Findings from the NIMH Multimodal Treatment Study of ADHD (MTA): implications and applications for primary care providers.

In 1992, the National Institute of Mental Health and 6 teams of investigators began a multisite clinical trial, the Multimodal Treatment of Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (MTA) study. Five hundred seventy-nine children were randomly assigned to either routine community care (CC) or one of three study-delivered treatments, all lasting 14 months. The three MTA treatments-monthly medication management (usually methylphenidate) following weekly titration (MedMgt), intensive behavioral treatment (Beh), and the combination (Comb)-were designed to reflect known best practices within each treatment approach. Children were assessed at four time points in multiple outcome. Results indicated that Comb and MedMgt interventions were substantially superior to Beh and CC interventions for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms. For other functioning domains (social skills, academics, parent-child relations, oppositional behavior, anxiety/depression), results suggested slight advantages of Comb over single treatments (MedMgt, Beh) and community care. High quality medication treatment characterized by careful yet adequate dosing, three times daily methylphenidate administration, monthly follow-up visits, and communication with schools conveyed substantial benefits to those children that received it. In contrast to the overall study findings that showed the largest benefits for high quality medication management (regardless of whether given in the MedMgt or Comb group), secondary analyses revealed that Comb had a significant incremental effect over MedMgt (with a small effect size for this comparison) when categorical indicators of excellent response and when composite outcome measures were used. In addition, children with parent-defined comorbid anxiety disorders, particularly those with overlapping disruptive disorder comorbidities, showed preferential benefits to the Beh and Comb interventions. Parental attitudes and disciplinary practices appeared to mediate improved response to the Beh and Comb interventions.

Symptom profiles in children with ADHD: effects of comorbidity and gender.

OBJECTIVE: To examine ratings and objective measures of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms to assess whether ADHD children with and without comorbid conditions have equally high levels of core symptoms and whether symptom profiles differ as a function of comorbidity and gender. METHOD: Four hundred ninety-eight children from the NIMH Collaborative Multisite Multimodal Treatment Study of Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (MTA) were divided into comorbid groups based on the parent Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children and assessed via parents' and teachers' Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham (SNAP) ratings and a continuous performance test (CPT). Comorbidity and gender effects were examined using analyses of covariance controlled for age and site. RESULTS: CPT inattention, impulsivity, and dyscontrol errors were high in all ADHD groups. Children with ADHD + oppositional defiant or conduct disorder were rated as more impulsive than inattentive, while children with ADHD + anxiety disorders (ANX) were relatively more inattentive than impulsive. Girls were less impaired than boys on most ratings and several CPT indices, particularly impulsivity, and girls with ADHD + ANX made fewer CPT impulsivity errors than girls with ADHD-only. CONCLUSIONS: Children with ADHD have high levels of core symptoms as measured by rating scales and CPT, irrespective of comorbidity. However, there are important differences in symptomatology as a function of comorbidity and gender.

ADHD comorbidity findings from the MTA study: comparing comorbid subgroups.

OBJECTIVES: Previous research has been inconclusive whether attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), when comorbid with disruptive disorders (oppositional defiant disorder [ODD] or conduct disorder [CD]), with the internalizing disorders (anxiety and/or depression), or with both, should constitute separate clinical entities. Determination of the clinical significance of potential ADHD + internalizing disorder or ADHD + ODD/CD syndromes could yield better diagnostic decision-making, treatment planning, and treatment outcomes. METHOD: Drawing upon cross-sectional and longitudinal information from 579 children (aged 7-9.9 years) with ADHD participating in the NIMH Collaborative Multisite Multimodal Treatment Study of Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (MTA), investigators applied validational criteria to compare ADHD subjects with and without comorbid internalizing disorders and ODD/CD. RESULTS: Substantial evidence of main effects of internalizing and externalizing comorbid disorders was found. Moderate evidence of interactions of parent-reported anxiety and ODD/CD status were noted on response to treatment, indicating that children with ADHD and anxiety disorders (but no ODD/CD) were likely to respond equally well to the MTA behavioral and medication treatments. Children with ADHD-only or ADHD with ODD/CD (but without anxiety disorders) responded best to MTA medication treatments (with or without behavioral treatments), while children with multiple comorbid disorders (anxiety and ODD/CD) responded optimally to combined (medication and behavioral) treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate that three clinical profiles, ADHD co-occurring with internalizing disorders (principally parent-reported anxiety disorders) absent any concurrent disruptive disorder (ADHD + ANX), ADHD co-occurring with ODD/CD but no anxiety (ADHD + ODD/CD), and ADHD with both anxiety and ODD/CD (ADHD + ANX + ODD/CD) may be sufficiently distinct to warrant classification as ADHD subtypes different from "pure" ADHD with neither comorbidity. Future clinical, etiological, and genetics research should explore the merits of these three ADHD classification options.

