critical opening pressure to reverse alveolar collapse in our neonatal ARDS model. Although we observed hemodynamic variations during both types of LRMs, these were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Our LRM protocols exceeded critical opening pressures to reverse alveolar collapse in our neonatal ARDS model. This range of pressures might involve less hemodynamic disturbance. Duration of the maximum opening pressure step is a determining factor for hemodynamic alterations.

Safety and efficacy evaluation of the automatic stepwise recruitment maneuver in the neonatal population: An in vivo interventional study. Can anesthesiologists safely perform automatic lung recruitment maneuvers in neonates?

BACKGROUND: A new software has recently been incorporated in almost all new anesthesia machines to enable automatic lung recruitment maneuvers. To date, no studies have assessed the safety and efficacy of these automatic software programs in the neonatal population. AIMS: We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the lung recruitment maneuver performed using the automatic stepwise recruitment maneuver software of the FLOW-i 4.3 Anesthesia System® in a healthy and live neonatal model. METHODS: Eight male newborn piglets were included in the study. The lung recruitment maneuver was performed in pressure-controlled ventilation with a constant driving pressure (15 cmH2 O) in a stepwise increasing positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) model. The target peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) was 30 cmH2 O and PEEP was 15 cmH2 O. The maneuver lasted for 39 seconds. The hemodynamic variables were monitored using the PICCO® system. The following respiratory parameters were monitored: oxygen saturation, fraction of inspired oxygen, partial pressure of oxygen and carbon dioxide in the arterial blood, end-tidal carbon dioxide pressure, PIP, plateau pressure, PEEP, static compliance (Cstat ), and dynamic compliance (Cdyn ). Safety was evaluated by assessing the accuracy of the software, need for not interrupting the maneuver, hemodynamic stability, and absence of adverse respiratory events with the lung recruitment maneuver. Efficacy was evaluated by improvement in Cstat and Cdyn after performing the lung recruitment maneuver. RESULTS: All lung recruitment maneuvers were safely performed as scheduled without any interruptions. No pneumothorax or other side effects were observed. Hemodynamic stability was maintained during the lung recruitment maneuver. We observed an improvement of 33% in Cdyn and 24% in Cstat after the maneuver. CONCLUSIONS: The automatic stepwise recruitment maneuver software of the FLOW-i 4.3 Anesthesia System® is safe and efficacious in a healthy neonatal model. We did not observe any adverse respiratory or hemodynamic events during the implementation of the lung recruitment maneuver in the pressure-controlled ventilation mode using a stepwise increasing PEEP (30/15 cmH2 O) approach.