Clinicopathologic Features and Efficacy of Induction Chemotherapy in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Real-World Experience.

INTRODUCTION: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) accounts for 0.01% of all carcinomas, and 70% of patients have locally advanced disease with a poor prognosis. The mainstay therapy is chemoradiotherapy (CRT), and concurrent administration of platinum-based agents and irradiation provides high local control rates. However, induction (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy (ICT) prior to CRT is recommended for large tumors with a high tumor burden at the category 1 level. For ICT, platinum-based doublet or triplet combination regimens are recommended. Selected patients with a high tumor burden at the time of diagnosis who did not receive ICT before CRT were given adjuvant (consolidation) therapy after CRT. This multicenter study aimed to share our experience in treatment of NPC and evaluate the factors associated with survival. METHODS: The study included patients diagnosed with NPC who were followed and treated between 2008 and 2022. Hundred and forty-two patients from 6 centers were evaluated. The factors associated with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. RESULTS: The median age of our patients was 51 years (IQR: 16-81 years), and the male:female ratio was 2.5:1. A majority of patients (71%) had stage 3-4 disease. They had locally advanced disease, and 48 patients (34%) received ICT. Twenty patients (14%) received adjuvant therapy. The median follow-up was 41 months (range, 2.7-175.1 months). The median DFS in NPC was 92.6 months (range, 71.9-113.3 months), with a 40th month DFS of 70.9%. The median OS was 113 months (range, 91-135 months), with a 40th month OS of 84.7%. Median DFS was 95.3 months (range, 64.2-126.4 months) in patients who received ICT before CRT, which was longer than in the CRT-only group (p = 0.6). DFS at the 40th month was 75.1% in patients treated with ICT compared to 65.1% in the CRT-only group. Median OS was 117 months (range, 92-142 months) in patients receiving ICT, which was longer than in the CRT-only group (p = 0.4). OS at the 40th month was 86.7% in patients receiving ICT but 83.6% in the CRT-only group. CONCLUSIONS: Both the objective response rate and survival were longer in patients who radiologically responded to CRT following ICT. Nonresponse to ICT is a negative predictive indicator. The role of ICT in locally advanced NPC is increasing.

The Effectiveness of Adjuvant PD-1 Inhibitors in Patients With Surgically Resected Stage III/IV Acral Melanoma.

Our aim was to assess the efficacy of adjuvant programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors and compare the other adjuvant treatments in patients with surgically resected stage III or IV acral melanoma. This study is a multicenter, retrospective analysis. We included 114 patients with stage III or IV acral malignant melanoma who underwent surgery within the past 10 years. We analyzed the effect of adjuvant programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitors on disease-free survival (DFS). The mean follow-up was 40 months, during which 69 (59.5%) patients experienced recurrence. Among the participants, 64 (56.1%) received systemic adjuvant therapy. Specifically, 48.4% received anti-PD-1 therapy, 29.7% received interferon, 14.1% received tezozolomide, and 7.8% received B-Raf proto-oncogene/mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitors. Patients who received adjuvant therapy had a median DFS of 24 (10.9-37.2) months, whereas those who did not receive adjuvant therapy had a median DFS of 15 (9.8-20.2) months. Multivariate analysis for DFS revealed that the receipt of adjuvant therapy and lymph node metastasis stage were independent significant parameters ( P = 0.021, P = 0.018, respectively). No statistically significant difference was observed for DFS between programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitor treatment and other adjuvant treatments. Regarding overall survival (OS), patients who received adjuvant treatment had a median OS of 71 (30.4-111.7) months, whereas those who did not receive adjuvant treatment had a median OS of 38 (16.7-59.3; P = 0.023) months. In addition, there were no significant differences in OS observed between various adjuvant treatment agents ( P = 0.122). In our study, we have shown that adjuvant therapy had a positive effect on both DFS and OS in patients with stages III-IV acral melanoma who underwent curative intent surgery. Notably, we found no significant differences between anti-PD-1 therapy and other adjuvant therapies.

Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Lobular and Rare Subtypes of Breast Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the predictive factors for the pathological complete response (pCR) in patients with non-ductal invasive breast cancer (ND-BC) receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. STUDY DESIGN: Observational study. Place and Duration of the Study: Departments of Medical Oncology, Tekirdag Namik Kemal University, Sirnak State Hospital, Aydin Adnan Menderes University, Marmara University, Bakirkoy Sadi Konuk Hospital, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura Hospital, Sakarya University, Balikesir Ataturk Hospital, Turkiye, from April 2016 to December 2022. METHODOLOGY: A total of 222 non-metastatic breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were included in this retrospective multicentric study. The clinicopathologic data were obtained from the hospitals' electronic-record-system. The logistic regression models were used to identify predictive factors for pCR. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-six patients (56.8%) had invasive lobular carcinoma and 28 patients (12.6%) had signet ring cell/mucinous carcinoma. A total of 45 patients (20.3%) achieved pCR. The pCR rate was 14.3% for lobular carcinoma and 17.9% for signet ring cell/mucinous carcinoma. The univariate analysis showed that estrogen receptor-negative tumours (p = 0.017), high Ki-67 (p = 0.008), high histologic grade (p<0.001), HER2+ expression (p<0.001), and non-lobular histologic type (p = 0.012) were predictive factors for pCR. The multivariate model revealed that HER2 expression (p<0.001) and Ki-67 (p = 0.005) were independent predictors. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy demonstrated effectiveness in ND-BC patients, leading to favourable pCR rates and enabling breast-conserving surgery. Predictive markers for pCR varied depending on histologic types, with HER2 expression, ER status, Ki-67, and histologic grade showing significance in non-ductal subtypes, while HER2 status alone was predictive in lobular carcinoma. KEY WORDS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, Non-ductal breast cancer, Lobular carcinoma.

The prognostic factors in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: impact of treatment sequencing.

The prognosis of patients with advanced HCC can vary widely depending on factors such as the stage of the cancer, the patient's overall health, and treatment regimens. This study aimed to investigate survival outcomes and associated factors in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this retrospective study, data from 23 medical oncology clinics were analyzed. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) values were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors associated with survival which were identified in univariate analysis were subsequently evaluated in a multivariate Cox-regression survival analysis was conducted using the backward stepwise (Conditional LR) method to determine the independent predictors of PFS and OS. Of 280 patients, 131 received chemotherapy and 142 received sorafenib, 6 received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and 1 received nivolumab for first-line setting. The median follow-up time was 30.4 (95%CI 27.1-33.6) months. For-first line, median PFS was 3.1 (95%CI2.7-3.5) months, and it was significantly longer in patients who received sorafenib or atezolizumab-bevacizumab or nivolumab (PFS 5.8 (95%CI 4.2-7.5) than in those received chemotherapy (PFS 2.1 (95%CI 1.9-2.3) in the first-line setting (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that male gender (HR: 2.75, 95% CI: 1.53-4.94, p = 0.01), poor ECOG performance score (HR: 1.88, 95% CI: 1.10-3.21, p = 0.02), higher baseline AFP level (HR: 2.38, 95% CI: 1.54-3.67, p < 0.001) and upfront sorafenib treatment (HR,0.38; 95% CI: 0.23-0.62, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with shorter PFS. The median OS was 13.2 (95%CI 11.1-15.2) months. It was significantly longer in patients who received sorafenib or atezolizumab-bevacizumab or nivolumab in the first-line setting followed by TKIs (sorafenib or regorafenib, OS 18.6 (95%CI 13.8-23.5)) compared to those who received chemotherapy (OS 10.3 (95%CI 6.6-14.1)) in the first-line setting. The multivariate analysis revealed that upfront chemotherapy treatment approach, male gender (HR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.07-2.94, p = 0.02), poor ECOG performance score (HR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.24-3.09, p = 0.004) and Child-Pugh score, presence of extrahepatic disease (HR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.09-2.18, p = 0.01), and higher baseline AFP value (HR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.03-2.19, p = 0.03) were significantly associated with poor prognosis. Additionally, regarding of treatment sequence, upfront sorafenib followed by regorafenib showed a significantly lower risk of mortality (HR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.25-0.66, p < 0.001). Sorafenib followed by regorafenib treatment was associated with a significantly lower risk of mortality rather than upfront sorafenib followed by BSC group or upfront chemotherapy followed by TKIs. These findings underscore the importance of the optimal treatment sequences to improve survival in patients with advanced HCC.