Multimodal treatment of ADHD in the MTA: an alternative outcome analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a post hoc investigation of the utility of a single composite measure of treatment outcome for the NIMH Collaborative Multisite Multimodal Treatment Study of Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (MTA) at 14 months postbaseline. BACKGROUND: Examination of multiple measures one at a time in the main MTA intent-to-treat outcome analyses failed to detect a statistically significant advantage of combined treatment (Comb) over medication management (MedMgt). A measure that increases power and precision using a single outcome score may be a useful alternative to multiple outcome measures. METHOD: Factor analysis of baseline scores yielded two "source factors" (parent and teacher) and one "instrument factor" (parent-child interactions). A composite score was created from the average of standardized parent and teacher measures. RESULTS: The composite was internally consistent (alpha = .83), reliable (test-retest over 3 months = 0.86), and correlated 0.61 with clinician global judgments. In an intent-to-treat analysis, Comb was statistically significantly better than all other treatments, with effect sizes ranging from small (0.28) versus MedMgt, to moderately large (0.70) versus a community comparison group. CONCLUSIONS: A composite of ADHD variables may be an important tool in future treatment trials with ADHD and may avoid some of the statistical limitations of multiple measures.

Clinical relevance of the primary findings of the MTA: success rates based on severity of ADHD and ODD symptoms at the end of treatment.

OBJECTIVES: To develop a categorical outcome measure related to clinical decisions and to perform secondary analyses to supplement the primary analyses of the NIMH Collaborative Multisite Multimodal Treatment Study of Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (MTA). METHOD: End-of-treatment status was summarized by averaging the parent and teacher ratings of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and oppositional defiant disorder symptoms on the Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham, version IV (SNAP-IV) scale, and low symptom-severity ("Just a Little") on this continuous measure was set as a clinical cutoff to form a categorical outcome measure reflecting successful treatment. Three orthogonal comparisons of the treatment groups (combined treatment [Comb], medication management [MedMgt], behavioral treatment [Beh], and community comparison [CC]) evaluated hypotheses about the MTA medication algorithm ("Comb + MedMgt versus Beh + CC"), multimodality superiority ("Comb versus MedMgt"), and psychosocial substitution ("Beh versus CC"). RESULTS: The summary of SNAP-IV ratings across sources and domains increased the precision of measurement by 30%. The secondary analyses of group differences in success rates (Comb = 68%; MedMgt = 56%; Beh = 34%; CC = 25%) confirmed the large effect of the MTA medication algorithm and a smaller effect of multimodality superiority, which was now statistically significant (p < .05). The psychosocial substitution effect remained negligible and nonsignificant. CONCLUSION: These secondary analyses confirm the primary findings and clarify clinical decisions about the choice between multimodal and unimodal treatment with medication.

Methylphenidate dosage for children with ADHD over time under controlled conditions: lessons from the MTA.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the trajectory of methylphenidate (MPH) dosage over time, following a controlled titration, and to ascertain how accurately the titration was able to predict effective long-term treatment in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHOD: Using the 14-month-treatment database of the NIMH Collaborative Multisite Multimodal Treatment Study of Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (MTA), the outcome of the initial placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized daily switch titration of MPH was compared with the subsequent maintenance pharmacotherapy. Children received monthly monitoring visits and, when needed, medication adjustments. RESULTS: Of the 198 children for whom MPH was the optimal treatment at titration (mean +/- SD dose: 30.5 +/- 14.2 mg/day), 88% were still taking MPH at the end of maintenance (mean dose 34.4 +/- 13.3 mg/day). Titration-determined dose and end-of-maintenance dose were significantly correlated (r = 0.52-0.68). Children receiving combined pharmacotherapy and behavioral treatment ended maintenance on a lower dose (31.1 +/- 11.7 mg/day) than did children receiving pharmacotherapy only (38.1 +/- 14.2 mg/day). Of the 230 children for whom titration identified an optimal treatment, 17% continued both the assigned medication and dosage throughout maintenance. The mean number of pharmacological changes per child was 2.8 +/- 1.8 (SD), and time to first change was 4.7 months +/- 0.3 (SE). CONCLUSIONS: For most children, initial titration found a dose of MPH in the general range of the effective maintenance dose, but did not prevent the need for subsequent maintenance adjustments. For optimal pharmacological treatment of ADHD, both careful initial titration and ongoing medication management are needed.

