RESUMEN
AIMS: To compare all-cause claims associated with the LATERA Absorbable Nasal Implant and surgical repair of nasal vestibular stenosis in patients with nasal valve collapse. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study utilized data from STATinMED RWD Insights. A defined set of HCPCS, ICD-10-CM and CPT codes were used to identify patients with ≥1 claim for a LATERA procedure, and patients with ≥1 claim for surgical repair between June 1, 2015- March 31, 2023. Patients with continuous capture for at least 12 months before and at least 6 months after the index date were selected. The index date was defined as earliest date of encounter for a LATERA or surgical repair procedure. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to ensure balance between cohorts. Descriptive analyses were provided for all claims data using standard summary statistics. All-cause claims were assessed during the baseline, index date, and follow-up period. Chi-squared tests and independent sample t-tests were used to assess differences in cohorts for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. RESULTS: The study population included 5,032 LATERA patients and 26,553 surgical repair patients. During the baseline and follow-up periods, the matched cohorts exhibited similar all-cause claims. On the index date, LATERA patients incurred lower claims vs. surgical repair, likely due to LATERA's ability to be implanted in the physician office setting. LATERA patients and surgical repair patients mean (SD) total costs were $9,612 [$14,930] vs $11,846 [$17,037] (p ≤ 0.0001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with the LATERA Absorbable Nasal Implant is a potentially cost saving option for payers on the index date compared to traditional surgical repair in patients with nasal valve collapse due to the ability to be performed in the office. All-cause claims were similar in the baseline and follow-up periods. When performed with concomitant procedures, all-cause claims during follow-up were similar between groups.
Asunto(s)
Implantes Absorbibles , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Obstrucción Nasal/cirugía , Anciano , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
Cerebrovascular disease encompasses a vast array of conditions. The imaging recommendations for stroke-related conditions involving noninflammatory steno-occlusive arterial and venous cerebrovascular disease including carotid stenosis, carotid dissection, intracranial large vessel occlusion, and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis are encompassed by this document. Additional imaging recommendations regarding complications of these conditions including intraparenchymal hemorrhage and completed ischemic strokes are also discussed. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.
Asunto(s)
Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Sociedades Médicas , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Estados Unidos , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
Cerebrovascular disease encompasses a vast array of conditions. The imaging recommendations for stroke-related conditions involving noninflammatory steno-occlusive arterial and venous cerebrovascular disease including carotid stenosis, carotid dissection, intracranial large vessel occlusion, and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis are encompassed by this document. Additional imaging recommendations regarding complications of these conditions including intraparenchymal hemorrhage and completed ischemic strokes are also discussed. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Trombosis de los Senos Intracraneales/cirugía , Disección de la Arteria Carótida Interna , Accidente Cerebrovascular IsquémicoRESUMEN
Many diseases remain difficult to identify because the occurrence of characteristic biomarkers within traditional matrices such as blood and urine remain unknown. Disease diagnosis could, therefore, benefit from the analysis of readily accessible, non-traditional matrices that have a high chemical content and contain distinguishing biomarkers. One such matrix is cerumen (i.e., earwax), whose chemical complexity can pose challenges when analyzed by conventional methods. A combination of cerumen chemical profiles analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and direct analysis in real time-high-resolution mass spectrometry (DART-HRMS) were investigated to ascertain the possible presence of the rare otolaryngological disorder Ménière's disease. This illness is currently identified via "diagnosis by exclusion" in which the disease is distinguished from others with overlapping symptoms by the process of elimination. GC-MS revealed a chemical profile difference between those with and without a Ménière's disease diagnosis by a visually apparent diminution of the compounds present in the Ménière's disease samples. DART-HRMS revealed that the two classes could be differentiated using three fatty acids: cis-9-hexadecenoic acid, cis-10-heptadecenoic acid, and cis-9-octadecenoic acid. These compounds were subsequently quantified by GC-MS and overall, the amounts of these fatty acids were decreased in Ménière's disease patients. The average levels for non-Ménière's disease samples were 7.89 µg/mg for cis-9-hexadecenoic acid, 0.87 µg/mg for cis-10-heptadecenoic acid, and 4.94 µg/mg for cis-9-octadecenoic acid. The average levels for Ménière's disease samples were 1.70 µg/mg for cis-9-hexadecenoic acid, 0.13 µg/mg for cis-10-heptadecenoic acid, and 2.07 µg/mg for cis-9-octadecenoic acid. The confidence levels for cis-9-hexadecenoic acid, cis-10-heptadecenoic acid, and cis-9-octadecenoic acid were 98.7%, 99.9%, and 95.4%, respectively. The results suggest that assessment of the concentrations of these fatty acids could be a useful clinical tool for the more rapid and accurate detection of Ménière's disease.