PNI as a Potential Add-On Biomarker to Improve the IMDC Intermediate Prognostic Score.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to assess the role of the adjusted PNI-IMDC risk scoring system in stratifying the intermediate group of metastatic RCC patients who received TKIS in the first-line setting. METHODS: A total of 185 patients were included. The adjusted PNI and IMDC model was used to divide the intermediate group into two groups: intermediate PNI-high and intermediate PNI-low groups. The statistical data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: The results showed that the adjusted PNI-IMDC risk score, classic IMDC, and PNI had similar prognostic values. Adjusted PNI-IMDC risk score might be used for a more homogeneous differentiation of the classic intermediate group. On the other hand, multivariate analysis revealed that the presence of nephrectomy, adjusted favorable/intermediate (PNI-high) group, ECOG performance score, and presence of bone metastasis were independent predictors of OS. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-treatment PNI, as a valuable and potential add-on biomarker to the adjusted PNI-IMDC classification model, can be helpful for establishing an improved prognostic model for intermediate group mRCC patients treated with first-line TKISs. Further validation studies are needed to clarify these findings.

Efficacy of Capecitabine and Temozolomide Regimen in Neuroendocrine Tumors: Data From the Turkish Oncology Group.

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to report the efficacy and safety of capecitabine plus temozolomide (CAPTEM) across different lines of treatment in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study analyzing the data of 308 patients with metastatic NETs treated with CAPTEM between 2010 and 2022 in 34 different hospitals across various regions of Turkey. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 41.0 months (range: 1.7-212.1), and the median age was 53 years (range: 22-79). Our results across the entire patient cohort showed a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 10.6 months and a median overall survival (OS) of 60.4 months. First-line CAPTEM treatment appeared more effective, with a median PFS of 16.1 months and a median OS of 105.8 months (median PFS 16.1, 7.9, and 9.6 months in first-, second- and ≥third-line respectively, P = .01; with median OS values of 105.8, 47.2, and 24.1 months, respectively, P = .003) In terms of ORR, the first-line treatment again performed better, resulting in an ORR of 54.7% compared to 33.3% and 30.0% in the second and third or higher lines, respectively (P < .001). Grade 3-4 side effects occurred only in 22.5% of the patients, leading to a discontinuation rate of 9.5%. Despite the differences in outcomes based on treatment line, we did not observe a significant difference in terms of side effects between the first and subsequent lines of treatment. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The substantial superior outcomes in patients receiving first-line CAPTEM treatment highlight its potential as an effective treatment strategy for patients with metastatic NET.

Evaluation of Predictive and Prognostic Importance of Lung Immune Prognostic Index in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: The systemic inflammatory response (SIR) is known as an important factor associated with tumorigenesis and tumor progression, and can be reflected by inflammatory markers. One of the markers that reflect this is the lung immune prognostic index (LIPI). It is based on a derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level. We aimed to investigate the significance of LIPI in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT). METHODS: In this retrospective study, we stratified the patients according to LIPI score as good LIPI and intermediate (int)/poor LIPI. According to pathological response to NACRT, we divided the patients into two groups as those with complete response (CR) or near-CR, and those with partial response (PR) or poor/no response. We classified CR and near-CR as good response. We evaluated the predictive and prognostic significance of LIPI for NACRT response, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: We included 137 patients in the results, with 72 (52.6%) having good LIPI and 65 (47.4%) having int/poor LIPI. The median follow-up period was 44.7 months (range: 10-105 months). Thirteen patients (18.0%) in the good LIPI group and 22 patients (34.0%) in the int/poor LIPI group achieved good response. In multivariate analysis, we found only the LIPI score as an independent risk factor (hazard ratio (HR): 2.4, p = 0.04) for NACRT response. Median DFS was 89.2 months (95% CI: 11.4-167.0) in the int/poor LIPI group; however, the DFS of all study populations and patients in the good LIPI group did not reach the median value. In multivariate analysis for DFS, we identified abdominoperineal resection (APR) (HR: 2.21, p = 0.02), presence of tumor deposit (HR: 2.96, p = 0.003), and int/poor LIPI score (HR: 2.07, p = 0.02) as separate risk variables. OS of all study populations and the patients in the LIPI groups did not reach the median value. In multivariate analysis for OS, we identified APR (HR: 2.74, p = 0.02), surgical margin positivity (HR: 12.94, p < 0.001), and adjuvant CT (HR: 0.20, p = 0.002) as separate risk variables for OS. CONCLUSION: This is the first study investigating the predictive and prognostic significance of LIPI in LARC patients treated with NACRT. The results revealed that int/poor LIPI was associated with a higher rate of good response but shorter DFS compared to good LIPI. The baseline LIPI score serves as an easily accessible and useful prognostic index, and it has significant potential for making appropriate treatment decisions in LARC.