Impairment and deportment responses to different methylphenidate doses in children with ADHD: the MTA titration trial.

OBJECTIVE: Results of the NIMH Collaborative Multisite Multimodal Treatment Study of Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (MTA) were analyzed to determine whether a double-blind, placebo-controlled methylphenidate (MPH) titration trial identified the best MPH dose for each child with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHOD: Children with ADHD assigned to MTA medication treatment groups (n = 289) underwent a controlled 28-day titration protocol that administered different MPH doses (placebo, low, middle, and high) on successive days. RESULTS: A repeated-measures analysis of variance revealed main effects for MPH dose with greater effects on teacher ratings of impairment and deportment (F3 = 100.6, n = 223, p = .0001; effect sizes 0.8-1.3) than on parent ratings of similar endpoints (F3 = 55.61, n = 253, p = .00001; effect sizes 0.4-0.6). Dose did not interact with period, dose order, comorbid diagnosis, site, or treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: The MTA titration protocol validated the efficacy of weekend MPH dosing and established a total daily dose limit of 35 mg of MPH for children weighing less than 25 kg. It replicated previously reported MPH response rates (77%), distribution of best doses (10-50 mg/day) across subjects, effect sizes on impairment and deportment, as well as dose-related adverse events.

National Institute of Mental Health Collaborative Multimodal Treatment Study of Children with ADHD (the MTA). Design challenges and choices.

The Collaborative Multimodal Treatment Study of Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), the MTA, is the first child multisite cooperative agreement treatment study of children conducted by the National Institute of Mental Health, Rockville, Md. It examines the long-term effectiveness of medication vs behavioral treatment vs both for treatment of ADHD and compares state-of-the-art treatment with routine community care. In a parallel-groups design, 576 children (age, 7-9 years) with ADHD (96 at each site) are thoroughly assessed and randomized to 4 conditions: (1) medication alone, (2) psychosocial treatment alone, (3) the combination of both, (4) or community comparison. The first 3 groups are treated for 14 months and all are reassessed periodically for 24 months. Designers met the following challenges: framing clinically relevant primary questions; defining the target population; choice, intensity, and integration and combination of treatments for fair comparisons; combining scientific controls and standardization with clinical flexibility; and implementing a controlled clinical trial in a nonclinical setting (school) controlled by others. Innovative solutions included extensive decision algorithms and manualized adaptations of treatments to specific needs.

Relapse and rehospitalization during maintenance treatment of schizophrenia. The effects of dose reduction and family treatment.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have examined dose reduction and family treatment in schizophrenia, but none has examined their interaction. This study assessed the impact of dose reduction of antipsychotic medication and family treatment on relapse and rehospitalization during maintenance treatment. METHODS: Subjects were 313 male and female outpatients at 5 centers with a DSM-III-R diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. In a 3 x 2 design, subjects were randomized to 1 of 3 medication strategies using fluphenazine decanoate under double-blind conditions: continuous moderate dose (standard) (12.5-50 mg every 2 weeks); continuous low dose (2.5-10 mg every 2 weeks); or targeted, early intervention (fluphenazine only when symptomatic). Subjects also were randomized to 1 of 2 family treatment strategies (supportive or applied). Supportive family management involved monthly group meetings. The more intensive applied family management involved monthly group meetings and home visits where communication and problem-solving skills were taught. Patients and families were treated and assessed for 2 years. RESULTS: Both continuous low-dose and targeted treatment increased use of rescue medication and relapse; only targeted treatment increased rehospitalization. This pattern was consistent across both family treatments; there were no differences between family treatments. CONCLUSIONS: These findings reaffirm the value of antipsychotic medication in preventing relapse and rehospitalization. The absence of family treatment differences may be because both conditions engaged families.

Medication treatment strategies in the MTA Study: relevance to clinicians and researchers.