RESUMEN
Earwax is a readily accessible biological matrix that has the potential to be used in disease diagnostics. However, its semisolid nature and high chemical complexity have hampered efforts to investigate its potential to reveal disease markers. This is because more conventional methods of analysis such as gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry yield unsatisfactory results due to the presence of many nonvolatile and/or coeluting compounds, which in some cases have very similar mass spectrometric profiles. In addition, these routine methods often require the sample to be saponified, which dramatically increases the complexity of the analysis and makes it difficult to determine which compounds are actually present versus those that are produced by saponification. In this study, two-dimensional GC mass spectrometry (GC × GC-MS) was successfully applied for the characterization of the chemical components of earwax from healthy donors using nonpolar (primary) and midpolar (secondary) columns without saponification. Over 35 of the compounds that were identified are reported for the first time to be detected in unsaponified earwax. The resulting GC × GC-MS contour plots revealed visually recognizable compound class clusters of previously reported groups including alkanes, alkenes, fatty acids, esters, triglycerides, and cholesterol esters, as well as cholesterol and squalene. The application of GC × GC-MS revealed results that provide a foundation upon which future studies aimed at comparing healthy donor earwax to that from individuals exhibiting various disease states can be accomplished.
RESUMEN
Cerebrovascular disease is a broad topic. This document focuses on the imaging recommendations for the varied clinical scenarios involving intracranial aneurysms, vascular malformations, and vasculitis, which all carry high risk of morbidity and mortality. Additional imaging recommendations regarding complications of these conditions, including subarachnoid hemorrhage and vasospasm, are also covered. While each variant presentation has unique imaging recommendations, the major focus of this document is neurovascular imaging techniques. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea , Malformaciones Vasculares , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Sociedades Médicas , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea/diagnóstico por imagen , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of the novel coronavirus pandemic on practice patterns, clinical behavior, personal health, and emotional/psychological concerns of rhinologists. METHODS: A 15-question survey was sent out to the American Rhinologic Society's (ARS) membership to determine the impact of COVID-19 during the crisis. Demographic factors and practice patterns were collected and evaluated. RESULTS: There were 224 total respondents out of 835 ARS members queried (26.8% response rate). Study queries were sent in April 2020. Notably, 17.8% reported illness in themselves or their staff and 74.4% noted a psychological/emotional impact. A plurality of rhinologists noted their practice volume and in-office procedure volume has become 20.0% and 0.0% of their prior volumes, respectively. In addition, 96.2% were noted to be using telemedicine in our subspecialty. CONCLUSION: In addition to severely impacting volume and the perception of future decreases in patients and revenue, the COVID-19 pandemic has had a physical and emotional impact on rhinologists in ways that need to be further studied. These data include significantly novel and objective information. The COVID-19 crisis also reveals the important role of telemedicine in rhinology. Guidelines regarding personal protective equipment for in-office visits, nasal endoscopy, and other in-office and operating room procedures would be particularly helpful as future waves are expected.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Otorrinolaringólogos , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Endoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Visita a Consultorio Médico/estadística & datos numéricos , Otorrinolaringólogos/psicología , Pandemias , Equipo de Protección Personal/estadística & datos numéricos , SARS-CoV-2 , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Telemedicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Investigate the current trends in otolaryngic allergy (OA). STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. METHODS: Survey of active AAOA membership. RESULTS: Response rate was 27.3%. Regional response distribution rates were proportional to the AAOA membership distribution within the United States (R2 = 0.95; P < 0.001), with no significant regional response bias demonstrated (P = 0.428). Self-reported duration to OA competency was 5.8 years. Physicians reporting OA competency were more likely to be board-certified (P < 0.001) and have AAOA fellowship status (P < 0.001). The AAOA was reported to be the most valuable educational resource toward achieving OA competency, with residency training being least valuable (P < 0.001). 91.5% of respondents' practices offered OA services. Subcutaneous injections predominated at twice the utilization of sublingual immunotherapy. Allergy immunotherapy tablets were rarely utilized. Home allergy shots were offered by 45.2% of respondents. In-office immunotherapy vial compounding was preferred (95.8%) to third-party vendors. 