Training and Evaluation of Residents to Ensure Competent Physician Metrics to Recognize Struggling Residents.

Assessing competency across domains of knowledge, skills, and behavior is critical to ensure that graduating orthopaedic residents possess the requisite skills and attributes to enter independent orthopaedic practice. Of the domains, knowledge is most easily assessed. In addition to the AAOS Orthopaedic In-Training Examination®, which provides a yearly gauge of residents' orthopaedic knowledge relative to their peers, there are several online platforms such as Orthobullets, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons ResStudy program, and the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Clinical Classroom that offer online learning resources and question banks. Clinical skills are best assessed through a combination of observation tools, including live or video assessments, 360° evaluations, and objective structured clinical examinations. Surgical skills can be evaluated in two domains: live surgical cases or simulations. The American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery is attempting to standardize live surgical evaluations through the use of the O-P tool. Although most available models feature only arthroscopic procedures, surgical simulators provide for opportunity to objectively evaluate resident performance. Behavior and professionalism has traditionally been the most challenging domain to assess. The American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery's Behavior Assessment Tool has demonstrated success in pilot testing and is being introduced as the standard for measuring behavior and professionalism in orthopaedic training. Although no single assessment tool can accurately gauge a resident's overall performance, a combination of readily available tools should be used to assess competence across domains.

Lateral epicondylitis of the elbow.

Lateral epicondylitis, or "tennis elbow," is a common musculotendinous degenerative disorder of the extensor origin at the lateral humeral epicondyle. Repetitive occupational or athletic activities involving wrist extension and supination are thought to be causative. The typical symptoms include lateral elbow pain, pain with wrist extension, and weakened grip strength. The diagnosis is made clinically through history and physical examination; however, a thorough understanding of the differential diagnosis is imperative to prevent unnecessary testing and therapies. Most patients improve with nonoperative measures, such as activity modification, physical therapy, and injections. A small percentage of patients will require surgical release of the extensor carpi radialis brevis tendon. Common methods of release may be performed via percutaneous, arthroscopic, or open approaches.

The incidence of and clinical approach to positive allograft cultures in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE: To define the incidence of positive allograft cultures in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and to determine a clinical approach to a positive test. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review, cohort series. SETTING: Urban academic hospital. PATIENTS: All patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using allograft between January 2003 and December 2008. One hundred fifteen patients met the inclusion criteria. INTERVENTIONS: Culture of allograft before surgical implantation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Positive allograft culture. RESULTS: Positive allograft cultures were obtained in 3 of 115 grafts (2.6%). Two cultures grew coagulase-negative Staphylococcus and 1 grew Escherichia coli, both from the broth only. CONCLUSIONS: Positive cultures in ACL allografts have a reported incidence of 5.7% to 13.25%. Our current series shows an incidence of 2.6%. No patients who had a culture-positive allograft developed a clinical infection postoperatively. Routine preimplantation culture of soft tissue allografts cannot be recommended given the low incidence of positive culture and lack of correlation with clinical infection. In the presence of a positive preimplantation allograft culture without signs of clinical infection, our series and the 4 other published series in the literature demonstrate that antibiotic treatment is not indicated. In contrast, signs and symptoms of septic arthritis should be aggressively treated with irrigation, debridement, and intravenous antibiotics.