OBJECTIVE: Clinicians have difficulty applying drug research findings to clinical practice, because research protocols use methods different from those used in daily office practice settings. METHOD: To design a medication protocol for a multisite clinical trial involving 576 children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) while maintaining relevance to clinical practice, investigators from the NIMH Collaborative Multisite Multimodal Treatment Study of Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (MTA study) developed novel medication strategies. These were designed to work either in a monomodal or multimodal format and to ensure standard approaches are used across diverse sites. Each child randomized to medication (projected N = 288) is individually titrated to his or her "best" methylphenidate dose and has individual ADHD symptoms monitored. Decision rules were developed to guide "best dose" selection, dose changes, medication changes, the management of side effects, and integration with psychosocial treatments. CONCLUSIONS: The MTA study uses a controlled method to standardize the identification of each child's "best" methylphenidate dose in a national, multisite cooperative treatment program. Although the titration protocol is complex, the study's individual dosing approach and algorithms for openly managing ADHD children's medication over time will be of interest to clinicians in office practice.

Transition from acute to maintenance treatment: prediction of stabilization.

The stabilization period that follows the exacerbation of a schizophrenic illness represents a critical point in the course of the illness. Successful stabilization is a prerequisite to long-term tenure in the community and the possibility of improvement in functional outcome. In this paper we present an operational definition of stabilization, developed in the context of a study of long-term maintenance treatment that incorporates time, symptomatic equilibrium and consistency of medication dosage. Patients were identified at the time of hospitalization and followed prospectively to determine whether or not they met stabilization criteria. Characteristics that predicted successful stabilization included measures drawn from the domains of patient personal characteristics and psychiatric history, symptoms of psychopathology and side effects in response to initial treatment and family judgments. These patients were treated primarily with fluphenazine decanoate, and five distinct dosing strategies with this agent were identified retrospectively. The dosing strategies distinguished the length of time to subsequent stabilization. The implications of these findings for clinical management of schizophrenia are discussed.

Maintenance treatment of schizophrenia: a review of dose reduction and family treatment strategies.

Maintenance treatment in schizophrenia requires the integration of both medication and psychosocial treatment interventions for maximum effect. We review the recent evidence for strategies drawn from both domains. For the use of anti-psychotic medication we focus on studies of dose reduction using two strategies that differ in assumptions regarding the action of medication. They are: continuous low-dose and targeted, early intervention or intermittent treatment. For psychosocial interventions we focus on studies of family treatment. Regarding dose reduction, we conclude that both strategies are feasible but the targeted strategy incurs higher relapse and rehospitalization rates. Regarding family treatment, we conclude that family treatment provides benefits beyond other psychosocial interventions or usual care, but that there is no evidence for differences in efficacy among family treatments.

Diagnostic interview for genetic studies. Rationale, unique features, and training. NIMH Genetics Initiative.

This article reports on the development and reliability of the Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies (DIGS), a clinical interview especially constructed for the assessment of major mood and psychotic disorders and their spectrum conditions. The DIGS, which was developed and piloted as a collaborative effort of investigators from sites in the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Genetics Initiative, has the following additional features: (1) polydiagnostic capacity; (2) a detailed assessment of the course of the illness, chronology of psychotic and mood syndromes, and comorbidity; (3) additional phenomenologic assessments of symptoms; and (4) algorithmic scoring capability. The DIGS is designed to be employed by interviewers who exercise significant clinical judgment and who summarize information in narrative form as well as in ratings. A two-phase test-retest (within-site, between-site) reliability study was carried out for DSM-III-R criteria-based major depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and schizoaffective disorder. Reliabilities using algorithms were excellent (0.73 to 0.95), except for schizoaffective disorder, for which disagreement on estimates of duration of mood syndromes relative to psychosis reduced reliability. A final best-estimate process using medical records and information from relatives as well as algorithmic diagnoses is expected to be more reliable in making these distinctions. The DIGS should be useful as part of archival data gathering for genetic studies of major affective disorders, schizophrenia, and related conditions.

Stabilization and depot neuroleptic dosages.