94% of AAOA respondents identified patient compliance to be an issue within OA. Non-inhalant allergy service integration included food allergy (63.5%), asthma (44.9%), allergic fungal sinusitis (43.8%), penicillin allergy (18%), stinging insect allergy (12.6%), and aspirin desensitization (3.9%). CONCLUSION: Reported duration to OA competency after residency was surprisingly long. Further investigation of current and future educational/clinical training is warranted given clinical integration reported for OA. Otolaryngology is in the unique position to develop a comprehensive sino-allergy evidence-based strategy integrating the extensive diagnostic and medical treatment arms alongside the surgical expertise of the specialty within a clinical sino-allergy home concept. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 Laryngoscope, 130:283-289, 2020.
Asunto(s)
Alergia e Inmunología/tendencias , Hipersensibilidad , Otolaringología/tendencias , Enfermedades Otorrinolaringológicas/inmunología , Competencia Clínica , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad/terapia , Enfermedades Otorrinolaringológicas/terapia , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Headache is one of the most common human afflictions. In most cases, headaches are benign and idiopathic, and resolve spontaneously or with minor therapeutic measures. Imaging is not required for many types of headaches. However, patients presenting with headaches in the setting of "red flags" such as head trauma, cancer, immunocompromised state, pregnancy, patients 50 years or older, related to activity or position, or with a corresponding neurological deficit, may benefit from CT, MRI, or noninvasive vascular imaging to identify a treatable cause. This publication addresses the initial imaging strategies for headaches associated with the following features: severe and sudden onset, optic disc edema, "red flags," migraine or tension-type, trigeminal autonomic origin, and chronic headaches with and without new or progressive features. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Asunto(s)
Cefalea/diagnóstico por imagen , Cefalea/epidemiología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Diagnóstico por Imagen/métodos , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Cefalea/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radiología/normas , Medición de Riesgo , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Factores Sexuales , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Sinusitis is common in children that usually resolves spontaneously. Imaging is not part of the standard of care for initial diagnosis, however may be necessary in cases with persistent or chronic sinusitis to guide surgical intervention, or to rule out intracranial and vascular complications of sinusitis. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the leading imaging modalities. In this article, appropriateness in use of imaging modalities are discussed under common/clinically relevant scenarios. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Asunto(s)
Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Sinusitis/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Niño , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Sociedades Médicas , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Visual loss can be the result of an abnormality anywhere along the visual pathway including the globe, optic nerve, optic chiasm, optic tract, thalamus, optic radiations or primary visual cortex. Appropriate imaging analysis of visual loss is facilitated by a compartmental approach that establishes a differential diagnosis on the basis of suspected lesion location and specific clinical features. CT and MRI are the primary imaging modalities used to evaluate patients with visual loss and are often complementary in evaluating these patients. One modality may be preferred over the other depending on the specific clinical scenario. Depending on the pattern of visual loss and differential diagnosis, imaging coverage may require targeted evaluation of the orbits and/or assessment of the brain. Contrast is preferred when masses and inflammatory processes are differential considerations. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Asunto(s)
Ceguera/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Orbitales/diagnóstico por imagen , Medios de Contraste , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Sociedades Médicas , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Diseases of the cerebral vasculature represent a heterogeneous group of ischemic and hemorrhagic etiologies, which often manifest clinically as an acute neurologic deficit also known as stroke or less commonly with symptoms such as headache or seizures. Stroke is the fourth leading cause of death and is a leading cause of serious long-term disability in the United States. Eighty-seven percent of strokes are ischemic, 10% are due to intracerebral hemorrhage, and 3% are secondary to subarachnoid hemorrhage. The past two decades have seen significant developments in the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of ischemic and hemorrhagic causes of stroke with advancements in CT and MRI technology and novel treatment devices and techniques. Multiple different imaging modalities can be used in the evaluation of cerebrovascular disease. The different imaging modalities all have their own niches and their own advantages and disadvantages in the evaluation of cerebrovascular disease. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/diagnóstico por imagen , Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico por imagen , Isquemia Encefálica/etiología , Hemorragia Cerebral/complicaciones , Hemorragia Cerebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/complicaciones , Diagnóstico por Imagen/métodos , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Radiología , Sociedades Médicas , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To assess characteristics of computed tomography (CT) facilities accredited by the Intersocietal Accreditation Commission (IAC) and evaluate the perceived effect of accreditation on CT radiation dose awareness and reduction. METHODS: IAC-accredited CT facilities were sent a survey in April 2016, which included 20 questions categorized into 5 groups: equipment and facility (7), patient safety/practice (5), protocols (2), dose reduction practice (3), and quality improvement (3). RESULTS: The response rate was 20.7% (N = 607). A majority of facilities (80%) reported that radiation dose was adjusted based on patient size. Before undergoing accreditation, 79% of facilities reported annual review of CT protocols and radiation exposure. Following accreditation, that number increased to 93%. A majority (77%) of respondents indicated that the accreditation process, along with the IAC Standards and Guidelines, increased awareness of radiation exposure; in addition, 36% indicated that radiation doses were lower after undertaking accreditation. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrated that most IAC-accredited facilities followed recommended radiation safety practices by adjusting radiation dose based on patient size, reviewing protocols annually, and participating in quality improvement activities that focus on patient radiation exposure. CONCLUSION: IAC-accredited facilities reported that the accreditation process had a positive effect on radiation dose awareness and reduced dose associated with CT examinations.
Asunto(s)
Acreditación , Adhesión a Directriz , Dosis de Radiación , Protección Radiológica , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Tamaño Corporal , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Seguridad del Paciente , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Accountable care organizations represent a shift in health care delivery while providing a significant potential for improved quality and coordination of care across multiple settings. Otolaryngologists have an opportunity to become leaders in this expanding arena. However, the field of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery currently lacks many of the tools necessary to implement value-based care, including performance measurement, electronic health infrastructure, and data management. These resources will become increasingly important for surgical specialists to be active participants in population health. This article reviews the fundamental issues that otolaryngologists should consider when pursuing new roles in accountable care organizations.
Asunto(s)
Organizaciones Responsables por la Atención , Otolaringología , Organizaciones Responsables por la Atención/métodos , Reforma de la Atención de Salud , Difusión de la Información , Otolaringología/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Compra Basada en CalidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to assess the current practice patterns of computed tomography (CT) imaging for diagnosis and management of adult chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). METHODS: A 29-item, electronic, Web-based physician survey was disseminated to the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) and American Rhinologic Society (ARS) membership from November 2012 to January 2013. RESULTS: A total of 331 otolaryngologists completed the survey. Seventy-five percent of respondents did not obtain confirmatory CT imaging prior to initiating medical therapy for CRS. A typical diagnostic scan was considered to be a 3-mm coronal CT with or without 3-mm axial images for 50.6% of participants. On average, the respondents obtained 1 (58.8%) or 2 (36.6%) CT scans prior to proceeding with sinus surgery. CT scanning was most commonly performed in a hospital radiology department (76.4%), followed by a free-standing imaging center (44.5%). An in-office CT scanner was owned by 24.5% of the respondents, mostly commonly a cone beam CT (74.0%) scanner. Most respondents (87.1%) did not experience problems with carriers denying ability to image or reimbursing for scans. Overall, 68.4% of the respondents were unaware of the dosage of radiation delivered by the scanner used for CT acquisition. CONCLUSION: This survey provides a snapshot of the current utility of CT imaging in the management paradigm for CRS. Given that most are unaware of the delivered radiation dose, this clearly represents an important area of improvement in the knowledge gap.
Asunto(s)
Otolaringología/organización & administración , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Rinitis/diagnóstico por imagen , Sinusitis/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Dosis de Radiación , Sociedades Médicas , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This review examined the diagnostic approach, surgical treatment, and outcomes of cervical sympathetic chain schwannomas (CSCS) to guide clinical decision making. DATA SOURCES: Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. REVIEW METHODS: A literature review from 1998 to 2013 identified 156 articles of which 51 representing 89 CSCS cases were evaluated in detail. Demographic, clinical, and outcomes data were extracted by 2 independent reviewers with high interrater reliability (κ = .79). Cases were mostly international (82%), predominantly from Asia (50%) and Europe (27%). CONCLUSIONS: On average, patients were 42.6 years old (SD = 13.3) and had a neck mass ranging between 2 to 4 cm (52.7%) or >4 cm (43.2%). Nearly 70% of cases were asymptomatic at presentation. Presurgical diagnosis relied on CT (63.4%), MRI (59.8%), or both (19.5%), supplemented by cytology (33.7%), which was nearly always inconclusive (96.7%). US-treated cases were significantly more likely to receive presurgical MRI than internationally treated cases but less likely to have cytology (P < .05). Presurgical diagnosis was challenging, with only 11% confirmatory accuracy postsurgically. Irrespective of mass size, extracapsular resection (ie, complete resection with nerve sacrifice) was the most frequently (87.6%) performed surgical procedure. Common postsurgical adverse events included Horner's syndrome (91.1%), first bite syndrome (21.1%), or both (15.7%), with higher prevalence when mass size was >4 cm. Adverse events persisted in 82.3% of cases at an average 30.0 months (SD = 30.1) follow-up time. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Given the typical CSCS patient is young and asymptomatic and the likelihood of persistent morbidity is high with standard surgical approaches, less invasive treatment options warrant consideration.
Asunto(s)
Ganglios Simpáticos/patología , Neurilemoma/diagnóstico , Neurilemoma/terapia , Neoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/mortalidad , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/terapia , Síndrome de Horner/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Horner/mortalidad , Síndrome de Horner/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Narración , Neurilemoma/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/mortalidad , Pronóstico , Medición de Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This clinical consensus statement (CCS) aims to improve care for pediatric and adult patients with a tracheostomy tube. Approaches to tracheostomy care are currently inconsistent among clinicians and between different institutions. The goal is to reduce variations in practice when managing patients with a tracheostomy to minimize complications. METHODS: A formal literature search was conducted to identify evidence gaps and refine the scope of this consensus statement. The modified Delphi method was used to refine expert opinion and facilitate a consensus position. Panel members were asked to complete 2 scale-based surveys addressing different aspects of pediatric and adult tracheostomy care. Each survey was followed by a conference call during which results were presented and statements discussed. RESULTS: The panel achieved consensus on 77 statements; another 39 were dropped because of lack of consensus. Consensus was reached on statements that address initial tracheostomy tube change, management of emergencies and complications, prerequisites for decannulation, management of tube cuffs and communication devices, and specific patient and caregiver education needs. CONCLUSION: The consensus panel agreed on statements that address the continuum of care, from initial tube management to complications in children and adults with a tracheostomy. The panel also highlighted areas where consensus could not be reached and where more research is needed. This consensus statement should be used by physicians, nurses, and other stakeholders caring for patients with a tracheostomy.