Little is known about the stabilization phase of schizophrenia. To address this deficiency, we studied the prescribing patterns of fluphenazine decanoate (FZD) for a cohort of schizophrenic patients recovering from an acute psychotic episode who were being followed in the Treatment Strategies in Schizophrenia (TSS) multi-site maintenance study. Dosage data from the first 208 successfully-stabilized TSS subjects were examined. We hypothesized five groups on the basis of dosage prescribed and dosage stability over time: (1) STABLE HIGH, (2) STABLE INTERMEDIATE, (3) STABLE LOW, (4) UNSTABLE RAISING, and (5) UNSTABLE LOWERING. The dosage patterns were rated and analyzed against predictive and outcome variables. Most of the subjects (n = 168, or 82%) fit one of the five hypothesized dosage pattern groups. Our preliminary findings are as follows: (1) all groups improved during stabilization; (2) baseline symptom severity did not distinguish among dosage pattern groups; (3) STABLE dose groups needed less time to stabilize than did the UNSTABLE groups, but the STABLE groups did not have a better medication response; (4) many of the UNSTABLE LOWERING subjects apparently received a "loading dose" strategy (e.g., initial FZD dose > or = 25 mg), which was paradoxically associated with a longer stabilization time.

Demographic characteristics, treatment history, presenting psychopathology and early course in schizophrenia. Treatment Strategies in Schizophrenia Collaborative Study Group.

Subject heterogeneity increases generalizability of study findings so long as site differences do not interact with treatment effects. Of 51 baseline characteristics of 234 patients, 31 show significant site differences. Of 33 baseline demographic, treatment history, and presenting symptom items, site differences were seen on 16. This heterogeneity emphasizes the importance of examining site interactions with other effects. The first opportunity to examine such interactions is in the prediction of patient stabilization following the index acute episode. Among the 33 demographic, treatment history, and presenting symptom variables, 11 significantly predicted this short-term outcome. Only 2 of these 33 variables showed site-by-baseline interactions in predicting stabilization, most likely due to chance sampling fluctuations. Thus, site heterogeneity is adding generality without confounding the predictions.

Ensuring data quality in a multicenter clinical trial: remote site data entry, central coordination and feedback.

In an ongoing multicenter clinical trial, "Treatment Strategies in Schizophrenia," the five participating sites have the capacity to perform a variety of tasks or study functions independently. These tasks include (a) verification of diagnostic eligibility through the use of computerized decision algorithms; (b) assignment of patients to treatment based on prognostic indicators using a computerized randomization algorithm; (c) entry of data into a microcomputer using a clinical trial data management system that performs simple range and missing data item checks; and (d) regular transfer of all data to the central coordinating team. The clinical trial data management system employed allows for both independent site functioning and assurance of consistency across sites. The integration of a variety of software outside the main data management system provides the central coordinators with the tools to monitor critical data as it is collected, as well as the capacity to assess the flow, quality, and uniformity of the ongoing trial.

Modular algorithm for tardive dyskinesia diagnosis (MALTD): a demonstration of a methodological concept for diagnostic decision making.

A set of algorithms has been written which assign the Research Diagnoses for Tardive Dyskinesia (RD-TD) to patients evaluated for this neurological syndrome that occurs as a side effect of neuroleptic drug treatment. The approach used in constructing these algorithms does not employ decision tree and flowcharting mechanisms often used in making automated diagnoses. Rather, a modular structure is used where a value is assigned to each independent component relevant to tardive dyskinesia, e.g. presence or absence of a minimal amount of abnormal involuntary movements, length of time of neuroleptic drug-taking. A particular combination of values of these components determines the diagnosis assigned. Advantages of such a modular system structure are that it permits new components to be added, existing components to be deleted, the criterion levels for existing components to be modified, and/or the definition of any of the diagnostic labels to be altered without affecting other components. Although this algorithm was developed specifically for research in tardive dyskinesia, the authors hope that the concepts of the modular structure will apply to the study of other longitudinal data.

Development and prediction of postpsychotic depression in neuroleptic-treated schizophrenics.

Data were collected during a year-long multicenter collaborative trial comparing short-acting fluphenazine hydrochloride with long-acting fluphenazine decanoate in a group of schizophrenic patients being maintained in the community. We examined the emergence and course of depressive symptomatology, operationally defined by the Hamilton Depression Scale total score. Of 211 patients, approximately 25% had depression develop within five months after discharge. Depressed patients had a more chronic psychiatric history and, contrary to the hypothesis that depression is a favorable prognostic indicator, they were more likely to relapse. There were no differences in incidence of emergent depression between the two drug treatment groups.