Asunto(s)
Intubación Intratraqueal/instrumentación , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Traqueostomía/normas , Adulto , Manejo de la Vía Aérea/normas , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Intubación Intratraqueal/normas , Masculino , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To develop a consensus statement on the appropriate use of computed tomography (CT) for paranasal sinus disease. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A modified Delphi method was used to refine expert opinion and reach consensus by the panel. RESULTS: After 3 full Delphi rounds, 33 items reached consensus and 16 statements were dropped because of not reaching consensus or redundancy. The statements that reached consensus were grouped into 4 categories: pediatric sinusitis, medical management, surgical planning, and complication of sinusitis or sinonasal tumor. The panel unanimously agreed with 13 of the 33 statements. In addition, at least 75% of the panel strongly agreed with 14 of 33 statements across all of the categories. CONCLUSIONS: For children, careful consideration should be taken when performing CT imaging but is needed in the setting of treatment failures and complications, either of the pathological process itself or as a result of iatrogenic (surgical) complications. For adults, imaging is necessary in surgical planning, for treatment of medical and surgical complications, and in all aspects of the complete management of patients with sinonasal and skull base pathology.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Senos Paranasales/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/normas , HumanosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Tonsillectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures in the United States, with more than 530,000 procedures performed annually in children younger than 15 years. Tonsillectomy is defined as a surgical procedure performed with or without adenoidectomy that completely removes the tonsil including its capsule by dissecting the peritonsillar space between the tonsil capsule and the muscular wall. Depending on the context in which it is used, it may indicate tonsillectomy with adenoidectomy, especially in relation to sleep-disordered breathing. This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations on the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative care and management of children 1 to 18 years old under consideration for tonsillectomy. In addition, this guideline is intended for all clinicians in any setting who interact with children 1 to 18 years of age who may be candidates for tonsillectomy. PURPOSE: The primary purpose of this guideline is to provide clinicians with evidence-based guidance in identifying children who are the best candidates for tonsillectomy. Secondary objectives are to optimize the perioperative management of children undergoing tonsillectomy, emphasize the need for evaluation and intervention in special populations, improve counseling and education of families of children who are considering tonsillectomy for their child, highlight the management options for patients with modifying factors, and reduce inappropriate or unnecessary variations in care. RESULTS: The panel made a strong recommendation that clinicians should administer a single, intraoperative dose of intravenous dexamethasone to children undergoing tonsillectomy. The panel made a strong recommendation against clinicians routinely administering or prescribing perioperative antibiotics to children undergoing tonsillectomy. The panel made recommendations for (1) watchful waiting for recurrent throat infection if there have been fewer than 7 episodes in the past year or fewer than 5 episodes per year in the past 2 years or fewer than 3 episodes per year in the past 3 years; (2) assessing the child with recurrent throat infection who does not meet criteria in statement 2 for modifying factors that may nonetheless favor tonsillectomy, which may include but are not limited to multiple antibiotic allergy/intolerance, periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis and adenitis, or history of peritonsillar abscess; (3) asking caregivers of children with sleep-disordered breathing and tonsil hypertrophy about comorbid conditions that might improve after tonsillectomy, including growth retardation, poor school performance, enuresis, and behavioral problems; (4) counseling caregivers about tonsillectomy as a means to improve health in children with abnormal polysomnography who also have tonsil hypertrophy and sleep-disordered breathing; (5) counseling caregivers that sleep-disordered breathing may persist or recur after tonsillectomy and may require further management; (6) advocating for pain management after tonsillectomy and educating caregivers about the importance of managing and reassessing pain; and (7) clinicians who perform tonsillectomy should determine their rate of primary and secondary posttonsillectomy hemorrhage at least annually. The panel offered options to recommend tonsillectomy for recurrent throat infection with a frequency of at least 7 episodes in the past year or at least 5 episodes per year for 2 years or at least 3 episodes per year for 3 years with documentation in the medical record for each episode of sore throat and 1 or more of the following: temperature >38.3°C, cervical adenopathy, tonsillar exudate, or positive test for group A ß-hemolytic streptococcus.